Dissection of the NUP107 nuclear pore subcomplex reveals a novel interaction with spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD1 in Caenorhabditis elegans

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 930-944

  Ródenas, Eduardo ^a,b   González Aguilera, Cristina ^a   Ayuso, Cristina ^a   Askjaer, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; MUTANT PROTEIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN NUF2; PROTEIN NUP107; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANOXIA; ARTICLE; BROOD PARASITE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CENTROMERE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE DISRUPTION; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METAZOON; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR IMPORT; NUCLEAR PORE; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; TIME LAPSE IMAGING;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL NUCLEUS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; KINETOCHORES; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX PROTEINS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; METAZOA;

EID: 84857842537     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-11-0927     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alber F et al. (2007). The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450, 695-701. (Pubitemid 350207701)
2. Askjaer P, Galy V, Hannak E, Mattaj IW (2002). Ran GTPase cycle and importins alpha and beta are essential for spindle formation and nuclear envelope assembly in living Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Mol Biol Cell 13, 4355-4370. (Pubitemid 35471191)
3. Bai SW, Rouquette J, Umeda M, Faigle W, Loew D, Sazer S, Doye V (2004). The fission yeast Nup107-120 complex functionally interacts with the small GTPase Ran/Spi1 and is required for mRNA export, nuclear pore distribution, and proper cell division. Mol Cell Biol 24, 6379-6392. (Pubitemid 38891137)
4. Belgareh N et al. (2001). An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 154, 1147-1160. (Pubitemid 34286193)
5. Boehmer T, Enninga J, Dales S, Blobel G, Zhong H (2003). Depletion of a single nucleoporin, Nup107, prevents the assembly of a subset of nucleoporins into the nuclear pore complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 981-985. (Pubitemid 36183941)
6. Boehmer T, Jeudy S, Berke IC, Schwartz TU (2008). Structural and functional studies of Nup107/Nup133 interaction and its implications for the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Cell 30, 721-731. (Pubitemid 351815127)
7. Campbell MS, Chan GK, Yen TJ (2001). Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J Cell Sci 114, 953-963. (Pubitemid 32266266)
8. Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW (2010). Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 140, 372-383.
9. Cheeseman IM, Desai A (2008). Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9, 33-46.
10. Cheeseman IM, Niessen S, Anderson S, Hyndman F, Yates JR 3rd, Oegema K, Desai A (2004). A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev 18, 2255-2268. (Pubitemid 39209574)
11. Cronshaw JM, Krutchinsky AN, Zhang W, Chait BT, Matunis MJ (2002). Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 158, 915-927. (Pubitemid 35001082)
12. D'Angelo MA, Anderson DJ, Richard E, Hetzer MW (2006). Nuclear pores form de novo from both sides of the nuclear envelope. Science 312, 440-443.
13. D'Angelo MA, Raices M, Panowski SH, Hetzer MW (2009). Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells. Cell 136, 284-295.
14. Deyter GM, Furuta T, Kurasawa Y, Schumacher JM (2010). Caenorhabditis elegans cyclin B3 is required for multiple mitotic processes including alleviation of a spindle checkpoint-dependent block in anaphase chromosome segregation. PLoS Genet 6, e1001218.
15. Doucet CM, Talamas JA, Hetzer MW (2010). Cell cycle-dependent differences in nuclear pore complex assembly in metazoa. Cell 141, 1030-1041.
16. Drin G, Casella JF, Gautier R, Boehmer T, Schwartz TU, Antonny B (2007). A general amphipathic alpha-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14, 138-146.
17. Essex A, Dammermann A, Lewellyn L, Oegema K, Desai A (2009). Systematic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that the spindle checkpoint is composed of two largely independent branches. Mol Biol Cell 20, 1252-1267.
18. Fang G, Yu H, Kirschner MW (1998). Direct binding of CDC20 protein family members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and G1. Mol Cell 2, 163-171. (Pubitemid 128373642)
19. Franz C, Askjaer P, Antonin W, Iglesias CL, Haselmann U, Schelder M, de Marco A, Wilm M, Antony C, Mattaj IW (2005). Nup155 regulates nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex formation in nematodes and vertebrates. EMBO J 24, 3519-3531. (Pubitemid 41509360)
20. Frokjaer-Jensen C, Davis MW, Hopkins CE, Newman BJ, Thummel JM, Olesen SP, Grunnet M, Jorgensen EM (2008). Single-copy insertion of transgenes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet 40, 1375-1383.
21. Galy V, Askjaer P, Franz C, Lopez-Iglesias C, Mattaj IW (2006). MEL-28, a novel nuclear-envelope and kinetochore protein essential for zygotic nuclear-envelope assembly in C. elegans. Curr Biol 16, 1748-1756. (Pubitemid 44696279)
22. Galy V, Mattaj IW, Askjaer P (2003). Caenorhabditis elegans nucleoporins Nup93 and Nup205 determine the limit of nuclear pore complex size exclusion in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 14, 5104-5115. (Pubitemid 37484824)
23. Gorjanacz M, Jaedicke A, Mattaj IW (2007). What can Caenorhabditis elegans tell us about the nuclear envelope? FEBS Lett 581, 2794-2801. (Pubitemid 46874383)
24. Grandi P, Dang T, Pane N, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Forbes D, Hurt E (1997). Nup93, a vertebrate homologue of yeast Nic96p, forms a complex with a novel 205-kDa protein and is required for correct nuclear pore assembly. Mol Biol Cell 8, 2017-2038. (Pubitemid 27451118)
25. Gupta BP, Sternberg PW (2002). Tissue-specific regulation of the LIM homeobox gene lin-11 during development of the Caenorhabditis elegans egg-laying system. Dev Biol 247, 102-115. (Pubitemid 34681168)
26. Hajeri VA, Little BA, Ladage ML, Padilla PA (2010). NPP-16/Nup50 function and CDK-1 inactivation are associated with anoxia-induced prophase arrest in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 21, 712-724.
27. Harel A, Orjalo AV, Vincent T, Lachish-Zalait A, Vasu S, Shah S, Zimmerman E, Elbaum M, Forbes DJ (2003). Removal of a single pore subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei devoid of nuclear pores. Mol Cell 11, 853-864. (Pubitemid 36566309)
28. Henderson ST, Johnson TE (2001). daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 11, 1975-1980. (Pubitemid 33146425)
29. Hetzer MW, Wente SR (2009). Border control at the nucleus: biogenesis and organization of the nuclear membrane and pore complexes. Dev Cell 17, 606-616.
30. Iouk T, Kerscher O, Scott RJ, Basrai MA, Wozniak RW (2002). The yeast nuclear pore complex functionally interacts with components of the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 159, 807-819. (Pubitemid 36008363)
31. Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M (2010). Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140, 360-371.
32. Kamath RS et al. (2003). Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature 421, 231-237. (Pubitemid 36139121)
33. Katsani KR, Karess RE, Dostatni N, Doye V (2008). In vivo dynamics of Drosophila nuclear envelope components. Mol Biol Cell 19, 3652-3666.
34. Lampson MA, Cheeseman IM (2011). Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function. Trends Cell Biol 21, 133-140.
35. Lee SH, Sterling H, Burlingame A, McCormick F (2008). Tpr directly binds to Mad1 and Mad2 and is important for the Mad1-Mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 22, 2926-2931.
36. Loiodice I, Alves A, Rabut G, Van Overbeek M, Ellenberg J, Sibarita JB, Doye V (2004). The entire Nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 15, 3333-3344. (Pubitemid 38850127)
37. Lussi YC, Shumaker DK, Shimi T, Fahrenkrog B (2010). The nucleoporin Nup153 affects spindle checkpoint activity due to an association with Mad1. Nucleus 1, 71-84.
38. Lutzmann M, Kunze R, Buerer A, Aebi U, Hurt E (2002). Modular self-assembly of a Y-shaped multiprotein complex from seven nucleoporins. EMBO J 21, 387-397. (Pubitemid 34137300)
39. Maduro M, Pilgrim D (1995). Identification and cloning of unc-119, a gene expressed in the Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system. Genetics 141, 977-988.
40. Maresca TJ, Salmon ED (2009). Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly check-point activity. J Cell Biol 184, 373-381.
41. McNally K, Audhya A, Oegema K, McNally FJ (2006). Katanin controls mitotic and meiotic spindle length. J Cell Biol 175, 881-891. (Pubitemid 44969194)
42. Nystul TG, Goldmark JP, Padilla PA, Roth MB (2003). Suspended animation in C. elegans requires the spindle checkpoint. Science 302, 1038-1041. (Pubitemid 37386195)
43. Orjalo AV, Arnaoutov A, Shen Z, Boyarchuk Y, Zeitlin SG, Fontoura B, Briggs S, Dasso M, Forbes DJ (2006). The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly. Mol Biol Cell 17, 3806-3818. (Pubitemid 44330867)
44. Osmani AH, Davies J, Liu HL, Nile A, Osmani SA (2006). Systematic deletion and mitotic localization of the nuclear pore complex proteins of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Biol Cell 17, 4946-4961. (Pubitemid 44907341)
45. Platani M, Santarella-Mellwig R, Posch M, Walczak R, Swedlow JR, Mattaj IW (2009). The Nup107-160 nucleoporin complex promotes mitotic events via control of the localization state of the chromosome passenger complex. Mol Biol Cell 20, 5260-5275.
46. Praitis V, Casey E, Collar D, Austin J (2001). Creation of low-copy integrated transgenic lines in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 157, 1217-1226. (Pubitemid 32225014)
47. Reese KJ, Dunn MA, Waddle JA, Seydoux G (2000). Asymmetric segregation of PIE-1 in C. elegans is mediated by two complementary mechanisms that act through separate PIE-1 protein domains. Mol Cell 6, 445-455.
48. Rodenas E, Klerkx EP, Ayuso C, Audhya A, Askjaer P (2009). Early embryonic requirement for nucleoporin Nup35/NPP-19 in nuclear assembly. Dev Biol 327, 399-409.
49. Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao Y, Chait BT (2000). The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 148, 635-651.
50. Scott RJ, Lusk CP, Dilworth DJ, Aitchison JD, Wozniak RW (2005). Interactions between Mad1p and the nuclear transport machinery in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 16, 4362-4374. (Pubitemid 41262903)
51. Seo HS, Ma Y, Debler EW, Wacker D, Kutik S, Blobel G, Hoelz A (2009). Structural and functional analysis of Nup120 suggests ring formation of the Nup84 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 14281-14286.
52. Siniossoglou S, Lutzmann M, Santos-Rosa H, Leonard K, Mueller S, Aebi U, Hurt E (2000). Structure and assembly of the Nup84p complex. J Cell Biol 149, 41-54.
53. Siniossoglou S, Wimmer C, Rieger M, Doye V, Tekotte H, Weise C, Emig S, Segref A, Hurt EC (1996). A novel complex of nucleoporins, which includes Sec13p and a Sec13p homolog, is essential for normal nuclear pores. Cell 84, 265-275. (Pubitemid 26040845)
54. Stiernagle T (2006). Maintenance of C. elegans. In WormBook. The Online Review of C. elegans Biology. http://www.wormbook.org/chapters/ www-strainmaintain/strainmaintain.html.
55. Strambio-De-Castillia C, Niepel M, Rout MP (2010). The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11, 490-501.
56. Tanaka TU (2010). Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps towards biorientation. EMBO J 29, 4070-4082.
57. Theerthagiri G, Eisenhardt N, Schwarz H, Antonin W (2010). The nucleoporin Nup188 controls passage of membrane proteins across the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 189, 1129-1142.
58. Uchida KS, Takagaki K, Kumada K, Hirayama Y, Noda T, Hirota T (2009). Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J Cell Biol 184, 383-390.
59. Walther TC et al. (2003). The conserved Nup107-160 complex is critical for nuclear pore complex assembly. Cell 113, 195-206. (Pubitemid 36514971)
60. Wan X et al. (2009). Protein architecture of the human kinetochore microtubule attachment site. Cell 137, 672-684.
61. Watanabe S, Yamamoto TG, Kitagawa R (2008). Spindle assembly check-point gene mdf-1 regulates germ cell proliferation in response to nutrition signals in C. elegans. EMBO J 27, 1085-1096. (Pubitemid 351508142)
62. Yamamoto TG, Watanabe S, Essex A, Kitagawa R (2008). SPDL-1 functions as a kinetochore receptor for MDF-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 183, 187-194.
63. Zuccolo M et al. (2007). The human Nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J 26, 1853-1864. (Pubitemid 46624053)