Visual causal impressions in the perception of several moving objects

Visual Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 395-404

  White, Peter A ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 14944376882     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000436     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Dittrich, W. H., & Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Visual perception of intentional motion. Perception, 23, 253-268.
2. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
3. Natsoulas, T. (1961). Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 394-402.
4. Scholl, B., & Nakayama, K. (2002). Causal capture: Contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 13, 493-498.
5. Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, P. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 299-309.
6. White, P. A., & Milne, A. (1997). Phenomenal causality: Impressions of pulling in the visual perception of objects in motion. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 573-602.
7. White, P. A., & Milne, A. (1999). Impressions of enforced disintegration and bursting in the visual perception of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 499-516.
8. White, P. A., & Milne, A. (2003). Visual impressions of penetration in the perception of objects in motion. Visual Cognition, 10, 605-619.
9. Yela, M. (1952). Phenomenal causation at a distance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 139-154.