What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry?

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 179-186

  Kang, Min Suk ^a   Blake, Randolph ^a,b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; BRAIN; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77949315454     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.1.179     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ALAIS, D., & PARKER, A. (2006). Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron, 52, 911-920. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006. 10.027
2. ALPERS, G. W., & PAULI, P. (2006). Emotional pictures predominate in binocular rivalry. Cognition & Emotion, 20, 596-607. doi:10.1080/ 02699930500282249
3. BLAKE, R (1988). Dichoptic reading: The role of meaning in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 133-141.
4. BLAKE, R., & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21. doi:10.1038/nrn701
5. BLAKE, R, & OVERTON, R. (1979). The site of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception, 8, 143-152. doi:10.1068/p080143
6. BLAKE, R, SOBEL, K., SC GILROY, L. (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869-878. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00495-l
7. BLAKE, R, WESTENDORF, D., & Fox, R. (1990). Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 593-602.
8. BRAINARD, D. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. dohlO.l 163/156856897X00357
9. BRASCAMP, J., VAN EE, R., NOEST, A. J., JACOBS, R. H. A. R, & VAN DEN BERG, A.V. (2006). The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Journal of Vision, 6, 1244-1256. doi:10.1167/6.11.8
10. CARTER, O., & PETTIGREW, J. (2003). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? Perception, 32, 295-305. doi: 10.1068/p3472
11. DAO, D. Y., LU, Z.-L., & DOSHER, B. A. (2006). Adaptation to sine-wave gratings selectively reduces the contrast gain of the adapted stimuli. Journal of Vision, 6, 739-759. doi: 10.1167/6.7.6
12. FAHLE, M. (1982). Binocular rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 22, 787-800. doi: 10.101670042-6989(82) 90010-4
13. Fox, R., & HERRMANN, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 432-436.
14. GAO, J. B., BILLOCK, V. A., MERK, I., TUNG, W. W, WHITE, K. D., HARRIS, J. G., & ROYCHOWDHURY, V. P. (2006). Inertia and memory in ambiguous visual perception. Cognitive Processing, 7, 105-112. doi:10.1007/sl0339-006-0030-5
15. HELMHOLTZ, R VON (1962). Treatise on physiological optics (J. P. C Southall, Ed. and Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1867)
16. HOLUNS, M., & HUDNELL, K. (1980). Adaptation of the binocular rivalry mechanism. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 19, 1117-1120.
17. KALARICKAL, G. J., & MARSHALL, J. A. (2000). Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry. Neurocomputing, 32-33, 843-853.
18. KANG, M.-S. (2009). Size matters: A study of binocular rivalry dynamics. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-11. doi:10.1167/9.1.17
19. KANG, M.-S., & BLAKE, R. (2008). Enhancement of bistable perception associated with visual stimulus rivalry. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 586-591. doi:10.3758/PBR15.3.586
20. KIM, C-Y, & BLAKE, R. (2005). Psychophysical magic: Rendering the visible "invisible." Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 9, 381-388. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.012
21. KIM, Y-J., GRABOWECKY, M., & SUZUKI, S. (2006). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 392-406. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005. 08.009
22. KLINK, P. C., VAN EE, R., & VAN WEZEL, R. J. A. (2008). General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry. PLoS ONE, 3, e3473. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003473
23. LACK, L. C. (1978). Selective attention in the control of binocular rivalry. The Hague: Mouton.
24. LAING, C. R, & CHOW, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 12, 39-53. doi:10.1023/A:1014942129705
25. LANKHEET, M. J. M. (2006). Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6, 304-310. doi: 10.1167/6.4.1
26. LEHKY, S. R (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228. doi: 10.1068/p 170215
27. LEHKY, S. R. (1995). Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 259, 71-76. doi:10.1098/rspb.l995.0011
28. LEOPOLD, D. A, & LOGOTHETIS, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7
29. LEVELT, W. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: RVO-TNO, Institute for Perception.
30. LEVTNSON, E, & SEKULER, R. (1975). The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement Journal of Physiology, 250, 347-366.
31. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., LEOPOLD, D. A., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624. doi:10.1038/380621a0
32. MENG, M., & TONG, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539-551. doi.10.1167/4.7.2
33. MORENO-BOTE, R., RINZEL, J., & RUBIN, N. (2007). Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 1125-1139. doi:10.1152/jn.00l 16.2007
34. NOEST, A J., VAN EE, R, NUS, M. M., & VAN WEZEL, R J. A. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-14. doi: 10.1167/7.8.10
35. PELLI, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
36. PETTIGREW, J. D. (2001). Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations. Brain & Mind, 2
37. 85-118. SHEPPARD, B. M., & PETTIGREW, J. D. (2006). Plaid motion rivalry: Correlates with binocular rivalry and positive mood state. Perception, 35, 157-169. doi:10.1068/p5395
38. SHPIRO, A, MORENO-BOTE, R, RUBIN, N., & RINZEL, J. (2009). Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 27, 37-54. doi:10.1007/sl0827-008-0125-3
39. STERZER, P., KLEINSCHMIDT, A., SC REES, G. (2009). The neural bases of multistable perception. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 13, 310-318. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.006
40. TONG, F., MENG, M., & BLAKE, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09. 003
41. VAN BOXTEL, J. J. A., ALAIS, D., & VAN EE, R (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-10. doi:10.1167/8.5.17
42. VAN EE, R. (2005). Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research, 45, 29-40. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.039
43. WADE, N. J., & DE WEERT, C. M. (1986). Aftereffects in binocular rivalry. Perception, 15, 419-434. doi:10.1068/pl50419
44. WALKER, P., Sc POWELL, D. J. (1979). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry to changes in the nondominant stimulus. Vision Research, 19, 247249. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(79)90169-X
45. WILSON, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the NationalAcademy ofSciences, 100, 14499-14503. doi:10.1073/pnas.2333622100
46. WILSON, H. R. (2007). Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory. Vision Research, 47, 2741-2750. doi:10.1016Vj. visres.2007.07.007
47. WOLFE, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478. doi:10.1016/0042 -6989(84)90044-90050