The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2007, Pages

  Pearson, Joel ^a,b   Tadin, Duje ^a   Blake, Randolph ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Bistable; Neural excitability; Single pulse; Stimulus rivalry; Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOSPHENES; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34249063081     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.7.2     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21. [PubMed]
2. Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & Gilroy, L. A. (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869-878. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Bonneh, Y., Sagi, D., & Karni, A. (2001). A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research, 41, 981-989. [PubMed]
4. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. [PubMed]
5. Brascamp, J. W., van Ee, R., Pestman, W. R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2005). Distributions of alternation frequencies in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision, 5(4):1, 287-298, http://journalofvision.org/5/4/1/, doi:10.1167/5.4.1. [PubMed] [Article]
6. Carter, O. L., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2003). A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries? Perception, 32, 295-305. [PubMed]
7. Carter, O. L., Pettigrew, J. D., Hasler, F., Wallis, G. M., Liu, G. B., Hell, D., et al. (2005). Modulating the rate and rhythmicity of perceptual rivalry alternations with the mixed 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A agonist psilocybin. Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 1154-1162. [PubMed]
8. Carter, O. L., Presti, D. E., Callistemon, C., Ungerer, Y., Liu, G. B., & Pettigrew, J. D. (2005). Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks. Current Biology, 15, R412-R413. [PubMed] [Article]
9. Chong, S. C., Tadin, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5(11):6, 1004-1012, http://journalofvision.org/5/11/6/, doi:10.1167/ 5.11.6. [PubMed] [Article]
10. Cowey, A. (2004). The Ferrier Lecture 2004 what can transcranial magnetic stimulation tell us about how the brain works? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1185-205. [PubMed]
11. Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision Research, 43, 1035-1045. [PubMed]
12. Fries, P, Roelfsema, P. R., Engle, A. K., Konig, P., & Singer, W., (1997). Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 12699-12704. [PubMed] [Article]
13. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412-4420. [PubMed] [Article]
14. George, R. W. (1936). The significance of the fluctuation experienced in observing ambiguous figures and in binocular rivalry. Journal of General Psychology, 15, 39-61.
15. Hafed, Z. M., & Clark, J. J. (2002). Microsaccades as an overt measure of covert attention shifts. Vision Research, 42, 2533-2545. [PubMed]
16. Hallett, M. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature, 406, 147-150. [PubMed]
17. Hollins, M. (1980). The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 550-556. [PubMed]
18. Kanai, R., Moradi, F., Shimojo, S., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception, 34, 803-822. [PubMed]
19. Kim, Y. -J., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2005). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 392-406. [PubMed]
20. Kleinfeld, D., Delaney, K. R., Fee, M. S., Flores, J. A., Tank, D. W., & Gelperin, A. (1994). Dynamics of propagating waves in the olfactory network of a terrestrial mollusk: An electrical and optical study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 72, 1402-1419. [PubMed]
21. Kleinschmidt, C., Buchel Zeki, S., & Frackowiak, R. S. (1998). Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 265, 2427-2433. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Lankheet, M. J. (2006). Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(4):1, 304-310, http://journalofvision.org/6/4/1/, doi:10.1167/6.4.1. [PubMed] [Article]
23. Laubrock, J., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention. Vision Research, 45, 721-730. [PubMed]
24. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454. [PubMed]
25. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2005). Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 22-23. [PubMed] [Article]
26. Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
27. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624. [PubMed]
28. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K. J., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930-1934. [PubMed]
29. Lumer, E. D., & Rees, G. (1999). Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 1669-1673. [PubMed] [Article]
30. Mamassian, P., & Goutcher, R. (2005). Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. Journal of Vision, 5(4):7, 361-375, http://journalofvision.org/5/4/7/, doi:10.1167/5.4.7. [PubMed] [Article]
31. Meenan, J. P., & Miller, L. A. (1994). Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1145-1149. [PubMed]
32. Miller, S. M., Liu, G. B., Ngo, T. T., Hooper, G., Riek, S., Carson, R. G., et al. (2000). Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Current Biology, 10, 383-392. [PubMed] [Article]
33. Mueller, T. J., and Blake, R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 61, 223-232. [PubMed]
34. O'Shea, R. P., & Corballis, P. M. (2003). Binocular rivalry in split-brain observers. Journal of Vision, 3 (10):3, 610-615, http://journalofvision.org/3/10/3/, doi:10.1167/3.10.3. [PubMed] [Article]
35. O'Shea, R. P., & Corballis, P. M. (2005). Visual grouping on binocular rivalry in a split-brain observer. Vision Research, 45, 247-261. [PubMed]
36. Paus, T., Sipila, P. K., & Strafella, A. P. (2001). Synchronization of neuronal activity in the human primary motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation: An EEG study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1983-1990. [PubMed] [Article]
37. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). When your brain decides what you see: Grouping across monocular, binocular and stimulus rivalry. Psychological Science, 16, 516-519. [PubMed]
38. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442. [PubMed]
39. Prechtl, J. C., Cohen, L. B., Pesaran, B., Mitra, P. P., & Kleinfeld, D. (1997). Visual stimuli induce waves of electrical activity in turtle cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7621-7626. [PubMed] [Article]
40. Rauschecker, A. M., Bestmann, S., Walsh, V., & Thilo, K. V. (2004). Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 124-127. [PubMed]
41. Ricci, C., & Blundo, C. (1990). Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1163-1173. [PubMed]
42. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511. [PubMed]
43. Tyrell, R. A., & Owens, D. A. (1988). A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena - The modified binary search (MOBS). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 20, 137-141.
44. van Dam, L. C., & van Ee, R. (2006a). Retinal image shifts, but not eye movements per se, cause alternations in awareness during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(11):3, 1172-1179, http://journalofvision.org/6/11/3/, doi:10.1167/6.11.3. [PubMed] [Article]
45. van Dam, L. C., & van Ee, R. (2006b). The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 787-799. [PubMed]
46. Walsh, V., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2003). Transcranial magnetic stimulation: A neurochronometrics of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Wilson, H. R. (1999). Spikes, decisions & actions: Dynamical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503. [PubMed] [Article]
49. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (2001). Dynamics of traveling waves in visual perception. Nature, 412, 907-910. [PubMed]