Combined effects of mass and velocity on forward displacement and phenomenological ratings: A functional measurement approach to the momentum metaphor

Psicologica

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 659-676

  de Sá Teixeira, Nuno ^a   Oliveira, Armando Mónica ^a   Amorim, Michel Ange ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149269082     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
3. Anderson, N. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
4. Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
5. Ashida, H. (2004). Action-specific extrapolation of target motion in human visual system. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1515-1524.
6. Cooper, L. A., & Munger, M. P. (1993). Extrapolating and remembering positions along cognitive trajectories: Uses and limitations of analogies to physical motion. In N. Eilan, R. McCarthy, & B. Brewer (Eds.), Spatial representations: Problems in philosophy and psychology (pp. 112-131). Cambridge, MA: Blackwells.
7. Daum, M. M., & Frick, A. (2003). Representational momentum in children and adults: A new approach using a touchscreen paradigm. Poster presented at the 8th Congress of the Swiss Society for Psychology (SGP/SSP), Bern, Switzerland, 14.-15. October 2003.
8. Finke, R.A., Freyd, J.J., & Shyi, G.C.-W. (1986) Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 175-188.
9. Freyd, J. J. (1983). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 575-581.
10. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 126-132.
11. Freyd, J. J., & Finke, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 443-446.
12. Freyd, J. J., & Johnson, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 259-268.
13. Freyd, J. J., Kelly, M. H., & DeKay, M. L. (1990). Representational momentum in memory for pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1107-1117.
14. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
15. Hayes, P. J. (1978) The naive physics manifesto. In D. Michie (Ed.), Expert Systems in the Micro-Electronic Age. Edinburgh University Press.
16. Hubbard, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309.
17. Hubbard, T. L. (1995). Cognitive representation of motion: Evidence for friction and gravity analogues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 241-254.
18. Hubbard, T. L. (1997). Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1484-1493.
19. Hubbard, T. L. (1998). Some effects of representational friction, target size, and memory averaging on memory for vertically moving targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 44-49.
20. Hubbard, T. L. (1999). How consequences of physical principles influence mental representation: The environmental invariants hypothesis. In P. R. Killeen & W. R. Uttal (Eds.). Fechner Day 99: The end of 20th century psychophysics. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Tempe, AZ, USA: The International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 274-279).
21. Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822-851.
22. Hubbard, T. L. (2006). Bridging the gap: Possible roles and contributions of representational momentum. Psicologica, 27, 1-34.
23. Hubbard, T. L. & Bharucha, J. J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211-221.
24. Hubbard, T. L., Blessum, J. A., & Ruppel, S. E. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's (1946/1963) Launching Effect paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 294-301.
25. Hubbard, T. L. & Ruppel, S. E. (2002). A possible role of naïve impetus in Michotte's Launching Effect: Evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 153-176.
26. Kerzel D. (2000). Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target. Vision Research, 40(27), 3703-3715.
27. Kerzel, D. (2003a). Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Research, 43(25), 2623-2635.
28. Kerzel, D. (2003b). Centripetal force draws the eyes, not memory of the target, toward the center. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 458-466.
29. Kerzel, D., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2003). Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Current Biology, 13(22), 1975-1978.
30. Kerzel, D., & Müsseler, J. (2008). Mental and sensorimotor extrapolation fare better than motion extrapolation in the offset condition [Commentary on Romi Nijhawan]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(2), 206-207.
31. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naive theories of motion. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (Eds.) Mental Models. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Michotte, A. (1954). La perception de la causalite (2nd Ed.). Anvers: Éditions Standaard-Boekhandel S. A.
33. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). The visual brain in action. In A. Nöe & E. Thompson (Eds.). Vision and Mind: Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception (pp. 515-529). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35. Munger, M. P. & Owens, T. R. (2004). Representational momentum and the flash-lag effect. Visual Cognition, 11, 81-103.
36. Reed, C. L., & Vinson, N. G. (1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 839-850.
37. Shepard, R. N. (1975). Form, formation, and transformation of internal representations. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition (pp. 87-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
39. Snowden, R. J. (1999). The bigger they are the slower they move: the effect of field size on speed discrimination. Perception 28 Supplement, 24-25.
40. Weiss, D. J. (2006). Analysis of variance and functional measurement. New York: Oxford University Press.