Phenomenal Causality II: Integration and Implication

Axiomathes

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 485-524

  Hubbard, Timothy L ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Causal impression; Causal representation; Intentionality; Launching effect; Michotte; Perception of causality; Phenomenal causality; Spatial representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883076243     PISSN: 11221151     EISSN: 15728390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10516-012-9200-5     Document Type: Article

References (175)

1. Alba JW, Hasher L (1983) Is memory schematic? Psychol Bull 93: 203-231.
2. Albert MK (2007) Mechanisms of modal and amodal interpolation. Psychol Rev 114: 455-469.
3. Arnheim R (1974) Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye (the new version). University of California Press, Berkeley.
4. Arnheim R (1988) Visual dynamics. Sci Am 76: 585-591.
5. Bartley SH, Wilkinson FR (1953) Some factors in the production of gamma movement. J Psychol 36: 201-206.
6. Bassili JN (1976) Temporal and spatial contingencies in the perception of social events. J Pers Soc Psychol 33: 680-685.
7. Beasley NA (1968) The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. Can J Psychol 22: 399-407.
8. Belanger ND, Desrochers S (2001) Can 6-month old infants process causality in different types of causal events? Br J Dev Psychol 19: 11-21.
9. Berry DS, Springer K (1993) Structure, motion, and preschoolers' perceptions of social causality. Ecol Psychol 5: 273-283.
10. Berry DS, Misovich SJ, Kean KJ, Baron RM (1992) Effects of disruption of structure and motion on perceptions of social causality. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 18: 237-244.
11. Blakemore SJ, Fonlupt P, Pachot-Clouard M, Darmon C, Boyer P, Meltzoff AN, Segebarth C, Decety J (2001) How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroReport 12: 3741-3746.
12. Blakemore SJ, Boyer P, Pachot-Clouard M, Meltzoff A, Segebarth C, Decety J (2003) The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 13: 837-844.
13. Bowler DM, Thommen E (2000) Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism. Autism 4: 147-171.
14. Boyle DG (1960) A contribution to the study of phenomenal causation. Quart J Exp Psychol 12: 171-179.
15. Brown HV, Miles TR (1969) Prior stimulation and the perception of causality. Quart J Exp Psychol 21: 134-136.
16. Buehner MJ, Humphreys GR (2010) Causal contraction: spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychol Sci 21: 44-48.
17. Bullock M, Gelman R, Baillargeon R (1982) The development of causal reasoning. In: Friedman WJ (ed) The developmental psychology of time. Academic Press, New York, pp 209-254.
18. Burke L (1952) On the tunnel effect. Quart J Exp Psychol 4: 121-138.
19. Castelli F, Happe F, Frith U, Frith C (2000) Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage 12: 314-325.
20. Choi H, Scholl BJ (2004) Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality. Percept Psychophys 66: 926-942.
21. Choi H, Scholl BJ (2006a) Perceiving causality after the fact: postdiction in the temporal dynamics of causal perception. Perception 35: 385-399.
22. Choi H, Scholl BJ (2006b) Measuring causal perception: connections to representational momentum? Acta Psychol 123: 91-111.
23. Cicchino JB, Aslin RN, Rakison DH (2011) Correspondences between what infants see and know about causal and self-propelled motion. Cognition 118: 171-192.
24. Cohen LB, Amsel G (1998) Precursors to infants' perception of the causality of a simple event. Infant Behav Dev 21: 713-732.
25. Cohen LB, Oakes LM (1993) How infants perceive a simple causal event. Dev Psychol 29: 421-433.
26. Congiu S, Schlottmann A, Ray E (2010) Unimpaired perception of social and physical causality, but impaired perception of animacy in high functioning children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 40: 39-53.
27. Corballis PM (2003) Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter. Brain Cogn 53: 171-176.
28. Corballis PM, Fendrich R, Shapley RM, Gazzaniga MS (1999) Illusory contour perception and amodal boundary completion: evidence of a dissociation following callosotomy. J Cogn Neurosci 11: 459-466.
29. Coren S, Girgus JS (1980) Principles of perceptual organization and spatial distortion: the Gestalt illusions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 6: 404-412.
30. De sa Teixeira NA, de Oliveira AM, Viegas R (2008) Functional approach to the integration of kinematic and dynamic variables in causal perception: is there a link between phenomenology and behavioral responses? Jpn Psychol Res 50: 232-241.
31. De sa Teixeira NA, de Oliveira AM, Amorim M-A (2010) Combined effects of mass and velocity on forward displacement and phenomenological ratings: a functional measurement approach to the momentum metaphor. Psicologica 31: 659-676.
32. Dennett DC (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge.
33. Dennett DC (1997) True believers: the intentional strategy and why it works. In: Haugeland J (ed) Mind design II. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 57-79.
34. Desrochers S (1999) Infants' processing of causal and noncausal events at 3. 5 months of age. J Genet Psychol 160: 294-302.
35. Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (1994) Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception 23: 253-268.
36. Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287: 2036-2038.
37. Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ (2003) The line-motion illusion can be reversed by motion signals after the line disappears. Perception 32: 963-968.
38. Falmier O, Young ME (2008) The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality. Am J Psychol 121: 473-500.
39. Finke RA, Freyd JJ, Shyi GCW (1986) Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 115: 175-188.
40. Flombaum JI, Scholl BJ (2006) A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting object. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 32: 840-853.
41. Fodor JA (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.
42. Fonlupt P (2003) Perception and judgment of physical causality involve different brain structures. Cogn Brain Res 17: 248-254.
43. Fugelsang JA, Roser ME, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS, Dunbar KN (2005) Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Cogn Brain Res 24: 41-47.
44. Gallager S, Sørensen JB (2006) Experimenting with phenomenology. Conscious Cogn 15: 119-134.
45. Gao T, Newman GE, Scholl BJ (2009) The psychophysics of chasing: a case study in the perception of animacy. Cogn Psychol 59: 154-179.
46. Gao T, McCarthy G, Scholl BJ (2010) The wolfpack effect: perception of animacy irresistibly influences interactive behavior. Psychol Sci 21: 1845-1853.
47. Gelman R, Durgin F, Kaufman L (1995) Distinguishing animates and inanimates: not by motion alone. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 150-184.
48. Gerbino W, Salmaso D (1987) The effect of amodal completion on visual matching. Acta Psychol 65: 25-46.
49. Gibbs RW Jr (2005) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press, New York.
50. Guski R, Troje N (2003) Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Percept Psychophys 65: 789-800.
51. Han S, Mao L, Qin J, Friederici AD, Ge J (2011) Functional roles and cultural modulations of the medial prefrontal and parietal activity associated with causal attribution. Neuropsychologia 49: 83-91.
52. Harrower MR (1929) Some experiments on the nature of gamma movement. Psychologische Forschung 13: 55-63.
53. Heider F, Simmel M (1944) An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am J Exp Psychol 57: 243-259.
54. Henle M (1984) Isomorphism: setting the record straight. Psychol Res Psychol Forsch 46: 317-327.
55. Hindmarch I (1973) Eye movements and the perception of phenomenal causality. Psychologica Belgica 13: 17-23.
56. Houssiadas L (1964) Effects of 'set' and intellectual level on the perception of causality. Acta Psychol 22: 155-161.
57. Hubbard TL (1996) The importance of a consideration of qualia to imagery and cognition. Conscious Cogn 5: 327-358.
58. Hubbard TL (1999) How consequences of physical principles influence mental representation: the environmental invariants hypothesis. In: Killeen PR, Uttal WR (eds) Fechner Day 99: The end of 20th century psychophysics. Proceedings of the 15th annual meeting of the international society for psychophysics. The International Society for Psychophysics, Tempe, pp 274-279.
59. Hubbard TL (2004) The perception of causality: Insights from Michotte's launching effect, naive impetus theory, and representational momentum. In: Oliveira AM, Teixeira MP, Borges GF, Ferro MJ (eds) Fechner Day 2004. The International Society for Psychophysics, Coimbra, pp 116-121.
60. Hubbard TL (2005) Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: a review of the findings. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 822-851.
61. Hubbard TL (2006) Bridging the gap: possible roles and contributions of representational momentum. Psicologica 27: 1-34.
62. Hubbard TL (2011) Extending pragnanz: Dynamic aspects of mental representation and Gestalt principles. In: Albertazzi L, van Tonder G, Vishwanath D (eds) Perception beyond inference: the information content of visual processes. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 75-108.
63. Hubbard TL (2012a) Launching, entraining, and representational momentum: Evidence consistent with an impetus heuristic in the perception of causality. Axiomathes. doi: 10. 1007/s10516-012-9186-z.
64. Hubbard TL (2012b) Phenomenal causality I: varieties and variables. Axiomathes. doi: 10. 1007/s10516-012-9198-8.
65. Hubbard TL (2012c) Visual perception of force: comment on White (2012). Psychol Bull 138: 616-623.
66. Hubbard TL, Favretto A (2003) Naive impetus and Michotte's "Tool Effect:" Evidence from representational momentum. Psychol Res Psychol Forsch 67: 134-152.
67. Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE (2002) A possible role of naive impetus in Michotte's "Launching Effect:" Evidence from representational momentum. Vis Cogn 9: 153-176.
68. Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE (2012) Ratings of causality and force in launching and shattering. Paper presented at the 53rd annual meeting of the psychonomic society, Minneapolis.
69. Hubbard TL, Blessum JA, Ruppel SE (2001) Representational momentum and Michotte's (1946/1963) "Launching Effect" paradigm. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27: 294-301.
70. Hubbard TL, Ruppel SE, Courtney JR (2005) The force of appearance: gamma movement, naive impetus, and representational momentum. Psicologica 26: 209-228.
71. Hume D (1960) A treatise of human nature. Clarendon, Oxford. (Original work published 1740).
72. Hume D (1977) An enquiry concerning human understanding. Hackett, Indianapolis. (Original work published 1748).
73. Jansson G (1964) Measurement of eye movements during a Michotte launching event. Scand J Psychol 5: 153-160.
74. Johansson G (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14: 201-211.
75. Jordan JS, Hunsinger M (2008) Learned patterns of action-effect anticipation contribute to the spatial displacement of continuously moving stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34: 113-124.
76. Jordan JS, Knoblich G (2004) Spatial perception and control. Psychon Bull Rev 11: 54-59.
77. Kaiser MK, Proffitt DR, Whelan SM, Hecht H (1992) The influence of animation on dynamical judgments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 669-690.
78. Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in vision: essays on Gestalt psychology. Praeger, New York.
79. Kanizsa G, Vicario G (1968) The perception of intentional reaction. In: Kanizsa G, Vicario G (eds) Experimental research on perception. University of Trieste, Treiste, pp 71-126.
80. Kant I (1950) Prolegomena to any future metaphysics (trans: Beck LW). Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis. (Original work published 1783).
81. Kant I (1965) Critique of pure reason (trans: Smith NK). St. Martin's Press, New York. (Original work published 1787).
82. Kawachi Y, Gyoba J (2006) A new response-time measure of object persistence in the tunnel effect. Acta Psychol 123: 73-90.
83. Kiritani Y (1999) Perceptual causality in the amodal completion of kinetic structures. Psychol Res Psychol Forsch 62: 255-260.
84. Kotovsky L, Baillargeon R (1998) The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants. Cognition 67: 311-351.
85. Kotovsky L, Baillargeon R (2000) Reasoning about collisions involving inert objects in 7. 5-month-old infants. Dev Sci 3: 344-359.
86. Kozhevnikov M, Hegarty M (2001) Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychon Bull Rev 8: 439-453.
87. Leslie AM (1982) The perception of causality in infants. Perception 11: 173-186.
88. Leslie AM (1984) Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception 13: 287-305.
89. Leslie AM (1986) Getting development off the ground: modularity and the infant's perception of causality. In: van Gest P (ed) Theory building in development. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 405-437.
90. Leslie AM (1988) The necessity of illusion: Perception and thought in infancy. In: Weiskrantz L (ed) Thought without language. Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185-210.
91. Leslie AM (1994) ToMM, ToBy, and agency: core architecture and domain specificity. In: Hirschfield L, Gelman S (eds) Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119-148.
92. Leslie AM (1995) A theory of agency. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 121-141.
93. Leslie AM, Keeble S (1987) Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition 25: 265-288.
94. Leyton M (1989) Inferring causal history from shape. Cogn Sci 13: 357-387.
95. Leyton M (1992) Symmetry, causality, mind. MIT Press, Cambridge.
96. Malle BF (2006) How the mind explains behavior: folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge.
97. McCloskey M (1983) Naive theories of motion. In: Gentner D, Stevens AL (eds) Mental models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 299-324.
98. Michotte A (1963). The perception of causality (trans: Miles T, Miles E). Basic Books, New York. (Original work published 1946).
99. Michotte A, Thinès G (1991) Perceived causality. In: Thinès G, Costall A, Butterworth G (eds) Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 66-87 (Original work published 1963).
100. Michotte A, Thinès G, Crabbé G (1964) Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptives [Amodal completions of perceptual structures]. Publications Universitaires, Studia Psychologica, Louvain.
101. Morris MW, Peng K (1994) Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J Pers Soc Psychol 67: 949-971.
102. Morris MW, Nisbett RE, Peng K (1995) Causal attribution across domains and cultures. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (eds) Causal cognition: a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 577-612.
103. Morris JP, Pelphrey KA, McCarthy G (2008) Perceived causality influences brain activity evoked by biological motion. Soc Neurosci 3: 16-25.
104. Nakamura K (1996) The effect of manual operation of a moving target on young children's perception of causality. Jpn J Dev Psychol 7: 119-127.
105. Nakamura K (2006) The perception of causality as a kinetic property by young children. Jpn J Psychon Sci 25: 35-40.
106. Natsoulas T (1961) Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. Am J Psychol 74: 394-402.
107. Newman GE, Choi H, Wynn K, Scholl BJ (2008) The origins of causal perception: evidence from postdictive processing in infancy. Cogn Psychol 57: 262-291.
108. O'Connell S, Dunbar RIM (2005) The perception of causality in chimpanzees (Panspp.). Anim Cogn 8: 60-66.
109. Oakes LM (1994) Development of infants' use of continuity cues in their perception of causality. Dev Psychol 30: 869-879.
110. Oakes LM, Cohen LB (1990) Infant perception of a causal event. Cogn Dev 5: 193-207.
111. Overgaard M, Gallagher S, Ramsøy TZ (2008) An integration of first-person methodologies in cognitive science. J Conscious Stud 15: 100-120.
112. Palmer S, Rock I (1994) Rethinking perceptual organization: the role of uniform connectedness. Psychon Bull Rev 1: 29-55.
113. Pavlova M, Guerreschi M, Lutzenberger W, Krägeloh-Mann I (2010) Social interaction revealed by motion: dynamics of neuromagnetic gamma activity. Cereb Cortex 20: 2361-2367.
114. Peng K, Knowles ED (2003) Culture, education, and the attribution of physical causality. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29: 1272-1284.
115. Pollick FE, Kay JW, Heim K, Stringer R (2005) Gender recognition from point-light walkers. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31: 1247-1265.
116. Powesland PF (1959) The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. Can J Psychol 13: 155-168.
117. Rakison DH (2005) A secret agent? How infants learn about the identity of objects in a causal scene. J Exp Child Psychol 91: 271-296.
118. Rakison DH, Krogh L (2012) Does causal action facilitate causal perception in infants younger than 6 months of age? Dev Sci 15: 43-53.
119. Rakison DH, Poulin-Dubois D (2001) Development origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychol Bull 127: 209-228.
120. Rauschenberger R, Peterson MA, Mosca F, Bruno N (2004) Amodal completion in visual search. Preemption or context effects? Psychol Sci 15: 351-355.
121. Rimé B, Boulanger B, Laubin P, Richir M, Stroobants K (1985) The perception of interpersonal emotions originated by patterns of movement. Motiv Emot 9: 241-260.
122. Rochat P, Morgan R, Carpenter M (1997) Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cogn Dev 12: 537-561.
123. Roediger HL (1996) Memory illusions. J Mem Lang 35: 76-100.
124. Roser ME, Fugelsang JA, Dunbar KN, Corballis PM, Gazzaniga MS (2005) Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology 19: 591-602.
125. Runeson S, Frykholm G (1981) Visual perception of lifted weight. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7: 733-740.
126. Saxe R, Carey S (2006) The perception of causality in infancy. Acta Psychol 123: 144-165.
127. Schlottmann A (1999) Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: how children understand the relationship between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. Dev Psychol 35: 303-317.
128. Schlottmann A (2000) Is perception of causality modular? Trends Cogn Sci 4: 441-442.
129. Schlottmann A, Anderson NH (1993) An information integration approach to phenomenal causality. Mem Cogn 21: 785-801.
130. Schlottmann A, Ray E (2010) Goal attribution to schematic animals: do 6-month-olds perceive biological motion as animate? Dev Sci 13: 1-10.
131. Schlottmann A, Shanks DR (1992) Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. Quart J Exp Psychol 44A: 321-342.
132. Schlottmann A, Surian L (1999) Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception 28: 1105-1113.
133. Schlottmann A, Allen D, Linderoth C, Hesketh S (2002) Perceptual causality in children. Child Dev 73: 1656-1677.
134. Schlottmann A, Ray ED, Mitchell A, Demetriou N (2006) Perceived social and physical causality in animated motion: spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychol 123: 112-143.
135. Schlottmann A, Surian L, Ray ED (2009) Causal perception of action-and-reaction sequences in 8- to 10-month-olds. J Exp Child Psychol 103: 87-107.
136. Schlottmann A, Ray ED, Surian L (2012) Emerging perception of causality in action-and-reaction sequences from 4 to 6 months of age: is it domain-specific? J Exp Child Psychol 112: 208-230.
137. Scholl BJ, Nakayama K (2002) Causal capture: contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychol Sci 13: 493-498.
138. Scholl BJ, Nakayama K (2004) Illusory causal crescents: misperceived spatial relations due to perceived causality. Perception 33: 455-469.
139. Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 299-309.
140. Spelke ES, Phillips A, Woodward AL (1995) Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In: Sperber D, Premack D, Premack A (eds) Causal cognition; a multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 44-78.
141. Springer K, Meier JA, Berry DS (1996) Nonverbal bases of social perception: developmental change in sensitivity to patterns of motion that reveal interpersonal events. J Nonverbal Behav 20: 199-211.
142. Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA (2011) Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 17: 37-53.
143. Straube B, Wolk D, Chatterjee A (2011) The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study. Exp Brain Res 215: 315-325.
144. Talmy L (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cogn Sci 12: 49-100.
145. Taylor SE, Fiske ST (1975) Point-of-view and perceptions of causality. J Pers Soc Psychol 32: 439-445.
146. Thommen E, Dumas A, Erskine J, Reymond J (1998) Perception and conceptualization of intentionality in children. Br J Dev Psychol 16: 255-272.
147. Tremoulet PD, Feldman J (2000) Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29: 943-951.
148. Tschacher W, Kupper Z (2006) Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophr Bull 32: S106-S112.
149. Varela FJ (1996) Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. J Consciousness Stud 3: 330-350.
150. Wagemans J, van Lier R, Scholl BJ (2006) Introduction to Michotte's heritage in perception and cognition research. Acta Psychol 123: 1-19.
151. Weir S (1978) The perception of motion: Michotte revisited. Perception 7: 247-260.
152. White PA (1990) Ideas about causation in philosophy and psychology. Psychol Bull 108: 3-18.
153. White PA (1999) Toward a causal realist account of causal understanding. Am J Psychol 112: 605-642.
154. White PA (2005) Visual causal impression in the perception of several moving objects. Vis Cogn 12: 395-404.
155. White PA (2006a) The causal asymmetry. Psychol Rev 113: 132-147.
156. White PA (2006b) The role of activity in visual impressions of causality. Acta Psychol 123: 166-185.
157. White PA (2007) Impressions of force in visual perception of collision events: a test of the causal asymmetry hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev 14: 647-652.
158. White PA (2009a) Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. Psychol Rev 116: 580-601.
159. White PA (2009b) Property transmission: an explanatory account of the role of similarity information in causal inference. Psychol Bull 135: 774-793.
160. White PA (2011a) Judgments about forces in described interaction between objects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 37: 979-993.
161. White PA (2011b) Visual impression of forces between objects: entraining, enforced disintegration, and shattering. Vis Cogn 19: 635-674.
162. White PA (2011c) Visual impressions of force exerted by one object on another when the objects do not come into contact. Vis Cogn 19: 340-366.
163. White PA (2012a) The experience of force: the role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments. Psychol Bull 138: 589-615.
164. White PA (2012b) Perceptual impressions and mental simulations of force: reply to Hubbard (2012). Psychol Bull 138: 624-627.
165. White PA, Milne A (1997) Phenomenal causality: impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. Am J Psychol 110: 573-602.
166. Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9: 625-636.
167. Wolff P (2007) Representing causation. J Exp Psychol Gen 136: 82-111.
168. Wolff P (2008) Dynamics and the perception of causal events. In: Shipley T, Zacks J (eds) Understanding events: how humans see, represent, and act on events. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 555-587.
169. Yela M (1952) Phenomenal causation at a distance. Quart J Exp Psychol 4: 139-154.
170. Young ME (1995) On the origin of personal causal theories. Psychon Bull Rev 2: 83-104.
171. Young ME, Falmier O (2008) Launching at a distance: the effect of spatial markers. Quart J Exp Psychol 61: 1356-1370.
172. Young ME, Sutherland S (2009) The spatiotemporal distinctiveness of direct causation. Psychon Bull Rev 16: 729-735.
173. Young ME, Rogers ET, Beckmann JS (2005) Causal impression: predicting when, not just whether. Mem Cogn 33: 320-331.
174. Young ME, Beckmann JS, Wasserman EA (2006) Pigeons' discrimination of Michotte's launching effect. J Exp Anal Behav 86: 223-237.
175. Zhou J, Huang X, Jin X, Liang J, Shui R, Shen M (in press) Perceived causalities of physical events are influenced by social cues. J Exp Psychol Hum Perc Perform.