Opposite influence of perceptual memory on initial and prolonged perception of sensory ambiguity

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  de Jong, Maartje Cathelijne ^a   Knapen, Tomas ^b   van Ee, Raymond ^a,c,d,e  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MEMORY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; VISION;

HUMANS; MEMORY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84856303787     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030595     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Helmholtz H von, Southall JPC (translator), (1911) Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, 3rd German ed., 1911, Hamburg: Voss. Treatise on Physiological Optics. Columbia University 1925 Reprint from New York: Dover, 1962.
2. Sasaki Y, Nanez JE, Watanabe T, (2010) Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 11/1: 53-60.
3. Kristjansson A, Campana G, (2010) Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Atten Percept Psychophys 72/1: 5-18.
4. Kourtzi Z, (2010) Visual learning for perceptual and categorical decisions in the human brain. Vision Res 50/4: 433-40.
5. Brascamp JW, Pearson J, Blake R, van den Berg AV, (2009) Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. J Vis 9/3: 3 1-23.
6. Carter O, Cavanagh P, (2007) Onset rivalry: brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. PLoS ONE 2/4: e343.
7. Hupé JM, Rubin N, (2003) The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res 43/5: 531-48.
8. Chong SC, Tadin D, Blake R, (2005) Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. J Vis 5/11: 1004-1012.
9. Chong SC, Blake R, (2006) Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Res 46/11: 1794-803.
10. Leopold DA, Wilke M, Maier A, Logothetis NK, (2002) Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience 5: 605-609.
11. Orbach J, Ehrlich D, Heath HA, (1963) Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of Bsatiation of orientation. Perceptual and Motor Skills 17: 439-458.
12. Pearson J, Brascamp J, (2008) Sensory memory for ambiguous vision. Trends Cogn Sci 12/9: 334-41.
13. Cohen L, (1959) Rate of apparent change of a neckercube as a function of prior stimulation. The American Journal of Psychology 72/3: 327-44.
14. Suzuki S, Grabowecky M, (2007) Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing. Neuron 56/4: 741-53.
15. Long GM, Toppino TC, Mondin GW, (1992) Prime time: fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Percept Psychophys 52/6: 609-16.
16. Klink PC, van Ee R, Nijs MM, Brouwer GJ, Noest AJ, et al. (2008) Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. J Vis 8/5: 16.
17. Brascamp JW, Knapen TH, Kanai R, Noest AJ, van Ee R, et al. (2008) Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE 3/1: e1497.
18. Pastukhov A, Braun J, (2008) A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. J Vis 8: 7, 1-14.
19. Kanai R, Verstraten FA, (2005) Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Res 45/25-26: 3109-3116.
20. Brascamp JW, Knapen TH, Kanai R, van Ee R, van den Berg AV, (2007) Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. J Vis 7/12: 12 1-12.
21. Daelli V, van Rijsbergen NJ, Treves A, (2010) How recent experience affects the perception of ambiguous objects. Brain Res 1322: 81-91.
22. Pearson J, Clifford CW, (2005) Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes. Vision Res 45/6: 707-14.
23. Virsu V, (1975) Determination of perspective reversals. Nature 257/5529: 786-7.
24. Harris JP, (1980) How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures? Am J Psychol 93/3: 445-57.
25. Long GM, Toppino TC, (2004) Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures. Psychol Bull 130/5: 748-68.
26. Petersik JT, Shepard A, Malsch R, (1984) A three-dimensional motion aftereffect produced by prolonged adaptation to a rotation simulation. Perception 13/4: 489-97.
27. Hochberg JE, (1950) Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40: 682-88.
28. Thompson P, Burr D, (2009) Visual aftereffects. Curr Biol 19/1: R11-4.
29. Levelt WJ, (1967) Note on the distribution of dominance times in binocular rivalry. Br J Psychol 58/1: 143-5.
30. Brascamp JW, van Ee R, Noest AJ, Jacobs RH, van den Berg AV, (2006) The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. J Vis 6/11: 1244-56.
31. Braunstein M, (1977) Perceived direction of rotation of simulated three-dimensional patterns. Percept Psychophys 21: 553-557.
32. Wallach H, O'Connell DN, (1953) The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 45: 205-217.
33. Maier A, Wilke M, Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, (2003) Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Curr Biol 13/13: 1076-85.
34. Chopin A, Mamassian P, (2011) Usefulness influences visual appearance in motion transparency depth rivalry. J Vis 11/7: 18.
35. Noest AJ, van Ee R, Nijs MM, van Wezel RJ, (2007) Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. J Vis 7/8: 10.
36. Hock HS, Schoner G, Hochstein S, (1996) Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion directions. Vision Res 36/20: 3311-23.
37. Knapen T, Brascamp J, Adams WJ, Graf EW, (2009) The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. J Vis 9/13: 16.
38. Harrison SJ, Backus BT, (2010) Uninformative visual experience establishes long term perceptual bias. Vision Res 50/18: 1905-11.
39. Brascamp JW, Kanai R, Walsh V, van Ee R, (2010) Human middle temporal cortex, perceptual bias, and perceptual memory for ambiguous three-dimensional motion. J Neurosci 30/2: 760-6.
40. Klink PC, Brascamp JW, Blake R, van Wezel RJ, (2010) Experience-driven plasticity in binocular vision. Curr Biol 20/16: 1464-1469.
41. van Ee R, (2009) Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 26/12: 2612-22.
42. Mamassian P, Goutcher R, (2005) Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5(4)/7: 361-75.
43. Naber M, Gruenhage G, Einhauser W, (2010) Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history. Vision Res 50/8: 818-28.
44. Suzuki S, Grabowecky M, (2002) Evidence for perceptual "trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 36/1: 143-57.
45. Pearson J, Clifford CG, (2004) Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. J Vis 4/3: 196-202.
46. Bartels A, Logothetis NK, (2010) Binocular rivalry: a time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. J Vis 10/12: 3.
47. Nawrot M, Blake R, (1991) The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Percept Psychophys 49/3: 230-44.
48. Von Grünau M, Dubé S, (1993) Ambiguous plaids: Switching between coherence and transparency. Spatial Vision 7/3: 199-211.
49. Jackson S, Blake R, (2010) Neural integration of information specifying human structure from form, motion, and depth. J Neurosci 30/3: 838-48.
50. Brouwer GJ, van Ee R, (2007) Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. J Neurosci 27/5: 1015-1023.
51. van Dam LC, Ernst MO, (2010) Preexposure disrupts learning of location-contingent perceptual biases for ambiguous stimuli. J Vis 10/8: 15.
52. Harrison SJ, Backus BT, Jain A, (2011) Disambiguation of Necker cube rotation by monocular and binocular depth cues: relative effectiveness for establishing long-term bias. Vision Res 51/9: 978-986.