Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project

Nature Climate Change

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 451-457

  Pidgeon, Nick ^a   Parkhill, Karen ^a   Corner, Adam ^a   Vaughan, Naomi ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOL; CLIMATE CHANGE; ETHICS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; INNOVATION; STRATOSPHERE;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84877038929     PISSN: 1758678X     EISSN: 17586798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1807     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty Science Policy Centre Report 10/09 (The Royal Society, 2009).
2. Vaughan, N. E. & Lenton, T. M. A review of climate geoengineering proposals. Climatic Change 109, 749-790 (2011).
3. Matthews, H. D. & Caldeira, K. Transient climate- carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9949-9954 (2007).
4. Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative Solar Radiation Management: The Governance of Research (The Royal Society, 2011).
5. Rayner, S. et al. The Oxford principles. Climatic Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2 (2013).
6. Climate Engineering: Technical Status, Future Directions and Potential Responses Report GAO 11-71 (US Government Accountability Office, 2011).
7. Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Kluwer, 1995).
8. Dietz, T. & Stern, P. (eds) Public Participation in Environmental Risk Assessment and Decision-Making (National Academies, 2008).
9. Fiorino, D. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 15, 226-243 (1990).
10. Rogers-Hayden, T. & Pidgeon, N. F. Moving engagement 'upstream'? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering inquiry. Public Underst. Sci. 16, 346-364 (2007).
11. Marris, C. Public views on GMOs: Deconstructing the myths. EMBO Rep. 21, 545-548 (2001).
12. Pidgeon, N. F., Harthorn, B., Bryant, K. & Rogers-Hayden, T. Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nature Nanotech. 4, 95-98 (2009).
13. Burri, R. V. Coping with uncertainty: Assessing nanotechnologies in a citizen panel in Switzerland. Public Underst. Sci. 18, 498-511 (2009).
14. Bhattachary, D., Calitz, J. P. & Hunter, A. Synthetic Biology Dialogue(BBSRC, 2010).
15. Stirling, A. Deliberate futures: Precaution and progress in social choice of sustainable technology. Sustain. Dev. 15, 286-295 (2007).
16. Pidgeon, N. F., Hood, C., Jones, D. K., Turner, B. A. & Gibson, R. in Risk: Analysis, Perception and Management 89-134 (The Royal Society, 1992).
17. Renn, O. in The Social Amplification of Risk (eds Pidgeon, N. F., Kasperson, R. K. & Slovic, P.) 374-401 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).
18. Experiment Earth: Report on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering (NERC, 2010); available at www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering-dialogue-final- report.pdf.
19. Jasanoff, S. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41, 223-244 (2003).
20. Rip, A., Misa, T. J. & Schot, J. Managing Technology in Society: The Case of Constructive Technology Assessment (Pinter, 1995).
21. Guston, D. H. & Sarewitz, D. Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Soc. 24, 93-109 (2002).
22. Owen, R. & Goldberg, N. Responsible innovation: A pilot study with the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Anal. 30, 1699-1707 (2010).
23. http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/hose-experiment/spice-opposition- letter/
24. Corner, A. & Pidgeon. N. F. Geoengineering the climate: The social and ethical implications. Environ: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 52, 24-37 (2010).
25. Gardiner, S. M. Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: A commentary on the values of the Royal Society report. Environ. Value. 20, 163-188 (2011).
26. Macnaghten, P. & Owen, R. Good governance for geoengineering. Nature 479, 293 (2011).
27. Corner, A. Pidgeon, N. & Parkhill, K. Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives, and the challenge of 'upstream' engagement. WIREs Clim. Change 3, 451-466 (2012).
28. Chilvers, J. Sustainable Participation? Mapping Out and Reflecting upon the Field of Public Dialogue on Science and Technology (Univ. East Anglia & Sciencewise, 2010).
29. Irwin, A. & Wynne, B. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996).
30. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. & Barthe, Y. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (MIT Press, 2011).
31. Pidgeon, N. F. et al. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4176-4196 (2012).
32. Buck, H. J. Geoengineering: Remaking climate for profit or humanitarian intervention? Dev. Change 43, 253-270 (2010).
33. Macnaghten, P. Researching technoscientific concerns in the making: Narrative structures, public responses, and emerging nanotechnologies. Environ. Plann. A 42, 23-37 (2010).
34. Turner, B. A. & Pidgeon, N. F. Man-made Disasters 2nd edn (Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997).
35. Harremoës, P. et al. (eds) Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1869-2000 Copenhagen (European Environment Agency, 2001).
36. Hamilton, C. The Ethical Foundations of Climate Engineering (Australian National Univ., 2011).
37. Parkhill, K. & Pidgeon, N. F. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on the SPICE Deliberative Workshops Understanding Risk Working Paper 11-01 (Cardiff Univ. School of Psychology, 2011).
38. Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W. & Simmons, P. Re-framing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Underst. Sci. 17, 145-169 (2008).
39. Nielsen, A. P., Lassen, J. & Sandoe, P. Democracy at its best? The consensus conference in a cross-national perspective. J. Agr. Environ. Ethic. 20, 13-35 (2007).
40. Dryzek, J. S. & Tucker, A. Deliberative innovation to different effect: Consensus conferences in Denmark, France and the United States. Public Admin. Rev. 68, 864-876 (2008).
41. Philbrick, M. & Barandarian, J. The National Citizens' Technology Forum: Lessons for the future. Sci. Public Policy 35, 335-347 (2009).
42. Cobb, M. D. Creating informed public opinion: Citizen deliberation about nanotechnologies for human enhancements. J. Nanopart. Res. 13, 1533-1548 (2011).
43. Chilvers, J. & Macnaghten, P. The Future of Science Governance: A Review of Public Concerns, Governance and Institutional Response (Univ. East Anglia, Univ. Durham & Sciencewise, 2011).
44. Wynne, B. Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Sci. Technol. Soc. 1, 99-110 (2007).
45. Lezaun, J. & Soneryd, L. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Underst. Sci. 16, 279-297 (2007).
46. Brown, J. & Isaccs, D. The World Café: Shaping our Future through Conversations that Matter (Berrett-Koehler, 2005).
47. Pidgeon, N. F. & Henwood, K. L. in Handbook of Data Analysis (eds Hardy, M. & Bryman, A.) 625-648 (Sage, 2004).
48. Pidgeon, N. F. & Fischhoff, B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Clim. Change 1, 35-41 (2011).