An integrative network algorithm identifies age-associated differential methylation interactome hotspots targeting stem-cell differentiation pathways

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  West, James ^a,b   Beck, Stephan ^a   Wang, Xiangdong ^c   Teschendorff, Andrew E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGING; ALGORITHM; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL AGING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CYTOLOGY; DNA METHYLATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEM CELL;

AGE FACTORS; AGING; ALGORITHMS; CELL AGING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA METHYLATION; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84882454737     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep01630     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Jones, P. A. & Baylin, S. B. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 3, 415-428 (2002).
2. Feinberg, A. P., Ohlsson, R. & Henikoff, S. The epigenetic progenitor origin of human cancer. Nat Rev Genet 7, 21-33 (2006).
3. Christensen, B. C. et al. Aging and environmental exposures alter tissue-specific dna methylation dependent upon cpg island context. PLoS Genet 5, e1000602 (2009).
4. Maegawa, S. et al. Widespread and tissue specific age-related dna methylation changes in mice. Genome Res 20, 332-340 (2010).
5. Rakyan, V. K. et al. Human aging-associated dna hypermethylation occurs preferentially at bivalent chromatin domains. Genome Res 20, 434-439 (2010).
6. Teschendorff, A. et al. Age-dependent dna methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res 20, 440-446 (2010).
7. Heyn, H. et al. Distinct dna methylomes of newborns and centenarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109, 10522-10527 (2012).
8. Hannum, G. et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell (2012).
9. Balducci, L. & Ershler, W. B. Cancer and ageing: a nexus at several levels. Nat Rev Cancer 5, 655-662 (2005).
10. Hoeijmakers, J. H. Dna damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med 361, 1475-1485 (2009).
11. Subramanian, A. etal. Gene set enrichment analysis: aknowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 15545-15550 (2005).
12. Chuang, H. Y., Lee, E., Liu, Y. T., Lee, D. & Ideker, T. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol 3, 140 (2007).
13. Ulitsky, I. & Shamir, R. Identification of functional modules using network topology and high-throughput data. BMC Syst Biol 1, 8 (2007).
14. Beisser, D., Klau, G. W., Dandekar, T., Mller, T. & Dittrich, M. T. Bionet: an r-package for the functional analysis of biological networks. Bioinformatics 26, 1129-1130 (2010).
15. Bhardwaj, N. & Lu, H. Correlation between gene expression profiles and proteinprotein interactions within and across genomes. Bioinformatics 21, 2730-2738 (2005).
16. Bhardwaj, N. & Lu, H. Co-expression among constituents of a motif in the protein-protein interaction network. J Bioinform Comput Biol 7, 1-17 (2009).
17. Pujana, M. A. et al. Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. Nat Genet 39, 1338-1349 (2007).
18. Dittrich, M. T., Klau, G. W., Rosenwald, A., Dandekar, T. & Mller, T. Identifying functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks: an integrated exact approach. Bioinformatics 24, i223-i231 (2008).
19. Taylor, I. W. et al. Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome. Nat Biotechnol 27, 199-204 (2009).
20. Bandyopadhyay, S. et al. Rewiring of genetic networks in response todna damage. Science 330, 1385-1389 (2010).
21. Ulitsky, I., Krishnamurthy, A., Karp, R. M. & Shamir, R. Degas: de novo discovery of dys-regulated pathways in human diseases. PLoS One 5, e13367 (2010).
22. Schramm, G., Nandakumar, K. & Konig, R. Regulation patterns in signaling networks of cancer. BMC Syst Biol 4, 162 (2010).
23. Teschendorff, A. E. & Severini, S. Increased entropy of signal transduction in the cancer metastasis phenotype. BMC Syst Biol 4, 104 (2010).
24. Li, J. et al. Identification of high-quality cancer prognostic markers and metastasis network modules. Nat Commun 1, 34 (2010).
25. Califano, A. Rewiring makes the difference. Mol Syst Biol 7, 463 (2011).
26. Ideker, T. & Krogan, N. J. Differential network biology. Mol Syst Biol 8, 565 (2012).
27. Wang, J. et al. Noa: a novel network ontology analysis method. Nucleic Acids Res 39, e87 (2011).
28. Beisser, D. et al. Robustness and accuracy of functional modules in integrated network analysis. Bioinformatics 28, 1887-1894 (2012).
29. Backes, C. et al. An integer linear programming approach for finding deregulated subgraphs in regulatory networks. Nucleic Acids Res 40, e43 (2012).
30. Liu, H. et al. Prioritizing cancer-related genes with aberrant methylation based on a weighted protein-protein interaction network. BMC Syst Biol 5, 158 (2011).
31. TCGA. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 455, 1061-1068 (2008).
32. Bibikova, M. et al. 2009. Epigenomics 1, 177-200 (2009).
33. Irizarry, R. A. et al. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific cpg island shores. Nat Genet 41, 178-186 (2009).
34. Horvath, S. et al. Aging effects on dna methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue. Genome Biol 13, R97 (2012).
35. Lee, C. K., Weindruch, R. & Prolla, T. A. Gene-expression profile of the ageing brain in mice. Nat Genet 25, 294-297 (2000).
36. Fraser, H. B., Khaitovich, P., Plotkin, J. B., Pbo, S. & Eisen, M. B. Aging and gene expression in the primate brain. PLoS Biol 3, e274 (2005).
37. Zahn, J. M. et al. Agemap: a gene expression database for aging in mice. PLoS Genet 3, e201 (2007).
38. Magalhaes, J. P., Curado, J. & Church, G. M. Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging. Bioinformatics 25, 875-881 (2009).
39. Edwards, M. G. et al. Gene expression profiling of aging reveals activation of a p53-mediated transcriptional program. BMC Genomics 8, 80 (2007).
40. Cao, K., Chen-Plotkin, A. S., Plotkin, J. B. & Wang, L. S. Age-correlated gene expression in normal and neurodegenerative human brain tissues. PLoS One 5 (2010).
41. Harries, L. W. et al. Advancing age is associated with gene expression changes resembling mtor inhibition: evidence from two human populations. Mech Ageing Dev 133, 556-562 (2012).
42. Koch, C. M. & Wagner, W. Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging (Albany NY) 3, 1018-1027 (2011).
43. Bocklandt, S. et al. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE 6, e14821 (2011).
44. Cerami, E. G. et al. Pathway commons, aweb resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D685-D690 (2011).
45. Ideker, T., Ozier, O., Schwikowski, B. & Siegel, A. F. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 18, S233-S240 (2002).
46. Reichardt, J. & Bornholdt, S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys. Rev. E 74, 016110 (2006).
47. Nepusz, T., Yu, H. & Paccanaro, A. Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Methods 9, 471-472 (2012).
48. Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. & Moore, C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 70, 066111 (2004).
49. Newman, M. E. Modularity and community structureinnetworks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 8577-8582 (2006).
50. Teschendorff, A. E. et al. 1An epigenetic signature in peripheral blood predicts active ovarian cancer. PLoS One 4, e8274 (2009).
51. Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabsi, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41-42 (2001).
52. Jonsson, P. F. & Bates, P. A. Global topological features of cancer proteins in the human interactome. Bioinformatics 22, 2291-2297 (2006).
53. Palla, G., Derenyi, I., Farkas, I. & Vicsek, T. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435, 814-818 (2005).
54. Jonsson, P., Cavanna, T., Zicha, D. & Bates, P. Cluster analysis of networks generated through homology: automatic identification of important protein communities involved in cancer metastasis. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 2 (2006).
55. Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 301-313 (2006).
56. Palmer, C., Diehn, M., Alizadeh, A. A. & Brown, P. O. Cell-type specific gene expression profiles of leukocytes in human peripheral blood. BMC Genomics 7, 115 (2006).
57. Bork, S. et al. DNAmethylation pattern changes upon long-term culture and aging of human mesenchymal stromal cells. Aging cell 9, 54-63 (2010).
58. Bocker, M. T. et al. Genome-wide promoter dna methylation dynamics of human hematopoietic progenitor cells during differentiation and aging. Blood 117, e182-e189 (2011).
59. Staiger, C. et al. A critical evaluation of network and pathway-based classifiers for outcome prediction in breast cancer. PLoS One 7, e34796 (2012).
60. Winnefeld, M. & Lyko, F. The aging epigenome: Dna methylation from the cradle to the grave. Genome Biology 13, 165 (2012).
61. van den Boom, V. et al. UTF1 is a chromatin-associated protein involved in ES cell differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 178, 913-924 (2007).
62. Buganim, Y. et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell 150, 1209-22 (2012).
63. Miura, K. et al. Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Nat Biotechnol (2009).
64. Wang, B.etal. Reprogramming efficiency and qualityofinduced pluripotent stem cells (ipscs) generated from muscle-derived fibroblasts of mdx mice at different ages. PLoS Curr 3, RRN1274 (2011).
65. Brack, A. S. & Rando, T. A. Intrinsic changes and extrinsic influences of myogenic stem cell function during aging. Stem Cell Rev 3, 226-237 (2007).
66. Brack, A. S. et al. Increased wnt signaling during aging alters muscle stem cell fate and increases fibrosis. Science 317, 807-810 (2007).
67. Maiese, K., Li, F., Chong, Z. Z. & Shang, Y. C. The wnt signaling pathway: aging gracefully as a protectionist? Pharmacol Ther 118, 58-81 (2008).
68. Almeida, M., Han, L., Martin-Millan, M., O'Brien, C. A. & Manolagas, S. C. Oxidative stress antagonizes wnt signaling in osteoblast precursors by diverting beta-catenin from t cell factor- to forkhead box o-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem 282, 27298-27305 (2007).
69. Caldwell, G. M. et al. The wnt antagonist sfrp1 in colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 64, 883-888 (2004).
70. Caldwell, G. M. et al. The wnt antagonist sfrp1 is downregulated in premalignant large bowel adenomas. Br J Cancer 94, 922-927 (2006).
71. Chakrabarti, L., Bandyopadhyay, B. C. & Poddar, M. K. Is age-induced decline in immune response associated with hypothalamic glutamate receptor density and dietary protein? Nutr Neurosci 4, 375-387 (2001).
72. Magnusson, K. R. Influence of dietary restriction on ionotropic glutamate receptors during aging in c57b1 mice. Mech Ageing Dev 95, 187-202 (1997).
73. Belbin, O. et al. Investigation of 15 of the top candidate genes for late-onset alzheimer's disease. Hum Genet 129, 273-282 (2011).
74. Teschendorff, A. E., Journe, M., Absil, P. A., Sepulchre, R. & Caldas, C. Elucidating the altered transcriptional programs in breast cancer using independent component analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 3, e161 (2007).