Molecular basis of the essential s phase function of the rad53 checkpoint kinase

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 33, Issue 16, 2013, Pages 3202-3213

  Hoch, Nicolas C ^a,b   Chen, Eric S W ^c,d,e   Buckland, Robert ^f   Wang, Shun Chung ^c   Fazio, Alessandro ^a   Hammet, Andrew ^a   Pellicioli, Achille ^g   Chabes, Andrei ^f   Tsai, Ming Daw ^c,d,e   Heierhorsta, Jörg ^b  

^a ST VINCENT'S INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY   (Taiwan)

^d GENOMICS RESEARCH CENTER   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^f UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL FUNCTION; CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; DNA REPLICATION; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POINT MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA, FUNGAL; ENZYME ACTIVATION; GENE DELETION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MUTATION; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTEOLYSIS; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84881294257     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00474-13     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Branzei D, Foiani M. 2010. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:208-219.
2. Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J. 2008. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319:1352-1355.
3. Mirkin EV, Mirkin SM. 2007. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71:13-35.
4. Santocanale C, Diffley JF. 1998. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395:615- 618.
5. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, Muzi- Falconi M, Newlon CS, Foiani M. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412:557-561.
6. Segurado M, Diffley JF. 2008. Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev. 22:1816-1827.
7. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJ, Bousset K, Furuya K, Diffley JF, Carr AM, Elledge SJ. 2001. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:958-965.
8. Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17:1755-1767.
9. Sun Z, Hsiao J, Fay DS, Stern DF. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281: 272-274.
10. Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679-5688.
11. Chen SH, Smolka MB, Zhou H. 2007. Mechanism of Dun1 activation by Rad53 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 986-995.
12. Lee H, Yuan C, Hammet A, Mahajan A, Chen ES, Wu MR, Su MI, Heierhorst J, Tsai MD. 2008. Diphosphothreonine-specific interaction between an SQ/TQ cluster and an FHA domain in the Rad53-Dun1 kinase cascade. Mol. Cell 30:767-778.
13. Chabes A, Georgieva B, Domkin V, Zhao X, Rothstein R, Thelander L. 2003. Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. Cell 112:391-401.
14. Sabouri N, Viberg J, Goyal DK, Johansson E, Chabes A. 2008. Evidence for lesion bypass by yeast replicative DNA polymerases during DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res. 36:5660-5667.
15. Huang M, Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. 1998. The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor. Cell 94:595-605.
16. Lee YD, Wang J, Stubbe J, Elledge SJ. 2008. Dif1 is a DNA-damageregulated facilitator of nuclear import for ribonucleotide reductase. Mol. Cell 32:70-80.
17. Zhao X, Rothstein R. 2002. The Dun1 checkpoint kinase phosphorylates and regulates the ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:3746-3751.
18. Zheng P, Fay DS, Burton J, Xiao H, Pinkham JL, Stern DF. 1993. SPK1 is an essential S-phase-specific gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a nuclear serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 5829-5842.
19. Cha RS, Kleckner N. 2002. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297:602-606.
20. Zhao X, Muller EG, Rothstein R. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2:329-340.
21. Desany BA, Alcasabas AA, Bachant JB, Elledge SJ. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:2956-2970.
22. Zhou Z, Elledge SJ. 1993. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell 75:1119-1127.
23. Fasullo M, Tsaponina O, Sun M, Chabes A. 2010. Elevated dNTP levels suppress hyper-recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae S-phase checkpoint mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:1195-1203.
24. Erdeniz N, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R. 1997. Cloning-free PCR-based allele replacement methods. Genome Res. 7:1174-1183.
25. Pike BL, Hammet A, Heierhorst J. 2001. Role of the N-terminal forkhead- associated domain in the cell cycle checkpoint function of the Rad53 kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 276:14019-14026.
26. Hammet A, Pike BL, Heierhorst J. 2002. Posttranscriptional regulation of the RAD5 DNA repair gene by the Dun1 kinase and the Pan2-Pan3 poly(A)-nuclease complex contributes to survival of replication blocks. J. Biol. Chem. 277:22469-22474.
27. Pike BL, Yongkiettrakul S, Tsai MD, Heierhorst J. 2003. Diverse but overlapping functions of the two forkhead-associated (FHA) domains in Rad53 checkpoint kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:30421-30424.
28. Fiorani S, Mimun G, Caleca L, Piccini D, Pellicioli A. 2008. Characterization of the activation domain of the Rad53 checkpoint kinase. Cell Cycle 7:493-499.
29. Hammet A, Pike BL, Mitchelhill KI, Teh T, Kobe B, House CM, Kemp BE, Heierhorst J. 2000. FHA domain boundaries of the dun1p and rad53p cell cycle checkpoint kinases. FEBS Lett. 471:141-146.
30. Pike BL, Heierhorst J. 2007. Mdt1 facilitates efficient repair of blocked DNA double-strand breaks and recombinational maintenance of telomeres. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6532-6545.
31. Ide S, Kobayashi T. 2010. Analysis of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by two-dimensional and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 49:22.14.1-22.14.12. doi:10.1002 /0471143030.cb2214s49.
32. Brewer BJ, Fangman WL. 1987. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51:463-471.
33. Kumar D, Abdulovic AL, Viberg J, Nilsson AK, Kunkel TA, Chabes A. 2011. Mechanisms of mutagenesis in vivo due to imbalanced dNTP pools. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:1360-1371.
34. Cox J, Mann M. 2008. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26:1367-1372.
35. Bonilla CY, Melo JA, Toczyski DP. 2008. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol. Cell 30:267-276.
36. Granata M, Lazzaro F, Novarina D, Panigada D, Puddu F, Abreu CM, Kumar R, Grenon M, Lowndes NF, Plevani P, Muzi-Falconi M. 2010. Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001047. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001047.
37. Hammet A, Magill C, Heierhorst J, Jackson SP. 2007. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep. 8:851-857.
38. Szilard RK, Jacques PE, Laramee L, Cheng B, Galicia S, Bataille AR, Yeung M, Mendez M, Bergeron M, Robert F, Durocher D. 2010. Systematic identification of fragile sites via genome-wide location analysis of gamma-H2AX. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:299-305.
39. Kitada T, Schleker T, Sperling AS, Xie W, Gasser SM, Grunstein M. 2011. GammaH2A is a component of yeast heterochromatin required for telomere elongation. Cell Cycle 10:293-300.
40. Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H. 2007. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:10364-10369.
41. Lee SJ, Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Stern DF. 2003. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6300-6314.
42. Bashkirov VI, Bashkirova EV, Haghnazari E, Heyer WD. 2003. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1441-1452.
43. Zhao X, Chabes A, Domkin V, Thelander L, Rothstein R. 2001. The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 20:3544-3553.
44. Pellicioli A, Lucca C, Liberi G, Marini F, Lopes M, Plevani P, Romano A, Di Fiore PP, Foiani M. 1999. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18:6561-6572.
45. Basrai MA, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Hieter P. 1999. NORF5/HUG1 is a component of the MEC1-mediated checkpoint response toDNAdamage and replication arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7041-7049.
46. Fay DS, Sun Z, Stern DF. 1997. Mutations in SPK1/RAD53 that specifically abolish checkpoint but not growth-related functions. Curr. Genet. 31:97-105.
47. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. 2009. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8:1077-1088.
48. Tsaponina O, Barsoum E, Astrom SU, Chabes A. 2011. Ixr1 is required for the expression of the ribonucleotide reductase Rnr1 and maintenance of dNTP pools. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002061. doi:10.1371 /journal.pgen.1002061.
49. Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T. 1999. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18:3173-3185.
50. Deshpande AM, Newlon CS. 1996. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science 272:1030-1033.
51. Poli J, Tsaponina O, Crabbe L, Keszthelyi A, Pantesco V, Chabes A, Lengronne A, Pasero P. 2012. dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J. 31:883-894.
52. Holmberg C, Fleck O, Hansen HA, Liu C, Slaaby R, Carr AM, Nielsen O. 2005. Ddb1 controls genome stability and meiosis in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 19:853-862.
53. Cliby WA, Roberts CJ, Cimprich KA, Stringer CM, Lamb JR, Schreiber SL, Friend SH. 1998. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17:159-169.
54. Snyder RD. 1984. The role of deoxynucleoside triphosphate pools in the inhibition of DNA-excision repair and replication in human cells by hydroxyurea. Mutat. Res. 131:163-172.
55. D'Angiolella V, Donato V, Forrester FM, Jeong YT, Pellacani C, Kudo Y, Saraf A, Florens L, Washburn MP, Pagano M. 2012. Cyclin F-mediated degradation of ribonucleotide reductase M2 controls genome integrity and DNA repair. Cell 149:1023-1034.
56. Tanaka H, Arakawa H, Yamaguchi T, Shiraishi K, Fukuda S, Matsui K, Takei Y, Nakamura Y. 2000. A ribonucleotide reductase gene involved in a p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint for DNA damage. Nature 404:42- 49.
57. Bester AC, Roniger M, Oren YS, Im MM, Sarni D, Chaoat M, Bensimon A, Zamir G, Shewach DS, Kerem B. 2011. Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145: 435-446.