Watching the grin fade: Tracing the effects of polyploidy on different evolutionary time scales

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 320-331

  Mayfield Jones, Dustin ^a   Washburn, Jacob D ^a   Arias, Tatiana ^a   Edger, Patrick P ^a   Pires, J Chris ^a   Conant, Gavin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Crabtree effect; Meiosis; Mitosis; Network evolution; Polyploidy; Warburg effect; WGD

Indexed keywords

CELL CYCLE; CELL FRACTIONATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL METABOLISM; CELL TYPE; CELLULAR PARAMETERS; EVOLUTION; GENE LOSS; GENETIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; MEIOSIS; MESOPOLYPLOIDY; NEOPOLYPLOIDY; NONHUMAN; PALEOPOLYPLOIDY; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; POLYPLOIDY; REVIEW; WHOLE GENOME DUPLICATION; YEAST;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84876726255     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: 10963634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (153)

1. Mosieniak G., Sikora E. Polyploidy: the link between senescence and cancer. Current Pharmaceutical Design 2010, 16:734-740.
2. Krajcovic M., Overholtzer M. Mechanisms of ploidy increase in human cancers: a new role for cell cannibalism. Cancer Research 2012, 72:1596-1601.
3. Duensing A., Duensing S. Centrosomes, polyploidy and cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2010, 676:93-103.
4. Edgar B.A., Orr-Weaver T.L. Endoreplication cell cycles: more for less. Cell 2001, 105:297-306.
5. Smith A.V., Orr-Weaver T.L. The regulation of the cell cycle during Drosophila embryogenesis: the transition to polyteny. Development 1991, 112:997-1008.
6. Zimmet J., Ravid K. Polyploidy: occurrence in nature, mechanisms, and significance for the megakaryocyte-platelet system. Experimental Hematology 2000, 28:3-16.
7. Friedman W.E., Madrid E.N., Williams J.H. Origin of the fittest and survival of the fittest: relating female gametophyte development to endosperm genetics. International Journal of Plant Sciences 2008, 169:79-92.
8. Fras A., Juchimiuk J., Siwinska D., Maluszynska J. Cytological events in explants of Arabidopsis thaliana during early callogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 2007, 26:1933-1939.
9. Melaragno J.E., Mehrotra B., Coleman A.W. Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1661-1668.
10. Galbraith D.W., Harkins K.R., Knapp S. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 1991, 96:985-989.
11. Storchova Z., Pellman D. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 2004, 5:45-54.
12. Pécrix Y., Rallo G., Folzer H., Cigna M., Gudin S., Le Bris M. Polyploidization mechanisms: temperature environment can induce diploid gamete formation in Rosa sp. Journal of Experimental Botany 2011, 62:3587-3597.
13. Davoli T., Denchi E.L., de Lange T. Persistent telomere damage induces bypass of mitosis and tetraploidy. Cell 2010, 141:81-93.
14. Caperta A.D., Delgado M., Ressurreição F., Meister A., Jones R.N., Viegas W., et al. Colchicine-induced polyploidization depends on tubulin polymerization in c-metaphase cells. Protoplasma 2006, 227:147-153.
15. Kondorosi E., Roudier F., Gendreau E. Plant cell-size control: growing by ploidy?. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2000, 3:488-492.
16. Lavania U.C., Srivastava S., Lavania S., Basu S., Misra N.K., Mukai Y. Autopolyploidy differentially influences body size in plants, but facilitates enhanced accumulation of secondary metabolites, causing increased cytosine methylation. Plant Journal 2012, 71:539-549.
17. Mable B.K. Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants': myths and mechanisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2004, 82:453-466.
18. Ohno S. Evolution by gene duplication 1970, Springer, New York.
19. Mable B.K., Alexandrou M.A., Taylor M.I. Genome duplication in amphibians and fish: an extended synthesis. Journal of Zoology 2011, 284:151-182.
20. Soltis P.S., Soltis D. Polyploidy and genome evolution 2013, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
21. Edger P.P., Pires J.C. Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes. Chromosome Research 2009, 17:699-717.
22. Otto S.P. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 2007, 131:452-462.
23. Ohno S. Gene duplication and the uniqueness of vertebrate genomes circa 1970-1999. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 1999, 10:517-522.
24. Jiao Y., Wickett N.J., Ayyampalayam S., Chanderbali A.S., Landherr L., Ralph P.E., et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473:97-100.
25. Masterson J. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 1994, 264:421-424.
26. Schranz M.E., Mohammadin S., Edger P.P. Ancient whole genome duplications, novelty and diversification: the WGD Radiation Lag-Time Model. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2012, 15:147-153.
27. Arrigo N., Barker M.S. Rarely successful polyploids and their legacy in plant genomes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2012, 15:140-146.
28. Mayrose I., Zhan S.H., Rothfels C.J., Magnuson-Ford K., Barker M.S., Rieseberg L.H., et al. Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates. Science 2011, 333:1257.
29. Mayfield D., Chen Z.J., Pires J.C. Epigenetic regulation of flowering time in polyploids. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2011, 14:174-178.
30. Wood T.E., Takebayashi N., Barker M.S., Mayrose I., Greenspoon P.B., Rieseberg L.H. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:13875-13879.
31. Brownfield L., Köhler C. Unreduced gamete formation in plants: mechanisms and prospects. Journal of Experimental Botany 2011, 62:1659-1668.
32. Uryvaeva I.V., Brodsky V.Y.U. Genome multiplication, growth and development: biology of polyploid and polytene cells 1985, Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.
33. Ravid K., Lu J., Zimmet J.M., Jones M.R. Roads to polyploidy: the megakaryocyte example. Journal of Cellular Physiology 2002, 190:7-20.
34. Terada N., Hamazaki T., Oka M., Hoki M., Mastalerz D.M., Nakano Y., et al. Bone marrow cells adopt the phenotype of other cells by spontaneous cell fusion. Nature 2002, 416:542-545.
35. Hörandl E., Hojsgaard D. The evolution of apomixis in angiosperms: a reappraisal. Plant Biosystems 2012, 146:681-693.
36. Ravi M., Marimuthu M.P.A., Siddiqi I. Gamete formation without meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nature 2008, 451:1121-1124.
37. Yamauchi A., Hosokawa A., Nagata H., Shimoda M. Triploid bridge and role of parthenogenesis in the evolution of autopolyploidy. American Naturalist 2004, 164:101-112.
38. Köhler C., Mittelsten Scheid O., Erilova A. The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants. Trends in Genetics 2010, 26:142-148.
39. Ramsey J., Schemske D.W. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1998, 29:467-501.
40. Ramsey J., Schemske D.W. Neopolylploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2002, 33:589-639.
41. Veitia R.A., Bottani S. Whole genome duplications and a 'function' for junk DNA?. Facts and hypotheses. PLoS One 2009, 4:e8201.
42. Cavalier-Smith T. Skeletal DNA and the evolution of genome size. Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering 1982, 11:273-302.
43. Mirsky A.E., Ris H. The desoxyribonucleic acid content of animal cells and its evolutionary significance. Journal of General Physiology 1951, 34:451-462.
44. Liu B., Vega J.M., Feldman M. Rapid genomic changes in newly synthesized amphiploids of Triticum and Aegilops. II. Changes in low-copy coding DNA sequences. Genome 1998, 41:535-542.
45. Chen Z.J., Ni Z. Mechanisms of genomic rearrangements and gene expression changes in plant polyploids. BioEssays 2006, 28:240-252.
46. Adams K.L., Wendel J.F. Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants. Trends in Genetics 2005, 21:539-543.
47. Gaeta R.T., Pires J.C., Iniguez-Luy F., Leon E., Osborn T.C. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell 2007, 19:3403-3417.
48. Guo M., Davis D., Birchler J.A. Dosage effects on gene expression in a maize ploidy series. Genetics 1996, 142:1349-1355.
49. Fox D.T., Gall J.G., Spradling A.C. Error-prone polyploid mitosis during normal Drosophila development. Genes and Development 2010, 24:2294-2302.
50. Ganem N.J., Storchova Z., Pellman D. Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 2007, 17:157-162.
51. Ganem N.J., Godinho S.A., Pellman D. A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 2009, 460:278-282.
52. Borel F., Lohez O.D., Lacroix F.B., Margolis R.L. Multiple centrosomes arise from tetraploidy checkpoint failure and mitotic centrosome clusters in p53 and RB pocket protein-compromised cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99:9819-9824.
53. Comai L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 2005, 6:836-846.
54. Riley R., Chapman V. Genetic control of the cytologically diplod behaviour of hexaploid wheat. Nature 1958, 182:713-715.
55. Sears E.R. Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annual Review of Genetics 1976, 10:31-51.
56. Wall A.M., Riley R., Gale M.D. The position of a locus on chromosome 5B of Triticum aestivum affecting homoeologous meiotic pairing. Genetics Research 1971, 18:329-339.
57. Prieto P., Shaw P., Moore G. Homologue recognition during meiosis is associated with a change in chromatin conformation. Nature Cell Biology 2004, 6:906-908.
58. Colas I., Shaw P., Prieto P., Wanous M., Spielmeyer W., Mago R., et al. Effective chromosome pairing requires chromatin remodeling at the onset of meiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105:6075-6080.
59. Lukaszewski A.J. The Ph1 locus from wheat controls meiotic chromosome pairing in Autotetraploid rye (Secale cereale L.). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 2010, 129:117-123.
60. Nicolas S.D. Genetic regulation of meiotic cross-overs between related genomes in Brassica napus haploids and hybrids. Plant Cell 2009, 21:373-385.
61. Jenczewski E., Eber F., Grimaud A., Huet S., Lucas M.O., Monod H., et al. PrBn, a major gene controlling homeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids. Genetics 2003, 164:645-653.
62. Liu Z., Adamczyk K., Manzanares-Dauleux M., Eber F., Lucas M.O., Delourme R., et al. Mapping PrBn and other quantitative trait loci responsible for the control of homeologous chromosome pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) haploids. Genetics 2006, 174:1583-1596.
63. Wiseman F.K., Alford K.A., Tybulewicz V.L., Fisher E.M. Down syndrome - recent progress and future prospects. Human Molecular Genetics 2009, 18:R75-R83.
64. Yousafzai F.K., Al-Kaff N., Moore G. The molecular features of chromosome pairing at meiosis: the polyploid challenge using wheat as a reference. Functional and Integrative Genomics 2010, 10:147-156.
65. Yousafzai F.K., Al-Kaff N., Moore G. Structural and functional relationship between the Ph1 locus protein 5B2 in wheat and CDK2 in mammals. Functional and Integrative Genomics 2010, 10:157-166.
66. Al-Kaff N., Knight E., Bertin I., Foote T., Hart N., Griffiths S., et al. Detailed dissection of the chromosomal region containing the Ph1 locus in wheat Triticum aestivum: with deletion mutants and expression profiling. Annals of Botany 2008, 101:863-872.
67. Adams K.L., Wendel J.F. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2005, 8:135-141.
68. Osborn T.C., Chris Pires J., Birchler J.A., Auger D.L., Chen Z.J., Lee H.S., et al. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends in Genetics 2003, 19:141-147.
69. Schubert I., Lysak M.A. Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends in Genetics 2011, 27:207-216.
70. Lysak M.A., Berr A., Pecinka A., Schmidt R., McBreen K., Schubert I. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:5224-5229.
71. Woodhouse M.R., Schnable J.C., Pedersen B.S., Lyons E., Lisch D., Subramaniam S., et al. Following tetraploidy in maize, a short deletion mechanism removed genes preferentially from one of the two homeologs. PLoS Biology 2010, 8.
72. Cheng F., Wu J., Fang L., Sun S., Liu B., Lin K., et al. Biased gene fractionation and dominant gene expression among the subgenomes of Brassica rapa. PLoS One 2012, 7.
73. Sankoff D., Zheng C., Wang B. A model for biased fractionation after whole genome duplication. BMC Genomics 2012, 13(Suppl. 1).
74. Schnable J.C., Springer N.M., Freeling M. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108:4069-4074.
75. Thomas B.C., Pedersen B., Freeling M. Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes. Genome Research 2006, 16:934-946.
76. Freeling M., Woodhouse M.R., Subramaniam S., Turco G., Lisch D., Schnable J.C. Fractionation mutagenesis and similar consequences of mechanisms removing dispensable or less-expressed DNA in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2012, 15:131-139.
77. Sankoff D., Zheng C., Zhu Q. The collapse of gene complement following whole genome duplication. BMC genomics 2010, 11:313.
78. Langham R.J., Walsh J., Dunn M., Ko C., Goff S.A., Freeling M. Genomic duplication, fractionation and the origin of regulatory novelty. Genetics 2004, 166:935-945.
79. Scannell D.R., Byrne K.P., Gordon J.L., Wong S., Wolfe K.H. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 2006, 440:341-345.
80. Sémon M., Wolfe K.H. Consequences of genome duplication. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 2007, 17:505-512.
81. Birchler J.A., Bhadra U., Bhadra M.P., Auger D.L. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Developmental Biology 2001, 234:275-288.
82. Freeling M. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2009, 60:433-453.
83. Birchler J.A., Riddle N.C., Auger D.L., Veitia R.A. Dosage balance in gene regulation: biological implications. Trends in Genetics 2005, 21:219-226.
84. Aury J.M., Jaillon O., Duret L., Noel B., Jubin C., Porcel B.M., et al. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 2006, 444:171-178.
85. Papp B., Pal C., Hurst L.D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 2003, 424:194-197.
86. Blomme T., Vandepoele K., De Bodt S., Simillion C., Maere S., Van de Peer Y. The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biology 2006, 7.
87. Bekaert M., Edger P.P., Pires J.C., Conant G.C. Two-phase resolution of polyploidy in the Arabidopsis metabolic network gives rise to relative followed by absolute dosage constraints. The Plant Cell 2011, 23:1719-1728.
88. Bekaert M., Edger P.P., Hudson C.M., Pires J.C., Conant G.C. Metabolic and evolutionary costs of herbivory defense: systems biology of glucosinolate synthesis. New Phytologist 2012, 196:596-605.
89. Wolfe K.H., Shields D.C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 1997, 387:708-713.
90. Dietrich F.S., Voegeli S., Brachat S., Lerch A., Gates K., Steiner S., et al. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 2004, 304:304-307.
91. Kellis M., Birren B.W., Lander E.S. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2004, 428:617-624.
92. Dujon B., Sherman D., Fischer G., Durrens P., Casaregola S., Lafontaine I., et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 2004, 430:35-44.
93. Byrne K.P., Wolfe K.H. The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Research 2005, 15:1456-1461.
94. Seoighe C., Wolfe K.H. Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. Current Opinion in Microbiology 1999, 2:548-554.
95. Conant G.C., Wolfe K.H. Turning a hobby into a job: how duplicated genes find new functions. Nature Reviews Genetics 2008, 9:938-950.
96. Wapinski I., Pfeffer A., Friedman N., Regev A. Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature 2007, 449:54-61.
97. Guan Y., Dunham M.J., Troyanskaya O.G. Functional analysis of gene duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2007, 175:933-943.
98. Hakes L., Pinney J.W., Lovell S.C., Oliver S.G., Robertson D.L. All duplicates are not equal: the difference between small-scale and genome duplication. Genome Biology 2007, 8:R209.
99. Amoutzias G.D., He Y., Gordon J., Mossialos D., Oliver S.G., Van de Peer Y. Posttranslational regulation impacts the fate of duplicated genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2010, 107:2967-2971.
100. Teichmann S., Babu M.M. Gene regulatory network growth by duplication. Nature Genetics 2004, 36:492-496.
101. Wagner A. The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2001, 18:1283-1292.
102. Qian W., He X., Chan E., Xu H., Zhang J. Measuring the evolutionary rate of protein-protein interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108:8725-8730.
103. Drummond D.A., Raval A., Wilke C.O. A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2006, 23:327-337.
104. Wagner A. Energy constraints on the evolution of gene expression. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2005, 22:1365-1374.
105. Evangelisti A.M., Conant G.C. Nonrandom survival of gene conversions among yeast ribosomal proteins duplicated through genome doubling. Genome Biology and Evolution 2010, 2:826-834.
106. Scannell D.R., Frank A.C., Conant G.C., Byrne K.P., Woolfit M., Wolfe K.H. Independent sorting-out of thousands of duplicated gene pairs in two yeast species descended from a whole-genome duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007, 104:8397-8402.
107. Huminiecki L., Heldin C.H. 2R and remodeling of vertebrate signal transduction engine. BMC Biology 2010, 8:146.
108. Huminiecki L., Goldovsky L., Freilich S., Moustakas A., Ouzounis C., Heldin C.H. Emergence, development and diversification of the TGF-beta signalling pathway within the animal kingdom. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009, 9:28.
109. Conant G.C., Wolfe K.H. Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks after genome duplication. PLoS Biology 2006, 4:e109.
110. Johnston M., Kim J.-H. Glucose as a hormone: receptor-mediated glucose sensing in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemical Society Transactions 2005, 33:247-252.
111. Geladé R., Van de Velde S., Van Dijck P., Thevelein J.M. Multi-level response of the yeast genome to glucose. Genome Biology 2003, 4:233.
112. Merico A., Sulo P., PiŠkur J., Compagno C. Fermentative lifestyle in yeasts belonging to the Saccharomyces complex. FEBS Journal 2007, 274:976-989.
113. Herrero P., Galíndez J., Ruiz N., Martínez-Campa C., Moreno F. Transcriptional regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HXK1, HXK2 and GLK1 genes. Yeast 1995, 11:137-144.
114. Blank L.M., Lehmbeck F., Sauer U. Metabolic-flux and network analysis of fourteen hemiascomycetous yeasts. FEMS Yeast Research 2005, 5:545-558.
115. Conant G.C., Wolfe K.H. Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast. Molecular Systems Biology 2007, 3:129.
116. Galitski T., Saldanha A.J., Styles C.A., Lander E.S., Fink G.R. Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 1999, 285:251-254.
117. Conant G.C., Wolfe K.H. Probabilistic cross-species inference of orthologous genomic regions created by whole-genome duplication in yeast. Genetics 2008, 179:1681-1692.
118. Duarte N.C., Herrgård M.J., Palsson B.Ø. Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. Genome Research 2004, 14:1298-1309.
119. van Hoek M.J., Hogeweg P. Metabolic adaptation after whole genome duplication. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2009, 26:2441-2453.
120. Pfeiffer T., Schuster S., Bonhoeffer S. Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science 2001, 292:504-507.
121. Pfeiffer T., Schuster S. Game-theoretical approaches to studying the evolution of biochemical systems. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2005, 30:20-25.
122. MacLean R.C., Gudelj I. Resource competition and social conflict in experimental populations of yeast. Nature 2006, 441:498-501.
123. Hardin G. The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. Science 1968, 162:1243-1248.
124. Ihmels J., Bergmann S., Gerami-Nejad M., Yanai I., McClellan M., Berman J., et al. Rewiring of the yeast transcriptional network through the evolution of motif usage. Science 2005, 309:938-940.
125. Thomson J.M., Gaucher E.A., Burgan M.F., De Kee D.W., Li T., Aris J.P., et al. Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:630-635.
126. Boveri T. Concerning the origin of malignant tumours by Theodor Boveri. Journal of Cell Science 2008, 121:1-84. Translated and annotated by Henry Harris.
127. Shackney S.E., Smith C.A., Miller B.W., Burholt D.R., Murtha K., Giles H.R., et al. Model for the genetic evolution of human solid tumors. Cancer Research 1989, 49:3344-3354.
128. Frohling S., Dohner H. Chromosomal abnormalities in cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2008, 359:722-734.
129. Mitelman F. Recurrent chromosome aberrations in cancer. Mutation Research 2000, 462:247-253.
130. Chester M., Gallagher J.P., Symonds V.V., Cruz da Silva A.V., Mavrodiev E.V., Leitch A.R., et al. Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109:1176-1181.
131. Xiong Z., Gaeta R.T., Pires J.C. Homoeologous shuffling and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011, 108:7908-7913.
132. Raber M.N., Barlogie B. DNA flow cytometry of human solid tumors. Flow cytometry and sorting 1990, 745-754. Wiley-Liss, New York. M.R. Melamed, T. M.M. Lindmo (Eds.).
133. Merlo L.M., Wang L.S., Pepper J.W., Rabinovitch P.S., Maley C.C. Polyploidy, aneuploidy and the evolution of cancer. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2010, 676:1-13.
134. Levine D.S., Sanchez C.A., Rabinovitch P.S., Reid B.J. Formation of the tetraploid intermediate is associated with the development of cells with more than four centrioles in the elastase-simian virus 40 tumor antigen transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1991, 88:6427-6431.
135. Lv L., Zhang T., Yi Q., Huang Y., Wang Z., Hou H., et al. Tetraploid cells from cytokinesis failure induce aneuploidy and spontaneous transformation of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:2864-2875.
136. Heselmeyer K., Schrock E., du Manoir S., Blegen H., Shah K., Steinbeck R., et al. Gain of chromosome 3q defines the transition from severe dysplasia to invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1996, 93:479-484.
137. Ornitz D.M., Hammer R.E., Messing A., Palmiter R.D., Brinster R.L. Pancreatic neoplasia induced by SV40 T-antigen expression in acinar cells of transgenic mice. Science 1987, 238:188-193.
138. Solomon D.A., Kim T., Diaz-Martinez L.A., Fair J., Elkahloun A.G., Harris B.T., et al. Mutational inactivation of STAG2 causes aneuploidy in human cancer. Science 2011, 333:1039-1043.
139. Pavelka N., Rancati G., Li R. Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: role of aneuploidy in cellular adaptation and cancer. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 2010, 22:809-815.
140. Pepper J.W., Scott Findlay C., Kassen R., Spencer S.L., Maley C.C. SYNTHESIS: cancer research meets evolutionary biology. Evolutionary Applications 2009, 2:62-70.
141. Stratton M.R., Campbell P.J., Futreal P.A. The cancer genome. Nature 2009, 458:719-724.
142. Ye C.J., Stevens J.B., Liu G., Bremer S.W., Jaiswal A.S., Ye K.J., et al. Genome based cell population heterogeneity promotes tumorigenicity: the evolutionary mechanism of cancer. Journal of Cellular Physiology 2009, 219:288-300.
143. Friedl P., Alexander S. Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell 2011, 147:992-1009.
144. Parsons B.L. Many different tumor types have polyclonal tumor origin: evidence and implications. Mutation Research 2008, 659:232-247.
145. Navin N., Kendall J., Troge J., Andrews P., Rodgers L., McIndoo J., et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 2011, 472:90-94.
146. Kim J.W., Dang C.V. Cancer's molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Research 2006, 66:8927-8930.
147. Dell'Antone P. Energy metabolism in cancer cells: how to explain the Warburg and Crabtree effects?. Medical Hypotheses 2012, 79:388-392.
148. Diaz-Ruiz R., Rigoulet M., Devin A. The Warburg and Crabtree effects: on the origin of cancer cell energy metabolism and of yeast glucose repression. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 2011, 1807:568-576.
149. Banerji S., Cibulskis K., Rangel-Escareno C., Brown K.K., Carter S.L., Frederick A.M., et al. Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature 2012, 486:405-409.
150. Hittinger C.T., Carroll S.B. Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch. Nature 2007, 449:677-681.
151. Gordon J.L., Byrne K.P., Wolfe K.H. Additions, losses and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genetics 2009, 5:e1000485.
152. Pérez-Bercoff å., McLysaght A., Conant G.C. Patterns of indirect protein interactions suggest a spatial organization to metabolism. Molecular BioSystems 2011, 7:3056-3064.
153. Huminiecki L., Conant G.C. Polyploidy and the evolution of complex traits. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012, 2012:292068.