Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference

Biological Conservation

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 298-305

  Eigenbrod, Felix ^a   Hecnar, Stephen J ^b   Fahrig, Lenore ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amphibian decline; Biodiversity; Experimental design; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat loss; Landscape ecology

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIODIVERSITY; DATA SET; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FROG; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; LANDSCAPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; POPULATION DECLINE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

GREAT LAKES BASIN; MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; HYLA VERSICOLOR;

EID: 78751569730     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bellamy P.E., Hinsley S.A., Newton I. Factors influencing bird species numbers in small woods in south-east England. Journal of Applied Ecology 1996, 33:249-262.
2. Brennan J.M., Bender D.J., Contreras T.A., Fahrig L. Focal patch landscape studies for wildlife management. Optimizing Sampling Effort Across Scales. Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management 2002, 68-91. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Wu, W.W. Taylor (Eds.).
3. Cushman S.A. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 2006, 128:231-240.
4. Eigenbrod F., Hecnar S.J., Fahrig L. The relative effects of road traffic and forest cover on anuran populations. Biological Conservation 2008, 141:35-46.
5. Eigenbrod, F., Hecnar, S.J, Fahrig, L., 2009. Quantifying the road-effect zone: threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario, Canada. Ecology and Society, 14, 24. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art24/.
6. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2003, 34:487-515.
7. Findlay C.S., Lenton J., Zheng L. Land-use correlates of anuran community richness and composition in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Écoscience 2001, 8:336-343.
8. Freckleton R. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. Journal of Applied Ecology 2002, 71:542-545.
9. Gagné S.A., Fahrig L. Effect of landscape context on anuran communities in breeding ponds in the National Capital Region, Canada. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:205-215.
10. Gibbs J.P., Whiteleather K.K., Schueler F.W. Changes in frog and toad populations over 30 years in New York state. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:1148-1157.
11. Gibbs K.E., Mackey R.L., Currie D.J. Human land use, agriculture, pesticides and losses of imperiled species. Diversity and Distributions 2009, 15:242-253.
12. Graham M.H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 2003, 84:2809-2815.
13. Guerry A.D., Hunter M.L. Amphibian distributions in a landscape of forests and agriculture: and examination of landscape composition and configuration. Conservation Biology 2002, 16:745-754.
14. Herrmann H.L., Babbitt K.J., Baber M.J., Congalton R.G. Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape. Biological Conservation 2005, 123:139-149.
15. Hocking D.J., Semlitsch R.D. Effects of timber harvest on breeding-site selection by gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor). Biological Conservation 2007, 138:506-513.
16. Holland J.D., Bert D.G., Fahrig L. Determining the spatial scale of species' response to habitat. BioScience 2004, 54:227-233.
17. Homan R.N., Windmiller B.S., Reed M. Critical thresholds associated with habitat loss for two vernal pool-breeding amphibians. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:1547-1553.
18. Houlahan J.E., Findlay C.S. The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2003, 60:1078-1094.
19. Hulbert S.H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 1984, 54:187-211.
20. Knutson M.G., Sauer J.M., Olsen D.A., Mossman M.J., Hemesath L.M., Lannoo M.J. Effects of landscape composition and wetland fragmentation on frog and toad abundance and species richness in Iowa and Wisconsin, USA. Conservation Biology 1999, 13:1437-1446.
21. Knutson M.G., Richardson W.B., Reineke D.M., Gray B.R., Parmelee J.R., Weick S.E. Agricultural ponds support amphibian populations. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:669-684.
22. Legendre P. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm?. Ecology 1993, 74:1659-1673.
23. Lehtinen R.M., Galatowitsch S.M., Tester J.R. Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 1999, 19:1-12.
24. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications 2002, 12:335-345.
25. Mossman M.J., Hartman L.M., Hay R., Sauer J.R., Dhuey B.J. Monitoring long term-trends in Wisconsin frog and toad populations. Status and Conservation of Midwestern Amphibians 1998, 169-198. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, USA. M.J. Lanoo (Ed.).
26. Pechmann J.H.K., Scott D.E., Semlitsch R.D., Caldwell J.P., Vitt L.J., Gibbons J.W. Declining amphibian populations: the problem of separating human impacts from natural fluctuations. Science 1991, 253:892-895.
27. Porej D., Micacchion M., Hetherington T.E. Core terrestrial habitat for conservation of local populations of salamanders and wood frogs in agricultural landscapes. Biological Conservation 2004, 120:399-409.
28. Price J.S., Marks D.R., Howe R.W., Hanowski J.M., Niemi G.J. The importance of spatial scale for conservation and assessment of anuran populations in coastal wetlands in the western Great Lakes, USA. Landscape Ecology 2004, 20:441-454.
29. R Development Core Team, 2007. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org.
30. Riley S.P.D., Busteed G.T., Kats L.B., Vandergon T.L., Lee L.F.S., Dagit R.G., Kerby J.L., Fisher R.N., Sauvajot R.M. Conservation Biology 2005, 19:1894-1907.
31. Royle J.A. Modeling abundance index data from anuran calling surveys. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:1378-1385.
32. Schooley R.L. Spatial heterogeneity and characteristic scales of species-habitat relationships. BioScience 2006, 56:533-537.
33. Smith A.C., Koper N., Francis C.M., Fahrig L. Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24:1271-1285.
34. Trenham P.C., Koenig W.D., Mossman M.J., Stark S.L., Jagger L.A. Regional dynamics of wetland-breeding frogs and toads: turnover and synchrony. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:1522-1532.
35. Turner M. Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? Annual Review of Ecology. Evolution and Systematics 2005, 36:319-344.
36. Vogelmann J.E., Howard S.M., Yang L., Larson C.R., Wylie B.K., Van Driel J.N. Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Data Set for the conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2001, 67:650-662.
37. Wiens J.A. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 1989, 3:385-397.