Using interactive whiteboards in pre-service teacher education: Examples from two Australian universities

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 447-463

  Campbell, Chris ^a   Kent, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (Australia)

^b ACT Department of Education   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956780557     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1064     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Amosa, W., Ladwig, J., Griffiths, T. & Gore, J. (2007). Equity effects of quality teaching: Closing the gap. In Proceedings Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, 25-29 November, 2007. http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/amo07284.pdf.
2. Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S. & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469.
3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. & Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to research in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4. Beane, J.A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 616-622.
5. BECTA (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards (Report). Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. [verified 7 Jun 2010] http://partners.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf.
6. Breen, R., Lindsay, R., Jenkins, A. & Smith, P. (2001). The role of information and communication technologies in a university learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 95-114.
7. Burns, R.B. (1994). Introduction to research methods. (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
8. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. (5th ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
9. Cope, M. & Kalantzis, B. (2005). Learning by design. Melbourne. Australia: Common Ground.
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1).
11. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (2010a). Experience the Digital Education Revolution: Overview. [viewed 10 Mar 2010] http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Pages/default.aspx.
12. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (2010b). Experience the Digital Education Revolution: Professional Development for teachers. [viewed 10 Mar 2010] http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/Pages/ProfessionalDevelopmentforTeachers.aspx.
13. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (2010c). ICT Innovation Fund Guidelines 2010-2012. Canberra. [verified 7 Jun 2010] http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/DigitalStrategyforTeachers/Pages/ICTInnovationFund.aspx.
14. Gillard, J. (2010, 18th February 2010). $40m for teachers' professional development in ICT. Media Release, 18 February 2010 [viewed 10 Mar 2010] http://www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Releases/Pages/Article_100218_130817.aspx.
15. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 10(3), 257-278.
16. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5-20.
17. Gore, J.M., Griffiths, T. & Ladwig, J.G. (2004). Towards better teaching: Productive pedagogy as a framework for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(4), 375-387.
18. Jonassen, D.H., Howland, J., Marra, R.M. & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
19. Kennewell, S. (2001). Interactive whiteboards - yet another solution looking for a problem to solve? Information Technology in Teacher Education, 39(Autumn), 3-6.
20. Kennewell, S. (2006). Reflections on the interactive whiteboard phenomenon: A synthesis of research from the UK. In Proceedings Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, 26-30 November, Adelaide, Australia. http://www.aare.edu.au/06pap/ken06138.pdf.
21. Kent, P. (2004a). e-teaching - the elusive promise. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA. [verified 7 Jun 2010] http://education.smarttech.com/NR/rdonlyres/B2197B4A-7164-48F8-8C79-483452CB5179/0/Kent2.pdf.
22. Kent, P. (2004b). e-teaching and interactive whiteboards: Technology used to enhance effective pedagogy - creating a significant impact on classroom practice and student learning. Paper presented at the Australian Computers in Education Conference, Adelaide, 6-8 July 2004. [verified 7 Jun 2010; abstract only] http://conferences.acce.edu.au/confpapers/paperdetails.asp?pid=7247&docid=106.
23. Kent, P. (2005). Creating simple and effective IWB files. Practical Interactivity. [not found 7 Jun 2010 at http://practicalinteractivity.edublogs.org/].
24. Kent, P. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: A practical guide for primary teachers. Sydney: Macmillan Education.
25. Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. [viewed 23 Nov 2008, verified 7 Jun 2010] http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm.
26. Masters, J. (2007). Connecting with education: The first year experience progress report. Unpublished report. Faculty of Education, La Trobe University. [not found 7 Jun 2010; see http://ajte.education.ecu.edu.au/issues/PDF/352/Masters.pdf].
27. McRae, D., Ainsworth, G., Groves, R., Rowland, M. & Zbar, V. (2000). Some key ideas in contemporary discussion of teacher professional development. PD 2000 Australia: A national mapping of school teacher professional development (pp. 14-26). http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/pd_2000_australia_school_teacher_development.htm.
28. Miller, D.J., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2005). Developing pedagogic skills for the use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics. [viewed 20 Nov 2009, verified 7 Jun 2010] http://www.keele.ac.uk/media/keeleuniversity/fachumsocsci/sclpppp/education/interactivewhiteboard/BERA%20Paper%20Sep%202005.pdf.
29. Newmann, F.M., Marks, H.M. & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(August), 280-312.
30. Newmann, F.M., Secada, W.G. & Wehlage, G.G. (1995). A guide to authentic instruction and assessment: Vision, standards and scoring. Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Center For Education Research.
31. NSW Department of Education and Training (2004). Quality teaching in NSW public schools: An assessment practice guide. Ryde: NSW Department of Education and Training, Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.
32. Promethean (undated). Promethean Interactive Whiteboards, IWB and Classroom Technology. http://www.prometheanworld.com/.
33. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2007). Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards: A case study of six schools. http://www.ed-dev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/iwbproject/home.html [viewed 19 Nov 2009, verified 16 Jun 2010, see also Australian Educational Computing, 23(1), 8-13.].
34. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2008). Classroom-based use of two educational technologies: A sociocultural perspective. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 394-406. [verified 7 Jun 2010] http://www.citejournal.org/articles/v8i4currentpractice2.pdf.
35. SMART Technologies (undated). SMART Technologies. http://smarttech.com/.
36. Smith, A. (2000). Interactive whiteboard evaluation (2000). [viewed 25 Nov 2008, verified 7 Jun 2010] http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk/pubs/smartboards.htm.
37. Swan, K., Schenker, J. & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The effects of the use of interactive whiteboards on student achievement. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications June 30 - July 4, Vienna.
38. Walker, D. (2002). White enlightening. Times Educational Supplement, 13 September, p. 19.
39. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. (3rd ed. Vol. 5). London: Sage Publications.