Cofilin: A redox sensitive mediator of actin dynamics during T-cell activation and migration

Immunological Reviews

Volumn 256, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 30-47

  Samstag, Yvonne ^a   John, Isabel ^a   Wabnitz, Guido H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actin cytoskeleton; Costimulation; Immune synapse; Microenvironment; Redox; T cell activation

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; ACTIN BINDING PROTEIN; ACTIN RELATED PROTEIN 2-3 COMPLEX; CD2 ANTIGEN; COFILIN; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; F ACTIN; LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN 1; PHOSPHOLIPID; PROTEIN KINASE B; RNA POLYMERASE II; WISKOTT ALDRICH SYNDROME PROTEIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CLONAL ANERGY; CYTOPLASM; DEPOLYMERIZATION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOSTIMULATION; LYMPHOCYTE MIGRATION; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEPHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNAPSE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; COSTIMULATION; IMMUNE SYNAPSE; MICROENVIRONMENT; REDOX; T-CELL ACTIVATION;

ACTIN DEPOLYMERIZING FACTORS; ACTINS; ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MOVEMENT; CHEMOKINES; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, CELLULAR; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; T-LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS;

EID: 84885336118     PISSN: 01052896     EISSN: 1600065X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12115     Document Type: Article

References (174)

1. Angus KL, Griffiths GM. Cell polarisation and the immunological synapse. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013;25:85-91.
2. Burkhardt JK, Carrizosa E, Shaffer MH. The actin cytoskeleton in T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol 2008;26:233-259.
3. Babich A, Li S, O'Connor RS, Milone MC, Freedman BD, Burkhardt JK. F-actin polymerization and retrograde flow drive sustained PLCgamma1 signaling during T cell activation. J Cell Biol 2012;197:775-787.
4. Piragyte I, Jun CD. Actin engine in immunological synapse. Immune Netw 2012;12:71-83.
5. Samstag Y, Eibert SM, Klemke M, Wabnitz GH. Actin cytoskeletal dynamics in T lymphocyte activation and migration. J Leukoc Biol 2003;73:30-48.
6. Daniel JL, Molish IR, Robkin L, Holmsen H. Nucleotide exchange between cytosolic ATP and F-actin-bound ADP may be a major energy-utilizing process in unstimulated platelets. Eur J Biochem 1986;156:677-684.
7. Bernstein BW, Bamburg JR. Actin-ATP hydrolysis is a major energy drain for neurons. J Neurosci 2003;23:1-6.
8. Thrasher AJ, Burns SO. WASP: a key immunological multitasker. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:182-192.
9. Uruno T, et al. Activation of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerization by cortactin. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:259-266.
10. Gomez TS, et al. HS1 functions as an essential actin-regulatory adaptor protein at the immune synapse. Immunity 2006;24:741-752.
11. Carrizosa E, et al. Hematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein 1 is recruited to the immunological synapse by IL-2-inducible T cell kinase and regulates phospholipase Cgamma1 Microcluster dynamics during T cell spreading. J Immunol 2009;183:7352-7361.
12. Blundell MP, Worth A, Bouma G, Thrasher AJ. The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: the actin cytoskeleton and immune cell function. Dis Markers 2010;29:157-175.
13. Nolz JC, et al. WAVE2 regulates high-affinity integrin binding by recruiting vinculin and talin to the immunological synapse. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:5986-6000.
14. Nolz JC, et al. The WAVE2 complex regulates actin cytoskeletal reorganization and CRAC-mediated calcium entry during T cell activation. Curr Biol 2006;16:24-34.
15. Symons M, et al. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, a novel effector for the GTPase CDC42Hs, is implicated in actin polymerization. Cell 1996;84:723-734.
16. Snapper SB, et al. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein-deficient mice reveal a role for WASP in T but not B cell activation. Immunity 1998;9:81-91.
17. Billadeau DD, Burkhardt JK. Regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics at the immune synapse: new stars join the actin troupe. Traffic 2006;7:1451-1460.
18. Pollard TD, Borisy GG. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 2003;112:453-465.
19. Wabnitz GH, et al. Costimulation induced phosphorylation of L-plastin facilitates surface transport of the T cell activation molecules CD69 and CD25. Eur J Immunol 2007;37:649-662.
20. Wabnitz GH, et al. Sustained LFA-1 cluster formation in the immune synapse requires the combined activities of L-plastin and calmodulin. Eur J Immunol 2010;40:2437-2449.
21. Wabnitz GH, et al. L-plastin phosphorylation: a novel target for the immunosuppressive drug dexamethasone in primary human T cells. Eur J Immunol 2011;41:3157-3169.
22. Pacaud M, Derancourt J. Purification and further characterization of macrophage 70-kDa protein, a calcium-regulated, actin-binding protein identical to L-plastin. Biochemistry 1993;32:3448-3455.
23. Namba Y, Ito M, Zu Y, Shigesada K, Maruyama K. Human T cell L-plastin bundles actin filaments in a calcium-dependent manner. J Biochem 1992;112:503-507.
24. Lin CS, Aebersold RH, Kent SB, Varma M, Leavitt J. Molecular cloning and characterization of plastin, a human leukocyte protein expressed in transformed human fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 1988;8:4659-4668.
25. Otey CA, Vasquez GB, Burridge K, Erickson BW. Mapping of the alpha-actinin binding site within the beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. J Biol Chem 1993;268:21193-21197.
26. Gordon-Alonso M, et al. EWI-2 association with alpha-actinin regulates T cell immune synapses and HIV viral infection. J Immunol 2012;189:689-700.
27. Stanley P, Smith A, McDowall A, Nicol A, Zicha D, Hogg N. Intermediate-affinity LFA-1 binds alpha-actinin-1 to control migration at the leading edge of the T cell. EMBO J 2008;27:62-75.
28. Bamburg JR. Proteins of the ADF/cofilin family: essential regulators of actin dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1999;15:185-230.
29. Hayden SM, Miller PS, Brauweiler A, Bamburg JR. Analysis of the interactions of actin depolymerizing factor with G- and F-actin. Biochemistry 1993;32:9994-10004.
30. Elam WA, Kang H, De La Cruz EM. Biophysics of actin filament severing by cofilin. FEBS Lett 2013;587:1215-1219.
31. Cao W, Goodarzi JP, De La Cruz EM. Energetics and kinetics of cooperative cofilin-actin filament interactions. J Mol Biol 2006;361:257-267.
32. Yonezawa N, Nishida E, Sakai H. pH control of actin polymerization by cofilin. J Biol Chem 1985;260:14410-14412.
33. Agnew BJ, Minamide LS, Bamburg JR. Reactivation of phosphorylated actin depolymerizing factor and identification of the regulatory site. J Biol Chem 1995;270:17582-17587.
34. Moriyama K, Iida K, Yahara I. Phosphorylation of Ser-3 of cofilin regulates its essential function on actin. Genes Cells 1996;1:73-86.
35. Nebl G, Meuer SC, Samstag Y. Dephosphorylation of serine-3 regulates nuclear translocation of cofilin. J Biol Chem 1996;271:26276-26280.
36. Blanchoin L, Robinson RC, Choe S, Pollard TD. Phosphorylation of Acanthamoeba actophorin (ADF/cofilin) blocks interaction with actin without a change in atomic structure. J Mol Biol 2000;295:203-211.
37. Samstag Y, Eckerskorn C, Wesselborg S, Henning S, Wallich R, Meuer SC. Costimulatory signals for human T cell activation induce nuclear translocation of pp 19/cofilin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:4494-4498.
38. Condeelis J. How is actin polymerization nucleated in vivo? Trends Cell Biol 2001;11:288-293.
39. Tania N, Prosk E, Condeelis J, Edelstein-Keshet L. A temporal model of cofilin regulation and the early peak of actin barbed ends in invasive tumor cells. Biophys J 2011;100:1883-1892.
40. van Rheenen J, Condeelis J, Glogauer M. A common cofilin activity cycle in invasive tumor cells and inflammatory cells. J Cell Sci 2009;122:305-311.
41. Oser M, Condeelis J. The cofilin activity cycle in lamellipodia and invadopodia. J Cell Biochem 2009;108:1252-1262.
42. Gurniak CB, Perlas E, Witke W. The actin depolymerizing factor n-cofilin is essential for neural tube morphogenesis and neural crest cell migration. Dev Biol 2005;278:231-241.
43. Moon AL, Janmey PA, Louie KA, Drubin DG. Cofilin is an essential component of the yeast cortical cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol 1993;120:421-435.
44. Schwartz RH. A cell culture model for T lymphocyte clonal anergy. Eur J Immunol 1990;248:1349-1356.
45. Mueller DL, Jenkins MK, Schwartz RH. Clonal expansion versus functional clonal inactivation: a costimulatory signalling pathway determines the outcome of T cell antigen receptor occupancy. Annu Rev Immunol 1989;7:445-480.
46. Appleman LJ, Boussiotis VA. T cell anergy and costimulation. Immunol Rev 2003;192:161-180.
47. Samstag Y, Bader A, Meuer SC. A serine phosphatase is involved in CD2-mediated activation of human T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. J Immunol 1991;147:788-794.
48. Meuer SC, et al. Alternative pathway of T cell activation: a functional role for the 50kD T11 sheep erythrocyte receptor protein. Cell 1984;36:897-906.
49. Hünig T, Tiefenthaler G. Meyer zum Büschenfelde K-H, Meuer SC. Alternative pathway activation of T cells by binding of CD2 to its cell-surface ligand. Nature 1987;326:298-301.
50. Lee KH, Meuer SC, Samstag Y. Cofilin: a missing link between T cell costimulation and rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. Eur J Immunol 2000;30:892-899.
51. Wabnitz GH, Nebl G, Klemke M, Schroder AJ, Samstag Y. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase functions as a Ras effector in the signaling cascade that regulates dephosphorylation of the actin-remodeling protein cofilin after costimulation of untransformed human T lymphocytes. J Immunol 2006;176:1668-1674.
52. Sester U, Wabnitz GH, Kirchgessner H, Samstag Y. Ras/PI3kinase/cofilin-independent activation of human CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ T cells by superagonistic CD28 stimulation. Eur J Immunol 2007;37:2881-2891.
53. Eibert SM, et al. Cofilin peptide homologs interfere with immunological synapse formation and T cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:1957-1962.
54. Tacke M, Hanke G, Hanke T, Hunig T. CD28-mediated induction of proliferation in resting T cells in vitro and in vivo without engagement of the T cell receptor: evidence for functionally distinct forms of CD28. Eur J Immunol 1997;27:239-247.
55. Henning SW, Meuer SC, Samstag Y. Serine phosphorylation of a 67 kDa protein in human T lymphocytes represents an accessory receptor mediated signalling event. J Immunol 1994;152:4808-4815.
56. Grakoui A, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 1999;285:221-227.
57. Campi G, Varma R, Dustin ML. Actin and agonist MHC-peptide complex-dependent T cell receptor microclusters as scaffolds for signaling. J Exp Med 2005;202:1031-1036.
58. Yokosuka T, et al. Newly generated T cell receptor microclusters initiate and sustain T cell activation by recruitment of Zap70 and SLP-76. Nat Immunol 2005;6:1253-1262.
59. Yi J, Wu XS, Crites T, Hammer JA 3rd. Actin retrograde flow and actomyosin II arc contraction drive receptor cluster dynamics at the immunological synapse in Jurkat T cells. Mol Biol Cell 2012;23:834-852.
60. Kaizuka Y, Douglass AD, Varma R, Dustin ML, Vale RD. Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:20296-20301.
61. Dustin ML, Depoil D. New insights into the T cell synapse from single molecule techniques. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:672-684.
62. Wülfing C, Davis MM. A receptor/cytoskeletal movement triggered by costimulation during T cell activation. Science 1998;282:2266-2269.
63. Tskvitaria-Fuller I, Rozelle AL, Yin HL, Wülfing C. Regulation of sustained actin dynamics by the TCR and costimulation as a mechanism of receptor localization. J Immunol 2003;171:2287-2295.
64. Dustin ML, Cooper JA. The immunological synapse and the actin cytoskeleton: molecular hardware for T cell signaling. Nat Immunol 2000;1:23-29.
65. Dustin ML, Shaw AS. Costimulation: building an immunological synapse. Science 1999;283:649-650.
66. Sims TN, et al. Opposing effects of PKCtheta and WASp on symmetry breaking and relocation of the immunological synapse. Cell 2007;129:773-785.
67. Nishida E, Iida K, Yonezawa N, Koyasu S, Yahara I, Sakai H. Cofilin is a component of intranuclear and cytoplasmic actin rods induced in cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:5262-5266.
68. Matsuzaki F, Matsumoto S, Yahara I, Yonezawa N, Nishida E, Sakai H. Cloning and characterization of porcine brain cofilin cDNA. J Biol Chem 1988;263:11564-11568.
69. Iida K, Matsumoto S, Yahara I. The KKRKK sequence is involved in heat shock-induced nuclear translocation of the 18-kDa actin-binding protein, cofilin. Cell Struct Funct 1992;17:39-46.
70. Pendleton A, Pope B, Weeds A, Koffer A. Latrunculin B or ATP depletion induces cofilin-dependent translocation of actin into nuclei of mast cells. J Biol Chem 2003;278:14394-14400.
71. Samstag Y, Dreizler EM, Ambach A, Sczakiel G, Meuer SC. Inhibition of constitutive serine phosphatase activity in T lymphoma cells results in phosphorylation of pp 19/cofilin and induces apoptosis. J Immunol 1996;156:4167-4173.
72. Blikstad I, Markey F, Carlsson L, Persson T, Lindberg U. Selective assay of monomeric and filamentous actin in cell extracts, using inhibition of desoxyribonuclease I. Cell 1978;15:935-943.
73. Rosner K, et al. Engineering a waste management enzyme to overcome cancer resistance to apoptosis: adding DNase1 to the anti-cancer toolbox. Cancer Gene Ther 2011;18:346-357.
74. Peitsch MC, et al. Characterization of the endogenous deoxyribonuclease involved in nuclear DNA degradation during apoptosis (programmed cell death). EMBO J 1993;12:371-377.
75. Rungger D, Rungger-Brandle E, Chaponnier C, Gabbiani G. Intranuclear injection of anti-actin antibodies into Xenopus oocytes blocks chromosome condensation. Nature 1979;282:320-321.
76. Scheer U, Hinssen H, Franke WW, Jockusch B. Microinjection of actin-binding proteins and actin antibodies demonstrates involvement of nuclear actin in transcription of lampbrush chromosomes. Cell 1984;39:111-122.
77. Bettinger BT, Gilbert DM, Amberg DC. Actin up in the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:410-415.
78. Hofmann WA, et al. Actin is part of pre-initiation complexes and is necessary for transcription by RNA polymerase II. Nat Cell Biol 2004;6:1094-1101.
79. Obrdlik A, Percipalle P. The F-actin severing protein cofilin-1 is required for RNA polymerase II transcription elongation. Nucleus 2011;2:72-79.
80. Genot E, Cleverley S, Henning S, Cantrell DA. Multiple p21ras effector pathways regulate nuclear factor of activated T cells. EMBO J 1996;15:3923-3933.
81. Ambach A, Saunus J, Konstandin M, Wesselborg S, Meuer SC, Samstag Y. The serine phosphatases PP1 and PP2A associate with and activate the actin-binding protein cofilin in human T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 2000;30:3422-3431.
82. Niwa R, Nagata-Ohashi K, Takeichi M, Mizuno K, Uemura T. Control of actin reorganization by Slingshot, a family of phosphatases that dephosphorylate ADF/cofilin. Cell 2002;108:233-246.
83. Gohla A, Birkenfeld J, Bokoch GM. Chronophin, a novel HAD-type serine protein phosphatase, regulates cofilin-dependent actin dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2005;7:21-29.
84. Mizuno K. Signaling mechanisms and functional roles of cofilin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Cell Signal 2013;25:457-469.
85. Schulte B, et al. A reducing milieu renders cofilin insensitive to phosphatidylinotisol 4, 5-bisphosphate inhibition. J Biol Chem; in press.
86. Schönrich G, et al. Down-regulation of T cell receptors on self-reactive T cells as a novel mechanism for extrathymic tolerance induction. Cell 1991;65:293-304.
87. Sechi AS, Buer J, Wehland J, Probst-Kepper M. Changes in actin dynamics at the T-cell/APC interface: implications for T-cell anergy? Immunol Rev 2002;189:98-110.
88. Schartner JM, Simonson WT, Wernimont SA, Nettenstrom LM, Huttenlocher A, Seroogy CM. Gene related to anergy in lymphocytes (GRAIL) expression in CD4+ T cells impairs actin cytoskeletal organization during T cell/antigen-presenting cell interactions. J Biol Chem 2009;284:34674-34681.
89. Janardhan SV, Praveen K, Marks R, Gajewski TF. Evidence implicating the Ras pathway in multiple CD28 costimulatory functions in CD4+ T cells. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e24931.
90. Fields PE, Gajewski TF, Fitch FW. Blocked Ras activation in anergic CD4+ T cells. Science 1996;271:1276-1278.
91. Zha Y, et al. T cell anergy is reversed by active Ras and is regulated by diacylglycerol kinase-alpha. Nat Immunol 2006;7:1166-1173.
92. Dustin ML. Modular design of immunological synapses and kinapses. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009;1:a002873.
93. Friedl P, Borgmann S, Brocker EB. Amoeboid leukocyte crawling through extracellular matrix: lessons from the Dictyostelium paradigm of cell movement. J Leukoc Biol 2001;70:491-509.
94. Wolf K, Muller R, Borgmann S, Brocker EB, Friedl P. Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. Blood 2003;102:3262-3269.
95. Renkawitz J, Sixt M. Mechanisms of force generation and force transmission during interstitial leukocyte migration. EMBO Rep 2010;11:744-750.
96. Friedl P, Entschladen F, Conrad C, Niggemann B, Zanker KS. CD4+ T lymphocytes migrating in three-dimensional collagen lattices lack focal adhesions and utilize beta1 integrin-independent strategies for polarization, interaction with collagen fibers and locomotion. Eur J Immunol 1998;28:2331-2343.
97. Friedl P, Zanker KS, Brocker EB. Cell migration strategies in 3-D extracellular matrix: differences in morphology, cell matrix interactions, and integrin function. Microsc Res Tech 1998;43:369-378.
98. Nourshargh S, Hordijk PL, Sixt M. Breaching multiple barriers: leukocyte motility through venular walls and the interstitium. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010;11:366-378.
99. Lammermann T, Sixt M. Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009;21:636-644.
100. Sixt M. Interstitial locomotion of leukocytes. Immunol Lett 2011;138:32-34.
101. Klemke M, Kramer E, Konstandin MH, Wabnitz GH, Samstag Y. An MEK-cofilin signalling module controls migration of human T cells in 3D but not 2D environments. EMBO J 2010;29:2915-2929.
102. Nishita M, Tomizawa C, Yamamoto M, Horita Y, Ohashi K, Mizuno K. Spatial and temporal regulation of cofilin activity by LIM kinase and Slingshot is critical for directional cell migration. J Cell Biol 2005;171:349-359.
103. Shan X, et al. Deficiency of PTEN in Jurkat T cells causes constitutive localization of Itk to the plasma membrane and hyperresponsiveness to CD3 stimulation. Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:6945-6957.
104. Chuang E, et al. The CD28 and CTLA-4 receptors associate with the serine/threonine phosphatase PP2A. Immunity 2000;13:313-322.
105. Klemke M, Wabnitz GH, Funke F, Funk B, Kirchgessner H, Samstag Y. Oxidation of cofilin mediates T cell hyporesponsiveness under oxidative stress conditions. Immunity 2008;29:404-413.
106. Gorbatyuk VY, et al. Mapping the phosphoinositide-binding site on chick cofilin explains how PIP2 regulates the cofilin-actin interaction. Mol Cell 2006;24:511-522.
107. Yonezawa N, Homma Y, Yahara I, Sakai H, Nishida E. A short sequence responsible for both phosphoinositide binding and actin binding activities of cofilin. J Biol Chem 1991;266:17218-17221.
108. Yonezawa N, Nishida E, Iida K, Yahara I, Sakai H. Inhibition of the interaction of cofilin, destrin, and deoxyribonuclease I with actin by phosphoinositides. J Biol Chem 1990;265:8382-8386.
109. Acuto O, Michel F. CD28-mediated co-stimulation: a quantitative support for TCR signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3:939-951.
110. Acuto O, Mise-Omata S, Mangino G, Michel F. Molecular modifiers of T cell antigen receptor triggering threshold: the mechanism of CD28 costimulatory receptor. Immunol Rev 2003;192:21-31.
111. Michel F, Acuto O. CD28 costimulation: a source of Vav-1 for TCR signaling with the help of SLP-76? Sci STKE 2002;2002:pe35.
112. Mouneimne G, et al. Phospholipase C and cofilin are required for carcinoma cell directionality in response to EGF stimulation. J Cell Biol 2004;166:697-708.
113. Leyman S, et al. Unbalancing the phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate-cofilin interaction impairs cell steering. Mol Biol Cell 2009;20:4509-4523.
114. van Rheenen J, et al. EGF-induced PIP2 hydrolysis releases and activates cofilin locally in carcinoma cells. J Cell Biol 2007;179:1247-1259.
115. Bernstein BW, Bamburg JR. ADF/cofilin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol 2010;20:187-195.
116. Wang W, Eddy R, Condeelis J. The cofilin pathway in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:429-440.
117. Wabnitz GH, et al. Mitochondrial translocation of oxidized cofilin induces caspase-independent necrotic-like programmed cell death of T cells. Cell Death Dis 2010;1:e58.
118. Pirzer UC, Schurmann G, Post S, Betzler M, Meuer SC. Differential responsiveness to CD3-Ti vs. CD2-dependent activation of human intestinal T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1990;20:2339-2342.
119. Qiao L, et al. Differential regulation of human T cell responsiveness by mucosal versus blood monocytes. Eur J Immunol 1996;26:922-927.
120. Qiao L, Schurmann G, Betzler M, Meuer SC. Activation and signaling status of human lamina propria T lymphocytes. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1529-1536.
121. Sido B, Braunstein J, Breitkreutz R, Herfarth C, Meuer SC. Thiol-mediated redox regulation of intestinal lamina propria T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 2000;192:907-912.
122. Kono K, et al. Hydrogen peroxide secreted by tumor-derived macrophages down-modulates signal-transducing zeta molecules and inhibits tumor-specific T cell-and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Eur J Immunol 1996;26:1308-1313.
123. Otsuji M, Kimura Y, Aoe T, Okamoto Y, Saito T. Oxidative stress by tumor-derived macrophages suppresses the expression of CD3 zeta chain of T-cell receptor complex and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:13119-13124.
124. Schmielau J, Finn OJ. Activated granulocytes and granulocyte-derived hydrogen peroxide are the underlying mechanism of suppression of t-cell function in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Res 2001;61:4756-4760.
125. Klamt F, et al. Oxidant-induced apoptosis is mediated by oxidation of the actin-regulatory protein cofilin. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:1241-1246.
126. Finkel T. Signal transduction by reactive oxygen species. J Cell Biol 2011;194:7-15.
127. Pope BJ, Zierler-Gould KM, Kuhne R, Weeds AG, Ball LJ. Solution structure of human cofilin: actin binding, pH sensitivity, and relationship to actin-depolymerizing factor. J Biol Chem 2004;279:4840-4848.
128. Pfannstiel J, et al. Human cofilin forms oligomers exhibiting actin bundling activity. J Biol Chem 2001;276:49476-49484.
129. Bernstein BW, Shaw AE, Minamide LS, Pak CW, Bamburg JR. Incorporation of cofilin into rods depends on disulfide intermolecular bonds: implications for actin regulation and neurodegenerative disease. J Neurosci 2012;32:6670-6681.
130. Takahashi A, et al. Preferential cell death of CD8+ effector memory (CCR7-CD45RA-) T cells by hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress. J Immunol 2005;174:6080-6087.
131. Nakashima I, Suzuki H, Kato M, Akhand AA. Redox control of T-cell death. Antioxid Redox Signal 2002;4:353-356.
132. Chua BT, Volbracht C, Tan KO, Li R, Yu VC, Li P. Mitochondrial translocation of cofilin is an early step in apoptosis induction. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:1083-1089.
133. Artigues A, Iriarte A, Martinez-Carrion M. Binding to chaperones allows import of a purified mitochondrial precursor into mitochondria. J Biol Chem 2002;277:25047-25055.
134. Artigues A, Crawford DL, Iriarte A, Martinez-Carrion M. Divergent Hsc70 binding properties of mitochondrial and cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase. Implications for their segregation to different cellular compartments. J Biol Chem 1998;273:33130-33134.
135. Jaattela M, Tschopp J. Caspase-independent cell death in T lymphocytes. Nat Immunol 2003;4:416-423.
136. Martner A, Aurelius J, Rydstrom A, Hellstrand K, Thoren FB. Redox remodeling by dendritic cells protects antigen-specific T cells against oxidative stress. J Immunol 2011;187:6243-6248.
137. Angelini G, et al. Antigen-presenting dendritic cells provide the reducing extracellular microenvironment required for T lymphocyte activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:1491-1496.
138. Thoren FB, Betten A, Romero AI, Hellstrand K. Cutting edge: antioxidative properties of myeloid dendritic cells: protection of T cells and NK cells from oxygen radical-induced inactivation and apoptosis. J Immunol 2007;179:21-25.
139. Kandasamy MK, McKinney EC, Meagher RB. Differential sublocalization of actin variants within the nucleus. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2010;67:729-743.
140. Gieni RS, Hendzel MJ. Actin dynamics and functions in the interphase nucleus: moving toward an understanding of nuclear polymeric actin. Biochem Cell Biol 2009;87:283-306.
141. Abe H, Nagaoka R, Obinata T. Cytoplasmic localization and nuclear transport of cofilin in cultured myotubes. Exp Cell Res 1993;206:1-10.
142. Hamon M, Bierne H, Cossart P. Listeria monocytogenes: a multifaceted model. Nat Rev Microbiol 2006;4:423-434.
143. Han X, et al. InlB-mediated Listeria monocytogenes internalization requires a balanced phospholipase D activity maintained through phospho-cofilin. Mol Microbiol 2011;81:860-880.
144. Han L, et al. Direct stimulation of receptor-controlled phospholipase D1 by phospho-cofilin. EMBO J 2007;26:4189-4202.
145. Bierne H, Gouin E, Roux P, Caroni P, Yin HL, Cossart P. A role for cofilin and LIM kinase in Listeria-induced phagocytosis. J Cell Biol 2001;155:101-112.
146. Loisel TP, Boujemaa R, Pantaloni D, Carlier MF. Reconstitution of actin-based motility of Listeria and Shigella using pure proteins. Nature 1999;401:613-616.
147. David V, et al. Identification of cofilin, coronin, Rac and capZ in actin tails using a Listeria affinity approach. J Cell Sci 1998;111(Pt 19):2877-2884.
148. Bamburg JR. Listeria monocytogenes cell invasion: a new role for cofilin in co-ordinating actin dynamics and membrane lipids. Mol Microbiol 2011;81:851-854.
149. Yoder A, et al. HIV envelope-CXCR4 signaling activates cofilin to overcome cortical actin restriction in resting CD4 T cells. Cell 2008;134:782-792.
150. Stolp B, Abraham L, Rudolph JM, Fackler OT. Lentiviral Nef proteins utilize PAK2-mediated deregulation of cofilin as a general strategy to interfere with actin remodeling. J Virol 2010;84:3935-3948.
151. Stolp B, et al. HIV-1 Nef interferes with host cell motility by deregulation of Cofilin. Cell Host Microbe 2009;6:174-186.
152. Wang W, et al. The activity status of cofilin is directly related to invasion, intravasation, and metastasis of mammary tumors. J Cell Biol 2006;173:395-404.
153. Sidani M, et al. Cofilin determines the migration behavior and turning frequency of metastatic cancer cells. J Cell Biol 2007;179:777-791.
154. Mouneimne G, et al. Spatial and temporal control of cofilin activity is required for directional sensing during chemotaxis. Curr Biol 2006;16:2193-2205.
155. Bravo-Cordero JJ, Oser M, Chen X, Eddy R, Hodgson L, Condeelis J. A novel spatiotemporal RhoC activation pathway locally regulates cofilin activity at invadopodia. Curr Biol 2011;21:635-644.
156. Yamaguchi H, et al. Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N-WASP-Arp2/3 complex pathway and cofilin. J Cell Biol 2005;168:441-452.
157. Munder M, et al. Arginase I is constitutively expressed in human granulocytes and participates in fungicidal activity. Blood 2005;105:2549-2556.
158. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9:162-174.
159. Grohmann U, Bronte V. Control of immune response by amino acid metabolism. Immunol Rev 2010;236:243-264.
160. Abeyakirthi S, et al. Arginase is overactive in psoriatic skin. Br J Dermatol 2010;163:193-196.
161. Zea AH, et al. Arginase-producing myeloid suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma patients: a mechanism of tumor evasion. Cancer Res 2005;65:3044-3048.
162. Rodriguez PC, et al. Arginase I production in the tumor microenvironment by mature myeloid cells inhibits T-cell receptor expression and antigen-specific T-cell responses. Cancer Res 2004;64:5839-5849.
163. Feldmeyer N, et al. Arginine deficiency leads to impaired cofilin dephosphorylation in activated human T lymphocytes. Int Immunol 2012;24:303-313.
164. Munder M, et al. Cytotoxicity of tumor antigen specific human T cells is unimpaired by arginine depletion. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e63521.
165. Ooka S, et al. Proteomic surveillance of autoantigens in patients with Behcet's disease by a proteomic approach. Microbiol Immunol 2010;54:354-361.
166. Gelderman KA, Hultqvist M, Holmberg J, Olofsson P, Holmdahl R. T cell surface redox levels determine T cell reactivity and arthritis susceptibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:12831-12836.
167. Gelderman KA, et al. Macrophages suppress T cell responses and arthritis development in mice by producing reactive oxygen species. J Clin Invest 2007;117:3020-3028.
168. van Ewijk W. T-cell differentiation is influenced by thymic microenvironments. Annu Rev Immunol 1991;9:591-615.
169. Gimmi CD, Freeman GJ, Gribben JG, Gray G, Nadler LM. Human T-cell clonal anergy is induced by antigen presentation in the absence of B7 costimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:6586-6590.
170. Curtsinger JM, Mescher MF. Inflammatory cytokines as a third signal for T cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol 2010;22:333-340.
171. Moser M, Murphy KM. Dendritic cell regulation of TH1-TH2 development. Nat Immunol 2000;1:199-205.
172. Friedl P, den Boer AT, Gunzer M. Tuning immune responses: diversity and adaptation of the immunological synapse. Nat Rev Immunol 2005;5:532-545.
173. Dustin ML, Chakraborty AK, Shaw AS. Understanding the structure and function of the immunological synapse. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2010;2:a002311.
174. Fooksman DR, et al. Functional anatomy of T cell activation and synapse formation. Annu Rev Immunol 2010;28:79-105.