Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT Model to Student Teachers

Asia-Pacific Education Researcher

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-10

  Wong, Kung Teck ^a,b   Teo, Timothy ^c   Russo, Sharon ^b  

^a SULTAN IDRIS EDUCATION UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Interactive whiteboard; Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877003483     PISSN: 01195646     EISSN: 22437908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40299-012-0001-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behaviour. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboard revolution: teaching with IWBs. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.
6. Campbell, C. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards in pre-service teacher education: Examples from two Australian universities. Australia Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 447-463.
7. Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Hu, P. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2010). Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(10), 519-549.
8. Cheng, B., Wang, M., Stephen, J. H. Y., Kinshuk, & Peng, J. (2011). Acceptance of competency-based workplace e-learning systems: Effects of individual and peer learning support. Computer & Education, 57(1), 1317-1333.
9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-339.
10. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
11. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it Desirable? Marketing Bulleting, 2, 66-70.
13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person-Hall International.
14. Harlow, A., Cowie, B., & Heazlewood, M. (2010). Keeping in touch with learning: The use of an interactive whiteboard in the junior school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 2(19), 237-243.
15. Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 283-301.
16. Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 3(32), 213-235.
17. Im, I., Kim, Y., & Han, H.-J. (2008). The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users' acceptance of technology. Information & Management, 45(1), 1-9.
18. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
19. Loo, W. H., Paul, Y. H. P., & Chong, S. C. (2009). User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 358-367.
20. Marchewka, K., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93-104.
21. Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506-509.
22. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, R. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
23. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
24. Murica, K., & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417-431.
25. Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 328-367.
26. Runyon, P., & Harber, A. (1991). Fundamentals of behavioral statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Schaik, P. (2009). Unified theory of acceptance and use for websites used by students in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(2), 229-257.
28. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 561-570.
29. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2011. 06. 008.
30. Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modelling approach. Computer & Technology, 57(2), 1645-1653.
31. Teo, T., & van Schaik, P. (2009). Understanding technology acceptance in pre-service teachers: A structural-equation modelling approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 18(1), 47-66.
32. Teo, T., Wong, S. L., & Chai, C. S. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysia pre-service teachers: An application of the TAM. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280.
33. Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). The acceptance and use of computer based assessment. Computer & Education, 56(4), 1032-1044.
34. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 124-143.
35. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167-187.
36. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioural control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Information System Research, 11(4), 342-365.
37. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
38. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
39. Venkatesh, V., & Zhang, X. (2010). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: U. S. vs. China. Journal of Global information Technology Management, 13(1), 5-24.
40. Vincent, J. (2007). The interactive whiteboard in an early years classroom: A case study in the impact of a new technology on pedagogy. Australian Educational Computing, 22(1), 20-25.
41. Wang, Y., & Shih, Y. (2009). Why do people use information kiosks? A validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 158-165.
42. Worcester, R. M., & Burns, T. R. (1975). A statistical examination of the relative precision of verbal scales. Journal of Market Research Society, 17(3), 181-197.
43. Yang, K. (2010). Determinants of US consumer mobile shopping services adoption: Implications for designing mobile shopping services. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27(3), 262-270.
44. Zhou, T., Lu, Y., & Wang, B. (2010). Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 760-767.