Dissecting the NUP107 complex: Multiple components and even more functions

Nucleus (United States)

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 10-

  González Aguilera, Cristina ^a   Askjaer, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Kinetochore; MAD1; Nuclear envelope; Nuclear pore complex; Nucleoporin; NUP107; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; NUCLEOPORIN; NUCLEOPORIN 107; PROTEIN MAD1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; ASPERGILLUS NIDULANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL NUCLEUS; CENTROMERE; CENTROSOME; COLD STRESS; CYTOPLASM; DNA REPAIR; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE DISRUPTION; HUMAN; IMMUNITY; INTERPHASE; MEMBRANE STABILIZATION; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; TELOMERE; USTILAGO MAYDIS;

EID: 84874784667     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Hetzer MW, Wente SR. Border control at the nucleus: biogenesis and organization of the nuclear membrane and pore complexes. Dev Cell 2009; 17:606-16; PMID:19922866; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. devcel.2009.10.007.
2. Strambio-De-Castillia C, Niepel M, Rout MP. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:490-501; PMID:20571586; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2928.
3. Cronshaw JM, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang W, Chait BT, Matunis MJ. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2002; 158:915-27; PMID:12196509; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200206106.
4. Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao Y, Chait BT. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 2000; 148:635-51; PMID:10684247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.148.4.635.
5. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, VeenhoffLM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007; 450:695-701; PMID:18046406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06405.
6. Brohawn SG, Partridge JR, Whittle JR, Schwartz TU. The nuclear pore complex has entered the atomic age. Structure 2009; 17:1156-68; PMID:19748337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2009.07.014.
7. Liang Y, Hetzer MW. Functional interactions between nucleoporins and chromatin. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23:65-70; PMID:21030234; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.09.008.
8. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Davidson MB, Roberts TM, Brown GW, et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008; 322:597-602; PMID:18948542; http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.1162790.
9. Lutzmann M, Kunze R, Buerer A, Aebi U, Hurt E. Modular self-assembly of a Y-shaped multiprotein complex from seven nucleoporins. EMBO J 2002; 21:387-97; PMID:11823431; http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/emboj/21.3.387.
10. Siniossoglou S, Lutzmann M, Santos-Rosa H, Leonard K, Mueller S, Aebi U, et al. Structure and assembly of the Nup84p complex. J Cell Biol 2000; 149:41-54; PMID:10747086; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.149.1.41.
11. Fernandez-Martinez J, Phillips J, Sekedat MD, Diaz-Avalos R, Velazquez-Muriel J, Franke JD, et al. Structure-function mapping of a heptameric module in the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2012; 196:419-34; PMID:22331846; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.201109008.
12. Berke IC, Boehmer T, Blobel G, Schwartz TU. Structural and functional analysis of Nup133 domains reveals modular building blocks of the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2004; 167:591-7; PMID:15557116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200408109.
13. Kampmann M, Blobel G. Three-dimensional structure and flexibility of a membrane-coating module of the nuclear pore complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:782-8; PMID:19503077; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nsmb.1618.
14. Hoelz A, Debler EW, Blobel G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu Rev Biochem 2011; 80:613-43; PMID:21495847; http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060109-151030.
15. Brohawn SG, Leksa NC, Spear ED, Rajashankar KR, Schwartz TU. Structural evidence for common ancestry of the nuclear pore complex and vesicle coats. Science 2008; 322:1369-73; PMID:18974315; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1165886.
16. Seo HS, Ma Y, Debler EW, Wacker D, Kutik S, Blobel G, et al. Structural and functional analysis of Nup120 suggests ring formation of the Nup84 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:14281-6; PMID:19706512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907453106.
17. Ródenas E, González-Aguilera C, Ayuso C, Askjaer P. Dissection of the NUP107 nuclear pore subcomplex reveals a novel interaction with spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 2012; 23:930-44; PMID:22238360; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-11-0927.
18. Kampmann M, Atkinson CE, Mattheyses AL, Simon SM. Mapping the orientation of nuclear pore proteins in living cells with polarized fluorescence microscopy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:643-9; PMID:21499242; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2056.
19. Doucet CM, Talamas JA, Hetzer MW. Cell cycle-dependent differences in nuclear pore complex assembly in metazoa. Cell 2010; 141:1030-41; PMID:20550937; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2010.04.036.
20. Harel A, Orjalo AV, Vincent T, Lachish-Zalait A, Vasu S, Shah S, et al. Removal of a single pore subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei devoid of nuclear pores. Mol Cell 2003; 11:853-64; PMID:12718872; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00116-3.
21. Siniossoglou S, Wimmer C, Rieger M, Doye V, Tekotte H, Weise C, et al. A novel complex of nucleoporins, which includes Sec13p and a Sec13p homolog, is essential for normal nuclear pores. Cell 1996; 84:265-75; PMID:8565072; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80981-2.
22. Walther TC, Alves A, Pickersgill H, Loïodice I, Hetzer M, Galy V, et al. The conserved Nup107-160 complex is critical for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell 2003; 113:195-206; PMID:12705868; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00235-6.
23. Debler EW, Hsia KC, Nagy V, Seo HS, Hoelz A. Characterization of the membrane-coating Nup84 complex: paradigm for the nuclear pore complex structure. Nucleus 2010; 1:150-7; PMID:21326946; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.1.2.11120.
24. Devos D, Dokudovskaya S, Alber F, Williams R, Chait BT, Sali A, et al. Components of coated vesicles and nuclear pore complexes share a common molecular architecture. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:e380; PMID:15523559; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.0020380.
25. Dokudovskaya S, Waharte F, Schlessinger A, Pieper U, Devos DP, Cristea IM, et al. A conserved coatomer-related complex containing Sec13 and Seh1 dynamically associates with the vacuole in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011; 10:M110, 006478; PMID:21454883.
26. Lupu F, Alves A, Anderson K, Doye V, Lacy E. Nuclear pore composition regulates neural stem/progenitor cell differentiation in the mouse embryo. Dev Cell 2008; 14:831-42; PMID:18539113; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.011.
27. Boehmer T, Jeudy S, Berke IC, Schwartz TU. Structural and functional studies of Nup107/Nup133 interaction and its implications for the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Cell 2008; 30:721-31; PMID:18570875; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2008.04.022.
28. Baï SW, Rouquette J, Umeda M, Faigle W, Loew D, Sazer S, et al. The fission yeast Nup107-120 complex functionally interacts with the small GTPase Ran/Spi1 and is required for mRNA export, nuclear pore distribution, and proper cell division. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:6379-92; PMID:15226438; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.24.14.6379-6392.2004.
29. Galy V, Askjaer P, Franz C, López-Iglesias C, Mattaj IW. MEL-28, a novel nuclear-envelope and kinetochore protein essential for zygotic nuclear-envelope assembly in C. elegans. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1748-56; PMID:16950114; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cub.2006.06.067.
30. Rabut G, Doye V, Ellenberg J. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6:1114-21; PMID:15502822; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1184.
31. Gao H, Sumanaweera N, Bailer SM, Stochaj U. Nuclear accumulation of the small GTPase Gsp1p depends on nucleoporins Nup133p, Rat2p/Nup120p, Nup85p, Nic96p, and the acetyl-CoA carboxylase Acc1p. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:25331-40; PMID:12730220; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M301607200.
32. Yao W, Lutzmann M, Hurt E. A versatile interaction platform on the Mex67-Mtr2 receptor creates an overlap between mRNA and ribosome export. EMBO J 2008; 27:6-16; PMID:18046452; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601947.
33. Dong CH, Hu X, Tang W, Zheng X, Kim YS, Lee BH, et al. A putative Arabidopsis nucleoporin, AtNUP160, is critical for RNA export and required for plant tolerance to cold stress. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:9533-43; PMID:17030626; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.01063-06.
34. Doye V, Wepf R, Hurt EC. A novel nuclear pore protein Nup133p with distinct roles in poly(A)+ RNA transport and nuclear pore distribution. EMBO J 1994; 13:6062-75; PMID:7813444.
35. Vasu S, Shah S, Orjalo A, Park M, Fischer WH, Forbes DJ. Novel vertebrate nucleoporins Nup133 and Nup160 play a role in mRNA export. J Cell Biol 2001; 155:339-54; PMID:11684705; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.200108007.
36. Faria AM, Levay A, Wang Y, Kamphorst AO, Rosa ML, Nussenzveig DR, et al. The nucleoporin Nup96 is required for proper expression of interferon-regulated proteins and functions. Immunity 2006; 24:295-304; PMID:16546098; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. immuni.2006.01.014.
37. Weirich CS, Erzberger JP, Berger JM, Weis K. The N-terminal domain of Nup159 forms a betapropeller that functions in mRNA export by tethering the helicase Dbp5 to the nuclear pore. Mol Cell 2004; 16:749-60; PMID:15574330; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.032.
38. Resendes KK, Rasala BA, Forbes DJ. Centrin 2 localizes to the vertebrate nuclear pore and plays a role in mRNA and protein export. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:1755-69; PMID:18172010; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.01697-07.
39. Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010; 140:372-83; PMID:20144761; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.054.
40. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Drubin DA, Rando OJ, Silver PA. Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1188-98; PMID:15905407; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1307205.
41. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004; 117:427-39; PMID:15137937; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00448-9.
42. Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010; 140:360-71; PMID:20144760; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.011.
43. Tous C, Rondón AG, García-Rubio M, González-Aguilera C, Luna R, Aguilera A. A novel assay identifies transcript elongation roles for the Nup84 complex and RNA processing factors. EMBO J 2011; 30:1953-64; PMID:21478823; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/emboj.2011.109.
44. Andrulis ED, Neiman AM, Zappulla DC, Sternglanz R. Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 1998; 394:592-5; PMID:9707122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/29100.
45. Galy V, Olivo-Marin JC, Scherthan H, Doye V, Rascalou N, Nehrbass U. Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 2000; 403:108-12; PMID:10638763; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/47528.
46. Loeillet S, Palancade B, Cartron M, Thierry A, Richard GF, Dujon B, et al. Genetic network interactions among replication, repair and nuclear pore deficiencies in yeast. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:459-68; PMID:15725626; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. dnarep.2004.11.010.
47. Therizols P, Fairhead C, Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Olivo-Marin JC, Dujon B, et al. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J Cell Biol 2006; 172:189-99; PMID:16418532; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200505159.
48. Palancade B, Liu X, Garcia-Rubio M, Aguilera A, Zhao X, Doye V. Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating Ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:2912-23; PMID:17538013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0123.
49. Chatel G, Fahrenkrog B. Nucleoporins: leaving the nuclear pore complex for a successful mitosis. Cell Signal 2011; 23:1555-62; PMID:21683138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.05.023.
50. Nakano H, Wang W, Hashizume C, Funasaka T, Sato H, Wong RW. Unexpected role of nucleoporins in coordination of cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:425-33; PMID:21270521; http://dx.doi. org/10.4161/cc.10.3.14721.
51. Wozniak R, Burke B, Doye V. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67:2215-30; PMID:20372967; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0325-7.
52. DeLuca JG, Musacchio A. Structural organization of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012; 24:48-56; PMID:22154944; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.11.003.
53. Tanenbaum ME, Medema RH. Mechanisms of centrosome separation and bipolar spindle assembly. Dev Cell 2010; 19:797-806; PMID:21145497; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.011.
54. Starr DA, Fridolfsson HN. Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUNKASH nuclear-envelope bridges. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010; 26:421-44; PMID:20507227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104037.
55. Splinter D, Tanenbaum ME, Lindqvist A, Jaarsma D, Flotho A, Yu KL, et al. Bicaudal D2, dynein, and kinesin-1 associate with nuclear pore complexes and regulate centrosome and nuclear positioning during mitotic entry. PLoS Biol 2010; 8:e1000350; PMID:20386726; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.1000350.
56. Bolhy S, Bouhlel I, Dultz E, Nayak T, Zuccolo M, Gatti X, et al. A Nup133-dependent NPCanchored network tethers centrosomes to the nuclear envelope in prophase. J Cell Biol 2011; 192:855-71; PMID:21383080; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201007118.
57. Schetter A, Askjaer P, Piano F, Mattaj I, Kemphues K. Nucleoporins NPP-1, NPP-3, NPP-4, NPP-11 and NPP-13 are required for proper spindle orientation in C. elegans. Dev Biol 2006; 289:360-71; PMID:16325795; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ydbio.2005.10.038.
58. Belgareh N, Rabut G, Baï SW, van Overbeek M, Beaudouin J, Daigle N, et al. An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 2001; 154:1147-60; PMID:11564755; http://dx.doi. org/10.1083/jcb.200101081.
59. Loïodice I, Alves A, Rabut G, Van Overbeek M, Ellenberg J, Sibarita JB, et al. The entire Nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:3333-44; PMID:15146057; http://dx.doi. org/10.1091/mbc.E03-12-0878.
60. Liu HL, De Souza CP, Osmani AH, Osmani SA. The three fungal transmembrane nuclear pore complex proteins of Aspergillus nidulans are dispensable in the presence of an intact An-Nup84-120 complex. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:616-30; PMID:19019988; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-06-0628.
61. Theisen U, Straube A, Steinberg G. Dynamic rearrangement of nucleoporins during fungal "open" mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:1230-40; PMID:18172026; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E07-02-0130.
62. Wiermer M, Cheng YT, Imkampe J, Li M, Wang D, Lipka V, et al. Putative members of the Arabidopsis Nup107-160 nuclear pore sub-complex contribute to pathogen defense. Plant J 2012; 70:796-808; PMID:22288649; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04928.x.
63. Katsani KR, Karess RE, Dostatni N, Doye V. In vivo dynasmics of Drosophila nuclear envelope components. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:3652-66; PMID:18562695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E07-11-1162.
64. Joseph J, Liu ST, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ, Dasso M. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol 2004; 14:611-7; PMID:15062103; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.031.
65. Salina D, Enarson P, Rattner JB, Burke B. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 2003; 162:991-1001; PMID:12963708; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200304080.
66. Wang X, Babu JR, Harden JM, Jablonski SA, Gazi MH, Lingle WL, et al. The mitotic checkpoint protein hBUB3 and the mRNA export factor hRAE1 interact with GLE2p-binding sequence (GLEBS)-containing proteins. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:26559-67; PMID:11352911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M101083200.
67. Zuccolo M, Alves A, Galy V, Bolhy S, Formstecher E, Racine V, et al. The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J 2007; 26:1853-64; PMID:17363900; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601642.
68. Rasala BA, Orjalo AV, Shen Z, Briggs S, Forbes DJ. ELYS is a dual nucleoporin/kinetochore protein required for nuclear pore assembly and proper cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:17801-6; PMID:17098863; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608484103.
69. Fernandez AG, Piano F. MEL-28 is downstream of the Ran cycle and is required for nuclear-envelope function and chromatin maintenance. Curr Biol 2006; 16:1757-63; PMID:16950115; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.071.
70. Platani M, Santarella-Mellwig R, Posch M, Walczak R, Swedlow JR, Mattaj IW. The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex promotes mitotic events via control of the localization state of the chromosome passenger complex. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:5260-75; PMID:19864462; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E09-05-0377.
71. Mishra RK, Chakraborty P, Arnaoutov A, Fontoura BM, Dasso M. The Nup107-160 complex and gamma-TuRC regulate microtubule polymerization at kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:164-9; PMID:20081840; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2016.
72. Orjalo AV, Arnaoutov A, Shen Z, Boyarchuk Y, Zeitlin SG, Fontoura B, et al. The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2006; 17:3806-18; PMID:16807356; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E05-11-1061.
73. Kim S, Yu H. Mutual regulation between the spindle checkpoint and APC/C. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011; 22:551-8; PMID:21439394; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.03.008.
74. Campbell MS, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J Cell Sci 2001; 114:953-63; PMID:11181178.
75. De Souza CP, Hashmi SB, Nayak T, Oakley B, Osmani SA. Mlp1 acts as a mitotic scaffold to spatially regulate spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Biol Cell 2009; 20:2146-59; PMID:19225157; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0878.
76. Ding D, Muthuswamy S, Meier I. Functional interaction between the Arabidopsis orthologs of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins MAD1 and MAD2 and the nucleoporin NUA. Plant Mol Biol 2012; 79:203-16; PMID:22457071; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-012-9903-4.
77. Ikui AE, Furuya K, Yanagida M, Matsumoto T. Control of localization of a spindle checkpoint protein, Mad2, in fission yeast. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:1603-10; PMID:11950879.
78. Iouk T, Kerscher O, Scott RJ, Basrai MA, Wozniak RW. The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2002; 159:807-19; PMID:12473689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200205068.
79. Quimby BB, Arnaoutov A, Dasso M. Ran GTPase regulates Mad2 localization to the nuclear pore complex. Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:274-80; PMID:15701789; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.2.274-280.2005.
80. Scott RJ, Lusk CP, Dilworth DJ, Aitchison JD, Wozniak RW. Interactions between Mad1p and the nuclear transport machinery in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16:4362-74; PMID:16000377; http://dx.doi. org/10.1091/mbc.E05-01-0011.
81. Lee SH, Sterling H, Burlingame A, McCormick F. Tpr directly binds to Mad1 and Mad2 and is important for the Mad1-Mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 2008; 22:2926-31; PMID:18981471; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1677208.
82. Lince-Faria M, Maffini S, Orr B, Ding Y, Cláudia Florindo, Sunkel CE, et al. Spatiotemporal control of mitosis by the conserved spindle matrix protein Megator. J Cell Biol 2009; 184:647-57; PMID:19273613; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200811012.