Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 71-77

  Fitch, James L ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442512183     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504773     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Berge, Z. (1999). Interaction in post-secondary Web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39(1), 5-11.
2. Blake, R. (2002). Faculty incentive grants awarded academic year 2002-2003 - LearnStar: Invigorating undergraduate education. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from Texas Tech University, Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center Web site: http://www.tltc.ttu.edu/content/asp/main/grants_02_03.asp.
3. Borsook, T., & Higginbotham-Wheat, N. (1991). Interactivity: What is it and what can it do for computer-based instruction? Educational Technology, 32 (10), 11-17.
4. Classroom Performance System (CPS). (n.d.). Retrieved April 15, 2003, from http://einstruction.com/master_template.cfm?color=blue&link= leamaboutcps.
5. ClassTalk. (n.d.). Retrieved April 18, 2003, from University of Massachusetts, Teaching Development Opportunities Web site: http://ww.umass.edu/ cft/teaching_development/class-room_systems.htm.
6. Cronin, M. (1993). Teaching listening skills via interactive videodisc. Technological Horizons in Education, 22(5), 62-67.
7. Egbert, J., & Thomas, M. (2001). The New Frontier: A Case Study in Applying Instruction Design for Distance Teacher Education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 391-404.
8. James, R., Lamb, C., Baily, M., & Householder, D. (2000). Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Technology in Middle School Technology-Rich Environments: A Study of Implementation and Change. School Science and Mathematics, 200, 27-40.
9. King, J., & Doerfert, D. (1996). Interaction in the distance education setting. Retrieved March 12, 2003, from University of Missouri, Social Sciences Unit Web site: http://www.ssu.missouri.edu/ssu/AgEd/NAERM/s-e-4.htm
10. Milheim, W. (1995-96). Interactivity and computer-based instruction. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 24(3), 225-233.
11. Miller, M. (1995). Technoliteracy and the New Professor. New Literacy History, 26(3), 601-611.
12. Notar, C., Wilson, J., Restauri, S., & Friery, K. (2002). Going the Distance: Active Learning. Education, 122(4), 649-656.
13. Personal Response System (PRS) (2003). http://educue.com/.
14. Pritchard, W., Micceri, T., & Barrett, J. (1989). A review of computer-based training materials: Current state of the art (instruction and interaction). Educational Technology, 29(7), 16-22.
15. Schroeder, C. (1993). New students-new learning styles. Change, 25(5), 21-26.