Impressions of force in visual perception of collision events: A test of the causal asymmetry hypothesis

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 647-652

  White, Peter A ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348899680     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196815     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. DISESSA, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 37-75.
2. GORDON, I. E., DAY, R. H., & STECHER, E. J. (1990). Perceived causality occurs with stroboscopic movement of one or both stimulus elements. Perception, 19, 17-20.
3. MICHOTTE, A. (1946). La perception de la causalité . Louvain: Institut Supérior de Philosophie.
4. MICHOTTE, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
5. NATSOULAS, T. (1961). Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 394-402.
6. SCHLOTTMANN, A., RAY, E., DEMETRIOU, N., & MITCHELL, A. (2006). Perceived social and physical causality in animated motions: Spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychologica, 123, 112-143.
7. SCHOLL, B. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2002). Causal capture: contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 13, 493-498.
8. SCHOLL, B. J., & TREMOULET, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299-309.
9. TALMY, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language. Cognitive Science, 12, 49-100.
10. WHITE, P. A. (2006). The causal asymmetry. Psychological Review, 113, 132-147.
11. WHITE, P. A., & MILNE, A. (1997). Phenomenal causality: Impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 573-602.
12. WOLFF, P., & SONG, G. (2003). Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 276-332.