Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 196-202

  Pearson, Joel ^a   Clifford, Colin W G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Awareness; Binocular rivalry; Bistable figures; Eye of origin; Stable perception; Stimulus rivalry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; COLOR VISION; COMPETITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA;

AWARENESS; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RETINA; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2442508683     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/4.3.6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alais D, Blake R (Eds.). (in press). Binocular rivalry and perceptual ambiguity. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
2. Andrews, T. J., & Purves, D.(1997). Similarities in normal and binocular rivarlous viewing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 94, 9905-9908.
3. Andrews, T. J. (2001). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 407-409.
4. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 1-11.
5. Blake, R., Sobel, K. V., & Gilroy, L. A. (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869-878.
6. Blake, R. Westendorf, D.H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Neuron, 9(2), 223-231.
7. Bonneh, Y., Sagi, D., & Karni, A. (2001) A transition between eye and object rivalry determined by stimulus coherence. Vision Research, 41, 981-989.
8. Chen, X., & He, S. (2003). What factors determine the stabilization of a bi-stable stimulus? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 254a.
9. Freeman, A. W., & Nguyen, V. A. (2001). Controlling binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 41, 2943-2950.
10. Helmholtz, H. (1924). Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics. New York: Opthomological Society of America.
11. Kovacs, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Feher, A. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 93, 15508-15511.
12. Laing, C. R., & Chow, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 12, 39-53.
13. Leat, S. J., & Woodhouse, J. M. (1984). Rivalry with continuous and flashed stimuli as a measure of ocular dominance across the visual field. Perception, 13, 351-357.
14. Lee, S.-H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454.
15. Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609.
16. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
17. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2003). Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Current Biology, 13, 1076-1085.
18. Mapp, A. P., Ono, H., & Barbeito, R. (2003). What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 310-317.
19. Necker, N. A. (1832). Observations on some remarkable optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal of a geometric solid. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1, 329-337.
20. Ono, H., & Barbeito, R. (1985). Utrocular discrimination is not sufficient for utrocular identification. Vision Research, 25, 289-299.
21. Orbach, J., Ehrilch, D. & Health, H. A. (1963). Reversibility of the Necker cube. I. An examination of the concept of " satiation" of orientation. Perceptual Motor Skills, 17, 439-458.
22. Porac, C., & Coren, S., (1976). The dominant eye. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 880-897.
23. Rubin, E. (1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 194-203). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. (Original work published 1915.)
24. Ramachandran, V. S., & Anstis, S. M. (1985). Perceptual organization in multistable apparent motion. Perception, 144, 135-143.
25. Sternberg, S., & Knoll, R. L. (1973) The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and Performance IV (pp. 629-685). New York: Academic Press.
26. Tong, F. (2001). Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution. Brain & Mind, 2, 55-83.
27. Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Resolving perceptual ambiguity. Nature, 380, 587-588.
28. Wheatstone, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371-394.