Experiments in Science Policy: An Autobiographical Note

Minerva

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 197-204

  Stilgoe, Jack ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geoengineering; Public dialogue; Science and technology studies; Science policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862887479     PISSN: 00264695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11024-012-9199-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brooks, Harvey. 1964. The Scientific Adviser. In Scientists and national policy making, eds. Gilpin and Wright. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Chilvers, Jason. 2008. Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice. Science, Technology & Human Values 33: 155-185.
3. Collingridge, David, and Jenny Douglas. 1984. Three Models of Policymaking: Expert Advice in the Control of Environmental Lead. Social Studies of Science 14(3): 343-370.
4. Collins, Harry. 1988. Public Experiments and Displays of Virtuosity: The Core-Set Revisited. Social Studies of Science 18: 725-748.
5. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 2000. Science and Society. London: The Stationery Office.
6. Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk: coming to terms with the 'new' scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299-320.
7. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. Experiments without borders: biology in the labs of life, transcript of the Biotechnology and Society lecture to the London School of Economics, 15 Jun 2006, see www. lse. ac. uk/collections/LSEPublicLecturesAndEvents/pdf/20060615_Jasanoff. pdf, accessed 8 June 2007.
8. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Latour, Bruno. 2008. It's development, stupid! or: How to modernize modernization. http://www. espacestemps. net/document5303. html, accessed 17 January 2012.
10. Lezaun, Javier, and Linda Soneryd. 2007. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science 16: 279-297.
11. Lindblom, Charles. 1959. The Science of 'Muddling Through'. Public Administration Review 19: 79-88.
12. Mercer, Ashley, David Keith, and Jacqueline Sharp. 2011. Public understanding of solar radiation management, Environmental Research Letters 6 (October-December 2011)044006 doi: 10. 1088/1748-9326/6/4/044006.
13. NERC (Natural Environment Research Council) 2010. Experiment Earth: Public dialogue on geoengineering. Natural Environment Research Council.
14. Nowotny, Helga. 1999. The place of people in our knowledge. European Review 7(2): 247-262.
15. Parkill, Karen, and Nick Pidgeon. 2011. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops, 2011. Cardiff: Cardiff University, Understanding Risk Research Group.
16. Phillips, Lord Nicholas of Worth Matravers. 2000. The Inquiry into BSE and Variant CJD in the United Kingdom. http://collections. europarchive. org/tna/20090505194948/http:/bseinquiry. gov. uk.
17. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. stReport. London: The Stationery Office.
19. Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, RS policy document 19/04. London: Royal Society.
20. Royal Society. 2009a. Reaping the benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. London: Royal Society.
21. Royal Society. 2009b. Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. London: Royal Society.
22. Stilgoe, Jack. 2007. Nanodialogues: Experiments in public engagement with science. London: Demos.
23. Stilgoe, Jack. 2010. A question of intent. Nature Climate Change 1 (7), 11 Sept 2011.
24. Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Willis. 2004. See Through Science. London: Demos.