What is grouping during binocular rivalry?

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue OCTOBER, 2011, Pages

  Stuit, Sjoerd M ^a   Paffen, Chris L E ^a   van der Smagt, Maarten J ^a   Verstraten, Frans A J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Grouping; Interocular grouping; Joint predominance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL HUMAN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84933678926     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00117     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aafjes, M., Hueting, J. E., and Visser, P. (1966). Individual and interindivid-ual differences in binocular retinal rivalry in man. Psychophysiology 3, 18-22.
2. Alais, D., and Blake, R. (1998). Inter-actions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 38, 637-644.
3. Alais, D., and Blake, R. (1999). Group-ing visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 39, 4341-4353.
4. Alais, D., O'Shea, R. P., Mesana-Alais, C., and Wilson, I. G. (2000). On binocular alternation. Perception 29, 1437-1445.
5. Ashwin, P., and Lavric, A. (2010). A low-dimensional model of binocular rivalry using winner-less competition. Physica D 239, 529-536.
6. Bartels, A., and Logothetis, N. K. (2010). Binocular rivalry: a time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. J. Vis. 10, 1-14.
7. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 96, 145-167.
8. Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controver-sies. Brain Mind 2, 5-38.
9. Blake, R., and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neu-rosci. 3, 13-21.
10. Blake, R., O'Shea, R. P., and Mueller, T. J. (1992). Spatial zones of binocu-lar rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Vis. Neurosci. 8, 469-478.
11. Bosking, W. H., Zhang, Y., Schofield, A., and Fitzpatrick, D. (1997). Ori-entation selectivityand the arrange-ment of horizontal connections in tree shrew striate cortex. J. Neurosci. 17, 2112-2127.
12. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psy-chophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436.
13. Carter, O., and Cavanagh, P. (2007). Onset rivalry: briefpresentation iso-lates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE 2, e343. doi:10.1371/jour-nal.pone.0000343
14. Das, A., and Gilbert, C. D. (1995). Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of the cat primary visual cortex. Nature 375, 780-784.
15. Diaz-Caneja, E. (1928). Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Ann. Oculist. 165, 721-731.
16. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. J. Neu-rophysiol. 94, 4412-4420.
17. Kapadia, M. K., Ito, M., Gilbert, C. D., and Westheimer, G. (1995). Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: paral-lel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys. Neuron 15, 843-856.
18. Kovács, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., and Fehér, A. (1997). When the brain changes its mind, Inte-rocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 15508-15511.
19. Lee, S. (2004). Binocular battles onmul-tiple fronts. TrendsCogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.)8, 148-151.
20. Lee, S. H., and Blake, R. (2004). A fresh look at interocular grouping dur-ing binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 44, 983-991.
21. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., and Heeger, D. J. (2005). Traveling waves of activ-ity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 22-23.
22. Levelt, W. J. M. (1967). Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. Br. J. Psychol. 58, 143-145.
23. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., and Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivaling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621-624.
24. Meenes, M. (1930). A phenomenologi-cal description of retinal rivalry. Am. J. Psychol. 42, 260-269.
25. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., and Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Res. 43, 2003-2008.
26. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat. Vis. 10, 437-442.
27. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., and Heeger, D. J. (2000). Neuronal activ-ity in human primary visual cor-texcorrelateswithperceptionduring binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1153-1159.
28. Silver, M., and Logothetis, N. K. (2007). Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry. Vision Res. 47, 532-543.
29. Tong, F., and Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411, 195-199.
30. Wheatstone, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binoc-ular vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 37, l-394.
31. Whittle, P., Bloor, D. C., and Pocock, S. (1968). Some experiments on figural effects in binocular rivalry. Percept. Psychophys. 4, 183-188.
32. Wilson, H., Blake, R., and Lee, S. (2001). Dynamicsoftravellingwaves in visual perception. Nature 412, 907-910.
33. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 14499-14503.