Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 465-474

  Macnaghten, Phil ^a,b   Szerszynski, Bronislaw ^c  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conditional acceptance; Deliberative methodology; Democracy; Geoengineering; Governance; Solar radiation management

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; GEOPOLITICS; GLOBAL WARMING; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; SOLAR RADIATION;

EID: 84878013674     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. American Meteorological Society, 2009. Geoengineering the Climate System: A Policy Statement of the American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA. Also at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2009geoengineeringclimate_amsstatement.html.
2. Asilomar Scientific Organizing Committee The Asilomar Conference Recommendations on Principles for Research into Climate Engineering Techniques 2010, Climate Institute, Washington, DC, Also at http://climate.org/PDF/AsilomarConferenceReport.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
3. Barben D., Fisher E., Selin C., Guston D. Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 2008, 979-1000. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. third edition. E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman (Eds.).
4. Barbour R. Doing Focus Groups 2008, Sage, London.
5. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice 1999, Sage, London. R. Barbour, J. Kitzinger (Eds.).
6. BBC British Broadcasting Corporation Climate Change Poll - February 2010 2010, Available at also http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/05_02_10climatechange.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
7. Beck U. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity 1992, Sage, London.
8. Betz G. The case for climate engineering research: an analysis of the "arm the future" argument. Climatic Change 2012, 111:473-485.
9. Bickerstaff K., Lorenzoni I., Pidgeon N., Poortinga W., Simmons P. Re-framing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science 2008, 17:145-169.
10. Bipartisan Policy Centre Task Force on Climate Remediation Research, 2011. Geoengineering: A National Strategic Plan for Research on the Potential Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Consequences of Climate Remediation Technologies. Bipartisan Policy Centre, Washington, DC. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.bipartisanpolicy.org/library/report/task-force-climate-remediation-research.
11. Boyd P. Ranking geo-engineering schemes. Nature Geoscience 2008, 1:722-723.
12. Caldeira K., Keith D. The need for climate engineering research. Issues in Science and Technology 2010, (Fall):57-62.
13. Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy 2009, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Chilvers J. Sustainable Participation? Mapping Out and Reflecting on the Field of Public Dialogue on Science and Technology 2010, Sciencewise Expert Resource Centre, Harwell, England.
15. Convention on Biological Diversity Climate-related Geoengineering and Biodiversity: Technical and Regulatory Matters on Geoengineering in relation to the CBD 2010, Available at http://www.cbd.int/climate/geoengineering/ (accessed 01 December 2012).
16. Corner A., Pidgeon N. Geoengineering the climate: the social and ethical implications. Environment 2010, 52:24-37.
17. Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., 2011. 'Experiment Earth?' reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding Risk Working Paper 11-02. School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
18. Corner A., Pidgeon N., Parkhill K. Perceptions of geoengineering: public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of "upstream" engagement. WIREs Climate Change 2012, 3:451-466.
19. Reconfiguring Responsibility: Deepening Debate on Nanotechnology 2009, Durham University, Durham. S. Davies, P. Macnaghten, M. Kearnes (Eds.).
20. EEA, 2002. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000. Environmental Issue Report No. 22. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22.
21. Felt U., Fochler M. Machineries for making publics: inscribing and de-scribing publics in public engagement. Minerva 2010, 48:219-238.
22. Felt, U., Schumann, S., Schwarz, C., Strassnig, M., 2012, May. Technology of Imagination. A Card-based Public Engagement Method for Debating Emerging Technologies. Published by the Department of Social Studies of Science, University of Vienna. Available at (accessed 15 November 2012). http://sciencestudies.univie.ac.at/publications.
23. Felt U., Wynne B., et al. Taking European Knowledge Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate 2007, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, Brussels, Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
24. Fleming J.R. Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control 2010, Columbia University Press, New York.
25. Galarraga M., Szerszynski B. Making climates: solar radiation management and the ethics of fabrication. Engineering the Climate: The ethics of solar radiation management 2012, 221-235. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA. C. Preston (Ed.).
26. Grove-White R., Macnaghten P., Wynne B. Wising Up: The Public and New Technologies 2000, Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Available at http://www.csec.lancs.ac.uk/docs/wising_upmacnaghten.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
27. Hulme M. Climate change: climate engineering through stratospheric aerosol injection. Progress in Physical Geography 2012, 36(5):694-705.
28. Ipsos-MORI Experiment Earth: Report on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering 2010, Natural Environment Research Council, Swindon, Available at www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering-dialogue-final-report.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
29. Irwin A. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 2006, 36:299-320.
30. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order 2004, Routledge, London. S. Jasanoff (Ed.).
31. Kearnes M., Grove-White R., Macnaghten P., Wilsdon J., Wynne B. From Bio to Nano: learning the lessons, interrogating the comparison. Science as Culture 2006, 15:291-307.
32. Keith D., Parsons E., Morgan M. Research on global sun block needed now. Nature 2010, 463:426-427.
33. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Smith N. Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans' Global Warming Beliefs and Attitudes in June 2010 2010, Yale University and George Mason University. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CT, p. 33. Available at http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/ClimateBeliefsJune2010.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
34. Lempert, R., Prosnitz, D., 2011. Governing Geoengineering Research: A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-term Options. (TR 846) RAND Corporation (Online). Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR846.html.
35. Lezaun J., Soneryd L. Consulting citizens: technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 2007, 16:279-297.
36. Macnaghten P. Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: narrative structures, public responses and emerging nanotechnologies. Environment and Planning A 2010, 41:23-37.
37. Macnaghten P., Myers G. Focus groups: the moderator's view and the analyst's view. Qualitative Research Practice 2004, 65-79. Sage, London. G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, C. Seale, D. Silverman (Eds.).
38. Macnaghten P., Owen R. Good governance for geoengineering. Nature 2011, 479:293.
39. Marshall, M., 2011. Political backlash to geo-engineering begins. The New Scientist 03 October 2011. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20996-political-backlash-to-geoengineering-begins.html.
40. Morgan D. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research 1988, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
41. Marres N. The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science 2007, 37:759-780.
42. Mercer A., Keith D., Sharp J. Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environmental Research Letters 2011, 6:044006. (9 pp.).
43. Nurse, P., 2011. I hope we never need geoengineering, but we must research it. The Guardian 08 September. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/sep/08/geoengineering-research-royal-society.
44. Olson R. Geoengineering for Decision-makers. Science and Technology Innovation Program 2011, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.
45. Owen R., Macnaghten P., Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy 2012, 39:751-760.
46. Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., 2011. Public engagement on geoengineering research: preliminary report on the SPICE deliberative workshops. Technical Report, Understanding Risk Group Working Paper, 11-01. Cardiff University School of Psychology, Cardiff. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/spice.pdf.
47. Pearce F. With Speed and Violence: Why Scientists Fear Tipping Points on Climate Change 2007, Bloomsbury, London.
48. Pew Research Centre for the People and the Press Fewer Americans See Solid Evidence of Global Warming 2009, Available at http://www.people-press.org/2009/10/22/fewer-americans-see-solid-evidence-of-global-warming/ (accessed 20 June 2012).
49. Pidgeon N., Corner A., Parkhill K., Spence A., Butler C., Poortinga W. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 2012, 370:4176-4196.
50. Pidgeon N., Fischhoff B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change 2011, 1:35-41.
51. Poortinga W., Spence A., Whitmarsh L., Capstick S., Pidgeon N. Uncertain climate: an investigation of public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change 2011, 21:1015-1024.
52. Poumadere M., Bertoldo R., Samadi J. Public perceptions and governance of controversial technologies to tackle climate change: nuclear, power, carbon capture and storage, wind and geoengineering. WIREs Climate Change 2011, 2:712-727.
53. Rayner, S., Redgwell, C., Sauvulescu, J., Pidgeon, N., Kruger, T., 2010. Draft Principles for the Conduct of Geoengineering Research (the 'Oxford Principles'). Reproduced in House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, The Regulation of Geoengineering, Fifth Report of Session 2009-2010, HC221, pp. 29-30. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/221/221.pdf.
54. Royal Society Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty 2009, The Royal Society, London, Available at http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2009/geoengineering-climate/ (accessed 20 June 2012).
55. Sarewitz D. Curing climate backlash. Nature 2010, 464:28.
56. Sciencewise-ERC The Government's Approach to Public Dialogue on Science and Technology 2010, Available at http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Sciencewise-ERC-Guiding-Principles.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
57. Selin C. Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 2011, 17(4):723-737.
58. Spence, A., Venables, D., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Demski, C., 2010. Public perceptions of climate change and energy futures in Britain: summary findings of a survey conducted in January-March 2010. Technical Report, Understanding Risk Working Paper 10-01. Cardiff University School of Psychology, Cardiff. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://psych.cf.ac.uk/understandingrisk/docs/final_report.pdf.
59. SRMGI Solar Radiation Management: The Governance of Research 2011, The Royal Society/EDF/TWAS, London, Available at http://www.srmgi.org/files/2012/01/DES2391_SRMGI-report_web_11112.pdf (accessed 20 June 2012).
60. Stilgoe J. A question of intent. Nature Climate Change 2011, 1:325-326.
61. Stirling A. "Opening up" and "closing down" -power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 2008, 33:262-294.
62. Svoboda T., Keller K., Goes M., Tuana N. Sulfate aerosol engineering: the question of justice. Public Affairs Quarterly 2011, 25(3):175-180.
63. United States Government Accountability Office Technical Report, 2011. Climate Engineering: Technical Status, Future Directions, and Potential Responses. GAO-11-71. Washington, DC. Available at (accessed 20 June 2012). http://www.gao.gov/assets/330/322208.pdf.
64. Vaughan N., Lenton T. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Climatic Change 2011, 109(3-4):791-825.
65. Virgoe J. International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change. Climatic Change 2009, 95(1):103-119.
66. Wilsdon J., Willis R. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream 2004, Demos, London, Available at http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/paddlingupstream (accessed 20 June 2012).
67. Wynne B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - hitting the notes, but missing the music?. Community Genetics 2006, 9:211-220.