Scientific citizenships: Self-representations of xenotransplantation's publics

Science as Culture

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-57

  Michael, Mike ^a   Brown, Nik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; POLICY; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; SCIENCE; XENOGRAFT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ANIMALS; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; POLITICS; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS;

EID: 32944461961     PISSN: 09505431     EISSN: 14701189     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09505430500041769     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abelson, J., Forest, P-G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., and Gauvibin, F-P., 2003. Deliberations about deliberation:issues in the design and evaluation of public consultation processes. Social Science and Medicine, 57:239–251.
2. Ashmore, M., and Richards, E., 1996. Politics and SSK:neutrality, commitment and beyond, Special Issue. Social Studies of Science, 26 (2)
3. Beder, S., 1999. “ Public participation or public relations ”. In Technology and Public Participation, Edited by:Martin, B., 169–292. Wollongong, Australia:Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong.
4. Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., and Radley, A., 1988. Ideological Dilemmas, London:Sage.
5. Brown, N., 2003. Hope against hype:accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16 (2):3–21.
6. Brown, N., and Michael, M., 2004. Risky creatures:institutional species boundary change in biotechnology regulation. Health, Risk and Society, 6 (3):207–222.
7. Callon, M., 2002. “ The increasing involvement of concerned groups in R&D policies:what lessons for public powers ”. In Science and Innovation:Rethinking Rationales for Funding and Governance, Edited by:Guena, A., Salter, A., and Steinmueller, W. E., 30–60. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
8. Callon, M., and Rabeharisoa, V., Gino's lesson on humanity. Paper presented at 3rd WTMC-CSI Workshop. 17–18 November. Maastricht
9. Callon, M., and Rabeharisoa, V., 2003. Research ‘in the wild’ and the mapping of new social identities. Technology in Society, 25:193–204.
10. Chaney, D., 1993. Fictions of Collective Life:Public Drama in Late Modern Drama, London:Routledge.
11. Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1988. A Thousand Plateaus:Capitalism and Schizophrenia, London:Athlone Press.
12. Elam, M., and Bertilsson, M., Consuming, engaging and confronting science:the emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship. Discussion Paper One, Science, Technology and Governance in Europe., Available at http://www.stage-research.net/STAGE/PAGES/disc_papers.html
13. Epstein, S., 1996. Impure Science:AIDS Activism and the Politics of Science, Berkeley:University of California Press.
14. Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25 (7):735–755.
15. Garfinkel, H., 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology, Cambridge:Polity Press.
16. Giddens, A., 1998. The Third Way:The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge:Polity Press.
17. Hacking, I., 1986. “ Making up people ”. In Reconstructing Individualism, Edited by:Heller, T. C., Sosna, M., and Wellberg, D. E., 222–236. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
18. Hagendijk, R., and Kallerud, E., Changing conceptions and practices of governance in science and technology in Europe:a framework for analysis. Discussion Paper Two, Science, Technology and Governance in Europe., Available at http://www.stage-research.net/STAGE/PAGES/disc_papers.html
19. Irwin, A., 1995. Citizen Science, London:Routledge.
20. Irwin, A., 2001. “ Constructing the scientific citizen:science and democracy in the biosciences ”. In Public Understanding of Science Vol. 101, 1–18.
21. Irwin, A., and Michael, M., 2003. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge, Maidenhead, Berks:Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
22. Irwin, A., and Wynne, B., 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Edited by:Irwin, A., and Wynne, B., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Joss, S., 1999. Introduction:public participation and technology policy—and decision-making—ephemeral phenomenon or lasting change?. Science and Public Policy, 26 (5):291–293.
24. Kleinman, D. L., 2000. Science, Technology and Democracy, Edited by:Kleinman, D. L., Albany:State University of New York Press.
25. Martin, B., 1999. “ Conclusion ”. In Technology and Public Participation, 249–263. Wollongong, Australia:Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong.
26. Michael, M., 1996. “ Ignoring science:discourses of ignorance in the public understanding of science ”. In Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Edited by:Irwin, A., and Wynne, B., 105–125. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
27. Michael, M., 1998. Between citizen and consumer:multiplying the meanings of the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 7:313–327.
28. Michael, M., 2002. Comprehension, apprehension, and prehension:heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27 (3):357–370.
29. Michael, M., and Birke, L., 1994. Animal experimentation:enrolling the core set. Social Studies of Science, 24:81–95.
30. Michael, M., and Brown, N., 2003a. “ Xenotransplantation:risk identities and the human/nonhuman interface, End of Award Report to the Economic and Social Research Council ”. Available at http://www.regard.ac.uk/research_findings/L218252044/report.pdf
31. Michael, M., and Brown, N., Dys-topias and dys-tropias:futures and performativities in xenotransplantation. 11–13 April. Paper presented at the annual British Sociology Association Conference, University of York
32. Michael, M., and Brown, N., 2004. The meat of the matter:grasping and judging xenotransplantation. Public Understanding of Science, 13:379–397.
33. Mouffe, C., 2002. “ Politics and passions:the stakes of democracy, Centre for the Study of Democracy, University of Westminster ”. Available at http://imm-live.wmin.ac.uk/sshl/pdf/Mouffe%20PDF%20.pdf
34. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-Thinking Science:Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge:Polity.
35. Shapin, S., 1991. “ Science and the public ”. In Companion to the History of Modern Science, Edited by:Olby, R. C., 990–1007. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
36. Warner, M., 2002. Publics and Counterpublics, New York:Zone Books.
37. Wynne, B. E., 1992. Misunderstood misunderstanding:social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1:281–304.
38. Wynne, B. E., 1995. “ The public understanding of science ”. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Edited by:Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., and Pinch, T., 361–388. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
39. Wynne, B. E., 2001. Creating public alienation:expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10 (4):445–482.