The GM debate: Risk, politics and public engagement

The GM Debate: Risk, Politics and Public Engagement

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-217

  Horlick Jones, Tom ^a   Walls, John ^b   Rowe, Gene ^c   Pidgeon, Nick ^d   Poortinga, Wouter ^e   Murdock, Graham ^f   O'Riordan, Tim ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917066943     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203945933     Document Type: Book

References (215)

1. Abelson, J., Forest, P.-G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. and Gauvin, F.-P. (2003) 'Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes', Social Science & Medicine, 57, pp. 239-251.
2. AEBC (2001) Crops on Trial, Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission report, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
3. Alaszewski, A. (2006) Using Diaries in Social Research, Sage, London.
4. Alvesson, M. (2004) Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Andersen, I. and Jaeger, B. (1999) 'Scenario workshops and consensus conferences:towards more democratic decision-making', Science and Public Policy, 26(5) pp. 331-340.
6. Anderson, L. (1999) Genetic Engineering, Food, and Our Environment, Green Books, Dartington.
7. Arnstein, S.R. (1969) 'A ladder of citizen participation', Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 pp. 215-224.
8. Arvai, J., Gregory, R. and McDaniels, T. (2001) 'Testing a structured decision-aiding approach: value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication', Risk Analysis, 21, pp. 1065-1076.
9. Bauer, M. (2005) 'Public perceptions and mass media in the biotechnology controversy', International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(1) pp. 5-22.
10. Bauer, M. and Gaskell, G. (eds) (2002) Biotechnology: The Making of a Global Controversy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
12. Beck, U. (1995) Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk, Polity, Cambridge.
13. Becker, H. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance, Free Press, New York.
14. Beierle, T. and Konisky, D. (2000) 'Values, conflict and trust in participatory environmental planning', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4) pp. 587-602.
15. Bennett, D., Glasner, P. and Travis, D. (1986) The Politics of Uncertainty: Regulating Recombinant DNA Research in Britain, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
16. Berger, P. (1987) The Capitalist Revolution, Wildwood House, Aldershot.
17. Blackman, T. (1991) 'Planning inquiries: a socio-legal study', Sociology, 25(2) pp. 311-327.
18. Blair, T. (1998) The Third Way: New Politics for a New Century, Pamphlet 588, The Fabian Society, London.
19. Blair, T. (2002) 'Science matters', speech to the Royal Society, London, 23 May.
20. Bloor, M. (1978) 'On the analysis of observational data: a discussion of the worth and uses of inductive techniques and respondent validation', Sociology, 12(3) pp. 545-557.
21. Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M. and Robson, K. (2001) Focus Groups in Social Research, Sage, London.
22. Bogen, D. (1989) 'A reappraisal of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action in light of detailed investigations of social praxis', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(1) pp. 47-77.
23. Burgess, A. (2004) Cellular Phones, Public Fears and a Culture of Precaution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Burke, K. (1969) A Grammar of Motives, University of California Press, Berkeley CA.
25. Butler, D., Adonis, A. and Travers, T. (1994) Failure in British Government: The Politics of the Poll Tax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Button, G. (1993) 'The curious case of the disappearing technology', in G. Button (ed.) Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology, Routledge, London, pp. 10-28.
27. Cabinet Office (2002) Risk: Improving Government's Ability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty, Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, London.
28. Cabinet Office (2003) Field Work: Weighing Up the Costs and Benefits of GM Crops, Cabinet Office Strategy Unit, London.
29. Campbell, S. and Townsend, E. (2003) 'Flaws undermine results of UK biotech debate', Nature, 425, p. 559.
30. Carnes, S., Schweitzer, M., Peelle, E., Wolfe, A. and Munro, J. (1998) 'Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the US Department of Energy', Technology in Society, 20(4) pp. 385-406.
31. CEC (2001) European Governance: a White Paper, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
32. Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.
33. Checkoway, B. (1981) 'The politics of public hearings', The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(4) pp. 566-582.
34. Chess, C. and Purcell, K. (1999) 'Public participation and the environment: do we know what works?', Environmental Science and Technology, 33(16) pp. 2685-2692.
35. Chilton, S., Covey, J., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Pidgeon, N.F. and Spencer, A. (2002) 'Public perceptions of risk and preference-based values of safety', Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25, 211-232.
36. Clarke, A. with Dawson, R. (1999) Evaluation Research: an Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice, Sage, London.
37. Cook, G. (2004) Genetically Modified Language: the Discourse of Arguments for GM Crops and Food, Routledge, London.
38. Cook, G., Robbins, P. and Pieri, E. (2006) '"Words of mass destruction": British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non-expert reactions', Public Understanding of Science, 14, pp. 5-29.
39. Coote, A. and Lenaghan, J. (1997) Citizens' Juries: Theory into Practice, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.
40. Corr Willbourn (2003a) A Report on the Foundation Discussion Workshops Conducted to Inform the GM Public Debate, Corr Willbourn Research and Development, London.
41. Corr Willbourn (2003b) Qualitative Research on a Series of Reconvened Group Discussions for the 'Narrow but Deep' Strand of the GM Public Debate, Corr Willbourn Research and Development, London.
42. DEFRA (2003) Compendium of UK Organic Standards, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
43. Desvousges, W.H. and Smith, V.K. (1988) 'Focus groups and risk communication: the "science" of listening to data', Risk Analysis, 8(4) pp. 479-484.
44. DETR (1998) Guidance on Enhancing Public Participation, Department of the Environment, Transport and Rural Affairs, London.
45. DETR (2000) Multi-Criteria Analysis: a Manual. DETR Appraisal Guidance, Department of Transport, Environment and the Regions, London.
46. Dingwall, R. (1997) 'Accounts, interviews and observations', in G. Miller and R. Dingwall (eds) Context and Method in Qualitative Research, Sage, London, pp. 51-65.
47. Dingwall, R. (1999) 'Risk society: the cult of theory and the millennium', Social Policy and Administration, 33, pp. 474-491.
48. Dryzek, J. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
49. Dunkerley, D. and Glasner, P. (1998) 'Empowering the public? Citizens' juries and the new genetic technologies', Critical Public Health, 8(3) pp. 181-192.
50. Durant, J. and Lindsey, N. (2000) The Great GM Food Debate: a Survey of Media Coverage in the First Half of 1999, House of Commons Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST), London.
51. Eden, C. (1990) 'The unfolding nature of group decision support-two dimensions of skill', in C. Eden and J. Radford (eds) Tackling Strategic Problems: the Role of Group Decision Support, Sage, London, pp. 48-55.
52. Esogbue, A.O. and Ahipo, Z.M. (1982) 'A fuzzy sets model for measuring the effectiveness of public participation in water resources planning', Water Resources Bulletin, 18(3) pp. 451-456.
53. Feldman, M. (1989) Order without Design: Information Processing and Policy Making, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
54. Fielding, N.G. and Fielding, J.L. (1986) Linking Data, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills CA.
55. Fincham, J. and Ravetz, J. (1991) Genetically Engineered Organisms: Benefits and Risks, Open University Press, Buckingham.
56. Fiorino, D. (1990) 'Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2) pp. 226-243.
57. Friend, J.K. and Hickling, A. (2005) Planning Under Pressure: the Strategic Choice Approach, 3rd edition, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
58. Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1992) 'Risk management as a post-normal science', Risk Analysis, 12(1) pp. 95-97.
59. Gamson, W. and Modigliani, A. (1989) 'Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach', American Journal of Sociology, 95(1) pp. 1-37.
60. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ.
61. Gaskell, G. (2004) 'Science policy and society: the British debate over GM agriculture', Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 15, pp. 241-245.
62. Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. (eds) (2001) Biotechnology 1996-2000: The Years of Controversy, The Science Museum, London.
63. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Bauer, M., Jackson, J., Howard, S. and Lindsey, N. (2003) Ambivalent GM Nation? Public attitudes to biotechnology in the UK, 1991-2002, Life Sciences in European Society Report, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
64. Gephart, R. (1988) Ethnostatistics: Qualitative Foundations for Quantitative Research, Sage, Newbury Park CA.
65. Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity, Polity, Cambridge.
66. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity, Polity, Cambridge.
67. Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: a Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
68. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London.
69. Glassner, B. (1999) The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are Afraid of the Wrong Things, Basic Books, New York.
70. GM Science Review Panel (2003) GM Science Review: First Report, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
71. Goffman, E. (1975) Frame Analysis: an Essay on the Organization of Experience, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
72. Grabner, P., Hampel, J., Lindsey, N. and Torgersen, H. (2001) 'Biotechnology diversity:the challenge of multilevel policy-making', in G. Gaskell and M. Bauer (eds) Biotechnology 1996-2000: the Years of Controversy, Science Museum, London, pp. 15-34.
73. Grove-White, R. (2003) 'GM debate methodology works in the real world', Nature, 426, p. 495.
74. Grove-White, R., Macnaghten, P., Mayer, S. and Wynne, B. (1997) Uncertain World:Genetically Modified Organisms, Food and Public Attitudes in Britain, Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster.
75. Habermas, J. (1987/1991) The Theory of Communicative Action (Parts I and II), Polity, Cambridge.
76. Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Polity, Cambridge.
77. Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
78. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd edition, Routledge, London.
79. Harper, R. (1998) Inside the IMF: an Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organisational Action, Academic Press, San Diego CA.
80. Hawes, C., Haughton, A., Osborne, J., Roy, S., Clark, S. et al. (2003) 'Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the farm scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B358, pp. 1899-1913.
81. Heberlein, T. (1976) 'Some observations on alternative mechanisms for public involvement:the hearing, public opinion poll, the workshop and the quasi-experiment', Natural Resources Journal, 16(1) pp. 197-212.
82. Her Majesty's Government (1999) Modernising Government, Cm 4310, The Stationery Office, London.
83. Hood, C. (1991) 'A public administration for all seasons?', Public Administration, 69, pp. 3-19.
84. Horlick-Jones, T. (1998) 'Meaning and contextualisation in risk assessment', Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 59, pp. 79-89.
85. Horlick-Jones, T. (2004) 'Experts in risk?... do they exist?', Health, Risk & Society, 6(2) pp. 107-114.
86. Horlick-Jones, T. (2005a) 'On "risk work": professional discourse, accountability and everyday action', Health, Risk & Society, 7(3) pp. 293-307.
87. Horlick-Jones, T. (2005b) 'On the governance of risk and the risk of governance:corporate-style risk management and British state institutions', paper presented to an Understanding Risk programme workshop on The Governance of Risk and New Technologies, held at the Royal Society, London, 21 November.
88. Horlick-Jones, T. (2005c) 'Informal logics of risk: contingency and modes of practical reasoning', Journal of Risk Research, 8(3) pp. 253-272.
89. Horlick-Jones, T. (2007) 'On the signature of new technologies: materiality, sociality and practical reasoning' in R. Flynn and P. Bellaby (eds), Risk and the Public Acceptability of New Technologies, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
90. Horlick-Jones, T. and Rosenhead, J. (2006) 'The uses of observation: combining problem structuring methods and ethnography', Journal of the Operational Research Society, in press.
91. Horlick-Jones, T. and Sime, J. (2004) 'Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity', Futures, 36, pp. 441-456.
92. Horlick-Jones, T. and Walls, J. (2005) 'Learning about, making sense of, and discussing issues about transgenic crops and food', paper presented to the 14th Annual Conference of the Society for Risk Analysis (Europe), Como, 12-14 September.
93. Horlick-Jones, T., Kitzinger, J. and Walls, J. (2006a) 'Bricolage in audience reception:mediated knowledge and the work of making sense about GM crops and food', paper presented to the 4th Communications, Medicine & Ethics (COMET) Conference, Cardiff, June-July.
94. Horlick-Jones, T., Rowe, G. and Walls, J. (in press, a) 'Citizen engagement processes as information systems: the role of knowledge and the concept of translation quality', Public Understanding of Science.
95. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and Kitzinger, J. (in press, b) 'Bricolage in action: learning about, making sense of, and discussing issues about GM crops and food'. Health, Risk & Society.
96. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Pidgeon, N. and Weyman, A. (2003a) 'Trust in UK health and safety regulators: the role of practical reasoning strategies in the formation of public attitudes', paper delivered to an ESRC workshop on trust, forming part of the 1st Medicine, Communication & Ethics (COMET) Conference, Cardiff, June.
97. Horlick-Jones, T., Rosenhead, J., Georgiou, I., Ravetz, J. and Löfstedt, R. (2001) 'Decision support for organisational risk management by problem structuring', Health, Risk & Society, 3(2) pp. 141-165.
98. Horlick-Jones, T., Rowe, G., Walls, J., O'Riordan, T. and Pidgeon, N. (2002) Proposals for the Evaluation of the UK Public Debate on the Possible Commercialisation of Genetically Modified Crops, memorandum considered by the GM Nation? Public Debate Steering Board, September.
99. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W. and O'Riordan, T. (2004) A Deliberative Future? An Independent Evaluation of the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Possible Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain 2003, Understanding Risk Working Paper 04-02, Norwich.
100. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W. and O'Riordan, T. (2006b) 'On evaluating the GM Nation? public debate about the commercialisation of transgenic crops in Britain', New Genetics & Society, in press.
101. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W. and O'Riordan, T., Murdock, G., Tait, J. and Bruce, A. (2003b) 'Memorandum submitted by the Understanding Risk Team and Collaborators' in House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, Conduct of the GM Public Debate, Eighteenth Report of the Session 2002-03, HC 1220, The Stationery Office, London, pp. Ev50-Ev56.
102. House of Lords (2000) Science and Society, Select Committee on Science and Technology Third Report, HL Paper 38, The Stationery Office, London.
103. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000) Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
104. Huber, P. (1991) Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, Basic Books, New York.
105. Hutchby, I. (2001) 'Technologies, texts and affordances', Sociology, 35(2) pp. 441-456.
106. Involve (2005) People & Participation: How to Put Citizens at the Heart of Decision-Making, Involve, London.
107. Irwin, A. (2006) 'The politics of talk: coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance', Social Studies of Science, 36(2) pp. 299-320.
108. Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds) (1996) Misunderstanding Science: the Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
109. Jasanoff, S. (1997) Civilization and madness: the great BSE scare of 1996, Public Understanding of Science, 6, pp. 221-232.
110. Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Petersen, J. and Pinch, T. (eds) (1995) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
111. Jensen, P.E. (2005) 'A contextual theory of learning and the learning organization', Knowledge and Process Management, 12(1) pp. 53-64.
112. Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State, Polity, Cambridge.
113. Johnson, B. (1987) 'The environmentalist movement and grid/group analysis: a modest critique', in B. Johnson and V. Covello (eds) The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 147-178.
114. Joss, S. (1995) 'Evaluating consensus conferences: necessity or luxury?', in S. Joss and J. Durant (eds) Public Participation in Science: the Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, The Science Museum, London, pp. 89-108.
115. Joss, S. and Durant, J. (eds) (1995) Public Participation in Science: the Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, The Science Museum, London.
116. Kitzinger, J. (2000) 'Media templates: patterns of association and the (re)construction of meaning over time', Media, Culture & Society, 22, pp. 61-84.
117. Kuhn, T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition, Chicago University Press, Chicago IL.
118. Laird, F. (1993) 'Participatory analysis, democracy, and technological decision making', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3) pp. 341-361.
119. Lauber, T. and Knuth, B. (1999) 'Measuring fairness in citizen participation: a case study of moose management', Society and Natural Resources, 11(1) pp. 19-37.
120. Levidow, L. and Carr, S. (2000) 'Unsound science? Transatlantic regulatory disputes', International Journal of Biotechnology, 2(1/2/3) pp. 257-273.
121. Levidow, L. and Carr, S. (2001) 'UK: precautionary commercialization', Journal of Risk Research, 3(3) pp. 261-270.
122. Linell, P. (1998) 'Discourse across boundaries: on recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse', Text, 18(2) pp. 143-157.
123. Löfstedt, R. and Horlick-Jones, T. (1999) 'Environmental politics in the UK: politics, institutional change and public trust', in G. Cvetkovich and R. Löfstedt (eds) Social Trust and Risk Management, Earthscan, London, pp. 73-88.
124. Löfstedt, R. and Renn, O. (1997) 'The Brent Spar controversy: an example of risk communication gone wrong', Risk Analysis, 17(2) pp. 131-136.
125. Lynch, M. (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
126. McHoul, A. and Watson, D.R. (1984) 'Two axes for the analysis of "commonsense" and "formal" geographical knowledge in classroom talk', British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(3) pp. 281-302.
127. Manning, P. (1988) Symbolic Communication: Signifying Calls and the Police Response, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
128. Marquand, D. (2004) Decline of the Public: the Hollowing Out of Citizenship, Polity Press, Cambridge.
129. Marris, C., Wynne, B., Simmons, P., Weldon, S., et al. (2001) Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe (PABE), Final Report to the European Commission, FAIR CT98-3844, DG12-SSMI.
130. Maxwell, R. (1997) An Unplayable Hand? BSE, CJD and British Government, Kings' Fund, London.
131. Milbraith, L. (1981) 'Citizen surveys as citizen participation mechanisms', Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(4) pp. 478-496.
132. Moore, S. (1996) 'Defining "successful" environmental dispute resolution: case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia', Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, pp. 151-169.
133. Mulkay, M. (1997) 'Review of A. Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology', in Science, Technology & Human Values, 22(2) pp. 254-264.
134. Munton, R. (2003) 'Deliberative democracy', in F. Berkout, I. Scoones and M. Leach (eds) Negotiating Environmental Change: New Perspectives from the Social Sciences, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 109-136.
135. Murdock, G. (2004) 'Popular representation and post-normal science: the struggle over genetically modified foods', in S. Braman (ed.) Biotechnology and Communication: the Meta-Technologies of Information, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ, pp. 227-259.
136. Murdock, G., Petts, J. and Horlick-Jones, T. (2003) 'After amplification: rethinking the role of the media in risk communication', in N. Pidgeon, P. Slovic and R. Kasperson (eds) The Social Amplification of Risk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 156-178.
137. Myers, D. and Lamm, H. (1976) 'The group polarisation phenomenon', Psychological Bulletin, 83, pp. 602-627.
138. NAO (2000) Supporting Innovation: Managing Risk in Government Departments, National Audit Office report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 864, Session 1999-2000, The Stationery Office, London.
139. NAO (2004) Managing Risks to Improve Public Services, National Audit Office report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, HC 1078-I, Session 2003-2004, The Stationery Office, London.
140. National Research Council (1996) Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society, P. Stern and H. Fineberg (eds), National Academy Press, Washington DC.
141. OECD (2001) 'Engaging Citizens in Policy-Making: Information, Consultation and Public Participation', PUMA Policy briefing No. 10, Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
142. OFCOM (2006) Consumers and the Communications Market: 2006, Office of Communications, London.
143. Oreszczyn, S. (2005) 'GM crops in the United Kingdom: precaution as process', Science and Public Policy, 32(4) pp. 317-424.
144. O'Riordan, T. (1976) Environmentalism, Pion, London.
145. O'Riordan, T., Kemp, R. and Purdue, M. (1988) Sizewell B: an Anatomy of the Inquiry, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
146. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.
147. Osmond, J. (1988) The Divided Kingdom, Constable, London.
148. OST (1999) The Advisory and Regulatory Framework for Biotechnology: Report from the Government's Review, Cabinet Office/Office Science and Technology, London.
149. OST (2005) Drugs Futures 2025?, Foresight report, Office of Science and Technology, London (www.foresight.gov.uk).
150. Patton, M. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edition, Sage, London.
151. PDSB (2003) GM Nation? The Findings of the Public Debate, Public Debate Steering Board, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
152. Petts, J. (1997) 'The public-expert interface in local waste management decisions:expertise, credibility and process', Public Understanding of Science, 6, pp. 359-381.
153. Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T. and Murdock, G. (2001) Social Amplification of Risk: the Media and the Public, HSE Books, Sudbury.
154. Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Bridgeman, J. and Ferguson-Smith, M. (2000) The BSE Inquiry ('The Phillips Inquiry'), The Stationery Office, London.
155. Pichardo, N. (1997) 'New social movements: a critical review', Annual Reviews of Sociology, 23, pp. 411-430.
156. Pidgeon, N. and Gregory, R. (2004) 'Judgement, decision making and public policy', in D. Koehler and N. Harvey (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Judgement and Decision-Making, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 604-623.
157. Pidgeon, N. and Poortinga, W. (2006) 'British public attitudes to agricultural biotechnology and the 2003 GM Nation? public debate: distrust, ambivalence and risk', in P. Glasner and H. Greenslade, P. Atkinson. (eds) New Genetics, New Social Formations, Routledge, London.
158. Pidgeon, N., Slovic, P. and Kasperson, R. (eds) (2003) The Social Amplification of Risk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
159. Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and O'Riordan, T. (2005) 'Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decision-making: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation public debate', Risk Analysis, 25(2) pp. 467-479.
160. Poisner, J. (1996) 'A civic republican perspective on the National Environmental Policy Act's process for citizen participation', Environmental Law, 26, pp. 53-94.
161. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2003a) Public Perceptions of Risk, Science and Governance:Main Findings of a British Survey on Five Risk Cases, University of East Anglia Centre for Environmental Risk, Norwich.
162. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2003b) 'Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation', Risk Analysis, 23(5) pp. 961-972.
163. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2004a) Public Perceptions of Genetically Modified Food and Crops, and the GM Nation? public debate on the commercialisation of agricultural biotechnology in the UK, Understanding Risk Working Paper 04-01, Norwich.
164. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2004b) 'Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs', Risk Analysis, 24(6) pp. 1475-1486.
165. POST (2001) Open Channels: Public Dialogue in Science and Technology, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London.
166. Prior, L. (2003) 'Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology', Sociology of Health & illness, 25, pp. 41-57.
167. Purdue, D. (1999) 'Experiments in the governance of biotechnology: a case study of the UK consensus conference', New Genetics and Society, 18(1) pp. 79-99.
168. Rayner, S. (2003) 'Democracy in an age of assessment: reflections on the roles of expertise and democracy in public-sector decision making', Science and Public Policy, 30(3) pp. 163-170.
169. Renn, O., Webler, T. and Wiedemann, P. (eds) (1995) Fairness and Competence in Citizens' Participation: Evaluating Models For Environmental Discourse, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
170. Rhodes, R. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Open University Press, Buckingham.
171. Rissler, J. and Mellon, M. (1996) The Ecological Risks of Engineered Crops, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
172. Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
173. Rosener, J. (1975) 'A cafeteria of techniques and critiques', Public Management, December, pp. 16-19.
174. Rosenhead, J. and Mingers, J. (eds) (2001) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited:Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict, Wiley, Chichester.
175. Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E. and Lipsey, M.W. (1999) Evaluation: a Systematic Approach, 6th edition, Sage Publications, London.
176. Rothstein, H., Huber, M. and Gaskell, G. (2006) 'A theory of risk colonization: the spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk', Economy and Society, 35(1) pp. 91-112.
177. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2000) 'Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1) pp. 3-29.
178. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2004) 'Evaluating public participation exercises: a research agenda', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(2) pp. 512-556.
179. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2005) 'A typology of public engagement mechanisms', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2) pp. 251-290.
180. Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J. and Pidgeon, N.F. (2005) 'Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate', Public Understanding of Science, 14(4) pp. 331-352.
181. Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. (in press) 'Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations'. Public Understanding of Science.
182. Rowe, G., Marsh, R. and Frewer, L. (2001) Public Participation Methods: Evolving and Operationalising an Evaluation Framework. Final Report, Report to the Department of Health and Health & Safety Executive, Institute of Food Research, Norwich.
183. Rowe, G., Marsh, R. and Frewer, L. (2004) 'Evaluation of a deliberative conference', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(1) pp. 88-121.
184. Rowe, G., Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. (2006) 'A comparison of responses to internet and postal surveys in a public engagement context', Science Communication, 27(3) pp. 352-375.
185. Rowell, A. (2003) Don't Worry: It's Safe to Eat, Earthscan, London.
186. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies:Opportunties and Uncertainties, Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, London (www.royalsoc.ac.uk).
187. Schön, D. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, New York: Basic.
188. Seale, C. (1999) The Quality of Qualitative Research, Sage, London.
189. Sewell, W. and Phillips, S. (1979) 'Models for the evaluation of public participation programmes', Natural Resources Journal, 19, pp. 337-358.
190. Shaw, I. (1999) Qualitative Evaluation, Sage Publications, London.
191. Shindler, B. and Neburka, J. (1997) 'Public participation in forest planning: 8 attributes of success', Journal of Forestry, pp. 17-19.
192. Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, Sage Publications, London.
193. Stirling, A. and Meyer, S. (1999) Rethinking Risk, Science and Technology Policy Research Unit, Brighton.
194. Strong, P. and Dingwall, R. (1989) 'Romantics and Stoics', in J. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds) The Politics of Field Research: Sociology Beyond Enlightenment, Sage, London, pp. 49-69.
195. Sturgis, P. and Allum, N. (2004) 'Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes', Public Understanding of Science, 13, pp. 55-74.
196. Thompson, J. (1995) The Media and Modernity: a Social Theory of the Media, Polity, Cambridge.
197. Timotijevic, L. and Barnett, J. (2006) 'Managing the possible health risks of mobile telecommunications: public understandings of precautionary action and advice', Health, Risk & Society, 8(2) pp. 143-164.
198. Toke, D. (2004) The Politics of GM Food: A Comparative Study of the UK, USA and EU, Routledge, London.
199. Toke, D. and Marsh, D. (2003) 'Policy networks and the GM crops issue: assessing the utility of a dialectical model of policy networks', Public Administration, 81(2) pp. 229-251.
200. Tuler, S. and Webler, T. (1999) 'Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process', Society and Natural Resources, 12(5) pp. 437-453.
201. Walls, J., Horlick-Jones, T., Niewöhner, J. and O'Riordan, T. (2005a) 'The metagovernance of risk: GM crops and mobile telephones', Journal of Risk Research, 8(7-8) pp. 635-661.
202. Walls, J., Pidgeon, N., Weyman, A. and Horlick-Jones, T. (2004) 'Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation', Health, Risk & Society, 6, pp. 133-150.
203. Walls, J., Rogers-Hayden, T., Mohr, A. and O'Riordan, T. (2005b) 'Seeking citizen's views on GM crops: experiences from the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand', Environment, 47(7) pp. 22-36.
204. Webler, T. (1995) '"Right" discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick', in O. Renn, T. Webler and P. Wiedemann (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 35-86.
205. White, S. (1988) The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
206. Wiedemann, P. and Femers, S. (1993) 'Public-participation in waste management decision-making-analysis and management of conflicts', Journal of Hazardous Materials, 33(3) pp. 355-368.
207. Wiener, J. and Rogers, M. (2002) 'Comparing precaution in the US and Europe', Journal of Risk Research, 5(4) pp. 317-349.
208. Williams, G. and Popay, J. (1994) 'Lay knowledge and the privilege of experience', in J. Gabe, D. Kelleher and G. Williams (eds) Challenging Medicine, Routledge, London, pp. 118-139.
209. Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R. (2004) See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, Demos, London.
210. Woolgar, S. (1988) Science: the Very Idea, Ellis Horwood and Tavistock, Chichester and London.
211. Wynne, B. (1987) Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
212. Wynne, B. (1991) 'Knowledges in context', Science, Technology & Human Values, 16(1) pp. 111-121.
213. Wynne, B. (1992) 'Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science', Public Understanding of Science, 1, pp. 281-304.
214. Wynne, B. (1995) 'Public understanding of science', in S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen and T. Pinch (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA, pp. 361-388.
215. Yearley, S. (1999) 'Computer models and the public's understanding of science', Social Studies of Science, 29(6) pp. 845-866.