Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 15, 2008, Pages

  van Boxtel, Jeroen J A ^a,b   Knapen, Tomas ^a   Erkelens, Casper J ^a   van Ee, Raymond ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Bistability; Perceptual organization; Rivalry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MONOCULAR VISION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

AWARENESS; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 56749177286     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.15.13     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (Eds.) (2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Andrews, T. J. (2001). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 407-409.
3. Andrews, T. J., & Lotto, R. B. (2004). Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 418-423.
4. Andrews, T. J., & Purves, D. (1997). Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 9905-9908.
5. Andrews, T. J., Sengpiel, F., & Blakemore, C. (2005). From contour to object-face rivalry: Multiple neural mechanisms resolve perceptual ambiguity. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry (pp. 187-211). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Battelli, L., Pascual-Leone, A., & Cavanagh, P. (2007). The 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 204-210.
7. Blake, R. (1977). Threshold conditions for binocular rivalry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 251-257.
8. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
9. Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain & Mind, 2, 5-38.
10. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
11. Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.
12. Blake, R., Yang, Y., & Westendorf, D. (1991). Discriminating binocular fusion from false fusion. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 32, 2821-2825.
13. Bonneh, Y., Sagi, D., & Karni, A. (2001). A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research, 41, 991-999.
14. Bosking, W. H., Crowley, J. C., & Fitzpatrick, D. (2002). Spatial coding of position and orientation in primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 874-882.
15. Brascamp, J. W., van Ee, R., Noest, A. J., Jacobs, R. H., & van den Berg, A. V. (2006). The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Journal of Vision, 6(11):8, 1244-1256, http://journalofvision.org/6/11/8/, doi:10.1167/6.11.8.
16. Breese, B. B. (1899). On inhibition. Psychological Monographs, 3, 1-15.
17. Burr, D. C., & Santoro, L. (2001). Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds. Vision Research, 41, 1891-1899.
18. Campbell, F. W., Gilinsky, A. S., Howell, E. R., Riggs, L. A., & Atkinson, J. (1973). The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation. Perception, 2, 123-125.
19. Coltheart, M. (1980a). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 183-228.
20. Coltheart, M. (1980b). The persistences of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 290, 57-69.
21. Creed, R. S. (1935). Observations on binocular fusion and rivalry. The Journal of Physiology, 84, 381-392.
22. Crick, F., & Koch, C. (1990). Towards a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 2, 263-275.
23. Dawson, S. (1915/1917). The experimental study of binocular colour mixture. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 510-551.
24. Desaguliers, J. T. (1716). A plain and easy experiment to confirm Sir Isaac Newton's doctrine of the different refrangibility of the rays of light. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 29, 448-452.
25. Edelman, S. (1995). Receptive fields for vision: From hyperacuity to object recognition. Weizmann Institute CS-TR(95-29).
26. Engel, G. R. (1970). An investigation of visual responses to brief stereoscopic stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 148-166.
27. Fox, R. (1991). Binocular rivalry. In D. Regan (Ed.), Binocular vision (1st ed., vol. 9, pp. 93-110). London: Macmillan Press.
28. Fox, R., & Check, R. (1972). Independence between binocular rivalry suppression duration and magnitude of suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 283-289.
29. Fox, R., & Herrmann, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 432-436.
30. Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412-4420.
31. Hawken, M. J., Shapley, R. M., & Grosof, D. H. (1996). Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 13, 477-492.
32. Holcombe, A. O. (2001). A purely temporal transparency mechanism in the visual system. Perception, 30, 1311-1320.
33. Holcombe, A. O., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 127-128.
34. Hollins, M. (1980). The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 550-556.
35. Hupé, J. M., & Rubin, N. (2003). The dynamics of bistable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: A fresh look at plaids. Vision Research, 43, 531-548.
36. Jiang, Y., Zhou, K., & He, S. (2007). Human visual cortex responds to invisible chromatic flicker. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 657-662.
37. Kakizaki, S. (1950). Effects of preceding conditions upon binocular rivalry. I. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 20, 24-32.
38. Knapen, T., Kanai, R., Brascamp, J., van Boxtel, J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 3269-3275.
39. Kourtzi, Z., & Huberle, E. (2005). Spatiotemporal characteristics of form analysis in the human visual cortex revealed by rapid event-related fMRI adaptation. Neuroimage, 28, 440-452.
40. Kovács, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Fehér, A. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 15508-15511.
41. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454.
42. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (2004). A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 44, 983-991.
43. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflects monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
44. Leopold, D. A., Maier, A., Wilke, M., & Logothetis, N. K. (2005). Binocular rivalry and the illusion of monocular vision. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry (pp. 231-258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Levelt, W. J. M. (1965). On binocular rivalry. The Netherlands: Soesterberg, Institute for Perception RVO-TNO.
46. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1801-1818.
47. Logothetis, N. K. (2002). The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 357, 1003-1037.
48. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
49. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412, 150-157.
50. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763.
51. Maier, A., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2005). Global competition dictates local suppression in pattern rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5(9):2, 668-677, http://journalofvision.org/5/9/2/, doi:10.1167/5.9.2.
52. Meyer, G. E., & Maguire, W. M. (1977). Spatial frequency and the mediation of short-term visual storage. Science, 198, 524-525.
53. Mukamel, R., Harel, M., Hendler, T., & Malach, R. (2004). Enhanced temporal non-linearities in human object-related occipito-temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 575-585.
54. Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research, 43, 2003-2008.
55. O'Shea, R. P. (1998). Effect of orientation and spatial frequency on monocular and binocular rivalry. Progress in connectionist-based information systems: Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Neural Information Processing and Intelligent Information Systems, 67-70.
56. O'Shea, R. P., & Blake, R. (1986). Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 39, 59-63.
57. O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1984). Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 266-276.
58. O'Shea, R. P., Sims, A. J., & Govan, D. G. (1997). The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 37, 175-183.
59. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). When your brain decides what you see: Grouping across monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Psychological Science, 16, 516-519.
60. Rauschecker, J. P., Campbell, F. W., & Atkinson, J. (1973). Colour opponent neurones in the human visual system. Nature, 245, 42-43.
61. Schmielau, F., & Singer, W. (1977). The role of visual cortex for binocular interactions in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research, 120, 354-361.
62. Schor, C. M. (1977). Visual stimuli for strabismic suppression. Perception, 6, 583-593.
63. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3408-3413.
64. Snowden, R. J., & Braddick, O. J. (1991). The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals. Vision Research, 31, 907-914.
65. Suzuki, S., & Grabowecky, M. (2002). Overlapping features can be parsed on the basis of rapid temporal cues that produce stable emergent percepts. Vision Research, 42, 2669-2692.
66. Tolhurst, D. J. (1973). Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of moving visual stimulus. The Journal of Physiology, 231, 385-402.
67. Tong, F., (2001). Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. Brain & Mind, 2, 55-83.
68. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
69. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
70. van Boxtel, J. J., Alais, D., Erkelens, C. J., & van Ee, R. (2008). The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE, 3, e1429.
71. van Boxtel, J. J., Alais, D., & van Ee, R. (2008). Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback. Journal of Vision, 8(5):17, 1-10, http://journalofvision.org/8/5/17/, doi:10.1167/8.5.17.
72. van Boxtel, J. J., van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (2007). Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. Journal of Vision, 7(14):3, 1-11, http://journalofvision.org/7/ 14/3/, doi:10.1167/ 7.14.3.
73. Van de Grind, W. A., Gruesser, O. J., & Lunkenheimer, H. O. (1973). Temporal transfer properties of the afferent visual system. Physiological, neurophysiological and theoretical investigations. In R. Jung (Ed.), Handbook of sensory physiology (vol. VII/3A, pp. 431-574). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
74. van Ee, R. (2005). Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research, 45, 29-40.
75. Wade, N. J. (1975). Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours. Perception, 4, 85-95.
76. Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90.
77. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 14499-14503.
78. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12, 447-456.
79. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.