Binocular rivalry: A time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1-14

  Bartels, Andreas ^a,b   Logothetis, Nikos K ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Consciousness; Flash suppression; Monocular; Onset rivalry; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONSCIOUSNESS; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MONOCULAR VISION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; CONSCIOUSNESS; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78449254503     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.12.3     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alais, D., & Melcher, D. (2007). Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research, 47, 269-279.
2. Alais, D., O'Shea, R. P., Mesana-Alais, C., & Wilson, I. G. (2000). On binocular alternation. Perception, 29, 1437-1445.
3. Andrews, T. J., & Purves, D. (1997). Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 94, 9905-9908.
4. Bartels, A., Logothetis, N. K., & Moutoussis, K. (2008). fMRI and its interpretations: An illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT. Trends in Neurosciences, 31, 444-453.
5. Bhardwaj, R., O'Shea, R. P., Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2008). Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images. Journal of Vision, 8(11):2, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/11/2, doi:10.1167/8.11.2.
6. Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687-692.
7. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
8. Blake, R., Westendorf, D., & Fox, R. (1990). Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 593-602.
9. Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.
10. Brascamp, J. W., Knapen, T. H., Kanai, R., Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2008). Multitimescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 3, e1497.
11. Brascamp, J. W., Pearson, J., Blake, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2009). Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: Implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. Journal of Vision, 9(3):3, 1-23, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/3/3, doi:10.1167/9.3.3.
12. Brouwer, G. J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1015-1023.
13. Burkhalter, A., Felleman, D. J., Newsome, W. T., & Van Essen, D. C. (1986). Anatomical and physiological asymmetries related to visual areas V3 and VP in macaque extrastriate cortex. Vision Research, 26, 63-80.
14. Carlson, T. A., & He, S. (2004). Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron, 43, 907-914.
15. Carter, O., & Cavanagh, P. (2007). Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE, 2, e343.
16. Chen, X., & He, S. (2004). Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 1013-1017.
17. Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 1794-1803.
18. Chong, S. C., Tadin, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5(11):6, 1004-1012, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/11/6, doi:10.1167/5.11.6.
19. Cohen, M. R., & Maunsell, J. H. (2009). Attention improves performance primarily by reducing inter-neuronal correlations. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 1594-1600.
20. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412-4420.
21. Gail, A., Brinksmeyer, H. J., & Eckhorn, R. (2004). Perception-related modulations of local field potential power and coherence in primary visual cortex of awake monkey during binocular rivalry. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 300-313.
22. Gilroy, L.A., & Blake, R. (2005). The interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages. Current Biology, 15, 1740-1744.
23. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
24. Kanai, R., Moradi, F., Shimojo, S., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception, 34, 803-822.
25. Kang, M. S., & Blake, R. (2010). What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry? Attentional Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 179-186.
26. Keliris, G. A., Logothetis, N. K., & Tolias, A. S. (2010). The role of primary visual cortex in perceptual suppression of salient visual stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12353-12365.
27. Kim, Y. J., Grabowecky, M., & Suzuki, S. (2006). Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 392-406.
28. Klink, P. C., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., Brouwer, G. J., Noest, A. J., & van Wezel, R. J. (2008). Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. Journal of Vision, 8(5):16, 11-18, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/5/16, doi:10.1167/8.5.16.
29. Knapen, T., Kanai, R., Brascamp, J., van Boxtel, J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 3269-3275.
30. Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2005). The Necker cubeVAn ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vision Research, 45, 955-960.
31. Kovacs, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Feher, A. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 15508-15511.
32. Laing, C. R., & Chow, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 12, 39-53.
33. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454.
34. Lehky, S. R. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228.
35. Lehky, S. R., & Maunsell, J. H. (1996). No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Research, 36, 1225-1234.
36. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
37. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609.
38. Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453, 869-878.
39. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
40. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763.
41. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Aura, C., Zhu, C., Ye, F. Q., & Leopold, D. A. (2008). Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1193-1200.
42. Maunsell, J. H., & Van Essen, D. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. II. Binocular interactions and sensitivity to binocular disparity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 1148-1167.
43. Mitchell, J. F., Stoner, G. R., & Reynolds, J. H. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature, 429, 410-413.
44. Mitchell, J. F., Sundberg, K. A., & Reynolds, J. H. (2009). Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4. Neuron, 63, 879-888.
45. Moreno-Bote, R., Rinzel, J., & Rubin, N. (2007). Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 1125-1139.
46. Ngo, T. T., Liu, G. B., Tilley, A. J., Pettigrew, J. D., & Miller, S. M. (2007). Caloric vestibular stimulation reveals discrete neural mechanisms for coherence rivalry and eye rivalry: A meta-rivalry model. Vision Research, 47, 2685-2699.
47. Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., & van Wezel, R. J. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model. Journal of Vision, 7(8):10, 1-14, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/8/10, doi:10.1167/7.8.10.
48. Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception, 28, 551-574.
49. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., & Heath, H. A. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation" . Perception of Motor Skills, 17, 439-458.
50. Orbach, J., Zucker, E., & Olson, R. (1966). Reversibility of the Necker cube: VII. Reversal rate as a function of figure-on and figure-off durations. Perception of Motor Skills, 22, 615.
51. Paffen, C. L., Alais, D., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychology Science, 17, 752-756.
52. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. G. (2004). Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. Journal of Vision, 4(3):6 196-202, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/3/6, doi:10.1167/4.3.6.
53. Pearson, J., Tadin, D., & Blake, R. (2007). The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry. Journal of Vision, 7(7):2, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/7/7/2, doi:10.1167/7.7.2.
54. Purves, D., & Lotto, B. R. (2003). Why we see what we do. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
55. Schurger, A., Pereira, F., Treisman, A., & Cohen, J. D. (2010). Reproducibility distinguishes conscious from nonconscious neural representations. Science, 327, 97-99.
56. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States America, 94, 3408-3413.
57. Sindermann, F., & Luddeke, H. (1972). Monocular analogues to binocular contour rivalry. Vision Research, 12, 763-772.
58. Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1096-1101.
59. Tsuchiya, N., Koch, C., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2006). Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 6(10):6, 1068-1078, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/6/10/6, doi:10.1167/6.10.6.
60. Uka, T., Tanaka, H., Yoshiyama, K., Kato, M., & Fujita, I. (2000). Disparity selectivity of neurons in monkey inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 120-132.
61. van Boxtel, J. J., Alais, D., & van Ee, R. (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision, 8(5):17, 11-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/5/17, doi:10.1167/8.5.17.
62. Watson, T. L., Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2004). Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670-1674.
63. Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2006). Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 103, 17507-17512.
64. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503.
65. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.
66. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.