The interactiue whiteboard in an early years classroom: A case study in the impact of a new technology on pedagogy

Australian Educational Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 20-25

  Vincent, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 47549102232     PISSN: 08169020     EISSN: 08169020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Armstrong, V, Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., and Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of the interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57, 4. pp. 457-469.
2. Beauchamp, G (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 3 327-347.
3. Beavis, C. (2001). Digital culture, digital literacies: Expanding notions of text. In C. Durrant & C. Beavis (Eds.), P(ICT)ures of English: Teachers, learners and technology (pp. 145-161). Adelaide: Australian Association of Teachers of English / Wakefield Press.
4. Becta (2004). Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
5. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse, Volume IV: Class codes and control. London: Routledge
6. Cogill, J. (2002). How is the interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does this affect teachers and teaching?. Becta research papers. On-line www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/ IFS_interactive_in_the_prirnary_school.pdf Accessed 12/01/2006
7. Hall, I. and Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 2. 102-117.
8. Kennewell, S. & Morgan, A. (2003). Student teachers' experiences and attitudes towards using interactive whiteboards in the teaching and learning of young children. In: Young Children and Learning Technologies, proceedings of the IFIP working group 3.5. Canberra: Australian Computer Society.
9. Lee, M. and Boyle, M. (2003). Educational effects and implications of the interactive whiteboard strategy of Richardson Primary School - a brief review. On-line, www.richardsonps.act.edu.au /RichardsonReview_Grey.pdf Accessed 18/04/2006
10. Miller, D. & Glover, D. (2002). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change: The experience of five elementary schools in an English education authority. Information Technology in Childhood Annual, pp. 5-19.
11. Smith, H., Higgins, S.. Wall, K., & Miller J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 91-101.
12. Vincent, J. (2004). Computer mediated multimodal text production: Ten-year-olds crossing semiotic boundaries. Unpublished thesis, University of Melbourne.
13. Vincent, J. (2006). Children writing: Multimodality and assessment in the writing classroom. Literacy 40, J 51-57