Propagation of a long-lived and threatened prairie plant, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 334-342

  Severns, Paul M ^a  

^a US Army Corps of Engineers   (United States)

Author keywords

Fender's blue butterfly; Grasslands; Kincaid's lupine; Prairie restoration; Seed scarification

Indexed keywords

ENDANGERED SPECIES; GERMINATION; PRAIRIE; PROPAGATION (HORTICULTURE); RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SEED TREATMENT;

UNITED STATES;

ICARICIA ICARIOIDES; LUPINUS; LUPINUS SULPHUREUS;

EID: 0141761117     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.00175.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allen, M. F. 1991. The ecology of mycorrhizae. Cambridge University Press, New York.
2. Alverson, E. R. 1993. Assessment of proposed wetland mitigation areas in West Eugene. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region X, Eugene, Oregon.
3. Barroetavena, C., S. D. Gisler, D. L. Luoma, and R. J. Meinke. 1998. Mycorrhizal status of the endangered species Astragalus applegatei Peck as determined from a soil bioassay. Mycorrhiza 8:117-119.
4. Begon, M., J. L. Harper, and C. R. Townsend. 1996. Ecology: individuals, populations, and communities. 3rd Edition. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
5. Boyd, R. 1986. Strategies of Indian burning in the Willamette Valley. Canadian Journal of Anthropology 5:65-86.
6. Brenzel, K. N., editor. 1995. Sunset western garden book. Sunset Publishing Corp., Menlo Park, California.
7. Buza, L., A. Young, and P. Thrall. 2000. Genetic erosion, inbreeding and reduced fitness in fragmented populations of the endangered tetraploid pea Swainsona recta. Biological Conservation 93:177-186.
8. Davis, T. D., S. W. George, A. Upadhyaya, and J. M. Parsons. 1991. Improvement of seedling emergence of Lupinus texensis Hook. following seed scarification treatments. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 9:17-21.
9. Ellstrand, N. C., and D. R. Elam. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24:217-242.
10. Helenurm, K. 1998. Outplanting and differential source population success in Lupinus guadalupensis. Conservation Biology 12:118-127.
11. Helenurm, K., and B. A. Schaal. 1996. Genetic load, nutrient limitation, and seed production in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 83:1585-1595.
12. Heschel, S. H., and K. N. Paige. 1995. Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in scarlet gilia (Ipomopsis aggregata). Conservation Biology 9:126-133.
13. Hickman, J. C., editor. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Ltd., London.
14. Hirsch, A. M., M. R. Lum, and J. A. Downie. 2001. What makes the rhizobia-legume symbiosis so special? Plant Physiology 127:1484-1492.
15. Kaye, T. N. 1999. Obligate insect pollination of a rare plant, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii. Northwest Science 73:50-52.
16. Kaye, T. N., and K. Kuykendall. 2001. Effects of scarification and cold stratification on seed germination of Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii. Seed Science and Technology 29:663-668.
17. Lande, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conservation Biology 9:783-791.
18. Leininger, S. 2001. Promoting and restoring Kincaid's lupine (Lupinus sulphureus, ssp. kincaidii) and Willamette Daisy (Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens) at Basket Slough NWR. Honors Thesis. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
19. Liston, A., K. St. Hilaire, and M. V. Wilson. 1995. Genetic diversity in populations of Kincaid's lupine, host plant of Fender's blue butterfly. Madroño 42:309-322.
20. Mackay, W. A., T. D. Davis, and D. Sankhla. 1995. Influence of scarification and temperature treatments on seed germination of Lupinus harvardii. Seed Science and Technology 23:815-821.
21. Mackay, W. A., T. D. Davis, D. Sankhla, and D. E. Riemenschneider. 1996. Factors influencing seed germination of Lupinus perennis. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 14:167-169.
22. Menges, E. S. 1991. Seed germination percentages increase with population size in a fragmented prairie species. Conservation Biology 5: 158-164.
23. Montavalo, A. M., and N. C. Ellstrand 2001. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 88:258-269.
24. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems (NCSS). 2000. Statistical system for Windows. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, Utah.
25. Nieminen, M., M. C. Singer, W. Fortelius, K. Schops, and I. Hanski. 2001. Experimental confirmation that inbreeding depression increases extinction risk in butterfly populations. The American Naturalist 157: 2237-2244.
26. Noss, R. F., E. T. LaRoe, and J. M. Scott. 1995. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. National Biological Service, Biological Report 28.
27. Oregon Natural Heritage Project. 2001. Rare, threatened and endangered plants and animals of Oregon. Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Portland.
28. Pitelka, L. F. 1977. Energy allocation in annual and perennial lupines (Lupinus: Leguminosae). Ecology 58:1055-1065.
29. Richardson, T. E., and A. G. Stephenson. 1992. Effects of parentage and size of the pollen load on progeny performance in Campanula americana. Evolution 46:1731-1739.
30. Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491-494.
31. Schemske, D. W., B. C. Husband, M. H. Ruckelshaus, C. Goodwillie, I. M. Parker, and J. G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584-606.
32. Schultz, C. B. 1998. Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfly. Conservation Biology 12:284-292.
33. Schultz, C. B. 2001. Restoring resources for an endangered butterfly. Journal of Applied Ecology 38:1007-1019.
34. Schultz, C. B., and K. M. Dlugosch. 1999. Nectar and hostplant scarcity limit populations of an endangered Oregon butterfly. Oecologia 119: 231-238.
35. Scott, J. A. 1986. The butterflies of North America: a natural history and field guide. Stanford University Press, Stanford. California.
36. Severns, P. 2003. Inbreeding and small population size reduce seed set in a threatened and fragmented plant species, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Fabaceae). Biological Conservation 110:221-229.
37. Smith, S. E., and D. J. Read. 1997. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom.
38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1998. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; proposed endangered status for Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy) and Fender's Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi) and proposed threatened status of Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid's lupine). Federal Register 63:3863-3877.
39. Willis, J. H. 1993. Partial self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 71:145-154.
40. Wilson, M. V., T. Erhart, P. C. Hammond, T. N. Kaye, K. Kuykendall, A. Liston, A. F. Robinson Jr., C. B. Schultz, and P. M. Severns. 2003. The biology of Kincaid's lupine (Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii), a threatened species of western Oregon native prairies. Natural Areas Journal 23:72-83.