Species-and sex-specific adjustments of movement behavior to landscape heterogeneity in butterflies

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 967-975

  Turlure, Camille ^a   Baguette, Michel ^a,b   Stevens, Virginie M ^a,b,c   Maes, Dirk ^d  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^d RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Boloria aquilonaris; Boloria eunomia; cage experiment; dispersal; flight speed; matrix quality

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; BUTTERFLY; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLIGHT ACTIVITY; FLIGHT BEHAVIOR; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT TYPE; HETEROGENEITY; INDIVIDUAL VARIATION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPE; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SPATIAL VARIATION;

BOLORIA AQUILONARIS; BOLORIA EUNOMIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 80052201315     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr077     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrews MW. 1984. Strategies of spatial orientation in 2 species of new world monkeys. Am J Primatol. 6:397.
2. Baguette M. 2003. Long distance dispersal and landscape occupancy in a metapopulation of the cranberry fritillary butterfly. Ecography. 26:153-160. (Pubitemid 36590265)
3. Baguette M, Mennechez G. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: a consensual viewpoint. Oikos. 106:399-403. (Pubitemid 39059113)
4. Baguette M, Nève G. 1994. Adult movements between populations in the specialist butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera, Nympha-lidae). Ecol Entomol. 19:1-5. (Pubitemid 2042195)
5. Baguette M, Van Dyck H. 2007. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecol. 22:1117-1129. (Pubitemid 47301388)
6. Bakker VJ, Van Vuren DH. 2005. Gap-crossing decisions by the red squirrel, a forest-dependent small mammal. Conserv Biol. 18: 689-697. (Pubitemid 38689090)
7. Belisle M. 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology. 86:1988-1995. (Pubitemid 41117467)
8. Bowne DR, Bowers MA. 2004. Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol. 19:1-20. (Pubitemid 38536918)
9. Chardon JP, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E. 2003. Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecol. 18: 561-573. (Pubitemid 37436024)
10. Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD. 2009. Dispersal. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Delattre T, Burel F, Humeau A, Stevens VM, Vernon P, Baguette M. 2010. Dispersal mood revealed by shifts from routine to direct flights in the meadow brown butterfly Maniola jurtina. Oikos. 119:1900-1908.
12. Dennis RLH. 2004. Butterfly habitats, broad-scale biotope affiliations, and structural exploitation of vegetation at finer scales: the matrix revisited. Ecol Entomol. 29:744-752. (Pubitemid 39623299)
13. Dennis RLH. 2010. A resource-based habitat view for conservation: butterflies in the British landscape. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Derosa CT, Taylor DH. 1980. Homeward orientation mechanisms in 3 species of turtles (Trionyx spinifer, Chrysemys picta and Terrapene carolina). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 7:15-23.
15. Driezen K, Adriaensen F, Rondinini C, Doncaster CP, Matthysen E. 2007. Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: a case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecol Model. 209:314-322. (Pubitemid 350051557)
16. Fahrig L. 2007. Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol. 21:1003-1015. (Pubitemid 350126655)
17. Fall A, Fortin M-J, Manseau M, O'Brien D. 2007. Spatial Graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems. 10: 448-461. (Pubitemid 47295419)
18. Franz NM, Wcislo WT. 2003. Foraging behavior in two species of Ec-tatomma (Formicidae: Ponerinae): individual learning of orientation and timing. J Insect Behav. 16:383-410.
19. Gillies CS, Saint Clair CC. 2010. Functional responses in habitat selection by tropical birds moving through fragmented forest. J Appl Ecol. 47:182-190.
20. Greenwood PJ. 1980. Mating systems, phylopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim Behav. 28:1140-1162.
21. Hansen AJ, Urban DL. 1992. Avian response to landscape pattern: the role of species' life histories. Landscape Ecol. 7:163-180.
22. Hanski I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol. 63:151-162.
23. Hanski I. 1999a. Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapo-pulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos. 87:209-219.
24. Hanski I. 1999b. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Hanski I, Simberloff D. 1997. The metapopulation approach, its history, conceptual domain, and application to conservation. In: Hanski I, Gilpin M, editors. Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics, and evolution. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p. 5-26.
26. Hein S, Gombert J, Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ. 2003. Movement patterns of the bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata in different types of habitat: matrix is not always matrix. Ecol Entomol. 28:432-438. (Pubitemid 36990103)
27. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT. 1996. Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on the dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. Ecol Lett. 65:725-735.
28. Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Strobeck C. 2005. Genetic differentiation and gene flow among populations of the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, vary with landscape connectivity. Mol Ecol. 14: 1897-1909. (Pubitemid 40772411)
29. Larue M, Nielsen C. 2008. Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods. Ecol Model. 212:372-381.
30. McKillup S. 2006. Statistics explained. An introductory guide for life scientists. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
31. Mennechez G, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M. 2003. Metapopulation of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecol. 18:279-291. (Pubitemid 36872707)
32. Merckx T, Van Dyck H, Karlsson B, Leimar O. 2003. The evolution of movements and behaviour at boundaries in different landscapes: a common arena experiment with butterflies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:1815-1821. (Pubitemid 37082879)
33. Moilanen A, Hanski I. 2001. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos. 95:147-151.
34. Nève G, Barascud B, Hughes R, Aubert J, Descimon H, Lebrun P, Baguette M. 1996. Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidop-tera: Nymphalidae). J Appl Ecol. 33:14-22.
35. Olden JD, Scholley RL, Monroe JB, Poff NL. 2004. Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes. J Anim Ecol. 73:1190-1194. (Pubitemid 39471167)
36. Pardini AT, Jones CS, Noble LR, Kreiser B, Malcolm H, Bruce BD, Stevens JD, Cliff G, Scholl MC, Francis M, et al. 2001. Sex-biased dispersal of great white sharks. Nature. 412:139-140. (Pubitemid 32674698)
37. Petit CC, Lambin EF. 2002. Long-term land-cover changes in the Belgian Ardennes (1775-1929): model-based reconstruction vs. historical maps. Glob Change Biol. 8:616-630. (Pubitemid 34801279)
38. Poethke HJ, Hovestadt T, Mitesser O. 2003. Local extinction and the evolution of dispersal rates: causes and correlations. Am Nat. 161: 631-640. (Pubitemid 36499902)
39. Prugnolle F, de Meeus T. 2002. Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity. 88:161-165. (Pubitemid 34287134)
40. Pusey AE. 1987. Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol Evol. 2:295-299.
41. Revilla E, Wiegand T, Palomares F, Ferreras P, Delibes M. 2004. Effects of the matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: from individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. Am Nat. 164: E130-E153.
42. Ricketts TH. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat. 158:87-99. (Pubitemid 32550582)
43. Romero S, Campbell JF, Nechols JR, With KA. 2009. Movement behavior in response to landscape structure: the role of functional grain. Landscape Ecol. 24:39-51.
44. Ronce O. 2007. A does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 38:231-253.
45. SAS Institute Inc 2003. SAS OnlineDoc 9.1 [WWW document]. [cited 2010 July 01]. Available from http://support.sas.com/91doc/doc-Mainpage.jsp.
46. Schtickzelle N, Joiris A, Van Dyck H, Baguette M. 2007. Quantitative analysis of changes in movement behaviour within and outside habitat in a specialist butterfly. BMC Evol Biol. 7:4.
47. Schtickzelle N, Le Boulengé E, Baguette M. 2002. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos. 97:349-360. (Pubitemid 34793696)
48. Schtickzelle N, Mennechez G, Baguette M. 2006. Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology. 87:1057-1065.
49. Sjorgren-Gulve P, Hanski I. 2000. Metapopulation viability analysis using occupancy models. Ecol Bull. 48:53-71. (Pubitemid 32235062)
50. Stevens VM, Pavoine S, Baguette M. 2010. Variation within and between closely related species uncovers high intra-specific variability in dispersal. PLoS One. 5:e11123.
51. Stevens VM, Polus E, Wesselingh RA, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M. 2004. Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Landscape Ecol. 19:829-842. (Pubitemid 40318881)
52. Stevens VM, Turlure C, Baguette M. 2010. A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. Biol Rev. 85:625-642.
53. Stevens VM, Verkenne C, Vandewoestijne S, Wesselingh RA, Baguette M. 2006. Gene flow and functional connectivity in the Natterjack toad. Mol Ecol. 15:2333-2444.
54. Sutcliffe OL, Bakkestuen V, Fry G, Stabbetorp OE. 2003. Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. Landscape Urban Plan. 63:15-31. (Pubitemid 36317593)
55. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos. 68:571-573. (Pubitemid 2020935)
56. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA. 2006. Landscape connectivity: a return to the basis. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA, editors. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p. 29-43.
57. Taylor PD, Merriam G. 1995. Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structure. Oikos. 73:43-48.
58. Thomas CD, Thomas JA, Warren MS. 1992. Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia. 92:563-567. (Pubitemid 24409143)
59. Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pear-man GS, Curtis R, Goodger B. 2001. The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 268: 1791-1796. (Pubitemid 32844026)
60. Tucker AD, McCallum HI, Limpus CJ, McDonald KR. 1998. Sex-biased dispersal in a long-lived polygynous reptile (Crocodylus johnstoni). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 44:85-90. (Pubitemid 28564618)
61. Turlure C, Choutt J, Van Dyck H, Baguette M, Schtickzelle N. 2010. Functional habitat area as a reliable proxy for population size: case study using two butterfly species of conservation concern. J Insect Conserv. 14:379-388.
62. Turlure C, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M. 2010. Resource grain scales mobility and adult morphology in butterflies. Landscape Ecol. 25:95-108.
63. Turlure C, Van Dyck H, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M. 2009. Resource-based definition of the habitat, niche overlap and conservation of two glacial relict butterflies. Oikos. 118:950-960.
64. Van Dyck H, Baguette M. 2005. Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: routine or special movements? Basic Appl Ecol. 6:535-545. (Pubitemid 41607949)
65. Wang IJ, Savage WK, Shaffer HB. 2009. Landscape genetics and least-cost path analysis reveal unexpected dispersal routes in the California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Mol Ecol. 18: 1365-1374.