MRX protects fork integrity at protein-DNA barriers, and its absence causes checkpoint activation dependent on chromatin context

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 3173-3189

  Bentsen, Iben B ^a   Nielsen, Ida ^a   Lisby, Michael ^b   Nielsen, Helena B ^a,b   Gupta, Souvik Sen ^a   Mundbjerg, Kamilla ^a,c   Andersen, Anni H ^a   Bjergbaek, Lotte ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; MRE11 PROTEIN; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN MRX; RIBOSOME DNA; SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR PROTEIN 2; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME 6; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE DELETION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIR2 GENE;

CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR PROTEINS, SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIRTUIN 2;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84876390863     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt051     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Admire, A., Shanks, L., Danzl, N., Wang, M., Weier, U., Stevens, W., Hunt, E. and Weinert, T. (2006) Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev., 20, 159-173.
2. Glover, T.W. (2006) Common fragile sites. Cancer Lett., 232, 4-12.
3. Lambert, S. and Carr, A.M. (2005) Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie, 87, 591-602.
4. Tourriere, H. and Pasero, P. (2007) Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst.), 6, 900-913.
5. Brewer, B.J., Lockshon, D. and Fangman, W.L. (1992) The arrest of replication forks in the rDNA of yeast occurs independently of transcription. Cell, 71, 267-276.
6. Kobayashi, T. (2011) Regulation of ribosomal RNA gene copy number and its role in modulating genome integrity and evolutionary adaptability in yeast. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 68, 1395-1403.
7. Dalgaard, J.Z. and Klar, A.J. (2000) swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell, 102, 745-751.
8. Katou, Y., Kanoh, Y., Bando, M., Noguchi, H., Tanaka, H., Ashikari, T., Sugimoto, K. and Shirahige, K. (2003) S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature, 424, 1078-1083.
9. Desany, B.A., Alcasabas, A.A., Bachant, J.B. and Elledge, S.J. (1998) Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev., 12, 2956-2970.
10. Cobb, J.A., Bjergbaek, L., Shimada, K., Frei, C. and Gasser, S.M. (2003) DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J., 22, 4325-4336.
11. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., Newlon, C.S. and Foiani, M. (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature, 412, 557-561.
12. Tercero, J.A., Longhese, M.P. and Diffley, J.F. (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell, 11, 1323-1336.
13. Tercero, J.A. and Diffley, J.F. (2001) Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature, 412, 553-557.
14. Calzada, A., Hodgson, B., Kanemaki, M., Bueno, A. and Labib, K. (2005) Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev., 19, 1905-1919.
15. Lambert, S., Watson, A., Sheedy, D.M., Martin, B. and Carr, A.M. (2005) Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell, 121, 689-702.
16. Ahn, J.S., Osman, F. and Whitby, M.C. (2005) Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast. EMBO J., 24, 2011-2023.
17. Bidnenko, V., Ehrlich, S.D. and Michel, B. (2002) Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences. EMBO J., 21, 3898-3907.
18. Courcelle, J., Donaldson, J.R., Chow, K.H. and Courcelle, C.T. (2003) DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli. Science, 299, 1064-1067.
19. Lambert, S., Mizuno, K., Blaisonneau, J., Martineau, S., Chanet, R., Freon, K., Murray, J.M., Carr, A.M. and Baldacci, G. (2010) Homologous recombination restarts blocked replication forks at the expense of genome rearrangements by template exchange. Mol. Cell, 39, 346-359.
20. Mizuno, K., Lambert, S., Baldacci, G., Murray, J.M. and Carr, A.M. (2009) Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev., 23, 2876-2886.
21. Nielsen, I., Bentsen, I.B., Lisby, M., Hansen, S., Mundbjerg, K., Andersen, A.H. and Bjergbaek, L. (2009) A Flp-nick system to study repair of a single protein-bound nick in vivo. Nat. Methods, 6, 753-757.
22. Frei, C. and Gasser, S.M. (2000) The yeast Sgs1p helicase acts upstream of Rad53p in the DNA replication checkpoint and colocalizes with Rad53p in S-phase-specific foci. Genes Dev., 14, 81-96.
23. Wu, J.R. and Gilbert, D.M. (1995) Rapid DNA preparation for 2D gel analysis of replication intermediates. Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 3997-3998.
24. Huberman, J.A., Spotila, L.D., Nawotka, K.A., el-Assouli, S.M. and Davis, L.R. (1987) The in vivo replication origin of the yeast 2 microns plasmid. Cell, 51, 473-481.
25. Maringele, L. and Lydall, D. (2006) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of budding yeast chromosomes. Methods Mol. Biol., 313, 65-73.
26. Pellicioli, A., Lucca, C., Liberi, G., Marini, F., Lopes, M., Plevani, P., Romano, A., Di Fiore, P.P. and Foiani, M. (1999) Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J., 18, 6561-6572.
27. Zou, H. and Rothstein, R. (1997) Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell, 90, 87-96.
28. Burkhalter, M.D. and Sogo, J.M. (2004) rDNA enhancer affects replication initiation and mitotic recombination: Fob1 mediates nucleolytic processing independently of replication. Mol. Cell, 15, 409-421.
29. Straight, A.F., Shou, W., Dowd, G.J., Turck, C.W., Deshaies, R.J., Johnson, A.D. and Moazed, D. (1999) Net1, a Sir2-associated nucleolar protein required for rDNA silencing and nucleolar integrity. Cell, 97, 245-256.
30. Huang, J. and Moazed, D. (2003) Association of the RENT complex with nontranscribed and coding regions of rDNA and a regional requirement for the replication fork block protein Fob1 in rDNA silencing. Genes Dev., 17, 2162-2176.
31. Mimitou, E.P. and Symington, L.S. (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature, 455, 770-774.
32. Shim, E.Y., Chung, W.H., Nicolette, M.L., Zhang, Y., Davis, M., Zhu, Z., Paull, T.T., Ira, G. and Lee, S.E. (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J., 29, 3370-3380.
33. Zhu, Z., Chung, W.H., Shim, E.Y., Lee, S.E. and Ira, G. (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell, 134, 981-994.
34. Cejka, P., Cannavo, E., Polaczek, P., Masuda-Sasa, T., Pokharel, S., Campbell, J.L. and Kowalczykowski, S.C. (2010) DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature, 467, 112-116.
35. Niu, H., Chung, W.H., Zhu, Z., Kwon, Y., Zhao, W., Chi, P., Prakash, R., Seong, C., Liu, D., Lu, L. et al. (2010) Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 467, 108-111.
36. Bressan, D.A., Baxter, B.K. and Petrini, J.H. (1999) The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol., 19, 7681-7687.
37. Mimitou, E.P. and Symington, L.S. (2010) Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J., 29, 3358-3369.
38. Hohl, M., Kwon, Y., Galvan, S.M., Xue, X., Tous, C., Aguilera, A., Sung, P. and Petrini, J.H. (2011) The Rad50 coiled-coil domain is indispensable for Mre11 complex functions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 18, 1124-1131.
39. Tittel-Elmer, M., Alabert, C., Pasero, P. and Cobb, J.A. (2009) The MRX complex stabilizes the replisome independently of the S phase checkpoint during replication stress. EMBO J., 28, 1142-1156.
40. Weitao, T., Budd, M., Hoopes, L.L. and Campbell, J.L. (2003) Dna2 helicase/nuclease causes replicative fork stalling and double-strand breaks in the ribosomal DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 22513-22522.
41. Fritsch, O., Burkhalter, M.D., Kais, S., Sogo, J.M. and Schar, P. (2010) DNA ligase 4 stabilizes the ribosomal DNA array upon fork collapse at the replication fork barrier. DNA Repair (Amst.), 9, 879-888.
42. Weitao, T., Budd, M. and Campbell, J.L. (2003) Evidence that yeast SGS1, DNA2, SRS2, and FOB1 interact to maintain rDNA stability. Mutat. Res., 532, 157-172.
43. Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F. and Nasmyth, K. (1999) Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature, 400, 37-42.
44. Torres, J.Z., Schnakenberg, S.L. and Zakian, V.A. (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 3198-3212.
45. Hopfner, K.P., Craig, L., Moncalian, G., Zinkel, R.A., Usui, T., Owen, B.A., Karcher, A., Henderson, B., Bodmer, J.L., McMurray, C.T. et al. (2002) The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature, 418, 562-566.
46. Doksani, Y., Bermejo, R., Fiorani, S., Haber, J.E. and Foiani, M. (2009) Replicon dynamics, dormant origin firing, and terminal fork integrity after double-strand break formation. Cell, 137, 247-258.
47. Ray Chaudhuri, A., Hashimoto, Y., Herrador, R., Neelsen, K.J., Fachinetti, D., Bermejo, R., Cocito, A., Costanzo, V. and Lopes, M. (2012) Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 19, 417-423.
48. Defossez, P.A., Prusty, R., Kaeberlein, M., Lin, S.J., Ferrigno, P., Silver, P.A., Keil, R.L. and Guarente, L. (1999) Elimination of replication block protein Fob1 extends the life span of yeast mother cells. Mol. Cell, 3, 447-455.
49. Atkinson, J. and McGlynn, P. (2009) Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 3475-3492.
50. Postow, L., Crisona, N.J., Peter, B.J., Hardy, C.D. and Cozzarelli, N.R. (2001) Topological challenges to DNA replication: conformations at the fork. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 8219-8226.
51. Postow, L., Ullsperger, C., Keller, R.W., Bustamante, C., Vologodskii, A.V. and Cozzarelli, N.R. (2001) Positive torsional strain causes the formation of a four-way junction at replication forks. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 2790-2796.
52. Torres-Rosell, J., De Piccoli, G., Cordon-Preciado, V., Farmer, S., Jarmuz, A., Machin, F., Pasero, P., Lisby, M., Haber, J.E. and Aragon, L. (2007) Anaphase onset before complete DNA replication with intact checkpoint responses. Science, 315, 1411-1415.
53. Goodarzi, A.A., Noon, A.T., Deckbar, D., Ziv, Y., Shiloh, Y., Lobrich, M. and Jeggo, P.A. (2008) ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol. Cell., 31, 167-177.
54. Kim, J.A., Kruhlak, M., Dotiwala, F., Nussenzweig, A. and Haber, J.E. (2007) Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J. Cell Biol., 178, 209-218.
55. Murga, M., Jaco, I., Fan, Y., Soria, R., Martinez-Pastor, B., Cuadrado, M., Yang, S.M., Blasco, M.A., Skoultchi, A.I. and Fernandez-Capetillo, O. (2007) Global chromatin compaction limits the strength of the DNA damage response. J. Cell Biol., 178, 1101-1108.
56. Noon, A.T., Shibata, A., Rief, N., Lobrich, M., Stewart, G.S., Jeggo, P.A. and Goodarzi, A.A. (2010) 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat. Cell Biol., 12, 177-184.
57. Ziv, Y., Bielopolski, D., Galanty, Y., Lukas, C., Taya, Y., Schultz, D.C., Lukas, J., Bekker-Jensen, S., Bartek, J. and Shiloh, Y. (2006) Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM-and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 870-876.
58. Di Micco, R., Sulli, G., Dobreva, M., Liontos, M., Botrugno, O.A., Gargiulo, G., dal Zuffo, R., Matti, V., d'Ario, G., Montani, E. et al. (2011) Interplay between oncogene-induced DNA damage response and heterochromatin in senescence and cancer. Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 292-302.
59. Lisby, M. and Rothstein, R. (2008) Differential regulation of the cellular response to DNA double strand breaks in G1. Mol. Cell, 30, 73-85.