The force of appearance: Gamma movement, naïve impetus, and representational momentum

Psicologica

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 209-228

  Hubbard, Timothy L ^a   Ruppel, Susan E ^b   Courtney, Jon R ^a  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FRANCIS MARION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 14544280221     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Bartley, S. H., & Wilkinson, F. R. (1953). Some factors in the production of gamma movement. Journal of Psychology, 36, 201-206.
2. Bingham, G. P. (1987). Kinematic form and scaling: Further investigations on the visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 155-177.
3. Cooke, N. J., & Breedin, S. D. (1994). Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly. Memory & Cognition, 22, 474-493.
4. Finke, R. A., Freyd, J. J., & Shyi, G. C. W. (1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 175-188.
5. Freyd, J. J., Pantzer, T. M., & Cheng, J. L. (1988). Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 395-407.
6. Gilden, D. L. (1991). On the origins of dynamical awareness. Psychological Review, 98, 554-568.
7. Gilden, D. L., & Proffitt, D. R. (1989). Understanding collision dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 372-383.
8. Harrower, M. R. (1929). Some experiments on the nature of gamma movement. Psychologische Forschung, 13, 55-63.
9. Hayes, A. E., & Freyd, J. J. (2002). Representational momentum when attention is divided. Visual Cognition, 9, 8-27.
10. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309.
11. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
12. Hubbard, T. L. (1997). Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1484-1493.
13. Hubbard, T. L. (2004). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Hubbard, T. L., Blessum, J. A., & Ruppel, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's (1946/1963) "Launching Effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 294-301.
15. Hubbard, T. L., & Favretto, A. (2003). Naive impetus and Michotte's "Tool Effect:" Evidence from representational momentum. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 67, 134-152.
16. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (1999). Representational momentum and landmark attraction effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 242-256.
17. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2000). Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 64, 41-55.
18. Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2002). A possible role of naive impetus in Michotte's "Launching Effect:" Evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 153-176.
19. Kerzel, D. (2003). Attention maintains mental extrapolation of target position: Irrelevant distractors eliminate forward displacement after implied motion. Cognition, 88, 109-131.
20. Kerzel, D., Jordan, J. S., & Müsseler, J. (2001). The role of perception in the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 829-840.
21. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 439-453.
22. McBeath, M. K., & Shepard, R. N. (1989). Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 333-337.
23. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (pp. 299-324).
24. McCloskey, M., & Kohl, D. (1983). Naive physics: The curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 146-156.
25. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality (T. R. Miles & E. Miles, Trans.). New York: Basic Books, (original work published 1946).
26. Proffitt, D. R., & Gilden, D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 384-393.
27. Reed, C. L., & Vinson, N. G. (1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 839-850.
28. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 585-615.
29. Shepard, R. N., & Zare, S. L. (1983). Path-guided apparent motion. Science, 220, 632-634.
30. Thinès, G., Costall, A., & Butterworth, G. (Eds.). (1991). Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Thornton, I. M., & Hubbard, T. L. (Eds.). (2002). Representational momentum: New findings, new directions. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
32. Valenti, S. S., & Costall, A. (1997). Visual perception of lifted weight from kinematic and static (photographic) displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 181-198.
33. Winters, J. J. (1964). Gamma movement: Apparent movement in figural aftereffects experiments. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 819-822.