Evaluating functional connectivity with matrix behavior uncertainty for an endangered butterfly

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 559-569

  Severns, Paul M ^a   McIntire, Eliot J B ^b,c   Schultz, Cheryl B ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c PACIFIC FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biased correlated random walk; Functional connectivity; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat restoration; Matrix configuration; SEIBM

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BUTTERFLY; CONNECTIVITY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT RESTORATION; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOVEMENT; PRAIRIE; PROBABILITY; RANDOM WALK METHOD; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

OREGON; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 84874991159     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9860-6     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andersson E, Bodin O (2009) Practical tool for landscape planning? An empirical investigation of network based models of habitat fragmentation. Ecography 32: 123-132.
2. Arnold RA (1983) Ecological studies of six endangered butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). U Cal Pub Entomol 99: 1-153.
3. Baguette M, van Dyck H (2007) Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecol 22: 1117-1129.
4. Baum KA, Haynes KJ, Dillemuth FP, Cronin JT (2004) The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. Ecology 85: 2671-2676.
5. Bélisle M (2005) Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86: 1988-1995.
6. Breed GA, Jonsen ID, Myers RA, Bowen WD, Leonard ML (2009) Sex-specific, seasonal foraging tactics of adult grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) revealed by state-space analysis. Ecology 90: 3209-3221.
7. Bridge ES, Thorup K, Bowlin MS, Chilson PB, Diehl RH, Fleron RW, Hartl P, Kays R, Kelly JF, Robinson WD, Wikelski M (2011) Technology on the move: recent and forthcoming innovations for tracking migratory birds. BioSci 61: 689-698.
8. Cant ET, Smith AD, Reynolds DR, Osborne JL (2005) Tracking butterfly flight paths across the landscape with harmonic radar. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 272: 785-790.
9. Carleton A, Schultz CB (2012) Restoration action and species response: oviposition habits of Plebejus icarioides fenderi (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) across a restoration chronosequence. J Insect Conserv. doi: 10. 1007/s10841-012-9535-7.
10. Castellόn TD, Sieving KE (2006) An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conserv Biol 20: 135-145.
11. Christy JA, Alverson ER (2011) Historical vegetation of the Willamette Valley, Oregon, circa 1850. Northwest Sci 85: 93-107.
12. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15: 1943-1966.
13. Douglas-Hamilton I, Krink T, Vollrath F (2005) Movements and corridors of African elephants in relation to protected areas. Naturwissenschaften 92: 158-163.
14. Dover JW, Fry GLA (2001) Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects of butterfly behavior in an agricultural landscape. Entomol Exp Appl 100: 221-233.
15. Dover J, Settele J (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J Insect Conserv 13: 3-27.
16. Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2011) Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference. Biol Conserv 144: 298-305.
17. Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol 21: 1003-1015.
18. Fall A, Fall JG (2001) A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecol Model 141: 1-18.
19. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16: 265-280.
20. Fudickar AM, Wikelski M, Partecke J (2011) Tracking migratory songbirds: accuracy of light-level loggers (geolocators) in forest habitats. Methods Ecol Evol 3: 47-52.
21. Goodwin BJ, Fahrig L (2002) How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99: 552-570.
22. Graf RF, Kramer-Schadt S, Fernández N, Grimm V (2007) What you see is where you go? Modeling dispersal in mountain landscapes. Landscape Ecol 22: 853-866.
23. Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153: 215-227.
24. Hagan M, Wikelski M, Kissling WD (2011) Space use of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) revealed by radio tracking. PLoS ONE 6: e19997.
25. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
26. Hawkes C (2009) Linking movement behaviour, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation the key? J Anim Ecol 78: 894-906.
27. Johannessen CL, Davenport WA, Millet A, McWilliams S (1970) The vegetation of the Willamette Valley. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 61: 286-302.
28. Kindlmann P, Burel F (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol 23: 879-890.
29. Knowlton JL, Graham CH (2010) Using behavioral landscape ecology to predict species' responses to land-use and climate change. Biol Conserv 143: 1342-1354.
30. Lima SL, Zollner PA (1996) Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 131-135.
31. Marucco F, McIntire EJB (2010) Predicting spatio-temporal recolonization of large carnivore populations and livestock depredation risk: wolves in the Italian Alps. J Appl Ecol 47: 789-798.
32. McIntire EJB, Schultz CB, Crone EE (2007) Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact. J Appl Ecol 44: 725-736.
33. McIntire EJB, Rompré G, Severns PM (2013) Biased correlated random walk and foray loop: which movement hypothesis drives a butterfly metapopulation? Oecologia. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-012-2475-9.
34. Moilanen A, Hanski I (2001) On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos 95: 147-151.
35. Mooij WM, DeAngelis DL (2003) Uncertainty in spatially explicit animal dispersal models. Ecol Appl 13: 794-805.
36. Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105: 19052-19059.
37. Ovaskainen O, Luoto M, Ikonen I, Rekola H, Meyke E, Kuussaari M (2008) An empirical test of a diffusion model: predicting clouded apollo movements in a novel environment. Am Nat 171: 610-619.
38. Pe'er G, Kramer-Schadt S (2008) Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models. Ecol Model 213: 73-85.
39. Pe'er G, Saltz D, Frank K (2005) Virtual corridors for conservation management. Conserv Biol 19: 1997-2003.
40. Prevedello JA, Vieira MV (2010) Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers Conserv 19: 1205-1233.
41. Prevedello JA, Forero-Medina G, Vieira MV (2010) Movement behavior within and beyond perceptual ranges in three small mammals: effects of matrix type and body mass. J Anim Ecol 79: 1315-1323.
42. Reuter H, Breckling B, Jopp F (2011) Individual-based models. In: Jopp F, Reuter H, Breckling B (eds) Modelling complex ecological dynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 163-178.
43. Revilla E, Wiegand T (2008) Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105: 19120-19125.
44. Revilla E, Wiegand T, Palomares F, Ferreras P, Delibes M (2004) Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: from individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. Am Nat 164: E130-E153.
45. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158: 87-99.
46. Ries L, Fletcher RJ Jr, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variation explained. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 491-522.
47. Schofield G, Hobson VJ, Fossette S, Lilley MKS, Katselidis KA, Hays GC (2010) Fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles. Divers Distr 16: 840-853.
48. Schooley RL, Wiens JA (2003) Finding habitat patches and functional connectivity. Oikos 102: 559-570.
49. Schultz CB (1998) Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly. Conserv Biol 12: 284-292.
50. Schultz CB (2001) Restoring resources for an endangered butterfly. J Appl Ecol 38: 1007-1019.
51. Schultz CB, Crone EE (2001) Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 7: 1879-1892.
52. Schultz CB, Crone EE (2005) Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conserv Biol 19: 887-896.
53. Schultz CB, Hammond PC, Wilson MV (2003) The biology of Fender's blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi), an endangered species of western Oregon native prairies. Nat Areas J 23: 61-71.
54. Schultz CB, Franco AMA, Crone EE (2012) Response of butterflies to structural and resource boundaries. J Anim Ecol 81: 724-734.
55. Severns PM (2003) Propagation of a long-lived and threatened prairie plant Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii. Restor Ecol 11: 334-342.
56. Severns PM (2008a) Exotic grass invasion impacts fitness of an endangered prairie butterfly, Icaricia icarioides fenderi. J Insect Conserv 12: 651-661.
57. Severns PM (2008b) Road crossing behavior of an endangered grassland butterfly, Icaricia icarioides fenderi Macy (Lycaenidae), between a subdivided population. J Lepid Soc 62: 55-58.
58. Severns PM, Warren AD (2008) Saving an imperiled butterfly, Euphydryas editha taylori (Taylor's checkerspot), by selectively conserving and eliminating exotic plants. Anim Conserv 11: 476-483.
59. Shapiro AM (2002) The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers Distrib 8: 31-40.
60. Shochat E, Patten MA, Morris DW, Reinking DL, Wolfe DH, Sherrod SK (2005) Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success. Oikos 111: 159-169.
61. Summerville KS, Veech JA, Crist TO (2002) Does variation in patch use among butterfly species contribute to nestedness at fine spatial scales? Oikos 97: 195-204.
62. Tepedino VJ, Bradley BA, Griswald TL (2008) Might flowers of invasive plants increase native bee diversity? Intimations from Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. Nat Areas J 28: 44-49.
63. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90: 7-19.
64. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17: 229-239.
65. Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates.
66. Turlure C, Baguette M, Stevens VM, Maes D (2011) Species- and sex-specific adjustments of movement behavior to landscape heterogeneity in butterflies. Behav Ecol 22: 967-975.
67. Uezu A, Metzger JP, Vielliard JME (2005) Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic forest bird species. Biol Conserv 123: 507-519.
68. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2010) Recovery plan for the prairie species of western Oregon and southwestern Washington U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
69. Valentine-Darby PL, Darby PC, Percival HF (2011) Gender-based differences in Florida apple snail (Pomacea paludosa) movements. Malacologia 54: 109-118.
70. van Dyck H, Baguette M (2005) Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl Ecol 6: 535-545.
71. Vos CC, Berry P, Opdam P, Baveco H, Nijhof B, O'Hanley J, Bell C, Kuipers H (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. J Appl Ecol 45: 1722-1731.
72. Wikelski M, Moskowitz D, Adelman JS, Cochran J, Wilcove DS, May ML (2006) Simple rules guide dragonfly migration. Biol Lett 2: 325-329.
73. Wikelski M, Kays RW, Kasdin NJ, Thorup K, Smith JA, Swenson GW (2007) Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists. J Exp Biol 210: 181-186.
74. Wilson MV, Erhart T, Hammond PC, Kaye TN, Kuykendall K, Liston A, Robinson AF Jr, Schultz CB, Severns PM (2003) The biology of Kincaid's lupine (Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii), a threatened species of western Oregon native prairies. Nat Areas J 23: 72-83.