The role of symbols signalling the product status on online users' information processing

Online Information Review

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 8-27

  Chang Lee, Kun ^a   Gurrea, Raquel ^b   Orús, Carlos ^b   Flavián, Carlos ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Consumer behaviour; Dual process theories; Information diagnosticity; Information retrieval; Need for cognition; Popularity; Product symbols; Recommendation

Indexed keywords

DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES; INFORMATION DIAGNOSTICITY; NEED FOR COGNITIONS; POPULARITY; RECOMMENDATION;

CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; WEBSITES;

DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 84875892515     PISSN: 14684527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14684521311311603     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszawski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A. and Wood, S. (1997), “Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 3, pp. 38-53.
2. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), “Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-23.
3. Arcand, M., Nantel, J., Arles-Dufour, M. and Vincent, A. (2007), “The impact of reading a web site's privacy statement over privacy and perceived trust”, Online Information Review, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 661-81.
4. Azjen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
5. Baron, R. and Kenny, D.A. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173-82.
6. Boulding, W. and Kirmani, A. (1993), “A consumer-side experimental examination of signalling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 111-23.
7. Chaiken, S. (1980), “Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 752-66.
8. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. and Eagly, A.H. (1989), “Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context”, in Uleman, J.S. and Bargh, J.A. (Eds), Unintended Thought, Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 212-52.
9. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. De Maeyer, P. and Estelami, H. (2011), “Consumer perceptions of third party product quality ratings”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64 No. 10, pp. 1067-73.
11. Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S. (1993), The Psychology of Attitudes, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA.
12. European Interactive Advertising Association (EIAA) (2008), “Europe online 2007”, available at: www.eiaa.net/research/europe-online.asp (accessed 10 May 2009).
13. Goel, L. and Prokopec, S. (2009), “If you build it will they come? An empirical investigation of consumer perceptions and strategy in virtual worlds”, Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 9 Nos 1-2, pp. 115-34.
14. Gupta, P. and Harris, J. (2010), “How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: a motivation to process information perspective”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63 Nos 9-10, pp. 1041-9.
15. Hair, J.F. Jr, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
16. Haynes, G.A. (2009), “Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: the effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 204-12.
17. Henry, P. (2005), “Is the internet empowering consumers to make better decisions, or strengthening marketers' potential to persuade?”, in Haugtvedt, C.P., Machleit, K.A. and Yalch, R.F. (Eds), Online Consumer Psychology. Understanding and Influencing Consumer Behaviour in the Virtual World, Routledge, New York, NY, pp. 345-60.
18. Higgins, E.T. (2000), “Category accessibility”, in Kazdin, A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 2, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 48-9.
19. Ho, B.C.T. and Oh, K.B. (2009), “An empirical study of the use of e-security seals in e-commerce”, Online Information Review, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 655-71.
20. Horcajo, J., Petty, R.E. and Briñol, P. (2010), “The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 99 No. 3, pp. 498-512.
21. Hsiao, K.L., Lin, J.C.C., Wang, X.Y., Lu, H.P. and Yu, H. (2010), “Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations”, Online Information Review, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 935-53.
22. Huang, J.H. and Chen, Y.F. (2006), “Herding in online product choice”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 413-28.
23. Huang, S.L. (2011), “Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: evaluation of preference-elicitation methods”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 398-407.
24. Jiang, Z.J. and Benbasat, I. (2005), “Virtual product experience: effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 111-48.
25. Kempf, D.S. and Laczniak, R.N. (2001), “Advertising's influence on subsequent product trial processing”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 27-38.
26. Kempf, D.S. and Smith, R.E. (1998), “Consumer processing of product trial and the influence of prior advertising: a structural modeling approach”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 325-38.
27. Khare, A., Labrecque, L.I. and Asare, A.K. (2011), “The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: an experimental examination of online consumer ratings”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 87 No. 1, pp. 111-26.
28. Kirmani, A. and Rao, A.R. (2000), “No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64 No. 2, pp. 66-79.
29. Lee, B.C., Ang, L. and Dubelaar, C. (2005), “Lemons on the web: a signalling approach to the problem of trust in internet commerce”, Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 607-23.
30. Lin, C.H. and Wu, P.H. (2006), “Effect of variety on consumer preferences: the role of need for cognition and recommended alternatives”, Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 34 No. 7, pp. 865-76.
31. Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
32. Observatorio Nacional de las Telecomunicaciones y de la Sociedad de la Información (ONTSI) (2010), Estudio sobre Comercio Electrónico B2C 2010, available at: www.ontsi.red.es/hogares-ciudadanos/articles/id/4877/estudio-b2c-2010.html (accessed 14 April 2011).
33. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L. and Zeithaml, V.A. (1988), “SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 12-40.
34. Parker, J.R. and Lehmann, D.R. (2011), “When shelf-based scarcity impacts consumer preferences”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 87 No. 2, pp. 142-55.
35. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), “The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 123-205.
36. Petty, R.E., Briñol, P. and Tormala, Z.L. (2002), “Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: the self-validation hypothesis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 5, pp. 722-41.
37. Richardson, P.S., Dick, A.S. and Jain, A.K. (1994), “Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 4, pp. 28-36.
38. Rosen, D.L. and Olshavsky, R.W. (1987), “The dual role of informational social influence: implications for marketing management”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 123-44.
39. Senecal, S. and Nantel, J. (2004), “The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 80 No. 2, pp. 159-69.
40. Tormala, Z.L., Petty, R.E. and Briñol, P. (2002), “Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: a self-validation analysis”, Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 1700-12.
41. Tormala, Z.L., Rucker, D.D. and Seger, C.R. (2008), “When increased confidence yields increased thought: a confidence-matching hypothesis”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 141-7.
42. Tucker, C. and Zhang, J. (2009), “How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment”, MIT Sloan working paper, available at: http://somwp.utdallas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/WDG.pdf (accessed 13 May 2010).
43. Van Noort, G., Kerkhof, P. and Fennis, B.M. (2008), “The persuasiveness of online safety cues: the impact of prevention focus compatibility of web content on consumers' risk perceptions, attitudes, and intentions”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 58-72.
44. Wells, J.D., Valacich, J.S. and Hess, T.J. (2011), “What signals are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 373-96.
45. Wood, S.L. and Swait, J. (2002), “Psychological indicators of innovation adoption: cross-classification based on need for cognition and need for change”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 1-13.
46. Xiao, B. and Benbasat, I. (2007), “E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 137-209.
47. Zuckerman, A. and Chaiken, S. (1998), “A heuristic-systematic processing analysis of the effectiveness of product warning labels”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 7, pp. 621-42.