Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2007, Pages

  Brascamp, Jan W ^a   Knapen, Tomas H J ^a   Kanai, Ryota ^b   van Ee, Raymond ^a   van den Berg, Albert V ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambiguous stimuli; Binocular rivalry; Flash suppression; Perceptual stabilization; Priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; TIME; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34848920664     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.12.12     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1999). Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 4341-4353.
2. Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984). Visual masking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Campana, G., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2002). Priming of motion direction and area V5/MT: A test of perceptual memory, Cerebral Cortex, 12, 663-669.
4. Carandini, M., Heeger, D. J., & Movshon, J. A. (1997). Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 8621-8644.
5. Chong, S. C., & Blake, R. (2006). Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 1794-1803.
6. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
7. Georgeson, M. A., & Georgeson, J. M. (1987). Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: Time-course and contrast dependence. Vision Research, 27, 369-379.
8. Huber, D. E., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: Temporal segregation through synaptic depression. Cognitive Science, 27, 403-430.
9. Huk, A. C., & Shadlen, M. N. (2005). Neural activity in macaque parietal cortex reflects temporal integration of visual motion signals during perceptual decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10420-10436.
10. Kamphuisen, A. P., van Wezel, R. J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 47, 1142-1144.
11. Kanai, R., & Kamitani, Y. (2003). Time-locked perceptual fading induced by visual transients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 664-672.
12. Kanai, R., & Verstraten, F. A. (2005). Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: Motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization. Vision Research, 45, 3109-3116.
13. Keysers, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 120-125.
14. Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2005). The Necker cube - An ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Vision Research, 45, 955-960.
15. Kreiman, G. (2001). On the neuronal activity in the human brain during visual recognition, imagery and binocular rivalry. Pasadena: California Institute of Technology.
16. Kreiman, G., Fried, I., & Koch, C. (2002). Single-neuron correlates of subjective vision in the human medial temporal lobe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 8378-8383.
17. Kreiman, G., Fried, I., & Koch, C. (2005). Responses of single neurons in the human brain during flash suppression. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609.
19. Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., & Mondin, G. W. (1992). Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 609-616.
20. Martínez-Trujillo, J., & Treue, S. (2002). Attentional modulation strength in cortical area MT depends on stimulus contrast. Neuron,, 35, 365-370.
21. Mitchell, J. F., Stoner, G. R., & Reynolds, J. H. (2004). Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature, 429, 410-413.
22. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1989). Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. Science, 244, 716-718.
23. Noest, A. J., Van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., & Van Wezel, R. J. A. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: A low-level neural model [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(8):10, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/7/8/10/, doi:10.1167/7.8.10.
24. O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1984). Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 266-276.
25. Orbach, J., Ehrlich, D., & Heath, H. A. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of "satiation of orientation." Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 439-458.
26. Orbach, J., Zucker, E., & Olson, R. (1966). Reversibility of the Necker cube: VII. Reversal rate as a function of figure-on and figure-off durations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 22, 615-618.
27. Paffen, C. L., Tadin, D., te Pas, S. F., Blake, R., & Verstraten, F. A. (2006). Adaptive' center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 46, 599-604.
28. Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2005). Mechanisms selectively engaged in rivalry: Normal vision habituates, rivalrous vision primes. Vision Research, 45, 707-714.
29. Pinkus, A., & Pantle, A. (1997). Probing visual motion signals with a priming paradigm. Vision Research, 37, 541-552.
30. Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T, & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703-714.
31. Sclar, G., Maunsell, J. H., & Lennie, P. (1990). Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Research, 30, 1-10.
32. Sengpiel, K., Blakemore, C., & Harrad, R. (1995). Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: A possible neural basis of binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 35, 179-195.
33. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3408-3413.
34. Tanaka, Y., & Sagi, D. (1998). A perceptual memory for low-contrast visual signals. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 12729-12733.
35. Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2003). Generalized flash suppression of salient visual targets. Neuron, 39, 1043-1052.
36. Wilson, H. R. (2005). Rivalry and perceptual oscillations: A dynamical synthesis. In D. Alais & R. Blake (Eds.), Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Wolfe, J. M. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12, 447-456.
38. Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471-478.