Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 315-346

  Penuel, William R ^a   Boscardin, Christy Kim ^b   Masyn, Katherine ^c   Crawford, Valerie M ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Latent class analysis; Student response systems; Teaching practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250219990     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-006-9023-4     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abrahamson, L., Owens, D. T., Demana, F., Meagher, M., & Herman, M. (2003, March). Developing pedagogy for wireless handheld computer networks. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
2. Adelman, N., Donnelly, M. B., Dove, T., Tiffany-Morales, J., Wayne, A., & Zucker, A. A. (2002). The integrated studies of educational technology: Professional development and teachers' use of technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
3. Anderson, R. J., Anderson, R., VanDeGrift, T., Wolfman, S. A., & Yasuhara, K. (2003, June). Promoting interaction in large classes with a computer-mediated feedback system. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Learning '03, Bergen, Norway.
4. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
5. Becker, H. J., & Anderson, R. J. (1998a). Teaching learning, and computing, 1998: A national survey of schools and teachers describing their best practices, teaching philosophies, and uses of technology. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
6. Becker, H. J., & Anderson, R. J. (1998b). Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California.
7. Berends, M., & Garet, M. S. (2002). In (re)search of evidence based school practices: Possibilities for integrating nationally representative surveys and randomized field trials to inform educational policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(4), 28-58.
8. Boyle, J. (1999, January). Using classroom communication systems with large classes. Paper presented at the Taking advantage of hand held technology and calculator network workshop, University of Strathclyde.
9. Burnstein, L., McDonnell, L. M., Van Winkle, J., Ormseth, T. H., Mirocha, J., & Guiton, G. (1995). Validating national curriculum indicators. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
10. Burnstein, R., & Lederman, L. M. (2001). Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. Physics Teacher, 39(8).
11. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. The Physics Teacher, 69(9), 970-977.
12. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Desimone, L., & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1-22.
14. DiGiano, C., Yarnall, L., Patton, C., Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., & Manley, M. (2003). Conceptual tools for planning for the wireless classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 284-297.
15. diSessa, A. A., & Minstrell, J. (1998). Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons. In J. G. Greeno, & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 155-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 81-94.
17. Dufresne, B., & Gerace, B. (1994). Using "extended scenario" to enhance learning during interactive lectures. Retrieved, 3/25/03, 2003.
18. Dufresne, R. J., & Gerace, W. J. (2004). Assessing-to-learn: Formative assessment in physics instruction. The Physics Teacher, 42(7), 428-433.
19. Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J., & Wenk, L. (1996). Using the Classtalk classroom communication system for promoting active learning in large lectures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7(2), 3-47.
20. Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2002). Peer instruction: Results from a range of classrooms. The Physics Teacher, 40(4), 206-207.
21. Friedler, Y., Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. (1990). Learning scientific reasoning skills in microcomputer-based laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 173-191.
22. Ganger, A. C., & Jackson, M. (2003). Wireless handheld computers in the preclinical under-graduate curriculum. Medical Education Online, 8.
23. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
24. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64-74.
25. Hartline, F. (1997). Analysis of 1st semester of Classtalk use at McIntosh elementary school. Yorktown, VA: Better Education, Inc.
26. Hegedus, S. (2003, September). Improving algebraic thinking through a connected SimCalc Mathworlds classroom. Paper presented at the the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th Conference of the PME-NA, Honolulu, HI.
27. Hegedus, S., & Kaput, J. (2004, September). An introduction to the profound potential of connected algebra activities: Issues of representation, engagement and pedagogy. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway.
28. Herman, J. L., Klein, D. C. D., & Abedi, J. (2000). Assessing students' opportunity to learn: Teacher and student perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19, 16-24.
29. Hudgins, B. (2001). Leveraging handheld technology in the classroom. THE Journal, 29(5), 46.
30. Jaillet, A. (2004). What is happening with portable computers in schools? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 115-128.
31. Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
32. Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Gulp, K. M. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313-329.
33. Kaput, J., & Hegedus, S. (2002). Exploiting classroom connectivity by aggregating student constructions to create new learning opportunities. Paper presented at the 26th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Norwich, UK.
34. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661-667.
35. Koziol, S. M., & Burns, P. (1986). Teachers' accuracy in self-reporting about instructional practices using a focused self-report inventory. Journal of Educational Research, 79(4), 205-209.
36. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767-778.
37. Lonsdale, P., Baber, C., & Sharples, M. (2004, September). Engaging learners with everyday technology: A participatory simulation using mobile phones. Paper presented at the Mobile Human Computer Interaction 2004: 6th International Symposium, Glascow, UK.
38. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., O'Connor, K. M., Chrostowski, S. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Garden, R. A. (2001). Science benchmarking report: TIMSS 1999 - Eighth Grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
39. Mayer, D. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 29-45.
40. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1995). Technology and education reform. Menlo Park: SRI International.
42. Means, B., Penuel, W. R., & Padilla, C. (2001). The connected school: Technology and learning in high school. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43. Means, B., Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., Sabelli, N., & Haertel, G. D. (2003). Technology's contribution to teaching and policy: Efficiency, standardization, or transformation? Review of Educational Research, 27, 159-181.
44. Mokros, J., & Tinker, R. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 269-383.
45. Mullens, J. E. (1998, October). Validating teacher responses on instructional practice self-report surveys: Findings from a recent field test. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Fall Research Conference, New York, NY.
46. Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2004). Mplus User's Guide, 3rd Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
47. National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Teachers' tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers' use of technology. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
48. National Research Council (2001). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
49. Nicol, D. J., & Boyle, J. (2003). Peer Instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction Methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.
50. O'Connor, M. C. (1994). Managing the intermental: Classroom group discussion and the social context of learning. In D. I. Slobin, J. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context and languages: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocication.
51. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussions. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Penuel, W. R., & Yarnall, L. (2005). Designing handheld software to support classroom assessment: An analysis of conditions for teacher adoption. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(5). Available from http://www.jtla.org.
53. Piazza, S. (2002). Peer instruction using an electronic response system in large lecture classes (Presentation document presented at the Pennsylvania State University Center for Education Technology Services "Teaching with Technology" series: Departments of Kinesiology, Mechanical Engineering, and Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Center for Locomotion Studies.
54. Poulis, C., Massen, C., Robens, E., & Gilbert, M. (1998). Physics learning with audience paced feedback. American Journal of Physics, 66, 439-441.
55. Ramasway, V., DeSarbo, W., Reibstein, D., & Robinson, W. (1993). Empirical pooling approach to marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103-124.
56. Robinson, S. (2002). Discourse: Decades of achievement results. Princeton, NJ: ETS Technologies, Incorporated.
57. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, A. L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54.
58. Ross, S. M., Troutman, A., Horgan, D., Maxwell, S., Laitinen, R., & Lowther, D. (1997). The success of schools in implementing eight restructuring desings: A synthesis of first-year evaluation outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(1), 95-124.
59. Rowan, B., Harrison, D. M., & Hayes, A. (2004). Using instructional logs to study mathematics curriculum and teaching in the early grades. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 103-127.
60. Sandholtz, J., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522.
62. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
63. Smithson, J. L., & Porter, A. C. (1994). Measuring classroom practice: Lessons learned from the efforts to describe the enacted curriculum - The Reform Up-Close Study. Madison, WI: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
64. Stroup, W. M. (2002, September). Instantiating seeing mathematics structuring the social sphere (MS3): Updating generative teaching and learning for networked mathematics and science classrooms. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Vaxjo, Sweden.
65. Stuart, S. A. J., Brown, M. I., & Draper, S. W. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner's application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 95-102.
66. Sung, M., Gips, J., Eagle, N., DeVaul, R., & Pentland, S. (2004). MIT.EDU: System architecture for real-world distributed multi-user applications in classroom settings. In J. Roschelle, T. W. Chan, Kinshuk & S. Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE international workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education (pp. 43-50). Los Alomitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
67. Truong, T. M., Griswold, W. G., Ratto, M., & Star, L. (2002). The ActiveClass project: experiments in encouraging classroom participation. San Diego, CA: University of California, San Diego.
68. Wilensky, U., & Stroup, W. M. (2000, June). Networked gridlock: Students enacting complex dynamic phenomena with the HubNet architecture. Paper presented at the The Fourth Annual International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
69. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers' use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 165-205.
70. Wit, E. (2003). Who wants to be. . . The use of a Personal Response System in statistics teaching. MSOR Connections, 3, 5-11.
71. Zhang, N. L. (2004). Hierarchical latent class models for cluster analysis. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5, 697-723.