Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 207-216

  Schubert, Ingo ^a   Lysak, Martin A ^b  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS AND CROP PLANT RESEARCH IPK   (Germany)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; GENE FUSION; GENE MUTATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPROCAL CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CHROMOSOMES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOMICS; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING;

EID: 79956330054     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 01689525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Mewes H.W., et al. Overview of the yeast genome. Nature 1997, 387:7-65.
2. Sparrow A.H., et al. A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 1972, 23:451-494.
3. Imai H.T., Taylor R.W. Chromosomal polymorphisms involving telomere fusion, centromeric inactivation and centromere shift in the ant Myrmecia (pilosula) n=1. Chromosoma 1989, 98:456-460.
4. Khandelwal S. Chromosome evolution in the genus Ophioglossum L. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1990, 102:205-217.
5. Ohno S. Conservation of linkage relationships between genes as the underlying theme of karyological evolution in mammals. Chromosomes in Evolution of Eukaryotic Groups 1984, Vol. 2:1-11. CRC Press.
6. Rieger R., et al. Glossary of Genetics: Classical and Molecular 1991, Springer-Verlag.
7. Pinkel D., et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and translocations of chromosome 4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85:9138-9142.
8. Lichter P., et al. Rapid detection of human chromosome 21 aberrations by in situ hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85:9664-9668.
9. Ferguson-Smith M.A., Trifonov V. Mammalian karyotype evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:950-962.
10. Lysak M.A., et al. Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae. Genome Res. 2005, 15:516-525.
11. Lysak M.A., et al. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:5224-5229.
12. Mandáková T., Lysak M.A. Chromosomal phylogeny and karyotype evolution in x=7 crucifer species (Brassicaceae). Plant Cell 2008, 20:2559-2570.
13. Mandáková T., et al. Fast diploidization in close mesopolyploid relatives of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22:2277-2290.
14. Salse J., et al. Identification and characterization of shared duplications between rice and wheat provide new insight into grass genome evolution. Plant Cell 2008, 20:11-24.
15. Schlueter J.A., et al. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 2004, 47:868-876.
16. Ming R., et al. The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 2008, 452:991-996.
17. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
18. Cannon S.B., et al. Three sequenced legume genomes and many crop species: rich opportunities for translational genomics. Plant. Physiol. 2009, 151:970-977.
19. International Brachypodium Initiative Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 2010, 463:763-768.
20. Schmutz J., et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 463:178-183.
21. Lysak M.A., et al. Ancestral chromosomal blocks are triplicated in Brassiceae species with varying chromosome number and genome size. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:402-410.
22. Soltis D.E., et al. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:336-348.
23. Schubert I., et al. Sequence organization and the mechanism of interstitial deletion clustering in a plant genome (Vicia faba). Mutat. Res. 1994, 325:1-5.
24. Schubert I. Mobile nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) in Allium (Liliaceae s. lat.) - inferences from the specificity of silver staining. Plant Syst. Evol. 1984, 144:291-305.
25. Schubert I. Alteration of chromosome numbers by generation of minichromosomes - is there a lower limit of chromosome size for stable segregation? Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 2001, 93:175-181.
26. Nussenzweig A., Nussenzweig M.C. Origin of chromosomal translocations in lymphoid cancer. Cell 2010, 141:27-38.
27. Gaeta R.T., Pires J.C. Homoeologous recombination in allopolyploids: the polyploid ratchet. New Phytol. 2010, 186:18-28.
28. Salmon A., et al. Homoeologous nonreciprocal recombination in polyploid cotton. New Phytol. 2010, 186:123-134.
29. Nicolas S.D., et al. Homeologous recombination plays a major role in chromosome rearrangements that occur during meiosis of Brassica napus haploids. Genetics 2007, 175:487-503.
30. Schubert I. Chromosome evolution. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:109-115.
31. Schubert I., et al. Karyotype variability and evolution in Vicia faba L. Biol. Zentralbl. 1982, 101:793-806.
32. Schubert I., et al. On the toleration of duplications and deletions by the Vicia faba genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1988, 76:64-70.
33. Muller H.J. An analysis of the process of structural change in chromosomes of Drosophila. J. Genet. 1940, 40:1-66.
34. Nakamura T.M., et al. Two modes of survival of fission yeast without telomerase. Science 1998, 282:493-496.
35. Darlington C.D. Recent Advances in Cytology 1937, Blakiston, Son and Co.
36. Tobgy H.A. A cytological study of Crepis fuliginosa, C. neglecta, and their F1 hybrid, and its bearing on the mechanism of phylogenetic reduction in chromosome number. J. Genet. 1943, 45:67-111.
37. Stebbins G.L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants 1971, Edward Arnold.
38. Koch M.A., Kiefer M. Genome evolution among cruciferous plants: a lecture from the comparison of the genetic maps of three diploid species - Capsella rubella, Arabidopsis lyrata subsp. petraea, and A. thaliana. Am. J. Bot. 2005, 92:761-767.
39. Luo M.C., et al. Genome comparisons reveal a dominant mechanism of chromosome number reduction in grasses and accelerated genome evolution in Triticeae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:15780-15785.
40. Thiel T., et al. Evidence and evolutionary analysis of ancient whole-genome duplication in barley predating the divergence from rice. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:209.
41. Abrouk M., et al. Palaeogenomics of plants: synteny-based modelling of extinct ancestors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:479-487.
42. Murat F., et al. Ancestral grass karyotype reconstruction unravels new mechanisms of genome shuffling as a source of plant evolution. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1545-1557.
43. Salse J., et al. Reconstruction of monocotyledonous proto-chromosomes reveals faster evolution in plants than in animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:14908-14913.
44. Nasuda S., et al. Stable barley chromosomes without centromeric repeats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:9842-9847.
45. Han F., et al. High frequency of centromere inactivation resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:3238-3243.
46. Schubert I., et al. Alteration of basic chromosome number by fusion-fission cycles. Genome 1995, 38:1289-1292.
47. Kostiner D.R., et al. Stabilization of a terminal inversion duplication of 8p by telomere capture from 18q. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2002, 98:9-12.
48. Harrington L.A., Greider C.W. Telomerase primer specificity and chromosome healing. Nature 1991, 353:451-454.
49. Tsujimoto H., et al. De novo synthesis of telomere sequences at the healed breakpoints of wheat deletion chromosomes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1999, 262:851-856.
50. Schubert I., Rieger R. A new mechanism for altering chromosome-number during karyotype evolution. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1985, 70:213-221.
51. Wei F., et al. Physical and genetic structure of the maize genome reflects its complex evolutionary history. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e123.
52. Wei F., et al. The physical and genetic framework of the maize B73 genome. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000715.
53. Amor D.J., Choo K.H. Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002, 71:695-714.
54. Maggert K.A., Karpen G.H. The activation of a neocentromere in Drosophila requires proximity to an endogenous centromere. Genetics 2001, 158:1615-1628.
55. Ventura M., et al. Evolutionary formation of new centromeres in macaque. Science 2007, 316:243-246.
56. Piras F.M., et al. Uncoupling of satellite DNA and centromeric function in the genus Equus. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000845.
57. Han Y., et al. Centromere repositioning in cucurbit species: implication of the genomic impact from centromere activation and inactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:14937-14941.
58. Huang S., et al. The genome of the cucumber. Cucumis sativus L. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:1275-1281.
59. Cohen S., et al. Extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from tandemly repeated genomic sequences in plants. Plant J. 2008, 53:1027-1034.
60. Navrátilova A., et al. Survey of extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from plant satellite repeats. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8:90.
61. Kirik A., et al. Species-specific double-strand break repair and genome evolution in plants. EMBO J. 2000, 19:5562-5566.
62. Wicker T., et al. Patching gaps in plant genomes results in gene movement and erosion of colinearity. Genome Res. 2010, 20:1229-1237.