Virtual corridors for conservation management

Conservation Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1997-2003

  Pe'er, Guy ^a,b   Saltz, David ^b   Frank, Karin ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

Habitat gradients; Hilltopping; Individual based model; Landscape heterogeneity; Landscape management; Nonrandom dispersal; Topography

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; HABITAT CORRIDOR; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOVEMENT;

ANIMALIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 33244466483     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00227.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beier, P. 1995. Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:228-237.
2. Beier, P., and R. F. Noss. 1998. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conservation Biology 12:1241-1252.
3. Bullock, J. M., R. E. Kenward, and R. S. Hails, editors. 2002. Dispersal ecology: the 42nd symposium of the British Ecological Society 2001. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts.
4. Conradt, L., T. J. Roper, and C. D. Thomas. 2001. Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies. Oikos 95:416-424.
5. Conradt, L., E. J. Bodsworth, T. J. Roper, and C. D. Thomas. 2000. Nonrandom dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267:1505-1510.
6. DeAngelis, D. L., and L. J. Gross, editors. 1992. Individual-based models and approaches in ecology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
7. Fadamiro, H. Y., Y. Henry, T. D. Wyatt, and M. C. Birch. 1998. Flying beetles respond as moths predict: optomotor anemotaxis to pheromone plumes at different heights. Journal of Insect Behavior 11:549-557.
8. Ferreras, P. 2001. Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biological Conservation 100:125-136.
9. Grimm, V. 1999. Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling 115:129-148.
10. Grimm, V., T. Wyszomirski, D. Aikman, and J. Uchmanki. 1999. Individual-based modelling and ecological theory: synthesis of a workshop. Ecological Modelling 115:275-282.
11. Gustafson, E. J., and R. H. Gardner. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77:94-107.
12. Haddad, N. M. 1999. Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecological Applications 9:612-622.
13. Lowe, W. 2003. Linking dispersal to local population dynamics: a case study using headwater salamander system. Ecology 84:2145-2154.
14. Malanson, G. P. 2003. Dispersal across continuous and binary representations of landscapes. Ecological Modelling 169:17-24.
15. Meffe, G. K., and C. R. Carrol. 1997. Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
16. Nève, G., L. Mousson, and M. Baguette. 1996. Adult dispersal and genetic structure of butterfly populations in a fragmented landscape. Acta Oecologica 17:621-626.
17. Obeysekera, J., and K. Rutchey. 1997. Selection of scale for everglades landscape models. Landscape Ecology 12:7-18.
18. Opdam, P. 1990. Dispersal in fragmented populations: the key to survival. Pages 3-17 in R. G. H. Bunce and D. C. Howard, editors. Species dispersal in agricultural habitats. Belhaven Press, London.
19. Palomares, F., M. Delibes, P. Ferreras, J. M. Fedriani, J. Calzada, and E. Revilla. 2000. Iberian lynx in a fragmented landscape: predispersal, dispersal, and postdispersal habitats. Conservation Biology 14:809-818.
20. Pe'er, G. 2003. The spatial and behavioral determinants of butterfly dispersal in topographically complex landscapes. Department of Life Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel. Available from http://www.ufz.de/index.php?de=2300#2004.
21. Pe'er, G., D. Saltz, H.-H. Thulke, and U. Metro. 2004. Response to topography in a hilltopping butterfly, and implications for modelling non-random dispersal. Animal Behaviour 68:825-839.
22. Phillips, J. B. 1996. Magnetic navigation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 180:309-319.
23. Rosenberg, D. K., B. R. Noon, and E. C. Meslow. 1997. Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy. BioScience 10:677-687.
24. Schadt, S., F. Knauer, P. Kaczensky, E. Revilla, T. Wiegand, and L. Trepl. 2002. Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for the Eurasian lynx. Ecological Applications 12:1469-1483.
25. Schippers, P., J. Verboom, J. P. Knaapen, and R. C. van Apeldoorn. 1996. Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: an analysis with a GIS-based random walk model. Ecography 19:97-106.
26. Shields, O. 1967. Hilltopping: an ecological study of summit congregation behavior of butterflies on a southern California hill. Journal of Research in Lepidoptera 6:69-178.
27. Shkedy, Y., and D. Saltz. 2000. Characterizing core and corridor use by Nubian ibex in the Negev desert, Israel. Journal of Conservation Biology 14:200-206.
28. Thomas, C. D. 2000. Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267: 139-145.
29. Tischendorf, L., and L. Fahrig. 2000. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7-19.
30. Tischendorf, L., and C. Wissel. 1997. Corridors as conduits for small animals: attainable distances depending on movement pattern, boundary reaction and corridor width. Oikos 79:603-611.
31. Turner, M. G., R. V. O'Neill, R. H. Gardner, and B. T. Milne. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology 3:153-162.
32. Vos, C. C., J. Verboom, P. F. M. Opdam, and C. J. F. Ter Braak. 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. The American Naturalist 183:24-41.
33. Wallraff, H. G. 2000. Simulated navigation based on observed gradients of atmospheric trace gases (models on pigeon homing, part 3). Journal of Theoretical Biology 205:133-145.
34. Wiegand, T., K. A. Moloney, J. Naves, and F. Knauer. 1999. Finding the missing link between landscape structure and population dynamics: a spatially explicit perspective. The American Naturalist 154:605-627.
35. Wiens, J. A. 1992. Ecological flows across landscape boundaries: a conceptual overview. Pages 217-235 in A. J. Hansen, and F. di Castri, editors. Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York.
36. Wiens, J. A. 2001. The landscape context of dispersal. Pages 96-109 in J. Clobert, E. Danchin, A. A. Dhondt, and J. D. Nichols, editors. Dispersal: individual, population, and community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
37. Wiens, J. A., N. C. V. Stenseth, and R. A. Ims. 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66:369-380.
38. Wiltschko, R., and W Wiltschko. 2003. Avian navigation: from historical to modern concepts. Animal Behaviour 65:257-272.
39. Yamanaka, T., S. Tatsuki, and M. Shimada. 2003. An individual-based model for sex-pheromone-oriented flight patterns of male moths in a local area. Ecological Modelling 161:35-51.