Biased correlated random walk and foray loop: Which movement hypothesis drives a butterfly metapopulation?

Oecologia

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 293-305

  McIntire, Eliot J B ^a,d   Rompré, Ghislain ^a,b   Severns, Paul M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b WILKES UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PACIFIC FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Colonization; Dispersal; Fender's blue butterfly; Individual based model; Pattern oriented modeling

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; COLONIZATION; DISPERSAL; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HOME RANGE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; METAPOPULATION; MOVEMENT; PATCHINESS; RANDOM WALK METHOD; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

OREGON; UNITED STATES; WILLAMETTE VALLEY;

ANIMALIA; PAPILIONOIDEA; PLEBEJUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISPERSAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; ECOSYSTEM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMAL DISTRIBUTION; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84876193513     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2475-9     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barton KA, Phillips BL, Morales JM, Travis JMJ (2009) The evolution of an "intelligent" dispersal strategy: biased, correlated random walks in patchy landscapes. Oikos 118: 309-319.
2. Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80: 205-225.
3. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2006) Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. Ecology 87: 125-132.
4. Conradt L, Bodsworth EJ, Roper TJ, Thomas CD (2000) Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc Roy Soc B 267: 1505.
5. Conradt L, Roper TJ, Thomas CD (2001) Dispersal behaviour of individuals in metapopulations of two British butterflies. Oikos 95: 416-424.
6. Conradt L, Zollner PA, Roper TJ, Frank K, Thomas CD (2003) Foray search: an effective systematic dispersal strategy in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 161: 905-915.
7. Cressman R, Křivan V (2006) Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am Nat 168: 384-397. doi: 10. 1086/506970.
8. Crone EE, Schultz CB (2003) Movement behavior and minimum patch size for butterfly population persistence. In: Boggs C, Watt W, Ehrlich P (eds) Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 561-576.
9. Crone EE, Schultz CB (2008) Old models explain new observations of butterfly movement at patch edges. Ecology 89: 2061-2067.
10. del Mar Delgado M, Penteriani V (2008) Behavioral states help translate dispersal movements into spatial distribution patterns of floaters. Am Nat 172: 475-485.
11. Delattre T, Burel F, Humeau A, Stevens VM, Vernon P, Baguette M (2010) Dispersal mood revealed by shifts from routine to direct flights in the meadow brown butterfly Maniola jurtina. Oikos 119: 1900-1908. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1600-0706. 2010. 18615. x.
12. Durier V, Rivault C (1999) Path integration in Blattella germanica (L.) (Dictyoptera: Blattellidae): orientation and distance. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 35: 142-147.
13. Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100: 65-74.
14. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34: 487-515.
15. Fall A, Fall JG (2001) A domain-specific language for models of landscape dynamics. Ecol Mod 141: 1-18.
16. Grimm V, Revilla E, Berger U, Jeltsch F, Mooij WM, Railsback SF, Thulke HH, Weiner J, Wiegand T, DeAngelis DL (2005) Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310: 987-991.
17. Grünbaum D (1998) Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes. Am Nat 151: 97-113.
18. Haddad NM (1999) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153: 215-227.
19. Hoffmann G (1983) The random elements in the systematic search behavior of the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13: 81-92.
20. Kareiva P, Odell G (1987) Swarms of predators exhibit "prey taxis" if individual predators use restricted area search. Am Nat 130: 233-270.
21. Kendall BE, Bjørnstad ON, Bascompte J, Keitt TH, Fagan WF (2000) Dispersal, environmental correlation, and spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Am Nat 155: 628-636.
22. Lima SL, Zollner PA (1996) Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 131-135.
23. Marucco F, McIntire EJB (2010) Predicting spatio-temporal recolonization of large carnivore populations and livestock depredation risk: wolves in the Italian Alps. J Appl Ecol 47: 789-798. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2664. 2010. 01831. x.
24. McIntire EJB, Fajardo A (2009) Beyond description: the active and effective way to infer processes from spatial patterns. Ecology 90: 46-56.
25. McIntire EJB, Schultz CB, Crone EE (2007) Designing a network for butterfly habitat restoration: where individuals, populations and landscapes interact. J Appl Ecol 44: 725-736.
26. Messier F (1985) Solitary living and extraterritorial movements of wolves in relation to social status and prey abundance. Can J Zoo 63: 239-245.
27. Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503-2515.
28. Müller M, Wehner R (1994) The hidden spiral: systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Comp Physiol A 175: 525-530.
29. Nathan R (2008) An emerging movement ecology paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 19050.
30. Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 19052.
31. Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ, Gregory RD (1999) Dispersal and spatial scale affect synchrony in spatial population dynamics. Ecol Lett 2: 114-120.
32. Revilla E, Wiegand T (2008) Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 19120.
33. Revilla E, Wiegand T, Palomares F, Ferreras P, Delibes M (2004) Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: from individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. Am Nat 164: E130.
34. Schick RS, Loarie SR, Colchero F, Best BD, Boustany A, Conde DA, Halpin PN, Joppa LN, McClellan CM, Clark JS (2008) Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. Ecol Lett 11: 1338-1350.
35. Schtickzelle N, Joiris A, van Dyck H, Baguette M (2007) Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evol Biol 7: 4.
36. Schultz CB (1998) Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly. Conserv Biol 12: 284-292.
37. Schultz CB, Crone EE (2001) Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterfly. Ecology 82: 1879-1892.
38. Schultz CB, Crone EE (2005) Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conserv Biol 19: 896.
39. Schultz CB, Hammond PC (2003) Using population viability analysis to develop recovery criteria for endangered insects: case study of the Fender's blue butterfly. Conserv Biol 17: 1385.
40. Schultz CB, Hammond PC, Wilson MV (2003) Biology of the Fender's blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi Macy), an endangered species of western Oregon native prairies. Nat Area J 23: 71.
41. Seymour AS, Gutiérrez D, Jordano D (2003) Dispersal of the lycaenid Plebejus argus in response to patches of its mutualist ant Lasius niger. Oikos 103: 162-174.
42. Stuart-Smith AK, Boutin S (1995) Behavioural differences between surviving and depredated juvenile red squirrels. Ecography 2: 34-40.
43. Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
44. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2006) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; designation of critical habitat for the Fender's blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi), Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid's lupine), and Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy); final rule. Fed Reg 71: 63861-63977.
45. Viswanathan G, Raposo E, Da Luz M (2008) Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches. Phys Life Rev 5: 133-150.
46. Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Comp Physiol A 142: 315-338.
47. Wiens JA, Chr N, van Horne B, Ims RA (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369-380.
48. Wilson MV, Hammond PC, Schultz CB (1997) The interdependence of native plants and Fender's blue butterfly. Native Plant Society of Oregon, Corvallis.
49. Wilson MV, Erhart T, Hammond PC, Kaye TN, Kuykendall K, Liston A, Robinson AF, Schultz CB, Severns PM (2003) The biology of Kincaid's lupine (Lupinus sulphureus spp. kincaidii), a threatened species of western Oregon native prairies. Nat Area J 23: 72-83.