The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users' acceptance of technologies

Information and Management

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-9

  Im, Il ^a   Kim, Yongbeom ^b   Han, Hyo Joo ^c  

^a Department of Innovation and Entrepreneurial Marketing   (South Korea)

^b FAIRLEIGH DICKINSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender; Moderating variable; Perceived risk; Technology acceptance; Technology type; User experience; UTAUT

Indexed keywords

RANDOM VARIABLES; RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

MODERATING VARIABLES; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY TYPE; USER EXPERIENCE;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EID: 38649091374     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2007.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.R., and Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-248
2. Baron R.M., and Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 6 (1986) 1173-1182
3. Campbell M.C., and Goodstein R.C. The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumer's evaluations of product incongruity: preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (2001) 439-449
4. Chau P.Y.K. An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems 13 2 (1996) 185-204
5. Dabholkar P.A., and Bagozzi R. An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 30 3 (2002) 184-201
6. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319-340
7. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
8. Featherman M.S. Extending the technology acceptance model by inclusion of perceived risk. Americas Conference on Information Systems. Boston, MA (2001) 758-760
9. Gefen D., and Straub D. The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. JAIS 1 8 (2000) 1-28
10. Gefen D., and Straub D.W. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS 4 7 (2000) 1-77
11. Gefen D., Karahanna E., and Straub D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27 1 (2003) 1-40
12. Hong W., Thong J.Y.L., Wong W.-M., and Tam K.-Y. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 3 (2000-2001) 97-124
13. K.G. Jöeskog, D. Söbom, LISREL8 User's Reference Guide, Science Software, Chicago, 1993.
14. Jacoby J., and Kaplan L.B. The components of perceived risk. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (1972) 382-393
15. Jarvenpaa S., Tractinsky N., Saarinen L., and Vitale M. Consumer trust in an Internet store: a cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5 2 (1999)
16. Karahanna E., Straub D.W., and Chervany N.L. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23 2 (1999) 183-213
17. Lai V.S., and Li H. Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis. Information & Management 42 (2005) 373-386
18. Lee D., Park J., and Ahn J. On the explanation of factors affecting e-commerce adoption. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). New Orleans, LA (2001) 109-120
19. Lin C., Hu P.J., Schroeder J., and Chen H. Exammining User Acceptance of COPLINK Technologies by Law Enforcement Officerces: A Survey Study (2004), University of Arizona, Tucan, Arizona
20. Mandel N. Shifting selves and decision making: the effects of self-construal priming on consumer risk-taking. Journal of Consumer Research 30 1 (2003) 30-40
21. Pavlou P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7 3 (2003) 101-134
22. E. Rogers, M., Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, 1983.
23. Turley L.W., and LeBlanc R.P. An exploratory investigation of consumer decision making in the service sector. Journal of Services Marketing 7 4 (1993) 11-18
24. van der Heijden H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28 4 (2004) 695-704
25. Venkatesh V., Speier C., and Morris M.G. User acceptance enablers in individual decision-making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences 33 (2002) 297-316
26. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
27. Weber E.U., Blais A.-R., and Betz N.E. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 4 (2002) 263-290
28. Wu J.-h., and Wang S.-C. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management 42 (2005) 719-729
29. Yi M.Y., Jackson J.D., Park J.S., and Probst J.C. Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrated view. Information & Management 43 (2006) 350-363