Spatial perception and control

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 54-59

  Jordan, J Scott ^a   Knoblich, Günther ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442548630     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206460     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BACHMANN, T. (1999). Twelve spatiotemporal phenomena and one explanation. In G. Aschersleben, J. Müsseler, & T. Bachmann (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 173-206). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
2. FINKE, R. A., FREYD, J. J., & SHYI, G. C. W. (1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 175-188.
3. FREYD, J. J., & FINKE, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 126-132.
4. FREYD, J. J., & FINKE, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23,443-446.
5. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
6. HUBBARD, T. L. (1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition, 18, 299-309.
7. HUBBARD, T. L. (1994). Judged displacement: A modular process? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 359-373.
8. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995a). Cognitive representation of motion: Evidence for friction and gravity analogues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 241-254.
9. HUBBARD, T. L. (1995b). Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 322-338.
10. HUBBARD, T. L. (1997). Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1484-1493.
11. HUBBARD, T. L. (1998). Some effects of representational friction, target size, and memory averaging on memory for vertically moving targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 44-49.
12. HUBBARD, T. L., & BHARUCHA, J. (1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 211-221.
13. HUBBARD, T. L., BLESSUM, J., & RUPPEL, S. (2001). Representational momentum and Michotte's "launching effect" paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 294-301.
14. HUBBARD, T. L., & MOTES, M. (2002). Does representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory? Cognition, 82, B89-B99.
15. HUBBARD, T. L., & RUPPEL, S. (1999). Representational momentum and the landmark attraction effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 242-256.
16. HUBBARD, T. L., & RUPPEL, S. (2000). Spatial memory averaging, the landmark attraction effect, and representational gravity. Psychological Research, 64, 41-55.
17. JORDAN, J. S., STORK, S., KNUF, L., KERZEL, D., & MÜSSELER, J. (2002). Action planning affects spatial localization. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention andperformance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 158-176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. KERZEL, D., JORDAN, J. S., & MÜSSELER, J. (2001). The role of perceptual anticipation in the localization of the final position of a moving target. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 829-840.
19. KLEIN, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
20. KNOBLICH, G., & JORDAN, J. S. (2003). Action coordination in groups and individuals: Learning anticipatory control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1006-1016.
21. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
22. NAGAI, M., & SAIKI, J. (2001, November). Direction of forward memory displacement is different from perceived motion direction. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
23. POSNER, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
24. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. REED, C., & VINSON, N. (1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 839-850.
26. RIZZOLATTI, G., RIGGIO, L., DASCOLA, I., & UMILTÀ, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
27. SCHNEIDER, W., & DEUBEL, H. (2002). Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 609-627). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. SENIOR, C., BARNES, J., GIAMPIETRO, V., SIMMONS, A., BULLMORE, E. T., BRAMMER, M., & DAVID, A. S. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or "representational momentum." Current Biology, 10, 16-22.
29. STORK, S., & MÜSSELER, J. (2001, November). Saccadic eye movements and mislocalizations of briefly presented stimuli. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
30. THORNTON, I. M. (2002). The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision, 15, 219-243.
31. VINSON, N., & REED, C. (2002). Sources of object-specific effects in representational momentum. Visual Cognition, 9, 41-65.
32. WOLFF, P. (1999). Space perception and intended action. In G. Aschersleben, J. Müsseler, & T. Bachmann (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 43-63). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.