The drivers in the use of online whistle-blowing reporting systems

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 153-190

  Lowry, Paul ^a   Moody, Gregory ^b   Galletta, Dennis ^c   Vance, Anthony ^d  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

anonymity; computer abuse; IT artifacts; organizational failure; organizational governance; risk; trust; whistle blowing; whistle blowing reporting systems

Indexed keywords

RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; RISKS;

ANONYMITY; COMPUTER ABUSE; IT ARTIFACTS; ORGANIZATIONAL FAILURES; ORGANIZATIONAL GOVERNANCE; REPORTING SYSTEMS; TRUST;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84883188346     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222300105     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Ancona, D.G.; Kochan, T.A.; Scully, M.; Van Maanen, J.; and Westney, D.E. Managing for the Future: Organizational Behavior and Processes, 3d ed. Cincinnati: Southwestern, 2004.
2. Barchard, K.A., and Williams, J. Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 4 (2008), 1111-1128.
3. Bennett, R.J., and Robinson, S.L. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 3 (2000), 349-360.
4. Bergman, M.E.; Langhout, R.D.; Cortina, L.M.; and Fitzgerald, L.F. The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 2 (2002), 230-242.
5. Birnbaum, M.H. Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55 (2004), 803-832.
6. Bowen, R.M.; Call, A.C.; and Rajgopal, S. Whistle-blowing: Target firm characteristics and economic consequences. Accounting Review, 85, 4 (2010), 1239-1271.
7. Chin, W.W.; Marcolin, B.L.; and Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 2 (2003), 189-217.
8. Colquitt, J.A.; Scott, B.A.; and LePine, J.A. Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-Analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 4 (2007), 909-927.
9. Crossler, R.E.; Johnston, A.C.; Lowry, P.B.; Hu, Q.; Warkentin, M.; and Baskerville, R . Future directions for behavioral information security research. Computers & Security, 32, 1 (2013), 90-101.
10. D'Arcy, J.; Hovav, A.; and Galletta, D.F. User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: A deterrence approach. Information Systems Research, 20, 1 (2009), 79-98.
11. Davis, M. Some paradoxes of whistleblowing. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 15, 1 (1996), 3-19.
12. de Lara, M., and Zoghbi, P. Relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing in the workplace: Has "anomia" a say in the matter? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 3 (2007), 464-470.
13. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 4 (Spring 2003), 9-30.
14. Diener, E.; Fraser, S.C.; Beaman, A.L.; and Kelem, R.T. Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 2 (1976), 178-183.
15. Dietz, G., and Gillespie, N. Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34, 1 (2009), 127-145.
16. Dinev, T., and Hart, P. An extended privacy calculus model for ecommerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17, 1 (2006), 61-80.
17. Dozier, J.B., and Miceli, M.P. Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. Academy of Management Review, 10, 4 (1985), 823-836.
18. Dyck, A.; Morse, A.; and Zingales, L. Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? Journal of Finance, 65, 6 (2010), 2213-2253.
19. European fraud survey 2009: Is integrity a causality of the downturn? Ernst & Young, London, 2009 (available at http://www2.eycom.ch/publications/ items/fraud-eu-2009/200904- EY-European-Fraud-Survey.pdf).
20. Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W. A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-Graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 5 (2005), 91-109.
21. Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; and Straub, D.W. Potential and repeat econsumers: The role of and trust vis-À-vis TAM. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 3 (2003), 307-321.
22. Gillespie, N., and Dietz, G. Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34, 1 (2009), 127-145.
23. Glomb, T.M.; Richman, W.L.; Hulin, C.L.; Drasgow, F.; Schneider, K.T.; and Fitzgerald, L.F. Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 3 (1997), 309-328.
24. Grazioli, S., and Jarvenpaa, S.L. Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, 4 (2000), 395-410.
25. Gundlach, M.J.; Douglas, S.C.; and Martinko, M.J. The decision to blow the whistle: A social information processing framework. Academy of Management Review, 28, 1 (2003), 107-123.
26. Harrington, S.J. The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. MIS Quarterly, 20, 3 (1996), 257-278.
27. Hinds, P.J., and Bailey, D.E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 6 (2003), 615-632.
28. Hunton, J.E., and Rose, J.M. Effects of anonymous whistle-blowing and perceived reputation threats on investigations of whistle-blowing allegations by audit committee members. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1 (2011), 75-98.
29. Jarvenpaa, S.L., and Tractinsky, N. Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5, 2 (1999), 1-36.
30. Joy, V.L., and Witt, L.A. Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice- distributive justice relationship. Group & Organization Management, 17, 3 (1992), 297-308.
31. Keil, M. Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 421-447.
32. Keil, M., and Robey, D. Turning around troubled software projects: An exploratory study of the deescalation of commitment to failing courses of action. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 4 (Spring 1999), 63-87.
33. Keil, M.; Im, G.P.; and Mähring, M. Reporting bad news on software projects: The effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving. Information Systems Journal, 17, 1 (2007), 59-87.
34. Keil, M.; Tiwana, A.; Sainsbury, R.; and Sneha, S. Toward a theory of whistleblowing intentions: A benefit-to-cost differential perspective. Decision Sciences, 41, 4 (2010), 787-812.
35. Kelton, K.; Fleischmann, K.R.; and Wallace, W.A. Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 3 (2008), 363-374.
36. Kim, B., and Han, I. The role of trust belief and its antecedents in a community-driven knowledge environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 5 (2009), 1012-1026.
37. Kim, H.-W.; Xu, Y.; and Koh, J. A comparison of online trust building factors between potential customers and repeat customers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 10 (2004), 392-420.
38. Kim, S.S., and Malhotra, N.K. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Science, 51, 5 (2005), 741-755.
39. Komiak, S., and Benbasat, I. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly, 30, 4 (2006), 941-960.
40. Latané, B., and Darley, J.M. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1970.
41. Lea, M.; Spears, R.; and de Groot, D. Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 5 (2001), 526-537.
42. Lee, J.-Y.; Heilmann, S.G.; and Near, J.P. Blowing the whistle on sexual harassment: Test of a model of predictors and outcomes. Human Relations, 57, 3 (2004), 297-322.
43. Lewicki, R.J., and Wiethoff, C., Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In M. Deutsch and P.T. C oleman (eds.), Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000, pp. 92-119.
44. Lewis, D. Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: Is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty at the workplace? Business Ethics: A European Review, 20, 1 (2011), 71-87.
45. Lowry, P.B.; Cao, J.; and Everard, A. Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of self-disclosure technologies: The case of instant messaging in two cultures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (Spring 2011), 165-204.
46. Lowry, P.B.; Rouibah, K.; Moody, G.; and Siponen, M. Towards a cross-cultural model of whistle-blowing systems use. Paper presented at 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2012), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, July 11-15, 2012.
47. Lowry, P.B.; Zhang, D.; Zhou, L.; and Fu, X. Effects of culture, social presence, and group composition on trust in technology-supported decision-making groups. Information Systems Journal, 20, 3 (2010), 297-315.
48. Lowry, P.B.; Vance, A.; Moody, G.; Beckman, B.; and Read, A. Explaining and predicting the impact of branding alliances and Web site quality on initial consumer trust of ecommerce Web sites. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (Spring 2008), 201-227.
49. Lowry, P.B.; Moody, G.; Vance, A.; Jensen, M.; Jenkins, J.L.; and Wells, T. Using an elaboration likelihood approach to better understand the persuasiveness of website privacy assurance cues for online consumers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 4 (2012), 755-766.
50. Lucassen, T., and Schraagen, J. M. Factual accuracy and trust in information: The role of expertise. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 7 (2011), 1232-1242.
51. Malhotra, N.K.; Kim, S.S.; and Agarwal, J. Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Information Systems Research, 15, 4 (2004), 336-355.
52. Mayer, R.C.; Davis, J.H.; and Schoorman, F.D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 (1995), 709-734.
53. McKnight, D.H. Trust in information technology. In G.B. Davis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Management, vol. 7. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005, pp. 329-331.
54. McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; and Kacmar, C. Developing and validating trust measures for ecommerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 3 (2002), 334-359.
55. McKnight, D.H.; Cummings, L.L.; and Chervany, N.L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 3 (1998), 473-490.
56. McKnight, D.H.; Carter, M.; Thatcher, J.B.; and Clay, P.F. Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 2, 2 (2011), 1-15.
57. Mesmer-Magnus, J.R., and Viswesvaran, C. Whistleblowing in organizations: An examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 3 (2005), 277-297.
58. Metzger, M.J. Effects of site, vendor, and consumer characteristics on Web site trust and disclosure. Communication Research, 33, 3 (2006), 155-179.
59. Miceli, M.P., and Near, J.P. The relationships among beliefs, organizational position, and whistle-blowing status: A discriminant analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 4 (1984), 687-705.
60. Miceli, M.P., and Near, J.P. Characteristics of organizational climate and perceived wrongdoing associated with whistle-blowing decisions. Personnel Psychology, 38, 3 (1985), 525-544.
61. Miceli, M.P., and Near, J.P. Individual and situational correlates of whistle-blowing. Personnel Psychology, 41, 2 (1988), 267-281.
62. Miceli, M.P., and Near, J.P. Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational & Legal Implications for Companies and Employees. New York: Lexington Books, 1992.
63. Miceli, M.P., and Near, J.P. Standing up or standing by: What predicts blowing the whistle on organizational wrongdoing. In J.J. Martocchio (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 24. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, 2005, pp. 95-136.
64. Miceli, M.P.; Near, J.P.; and Dworkin, T.M. Whistle-Blowing in Organizations. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.
65. Miceli, M.P.; Near, J.P.; and Dworkin, T.M. A word to the wise: How managers and policy-makers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 3 (2009), 379-396.
66. Miner, J.B. Theories of motivation rooted in learning theory. In J.B. Miner (ed.), Organizational Behavior: Foundations, Theories, and Analyses. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 189-219.
67. Near, J.P., and Miceli, M.P. Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1 (1985), 1-16.
68. Near, J.P., and Miceli, M.P. Effective whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3 (1995), 679-708.
69. Near, J.P., and Miceli, M.P. Whistle-blowing: Myth and reality. Journal of Management, 22, 3 (1996), 507-526.
70. Near, J.P., and Miceli, M.P. Wrongdoing, whistle-blowing, and retaliation in the U.S. government: What have researchers learned from the merit systems protection board (MSPB) survey results? Review of Public Personnel and Administration, 28, 3 (2008), 263-281.
71. Near, J.P.; Dworkin, T.M.; and Miceli, J.P. Explaining the whistle-blowing process: Suggestions from power theory and justice theory. Organization Science, 4, 3 (1993), 393-411.
72. Near, J.P.; Rehg, M.T.; Van Scotter, J.R.; and Miceli, M.P. Does type of wrongdoing affect the whistle-blowing process? Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 2 (2004), 219-242.
73. Nicolaou, A.I., and McKnight, D.H. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17, 4 (2006), 332-351.
74. Niehoff, B.P., and Moorman, R.H. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 3 (1993), 527-556.
75. O'Fallon, M., and Butterfield, K. A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 4 (2005), 375-413.
76. Park, C., and Keil, M. Organizational silence and whistle-blowing on IT projects: An integrated model. Decision Sciences, 40, 4 (2009), 901-918.
77. Park, C.; Im, G.; and Keil, M. Overcoming the mum effect in IT project reporting: Impacts of fault responsibility and time urgency. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 7 (2008), 409-431.
78. Pavlou, P.A., and Gefen, D. Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Information Systems Research, 16, 4 (2005), 372-399.
79. Pinsonneault, A., and Heppel, N. Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 3 (Winter 1997-98), 89-108.
80. Pogarsky, G. Projected offending and implications for heterotypic continuity. Criminology, 42, 1 (2004), 111-135.
81. Posey, C.; Bennett, R.; Roberts, T.L.; and Lowry, P.B. When computer monitoring backfires: Invasion of privacy and organizational injustice as precursors to computer abuse. Journal of Information System Security, 7, 1 (2011), 24-47.
82. Posey, C.; Lowry, P.B.; Roberts, T.L.; and Ellis, S. The culture-influenced online community self-disclosure model: The case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 2 (2010), 181-195.
83. Postmes, T., and Spears, R. Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 3 (1998), 238-259.
84. Rains, S.A. The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in computer-mediated group communication: A test of two competing hypotheses. Communication Research, 34, 1 (2007), 100-125.
85. Rains, S.A., and Scott, C.R. To identify or not to identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 17, 1 (2007), 61-91.
86. Rehg, M.T.; Miceli, M.P.; Near, J.P.; and Van Scotter, J.R. Antecedents and outcomes of retaliation against whistleblowers: Gender differences and power relationships. Organization Science, 19, 2 (2008), 221-240.
87. Reicher, S., and Levine, M. On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 4 (1994), 511-524.
88. Reinartz, W.; Haenlein, M.; and Henseler, J. An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 4 (2009), 332-344.
89. Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; and Will, S. SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) beta. University of Hamburg, 2005 (available at www.smartpls.de/forum/).
90. Rothwell, G.R., and Baldwin, J.N. Ethical climates and contextual predictors of whistleblowing. Review of Public Personnel and Administration, 26, 3 (2006), 216-244.
91. Schoorman, F.; Mayer, R.; and Davis, J.H. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 2 (2007), 344-354.
92. Schopler, J.; Insko, C.; Drigotas, S.; Wieselquist, J.; Pemberton, M.; and Cox, C. The role of identifiability in the reduction of interindividual- intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 6 (1995), 553-574.
93. Siponen, M., and Vance, A. Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS Quarterly, 34, 3 (2010), 487-502.
94. Skinner, W.F., and Fream, A.M. A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 4 (1997), 495-518.
95. Smith, H.J., and Keil, M. The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model. Information Systems Journal, 13, 1 (2003), 69-95.
96. Smith, H.J.; Keil, M.; and Depledge, G. Keeping mum as the project goes under: Toward an explanatory model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 2 (Fall 2001), 189-227.
97. Soloman, L.Z.; Solomon, H.; and Stone, R. Helping as a function of number of bystanders and ambiguity of emergency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 2 (1978), 318-321.
98. Song, J., and Zahedi, F.M. Trust in health infomediaries. Decision Support Systems, 43, 2 (2007), 390-407.
99. Straub, D.W. Effective IS security: An empirical study. Information Systems Research, 1, 3 (1990), 255-276.
100. Street, M.D. Cognitive moral development and organizational commitment: Two potential predictors of whistle-blowing. Journal of Applied Business Research, 11, 4 (2011), 104-110.
101. Trevino, L.K. Experimental approaches to studying ethical-unethical behavior in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 2 (1992), 121-136.
102. Trevino, L.K., and Victor, B. Peer reporting of unethical behavior: A social context perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 1 (1992), 38-64.
103. Vance, A. Examining IT artifacts: How trust affects our use of technology. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, 2008.
104. Vance, A.; Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C.; and Straub, D.W. Examining trust in information technology artifacts: The effects of system quality and culture. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (Spring 2008), 73-100.
105. Vroom, V.H. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
106. Wang, W., and Benbasat, I. Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: A study of recommendation agents for ecommerce. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (Spring 2008), 249-273.
107. Williams, D.J., and Noyes, J.M. How does our perception of risk influence decisionmaking? Implications for the design of risk information. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 1 (2007), 1-35.
108. Zahedi, F.M., and Song, J. Dynamics of trust revision: Using health infomediaries. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 4 (Spring 2008), 225-248.
109. Zhang, D.; Lowry, P.B.; Zhou, L.; and Fu, X. The impact of individualism-collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 4 (Spring 2007), 53-80.