Temporal Analysis of Image-Rivalry Suppression

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Bhardwaj, Rishi ^a,b,c   O'Shea, Robert P ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Nethradhama School of Optometry   (India)

^d SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; MALE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 84866644731     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045407     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baker DH, (2010) Visual consciousness: The binocular rivalry explosion. Current Biology 20: R644-R646.
2. Campbell FW, Howell ER, (1972) Monocular alternation: A method for the investigation of pattern vision. Journal of Physiology 225: 19P-21P.
3. Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL, (1996) What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380: 621-624.
4. Naber M, Gruenhage G, Einhauser W, (2010) Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history. Vision Research 50: 818-828.
5. Necker LA, (1832) Observations on some remarkable Optical Phenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an Optical Phenomenon which occurs on viewing a Figure of a Crystal or geometrical Solid. The London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 1: 329-337.
6. Suzuki S, Grabowecky M, (2002) Evidence for perceptual "trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 36: 44-157.
7. Wheatstone C, (1838) Contributions to the physiology of vision.-Part the First. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phænomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128: 371-394.
8. Crick F, (1996) Visual perception: Rivalry and consciousness [Comment on Leopold and Logothetis (1996)]. Nature 379: 485-486.
9. Blake R, Logothetis N, (2002) Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 1-12.
10. Blake R, Tong F, (2008) Binocular rivalry. Scholarpedia 3: 1578.
11. Blake R, (1989) A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 96: 145-167.
12. Blake R, Westendorf DH, Overton R, (1980) What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception 9: 223-231.
13. Lehky SR, (1988) An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception 17: 215-228.
14. Nguyen VA, Freeman AW, Wenderoth P, (2001) The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics 63: 348-360.
15. Ooi TL, He ZJ, (1999) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception 28: 551-574.
16. Shimojo S, Nakayama K, (1990) Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 30: 69-80.
17. Wolfe JM, (1986) Stereopsis and binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 93: 269-282.
18. Alais D, O'Shea RP, Mesana-Alais C, Wilson IG, (2000) On binocular alternation. Perception 29: 1447-1445.
19. Kovács I, Papathomas TV, Yang M, Fehér Á, (1996) When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93: 15508-15511.
20. Lee SH, Blake R, (1999) Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research 39: 1447-1454.
21. Blake R, Fox R, (1974) Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research 14: 687-692.
22. Fox R, Check R, (1966) Binocular fusion: A test of the suppression theory. Perception & Psychophysics 1: 331-334.
23. Fox R, Check R, (1968) Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78: 388-395.
24. Ooi TL, Loop MS, (1994) Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity. Vision Research 34: 2997-3003.
25. O'Shea RP, Crassini B, (1981) The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception 10: 283-293.
26. Smith EL, Levi DM, Harwerth RS, White JM, (1982) Color vision is altered during the suppression phase of binocular rivalry. Science 218: 802-804.
27. Wales R, Fox R, (1970) Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics 8: 90-94.
28. Bhardwaj R, O'Shea RP, Alais D, Parker A (2008). Probing visual consciousness: Rivalry between eyes and images. Journal of Vision 8: 2, 1-13.
29. Green DM, Swets JA (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
30. Caetta F, Gorea A, Bonneh Y (2007) Sensory and decisional factors in motion-induced blindness. Journal of Vision: 7: 4, 1-12.
31. Bonneh YS, Cooperman A, Sagi D, (2001) Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature 411: 798-801.
32. Khoe W, Mitchell JF, Reynolds JH, Hillyard SA, (2008) ERP evidence that surface-based attention biases interocular competition during rivalry. Journal of Vision 8(3)18: 1-11.
33. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 444-446.
34. Pelli DG, (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10: 437-442.
35. Watson AB, Pelli DG, (1983) QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics 33: 113-120.
36. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Tanner TA, Rauk JA, Atkinson RC, (1970) Signal recognition as influenced by information feedback. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 7: 259-274.
38. Stuit SM, Cass J, Paffen CLE, Alais D (2009). Orientation-tuned suppression in binocular rivalry reveals general and specific components of rivalry suppression. Journal of Vision 9(11):17, 1-15.
39. O'Shea RP, Crassini B, (1984) Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics 36: 266-276.
40. Wolfe JM, (1983) Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 12: 447-456.
41. Nguyen VA, Freeman AW, Alais D, (2003) Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research 43: 2003-2008.
42. Wilson HR, (2003) Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 100: 14499-14503.
43. Bartels A, Logothetis NK, (2010) Binocular rivalry: A time dependence of eye and stimulus contributions. Journal of Vision 10(12): 3.
44. Alais D, Cass J, O'Shea RP, Blake R, (2010) Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness. Current Biology 20: 1362-1367.
45. O'Shea RP, Parker A, La Rooy DJ, Alais D, (2009) Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: Evidence for common processes. Vision Research 49: 671-681.