Neural bases of binocular rivalry

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 502-511

  Tong, Frank ^a   Meng, Ming ^b   Blake, Randolph ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR RIVALRY; EYE SELECTIVE INFORMATION; MONOCULAR IMAGES; NEUROIMAGING;

BRAIN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEUROLOGY; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

BINOCULARS;

AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN REGION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMAN; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROIMAGING; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; VISION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEURAL INHIBITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RETINA; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 33750196118     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Blake R., and Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 (2002) 13-21
2. Rees G., et al. Neural correlates of consciousness in humans. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 (2002) 261-270
3. Tong F. Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4 (2003) 219-229
4. Kim C.Y., and Blake R. Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible 'invisible'. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9 (2005) 381-388
5. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 96 (1989) 145-167
6. Tong F. Competing theories of binocular rivalry: a possible resolution. Brain and Mind 2 (2001) 55-83
7. Lehky S.R. An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 17 (1988) 215-228
8. Leopold D.A., and Logothetis N.K. Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379 (1996) 549-553
9. Logothetis N.K., et al. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?. Nature 380 (1996) 621-624
10. Freeman A.W. Multistage model for binocular rivalry. J. Neurophysiol. 94 (2005) 4412-4420
11. Wilson H.R. Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 14499-14503
12. Logothetis N.K. Single units and conscious vision. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353 (1998) 1801-1818
13. Lee S.H., and Blake R. Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 39 (1999) 1447-1454
14. Andrews T.J., and Purves D. Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 9905-9908
15. Dayan P. A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput. 10 (1998) 1119-1135
16. Laing C.R., and Chow C.C. A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J. Comput. Neurosci. 12 (2002) 39-53
17. Lankheet M.J.M. Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. J. Vis. 6 (2006) 304-310
18. Lansing R.W. Electroencephalographic correlates of binocular rivalry in man. Science 146 (1964) 1325-1327
19. Cobb W.A., et al. Cerebral potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature 216 (1967) 1123-1125
20. Brown R.J., and Norcia A.M. A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP. Vision Res. 37 (1997) 2401-2408
21. Tononi G., et al. Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 (1998) 3198-3203
22. Lumer E.D., et al. Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280 (1998) 1930-1934
23. Tong F., et al. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21 (1998) 753-759
24. Polonsky A., et al. Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 1153-1159
25. Tong F., and Engel S.A. Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411 (2001) 195-199
26. Lee S.H., et al. Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 22-23
27. Haynes J.D., and Rees G. Predicting the stream of consciousness from activity in human visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 1301-1307
28. Meng M., et al. Filling-in of visual phantoms in the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1248-1254
29. Moutoussis K., et al. A binocular rivalry study of motion perception in the human brain. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 2231-2243
30. Wunderlich K., et al. Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1595-1602
31. Haynes J.D., et al. Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438 (2005) 496-499
32. Kamitani Y., and Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 679-685
33. Haynes J.D., and Rees G. Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 686-691
34. Pasley B.N., et al. Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron 42 (2004) 163-172
35. Williams M.A., et al. Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 2898-2904
36. Fang F., and He S. Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1380-1385
37. Blake R., and Fox R. Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature 249 (1974) 488-490
38. Wade N.J., and Wenderoth P. The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect. Vision Res. 18 (1978) 827-835
39. Lehmkuhle S.W., and Fox R. Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect. Vision Res. 15 (1975) 855-859
40. Freeman A.W., and Nguyen V.A. Controlling binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 41 (2001) 2943-2950
41. Blake R., et al. Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 4783-4788
42. Gilroy L.A., and Blake R. The interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 1740-1744
43. Tsuchiya N., and Koch C. Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nat. Neurosci. 8 (2005) 1096-1101
44. Andrews T.J., and Blakemore C. Form and motion have independent access to consciousness. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999) 405-406
45. Carlson T.A., and He S. Visible binocular beats from invisible monocular stimuli during binocular rivalry. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 1055-1058
46. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W. Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) 2142-2148
47. Nguyen V.A., et al. Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Res. 43 (2003) 2003-2008
48. Sheinberg D.L., and Logothetis N.K. The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997) 3408-3413
49. Moradi F., et al. Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 45 (2005) 169-175
50. Cave C.B., et al. Binocular rivalry disrupts visual priming. Psychol. Sci. 9 (1998) 299-302
51. Jiang, Y. et al. (2006) Processing of invisible stimuli: faster for upright faces and recognizable words to overcome interocular suppression. Psychol. Sci. (in press)
52. Kovacs I., et al. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 (1996) 15508-15511
53. Alais D., et al. Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field. Vision Res. 46 (2006) 1473-1487
54. Ngo T.T., et al. Binocular rivalry and perceptual coherence. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) R134-R136
55. Lee S.H., and Blake R. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 44 (2004) 983-991
56. Watson T.L., et al. Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1670-1674
57. Suzuki S., and Grabowecky M. Evidence for perceptual 'trapping' and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 36 (2002) 143-157
58. Pearson J., and Clifford C.W. When your brain decides what you see: grouping across monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalry. Psychol. Sci. 16 (2005) 516-519
59. Wilson H.R., et al. Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 412 (2001) 907-910
60. Carlson T.A., and He S. Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron 43 (2004) 907-914
61. Leopold D.A., et al. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002) 605-609
62. Chen X., and He S. Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 1013-1017
63. Pearson J., and Clifford C.G. Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 196-202
64. Ooi T.L., and He Z.J. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention. Perception 28 (1999) 551-574
65. Meng M., and Tong F. Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 539-551
66. Mitchell J.F., et al. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry. Nature 429 (2004) 410-413
67. Chong S.C., et al. Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. J. Vis. 5 (2005) 1004-1012
68. van Ee R., et al. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 41-55
69. Lack L.C. Selective Attention and the Control of Binocular Rivalry (1978), Mouton
70. Chong S.C., and Blake R. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 46 (2006) 1794-1803
71. van Dam L.C., and van Ee R. The role of saccades in exerting voluntary control in perceptual and binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 46 (2006) 787-799
72. Kanai R., et al. Perceptual alternation induced by visual transients. Perception 34 (2005) 803-822
73. Miller S.M., et al. Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Curr. Biol. 10 (2000) 383-392
74. Logothetis N.K., and Schall J.D. Neural correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245 (1989) 761-763
75. Lehky S.R., and Maunsell J.H. No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Res. 36 (1996) 1225-1234
76. Logothetis N.K., et al. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412 (2001) 150-157
77. Mukamel R., et al. Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and fMRI in human auditory cortex. Science 309 (2005) 951-954
78. Takano T., et al. Astrocyte-mediated control of cerebral blood flow. Nat. Neurosci. 9 (2006) 260-267
79. Ichida J.M., and Casagrande V.A. Organization of the feedback pathway from striate cortex (V1) to the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) in the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). J. Comp. Neurol. 454 (2002) 272-283
80. Carter O.L., and Pettigrew J.D. A common oscillator for perceptual rivalries?. Perception 32 (2003) 295-305