A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 21, 2013, Pages 8337-8344

  Brascamp, Jan ^a,b   Sohn, Hansem ^c   Lee, Sang Hun ^c   Blake, Randolph ^c,d  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambiguous stimuli; Binocular rivalry; Bistable perception; Flicker and swap rivalry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULUS RIVALRY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

AMBIGUOUS STIMULI; BINOCULAR RIVALRY; BISTABLE PERCEPTION; FLICKER-AND-SWAP RIVALRY;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84878161515     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305393110     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Blake R, Logothetis N (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(1): 13-21.
2. Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL (1996) What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380(6575): 621-624.
3. Wilson HR (2003) Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(24): 14499-14503.
4. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn Sci 10(11): 502-511.
5. Pearson J, Tadin D, Blake R (2007) The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry. J Vis 7(7):2.1-2.11.
6. Blakemore C, Campbell FW (1969) On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol 203(1): 237-260.
7. Vautin RG, Berkley MA (1977) Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: neural correlates of visual aftereffects. J Neurophysiol 40(5): 1051-1065.
8. Movshon JA, Lennie P (1979) Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature 278(5707): 850-852.
9. Blake R, He S (2005) Visual adaptation as a tool for studying the neural correlates of conscious visual awareness. Fitting the Mind to the World, eds Clifford C, Rhodes G (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp 281-307.
10. Blake R, Tadin D, Sobel KV, Raissian TA, Chong SC (2006) Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(12): 4783-4788.
11. Yang E, Hong S-W, Blake R (2010) Adaptation aftereffects to facial expressions suppressed from visual awareness. J Vis 10(12):24, 1-13.
12. Brascamp JW, van Boxtel JJ, Knapen TH, Blake R (2010) A dissociation of attention and awareness in phase-sensitive but not phase-insensitive visual channels. J Cogn Neurosci 22(10): 2326-2344.
13. Montaser-Kouhsari L, Moradi F, Zandvakili A, Esteky H (2004) Orientation-selective adaptation during motion-induced blindness. Perception 33(2): 249-254.
14. Blake R, Overton R, Lema-Stern S (1981) Interocular transfer of visual aftereffects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 7(2): 367-381.
15. Blake R, Overton R (1979) The site of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception 8(2): 143-152.
16. Wade NJ, de Weert CM (1986) Aftereffects in binocular rivalry. Perception 15(4): 419-434.
17. Kang M-S, Blake R (2010) What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry? Atten Percept Psychophys 72(1): 179-186.
18. Van Boxtel J, Alais D, Van Ee R (2008) Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. J Vis 8(5):17.1-17.10.
19. de Jong MC, Knapen T, van Ee R (2012) Opposite influence of perceptual memory on initial and prolonged perception of sensory ambiguity. PLoS ONE 7(1):e30595.
20. Noest AJ, van Wezel RJ (2012) Dynamics of temporally interleaved percept-choice sequences: Interaction via adaptation in shared neural populations. J Comput Neurosci 32(1): 177-195.
21. Carandini M, Heeger D (2011) Normalization as a canonical neural computation. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 1-12.
22. Baker DH, Meese TS, Summers RJ (2007) Psychophysical evidence for two routes to suppression before binocular summation of signals in human vision. Neuroscience 146(1): 435-448.
23. Bonds AB (1989) Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 2(1): 41-55.
24. Walker GA, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1998) Binocular cross-orientation suppression in the cat's striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 79(1): 227-239.
25. Moradi F, Heeger D (2009) Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex. J Vis 9(3):13.1-13.22.
26. Roeber U, Wong E, Freeman A (2008) Cross-orientation interactions in human vision. J Vis 8(3):15.1-15.11.
27. Blake R, Westendorf DH, Overton R (1980) What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception 9(2): 223-231.
28. Lee SH, Blake R (1999) Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res 39(8): 1447-1454.
29. Ding J, Sperling G (2006) A gain-control theory of binocular combination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(4): 1141-1146.
30. Van Boxtel J, Knapen T, Erkelens C, Van Ee R (2008b) Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries. J Vis 8(15):13.1-13.17.
31. Denison RN, Silver MA (2012) Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection. J Cogn Neurosci 24(1): 246-259.
32. Stuit S, Paffen C, Smagt M, Verstraten F (2011) What is grouping during binocular rivalry? Front Hum Neurosci 5: 1-9.
33. Li B, Peterson MR, Thompson JK, Duong T, Freeman RD (2005) Cross-orientation suppression: Monoptic and dichoptic mechanisms are different. J Neurophysiol 94(2): 1645-1650.
34. Bhardwaj R, O'Shea RP (2012) Temporal analysis of image-rivalry suppression. PLoS ONE 7(9):e45407.
35. Pearson J, Clifford CG (2004) Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. J Vis 4(3): 196-202.
36. Brascamp J, et al. (2008) Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. J Vis 7(12):12.1-2.12.
37. Bartels A, Logothetis N (2010) Binocular rivalry: A time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. J Vis 10(12):3, 1-14.
38. Keliris GA, Logothetis NK, Tolias AS (2010) The role of the primary visual cortex in perceptual suppression of salient visual stimuli. J Neurosci 30(37): 12353-12365.
39. Pearson J, Clifford CW (2005) When your brain decides what you see: Grouping across monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Psychol Sci 16(7): 516-519.
40. Bonneh Y, Sagi D, Karni A (2001) A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Res 41(8): 981-989.
41. Crick F, Koch C (1998) Consciousness and neuroscience. Cereb Cortex 8(2): 97-107.
42. Rees G, Kreiman G, Koch C (2002) Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(4): 261-270.
43. Tong F (2003) Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 4(3): 219-229.
44. Watson AB, Pelli DG (1983) QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 33(2): 113-120.
45. van Dam LC, van Ee R (2006) Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. J Vis 6(11): 1172-1179.