The experience of force: The role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 138, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 589-615

  White, Peter A ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Force perception; Haptics; Mental simulation; Perceived object motion; Representational momentum

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; GRAVITY; HUMAN; MECHANORECEPTOR; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; TOUCH; VISION;

BIOMECHANICS; CONCEPT FORMATION; FORM PERCEPTION; GRAVITATION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MECHANORECEPTORS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTOR SKILLS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TOUCH; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84867307398     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025587     Document Type: Article

References (200)

1. Arnheim, R. (1956). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. London, England: Faber & Faber.
2. Augurelle, A.-S., Smith, A. M., Lejeune, T., & Thonnard, J.-L. (2003). Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 665-671. doi:10.1152/jn.00249.2002
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
4. Biro, S., & Leslie, A. M. (2007). Infants' perception of goal-directed actions: Development through cue-based bootstrapping. Developmental Science, 10, 379-398. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00544.x
5. Blake, R., & Shiffrar, M. (2007). Perception of human motion. Annual Blakemore, S.-J. (2003). Deluding the motor system. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 647-655. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2003.07.001
6. Blakemore, S.-J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561-567.
7. Blakemore, S.-J., Frith, C. D., & Wolpert, D. M. (1999). Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 551-559. doi:10.1162/089892999563607
8. Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 237-242. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01907-1
9. Bleyenheuft, Y., Lefevre, P., & Thonnard, J. L. (2009). Predictive mechanisms control grip force after impact in self-triggered perturbations. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41, 411-417. doi:10.3200/35-08-084
10. Bosbach, S., Cole, J., Prinz, W., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Inferring another's expectation from action: The role of peripheral sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1295-1297. doi:10.1038/nn1535
11. Bushnell, E. W., & Boudreau, J. P. (1993). Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Development, 64, 1005-1021. doi: 10.2307/1131323
12. Carello, C., Fitzpatrick, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1992). Haptic probing: Perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of the surface probed. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 51, 580-598. doi:10.3758/ BF03211655
13. Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). Physics and psychology of the muscle sense. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 25-28. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301007.x
14. Carson, R. G., Riek, S., & Shahbazpour, N. (2002). Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions. Journal of Physiology, 539, 913-925. doi:10.1113/ jphysiol.2001.013385
15. Casile, A., & Gliese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, 69-74. doi:10.1016/ j.cub.2005.10.071
16. Cicchino, J. B., & Rakison, D. H. (2008). Producing and processing self-propelled motion in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1232-1241. doi:10.1037/a0012619
17. Cohen, A. L. (2006). Contribution of invariants, heuristics, and exemplars to the perception of relative mass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 574-598. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.574
18. Cole, J. D., & Sedgwick, E. M. (1992). The perceptions of force and of movement in a man without large myelinated sensory afferents below the neck. Journal of Physiology, 449, 503-515.
19. Coopersmith, J. (2010). Energy, the subtle concept: The discovery of Feynman's blocks from Leibniz to Einstein. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20. Craig, J. C. (1999). Somesthesis. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 305-331. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.305
21. Csibra, G. (2008). Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition, 107, 705-717. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.001
22. Decety, J. (2002). Is there such a thing as functional equivalence between imagined, observed, and executed action? In A. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 291-310). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489969.017
23. Decety, J., & Grezès, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4-14. doi:10.1016/ j.brainres.2005.12.115
24. de Graaf, J. B., Galléa, C., Pailhous, J., Anton, J.-L., Roth, M., & Bonnard, M. (2004). Awareness of muscular force during movement production: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21, 1357-1367. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.009
25. Delevoye-Turrell, Y. N., Li, F.-X., & Wing, A. M. (2003). Efficiency of grip force adjustments for impulsive loading during imposed and actively produced collisions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56, 1113-1128. doi:10.1080/02724980245000025
26. Desmurget, M., & Sirigu, A. (2009). A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 411-419. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.001
27. de'Sperati, C., & Viviani, P. (1997). The relationship between curvature and velocity in two-dimensional smooth pursuit eye movements. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 3932-3945.
28. Dijkerman, H. C., & de Haan, E. H. F. (2007). Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 189-201. doi:10.1017/S0140525X07001392
29. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics [Special issue]. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225.
30. Dittrich, W. H., & Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception, 23, 253-268. doi:10.1068/p230253
31. Dolgov, I., Birchfield, D. A., McBeath, M. K., Thornburg, H., & Todd, C. G. (2009). Amelioration of axis-aligned motion bias for active versus stationary judgments of bilaterally symmetric moving shapes' final destinations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 523-529. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.523
32. Dolgov, I., McBeath, M. K., & Sugar, T. (2009). Evidence for axis-aligned motion bias: Football axis-trajectory misalignment causes systematic error in projected final destinations of thrown American footballs. Perception, 38, 399-410. doi:10.1068/p6114
33. Finke, R. A., Freyd, J. J., & Shyi, G. C.-W. (1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 175-188. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.175
34. Flach, R., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2004). The two-thirds power law in motion perception. Visual Cognition, 11, 461-481. doi:10.1080/ 13506280344000392
35. Flanagan, J. R., & Wing, A. M. (1997). The role of internal models in planning and control: Evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1519-1528.
36. Follows, M. (2010, June). [Reply to question posted on The Last Word web page]. New Scientist. Retrieved from http://www.last-word.com/content_handling/show_tree/tree_id/1962.html
37. Fourneret, P., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1133-1140. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00006-2
38. Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94, 427-438. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.427
39. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126-132. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.126
40. Freyd, J. J., & Jones, K. T. (1994). Representational momentum for a spiral path. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 968-976. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.968
41. Freyd, J. J., Pantzer, T. M., & Cheng, J. L. (1988). Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 395-407. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.395
42. Frith, C. (2002). Attention to action and awareness of other minds. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 481-487. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(02) 00022-3
43. Futterweit, L. R., & Beilin, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 163-179. doi:10.1006/jecp.1994.1008
44. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 384-409. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1409
45. Gallagher, S., & Cole, J. D. (1995). Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16, 369-390.
46. Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992). Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 614-632.
47. Gelfan, S., & Carter, S. (1967). Muscle sense in man. Experimental Neurology, 18, 469-473. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(67)90064-7
48. Gelli, F., Del Santo, R., Mazzocchio, R., & Rossi, A. (2005). Force estimation processing as a function of the input-output relationship of the corticospinal pathway in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1127-1134. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04287.x
49. Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79-106. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1401_5
50. Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150-184). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
51. Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-491. doi:10.1037/h0046962
52. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
53. Gilden, D. L. (1991). On the origins of dynamical awareness. Psychological Review, 98, 554-568.
54. Gilden, D. L., & Proffitt, D. R. (1989). Understanding collision dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 372-383.
55. Goodwin, G. M., McCloskey, D. I., & Matthews, P. B. (1972). The contribution of muscle afferents to kinesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralyzing joint afferents. Brain, 95, 705-748. doi:10.1093/brain/95.4.705
56. Gordon, A. M., Forssberg, H., Johansson, R. S., & Westling, G. (1991). Integration of sensory information during the programming of precision grip: Comments on the contribution of size cues. Experimental Brain Research, 85, 226-229. doi:10.1007/BF00230004
57. Gordon, I. E., Day, R. H., & Stecher, E. J. (1990). Perceived causality occurs with stroboscopic movement of one or both stimulus elements. Perception, 19, 17-20. doi:10.1068/p190017
58. Greco, C. C., Rovee-Collier, C., Hayne, P., Griesler, P., & Earley, L. (1986). Ontogeny of early event memory: I. Forgetting and retrieval by 2- and 3-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 9, 441-460. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(86)90017-2
59. Green, S., Grierson, L. E. M., Dubrowski, A., & Carnahan, H. (2010). Motor adaptation and manual transfer: Insight into the persistent nature of sensorimotor representations. Brain and Cognition, 72, 385-393. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.11.006
60. Guski, R., & Troje, N. F. (2003). Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 65, 789-800.
61. Haggard, P. (2005). Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 290-295. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.012
62. Hahn, U., Prat-Sala, M., Pothos, E. M., & Brumby, D. P. (2010). Exemplar similarity and rule application. Cognition, 114, 1-18. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2009.08.011
63. Hamilton, A., Wolpert, D., & Frith, U. (2004). Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology, 14, 493-498. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007
64. Hecht, H. (1996). Heuristics and invariants in dynamic event perception: Immunized concepts or nonstatements? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 61-70.
65. Hecht, H. (2001a). Regularities of the physical world and the absence of their internalization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 608-617. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000036
66. Hecht, H. (2001b). Universal internalization or pluralistic micro-theories? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 749-755. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X0175008X
67. Hecht, H., & Bertamini, M. (2000). Understanding projectile acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 730-746. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.730
68. Hecht, H., Vogt, S., & Prinz, W. (2001). Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: A case for action-perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, 3-14. doi:10.1007/s004260000043
69. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-249. doi: 10.2307/1416950
70. Heptulla Chatterjee, S., Freyd, J., & Shiffrar, M. (1996). Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 916-929. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.916
71. Hermsdörfer, J., & Blankenfeld, H. (2008). Grip force control of predictable external loads. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 719-728. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1195-6
72. Hernandez-Reif, M., Field, T., Diego, M., & Largie, S. (2001). Weight perception by newborns of depressed versus non-depressed mothers. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 305-316. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00081-9
73. Hilton, D. J., McClure, J., & Sutton, R. M. (2010). Selecting explanations from causal chains: Do statistical principles explain preferences for voluntary causes? European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 383-400. doi:10.1002/ejsp.623
74. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411
75. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X01000103
76. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851. doi:10.3758/BF03196775
77. Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Bridging the gap: Possible roles and contributions of representational momentum. Psicológica, 27, 1-34.
78. Hubbard, T. L., Blessum, J. A., & Ruppel, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's (1946/1963) "launching effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 294-301. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.294
79. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2002). A possible role of naïve impetus in Michotte's "launching effect" evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 153-176. doi:10.1080/13506280143000377
80. Huber, S., & Krist, H. (2004). When is the ball going to hit the ground? Duration estimates, eye movements, and mental imagery of object motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 431-444. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.431
81. Ingram, J. N., Howard, I. S., Flanagan, J. R., & Wolpert, D. M. (2010). Multiple grasp-specific representations of tool dynamics mediate skillful manipulation. Current Biology, 20, 618-623. doi:10.1016/ j.cub.2010.01.054
82. Ivanenko, Y. P., Grasso, R., Macellari, V., & Lacquaniti, F. (2002). Two-thirds power law in human locomotion: Role of ground contact forces. NeuroReport, 13, 1171-1174. doi:10.1097/00001756-200207020-00020
83. Johansson, R. S., & Flanagan, J. R. (2009). Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 345-359. doi:10.1038/nrn2621
84. Jolicoeur, P., & Cavanagh, P. (1992). Mental rotation, physical rotation, and surface media. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 371-384. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18 .2.371
85. Jones, L. A., & Piateski, E. (2006). Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 298-302. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0259-8
86. Jordan, J. S., & Hunsinger, M. (2008). Learned patterns of action-effect anticipation contribute to the spatial displacement of continuously moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 113-124. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.113
87. Jouen, F., & Molina, M. (2005). Exploration of the newborn's manual activity: A window into early cognitive processes. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 227-239. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.05.001
88. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
89. Kanizsa, G., & Vicario, G. (1968). La percezione della reazione intenzionale [The perception of intentional reaction]. In G. Kanizsa & G. Vicario (Eds.), Ricerche Sperimentali sulla Percezione (pp. 71-126). Trieste, Italy: University of Trieste Press.
90. Kingma, I., van de Langenberg, R., & Beek, P. J. (2004). Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 346-354. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.30.2.346
91. Knoblich, G., Seigerschmidt, E., Flach, R., & Prinz, W. (2002). Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 55, 1027-1046. doi:10.1080/ 02724980143000631
92. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439-453. doi:10.3758/ BF03196179
93. Lacquaniti, F., & Maioli, C. (1989). The role of preparation in timing anticipatory and reflex responses during catching. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 134-148.
94. Lacquaniti, F., Terzuolo, C., & Viviani, P. (1983). The law relating kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 115-130. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(83)90027-6
95. Lafargue, G., Paillard, J., Lamarre, Y., & Sirigu, A. (2003). Production and perception of grip force without proprioception: Is there a sense of effort in deafferented subjects? European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 2741-2749. doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02700.x
96. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1993). Extracting object properties through haptic exploration. Acta Psychologica, 84, 29-40. doi:10.1016/ 0001-6918(93)90070-8
97. Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., Abramowicz, R., Salsman, K., Kitada, R., & Hamilton, C. (2007). Haptic recognition of static and dynamic expressions of emotion in the live face. Psychological Science, 18, 158-164. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01866.x
98. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of the visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459. doi: 10.1068/p050437
99. Lee, D. N. (1998). Guiding movement by coupling taus. Ecological Psychology, 10, 221-250. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco103&4_4
100. Leslie, A. M. (1994). 5-ToMM, ToBy, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. Hirschfield & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119-148). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511752902.006
101. Leslie, A. M. (1995). A theory of agency. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 121-149). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
102. Leslie, A. M., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265-288. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(87) 80006-9
103. Leyton, M. (1992). Symmetry, causality, mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
104. Lindemann, O., & Bekkering, H. (2009). Object manipulation and motion perception: Evidence of an influence of action planning on visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1062-1071. doi:10.1037/a0015023
105. Luo, Y., Kaufman, L., & Baillargeon, R. (2009). Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 441-486. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.11.001
106. Matthews, P. B. C. (1982). Where does Sherrington's "muscular sense" originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 5, 189-218. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.05.030182.001201
107. McBeath, M. K., Morikawa, K., & Kaiser, M. K. (1992). Perceptual bias for forward-facing motion. Psychological Science, 3, 362-367. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00048.x
108. McCloskey, D. L., Ebeling, P., & Goodwin, G. M. (1974). Estimation of weights and tensions and apparent involvement of a "sense of effort." Experimental Neurology, 42, 220-232.
109. McCloskey, M. (1983, April). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248, 122-130. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0483-122
110. McClure, J., Hilton, D. J., & Sutton, R. M. (2007). Judgments of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: Probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 879-901. doi:10.1002/ejsp.394
111. Michaels, C. F., & De Vries, M. M. (1998). Higher and lower order variables in the visual perception of relative pulling force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 526-546. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.526
112. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
113. Molina, M., & Jouen, F. (2004). Manual cyclical activity as an exploratory tool in neonates. Infant Behavior and Development, 27, 42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.05.003
114. Monzée, J., Lamarre, Y., & Smith, A. M. (2003). The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 672-683. doi:10.1152/jn.00434.2001
115. Morewedge, C. K., Preston, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1-11. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.1
116. Morikawa, K. (1999). Symmetry and elongation of objects influence perceived direction of translational motion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 61, 134-143. doi:10.3758/BF03211954
117. Munger, M. P., Solberg, J. L., & Horrocks, K. K. (1999). The relationship between mental rotation and representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1557-1568. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1557
118. Natsoulas, T. (1961). Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. The American Journal of Psychology, 74, 394-402. doi:10.2307/1419745
119. Newman, G. E., Choi, H., Wynn, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2008). The origins of causal perception: Evidence from postdictive processing in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 262-291. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008 .02.003
120. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 54-65. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.54
121. Nowak, D. A., Glasauer, S., & Hermsdörfer, J. (2004). How predictive is grip force control in the complete absence of somatosensory feedback? Brain, 127, 182-192. doi:10.1093/brain/awh016
122. Oberle, C. D., McBeath, M. K., Madigan, S. C., & Sugar, T. G. (2005). The Galileo bias: A naive conceptual belief that influences people's perceptions and performance in a ball-dropping task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 643-653. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.643
123. P. A., & Milne, A. (1997). Phenomenal causality: Impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. The American Journal of Psychology, 110, 573-602. doi:10.2307/1423411
124. Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., & Stapley, P. (1998). Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man. Neuroscience Letters, 253, 103-106. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00604-1
125. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinetic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730. doi:10.1037/ 0096-1523.20.4.709
126. Pozzo, T., Papaxanthis, C., Petit, J. L., Schweighofer, N., & Stucchi, N. (2006). Kinematic features of movement tunes perception and action coupling. Behavioural Brain Research, 169, 75-82. doi:10.1016/ j.bbr.2005.12.005
127. Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110-122. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x
128. Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428. doi: 10.3758/BF03210980
129. Proffitt, D. R., Creem, S. H., & Zosh, W. D. (2001). Seeing mountains in molehills: Geographical-slant perception. Psychological Science, 12, 418-423. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00377
130. Rakison, D. H. (2005). A secret agent? How infants learn about the identity of objects in a causal scene. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 271-296. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.005
131. Rakison, D. H. (2006). Making the first move: How infants learn about self-propelled objects. Developmental Psychology, 42, 900-912. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.900
132. Rakison, D. H., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2001). Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 209-228. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209
133. Rakison, D. H., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2002). You go this way and I'll go that way: Developmental changes in infants' detection of correlations among static and dynamic features in motion events. Child Development, 73, 682-699. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00432
134. Rochat, P. (1987). Mouthing and grasping in neonates: Evidence for the early detection of what hard or soft substances afford for action. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 435-449. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(87)90041-5
135. Rochat, P., Morgan, R., & Carpenter, M. (1997). Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cognitive Development, 12, 537-561. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90022-8
136. Roland, P. E., & Ladegaard-Pederson, H. (1977). A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man: Evidence for a peripherally operating muscular sense and for a sense of effort. Brain, 100, 671-692. doi:10.1093/brain/100.4.671
137. Rothwell, J. C., Traub, M. M., Day, B. L., Obeso, J. L., Thomas, P. K., & Marsden, C. D. (1982). Manual motor performance in a deafferented man. Brain, 105, 515-542. doi:10.1093/brain/105.3.515
138. Rovee-Collier, C. (1990). The "memory system" of prelinguistic infants. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 608, 517-542. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48908.x
139. Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity-Not perceived as such. Psychological Research, 37, 3-23. doi:10.1007/BF00309076
140. Runeson, S. (1975). Visual prediction of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 18, 261-266. doi:10.3758/BF03199372
141. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733-740. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.733
142. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.585
143. Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525-555. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.525
144. Runeson, S., & Vedeler, D. (1993). The indispensability of precollision kinematics in the visual perception of relative mass. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 53, 617-632. doi:10.3758/BF03211738
145. Sack, A. T., Lindner, M., & Linden, D. E. J. (2007). Objectand directionspecific interference between manual and mental rotation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 69, 1435-1449. doi:10.3758/BF03192958
146. Sann, C., & Streri, A. (2008). The limits of newborns' grasping to detect texture in a cross-modal transfer task. Infant Behavior and Development, 31, 523-531. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.03.001
147. Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Carey, S. (2005). Secret agents: Inferences about hidden causes by 10 and 12-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 995-1001. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01649.x
148. Saxe, R., Tzelnic, T., & Carey, S. (2007). Knowing who dunnit: Infants identify the causal agent in an unseen causal interaction. Developmental Psychology, 43, 149-158. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.149
149. Schlottmann, A., Ray, E., Mitchell, A., & Demetriou, N. (2006). Perceived social and physical causality in animated motions: Spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychologica, 123, 112-143. doi:10.1016/ j.actpsy.2006.05.006
150. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299-309. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01506-0
151. Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: Action induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 349-355. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.005
152. Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Physical imagery: Kinematic versus dynamic models. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 433-464. doi:10.1006/ cogp.1998.0702
153. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, T. (1999). Inferences through imagined actions: Knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 116-136. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.116
154. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.4.417
155. Shepard, R. N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 2-28. doi:10.3758/ BF03200759
156. Shepard, R. N. (2001). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 581-601. doi:10.1017/ S0140525X01000012
157. Shiffrar, M., & Freyd, J. (1990). Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, 257-264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990 .tb00210.x
158. Shim, J., Carlton, L. G., & Kim, J. (2004). Estimation of lifted weight and produced effort through perception of point-light display. Perception, 33, 277-291. doi:10.1068/p3434
159. Simion, F., Regolin, L., & Bulf, H. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 809-813. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707021105
160. Simon, A. M., & Ferris, D. P. (2008). Lower limb force production and bilateral force asymmetries are based on sense of effort. Experimental Brain Research, 187, 129-138. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1288-x
161. Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404-427. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.404
162. Solomon, H. Y., Turvey, M. T., & Burton, G. (1989). Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: Haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 58-68. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.1.58
163. Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions. Cognition, 96, B1-B11. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.004
164. Southgate, V., Johnson, M. H., & Csibra, G. (2008). Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actions. Cognition, 107, 1059-1069. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.002
165. Spelke, E. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431-445. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90039-6
166. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605-632. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.605
167. Spelke, E. S., Phillips, A., & Woodward, A. L. (1995). Infants' knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44-78). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
168. Streri, A., & Féron, J. (2005). The development of haptic abilities in very young infants: From perception to cognition. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 290-304. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.05.004
169. Streri, A., & Gentaz, E. (2003). Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes in human newborns. Somatosensory & Motor Research, 20, 13-18. doi:10.1080/0899022031000083799
170. Streri, A., & Gentaz, E. (2004). Cross-modal recognition of shape from hand to eyes and handedness in human newborns. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1365-1369. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.012
171. Streri, A., Spelke, E., & Rameix, E. (1993). Modality-specific and amodal aspects of object perception in infancy: The case of active touch. Cognition, 47, 251-279. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90051-V
172. Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49-100. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
173. Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development: A new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50, 79-95. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.2.79
174. Thelen, E., & Fisher, D. M. (1982). Newborn stepping: An explanation for a "disappearing reflex." Developmental Psychology, 18, 760-775. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.18.5.760
175. Thelen, E., & Fisher, D. M. (1983). The organization of spontaneous leg movements in newborn infants. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 353-377.
176. Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(1, Serial No. 223).
177. Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943-951. doi:10.1068/p3101
178. Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2006). The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 68, 1047-1058. doi: 10.3758/BF03193364
179. Turrell, Y. N., Li, F.-X., & Wing, A. M. (1999). Grip force dynamics in the approach to a collision. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 86-91. doi:10.1007/s002210050822
180. Turvey, M. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134-1152. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1134
181. Van Doren, C. L. (1998). Differential effects of load stiffness on matching pinch force, finger span, and effort. Experimental Brain Research, 120, 487-495. doi:10.1007/s002210050422
182. Vieilledent, S., Kerlirzin, Y., Dalbera, S., & Berthoz, A. (2001). Relationahip between velocity and curvature of a human locomotor trajectory. Neuroscience Letters, 305, 65-69. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01798-0
183. Viviani, P., Baud-Bovy, G., & Redolfi, M. (1997). Perceiving and tracking kinesthetic stimuli: Further evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1232-1252. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1232
184. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1989). The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 46, 266-274. doi:10.3758/BF03208089
185. Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992). Biological movements look constant: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 603-623. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.3.603
186. Viviani, P., & Terzuolo, C. (1982). Trajectory determines movement dynamics. Neuroscience, 7, 431-437. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(82) 90277-9
187. White, P. A. (2006). The causal asymmetry. Psychological Review, 113, 132-147. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.132
188. White, P. A. (2007). Impressions of force in visual perception of collision events: A test of the causal asymmetry hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 647-652. doi:10.3758/BF03196815
189. White, P. A. (2009). Perception of forces exerted by objects in collision events. Psychological Review, 116, 580-601. doi:10.1037/a0016337
190. White, P. A. (2011a). Visual impressions of forces between objects: Entraining, enforced disintegration, and shattering. Visual Cognition, 19, 635-674. doi:10.1080/13506285.2011.575898
191. White, P. A. (2011b). Visual impressions of pushing and pulling: The object perceived as causal is not always the one that moves first. Manuscript submitted for publication.
192. White, P. A. (2011). Judgments about forces in described interactions between objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 979-993.
193. White, P. A., & Milne, A. (1999). Impressions of enforced disintegration and bursting in the visual perception of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 499-516. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.499
194. Wohlschläger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40, 925-930. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00239-4
195. Wohlschläger, A., & Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397-412. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.2.397
196. Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82-111. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82
197. Wolff, P., & Song, G. (2003). Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 276-332. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00036-7
198. Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, R729-R732. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00432-8
199. Yela, M. (1952). Phenomenal causation at a distance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 139-154. doi:10.1080/ 17470215208416612
200. Zago, M., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). Cognitive, perceptual and action oriented representations of falling objects. Neuropsychologia, 43, 178-188. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.005