Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 407-431

  Heintze, Siegward D ^a   Rousson, Valentin ^b  

^a IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG   (Liechtenstein)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; COMPOMER; DENTAL MATERIAL; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PATIENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RUBBERDAM; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RUBBER DAMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84872047073     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a28390     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Adabo GL, dos Santos Cruz CA, Fonseca RG, Vaz LG. The volumetric fraction of inorganic particles and the flexural strength of composites for posterior teeth. J Dent 2003;31:353-359.
2. Antony K, Genser D, Hiebinger C, Windisch F. Longevity of dental amalgam in comparison to composite materials. GMS Health Technol Assess 2008;4:Doc12.
3. Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results. Oper Dent 2010;35:397-404.
4. Bader JD, Shugars DA. Agreement among dentists’ recommendations for restorative treatment. J Dent Res 1993;72:891-896.
5. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resinbased composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13:50-57.
6. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-151.
7. Bekes K, Boeckler L, Gernhardt CR, Schaller HG. Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system - 2-year results. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:855-861.
8. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:775-783.
9. Black GV. Konservierende Zahnheilkunde. Berlin: Meusser, 1914.
10. Boksman L, Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Charles DH. A visible light-cured posterior composite resin: results of a 3-year clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:627-631.
11. Bottenberg P, Jacquet W, Alaerts M, Keulemans F. A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results. J Dent 2009;37:198-203.
12. Brunson WD, Bayne SC, Shurdevant JR, Roberson TM, Wilder AD, Taylor DF. Three-year clinical evaluation of a self-cured posterior composite resin. Dent Mater 1989;5:127-132.
13. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:63-70.
14. Burke FJ, Crisp RJ, Balkenhol M, Bell TJ, Lamb JJ, McDermott K, Siddons C, Weller B. Two-year evaluation of restorations of a packable composite placed in UK general dental practices. Br Dent J 2005;199:293-296.
15. Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, de Oliveira Carrilho MR. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Am J Dent 2001;14:304-308.
16. Chadwick B, Dummer P, Dunstan F. A systematic review of the longevity of dental restorations. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 1999.
17. Chadwick BL, Dummer PM, Dunstan FD, Gilmour AS, Jones RJ, Phillips CJ, Rees J, Richmond S, Stevens J, Treasure ET. What type of filling? Best practice in dental restorations. Qual Health Care 1999;8:202-207.
18. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998;26:311-317.
19. Cook WD, Chong MP. Colour stability and visual perception of dimethacrylate based dental composite resins. Biomaterials 1985;6:257-264.
20. Cunningham J, Mair LH, Foster MA, Ireland RS. Clinical evaluation of three posterior composite and two amalgam restorative materials:3-year results. Br Dent J 1990;169:319-323.
21. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-420.
22. Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG, Donassollo TA, Andre Dde A, Leida FL. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices:2-year follow-up findings. J Dent 2007;35:231-237.
23. DeRouen TA, Cunha-Cruz J, Hilton TJ, Ferracane J, Berg J, Zhou L, Rothen M. What’s in a dental practice-based research network? Characteristics of Northwest PRECEDENT dentists, their patients and office visits. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;141:889-899.
24. Dietschi D, Holz J. A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report. Quintessence Int 1990;21:965-975.
25. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999;187:432-439.
26. Eames WB, Strain JD, Weitman RT, Williams AK. Clinical comparison of composite, amalgam, and silicate restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;89:1111-1117.
27. el-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1999;24:2-8.
28. El Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994;22:33-43.
29. Ermis RB, Kam O, Celik EU, Temel UB. Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch&rinse and a two-step self-etch adhesive system in Class II restorations:two-year results. Oper Dent 2009;34:656-663.
30. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk F, Willershausen B. Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fineparticle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:119-125.
31. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:148-155.
32. Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Carvalho CA, Franco EB, van Dijken JW, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five-year follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:447-454.
33. Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, Simonsen RJ. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years. Dent Mater 1992;8:60-64.
34. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995;20:34-38.
35. Gallo JR, Burgess JO, Ripps AH, Walker RS, Winkler MM, Mercante DE, Davidson JM. Two-year clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite using a fourth- and fifth-generation bonding agent. Oper Dent 2005;30:290-296.
36. Gängler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:185-194.
37. Gibson GB, Richardson AS, Patton RE, Waldman R. A clinical evaluation of occlusal composite and amalgam restorations: one- and twoyear results. J Am Dent Assoc 1982;104:335-337.
38. Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent J 1983;28:156-161.
39. Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, Mondragon E, Mjör IA. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1476-1484.
40. Gordan VV, Riley JL, 3rd, Blaser PK, Mondragon E, Garvan CW, Mjör IA. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations:Results of a seven-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:842-849.
41. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2000;25:473-481.
42. Heintze SD, Ruffieux C, Rousson V. Clinical performance of cervical restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2010;26:993-1000.
43. Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Zappini G. The relationship between physcal parameters and wear of dental composites. Wear 2007;263:1138-1146.
44. Helbig EB, Klimm W, Haufe E, Richter G. Klinische Fünfjahresstudie zum Feinpartikelhybird P-50 in Kombination mit Scotchbond 2. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilk 1998;3:171-177.
45. Hendriks FH, Letzel H, Vrijhoef MM. Composite vs amalgam restorations. A three-year clinical evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:401-411.
46. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
47. Ikeda T, Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawakami S, Komatsu H, Sano H. Relation of enamel prism orientation to microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 2002;15:109-113.
48. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:427-438.
49. ISO. Dentistry - Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. International Standard 2009;No.4049:1-27.
50. Johnson GH, Bales DJ, Gordon GE, Powell LV. Clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:705-711.
51. Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34:11-17.
52. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000;28:111-116.
53. Krämer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years. Dent Mater 2011;27:455-464.
54. Krämer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years. Am J Dent 2006;19:61-66.
55. Krämer N, Garcia Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. Am J Dent 2005;18:75-81.
56. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD, Wall JT. Clinical evaluation of composite resins as anterior and posterior restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:407-416.
57. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. J Dent 2007;35:124-129.
58. Lopes LG, Cefaly DF, Franco EB, Mondelli RF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: twoyear results. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:123-128.
59. Lundin SA, Rasmusson CG. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results. Quintessence Int 2004;35:758-762.
60. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results. Am J Dent 2002;15:403-406.
61. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int 1998;29:483-490.
62. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
63. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:237-243.
64. Mannerberg F, Birkhed D, Göran E. Kunststoff-Füllungen im Seitenzahnbereich Fünf Jahre klinische Erfahrungen mit Isocap und drei verschiedenen konventionellen Composits (I). Die Quintessenz 1983;5:911-917.
65. Mannerberg F, Birkhed D, Göran E. Kunststoff-Füllungen im Seitenzahnbereich Fünf Jahre klinische Erfahrungen mit Isocap und drei verschiedenen konventionellen Composits (II) Die Quintessenz 1983:1135-1144.
66. Mannerberg F, Birkhed D, Göran E. Kunststoff-Füllungen im Seitenzahnbereich Fünf Jahre klinische Erfahrungen mit Isocap und drei verschiedenen konventionellen Composits (III) Die Quintessenz 1983;7:1319-1323.
67. Mejàre I, Källestal C, Stenlund H, Johansson H. Caries development fromm 11 to 22 years of age: A prospective radiographic study. Caries Res 1998;32:10-16.
68. Mitchell RJ, Koike M, Okabe T. Posterior amalgam restorations--usage, regulation, and longevity. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:573-589, v.
69. Mjör IA. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1426-1433.
70. Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996;27:171-174.
71. Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29:313-317.
72. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
73. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:97-101.
74. Mjör IA, Medina JE. Reasons for placement, replacement, and age of gold restorations in selected practices. Oper Dent 1993;18:82-87.
75. Mjör IA, Pakhomov GN. Dental amalgam and alternative direct restorative materials. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.
76. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17:82-85.
77. Monteiro PM, Manso MC, Gavinha S, Melo P. Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:319-329.
78. Morris CF, Garman T, Kinzer R, Binon P. Clinical evaluation of an experimental composite in Class II restorations. A three year report. J Dent Res 1977;56:Spec Issue B, B180, Abstract No 515.
79. Musanje L, Shu M, Darvell BW. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater 2001;17:394-401.
80. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 2006;14:14.
81. Osborne JW, Gale EN, Ferguson GW. One-yer and two-year clinical evaluation of a composite resin vs. amalgam. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:795-800.
82. Özer L, Thylstrup A. What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement ? A review. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:394-402.
83. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlay. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:71-79.
84. Perdigão J, Dutra-Correa M, Anauate-Netto C, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Lewgoy HR, Amore R, Cordeiro HJ. Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etching adhesives in posterior restorations. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:149-159.
85. Perry RD, Kugel G. Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:1067-1072.
86. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent 1997;45:344-349.
87. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins. Dent Mater 1992;8:146-148.
88. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R, Swartz ML, McCune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: three-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:891-897.
89. Prati C, Montanari G. Three-year clinical study of two composite resins and one non-gamma 2 conventional amalgam in posterior teeth. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1988;98:120-125.
90. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SA. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-182.
91. Research IV-M. Global dental market - adhesive systems. 2011.
92. Richardson AS, Derkson GD. Clinical evaluation of light-cured and auto-cured composite resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc 1987;53:681-683.
93. Roulet JF, Mettler P, Friedrich U. Ein klinischer Vergleich dreier Komposits mit Amalgam für Klasse-II-Füllungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Abrasion. Resultate nach 2 Jahren. Schweiz Mschr Zahnheilk 1980;90:19-30.
94. Roulet JF, Mettler P, Friedrichs U. Studie über die Abrasion von Komposits im Seitenzahnberich- Resultate nach 3 Jahren. Deutsch Zahnärzt Z 1980;35:433-497.
95. Sachdeo A, Gray GB, Sulieman MA, Jagger DC. Comparison of wear and clinical performance between amalgam, composite and open sandwich restorations: 2-year results. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2004;12:15-20.
96. Sarrett DC. Prediction of clinical outcomes of a restoration based on in vivo marginal quality evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2007;9 (Supplement 1):117-120.
97. Sarrett DC, Brooks CN, Rose JT. Clinical performance evaluation of a packable posterior composite in bulk-cured restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:71-80.
98. Sturdevant JR, Lundeen TF, Sluder TB, Wilder AD, Taylor DF. Fiveyear study of two light-cured posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1988;4:105-110.
99. Tobi H, Groen HJ, Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE. Observer variation in the assessment of resin composite. Dent Mater 1998;14:1-5.
100. Türkün LS, Aktener BO, Ates M. Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: a 7-year report. Quintessence Int 2003;34:418-426.
101. Türkün LS, Türkün M, Ozata F. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years. Quintessence Int 2005;36:365-372.
102. Tyas MJ. Colour stability of composite resins: a clinical comparison. Aust Dent J 1992;37:88-90.
103. Van Dijken JW. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year followup. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
104. Van Dijken JW, Lindberg A. Clinical effectiveness of a low-shrinkage resin composite: a five-year evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:143-148.
105. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step selfetch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent 2011;39:16-25.
106. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D’Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent 2003;31:395-405.
107. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays vs conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-382.
108. Wei YJ, Silikas N, Zhang ZT, Watts DC. Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 2011;27:259-266.
109. Wilder AD, Bayne SC, May KN, Leinfelder KF, Taylor DF. Five-year clinical study of u.v.-polymerized posterior composites. J Dent 1991;19:214-220.
110. Wilson NH, Burke FJ, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997;28:245-248.
111. Wilson NH, Gordan VV, Brunton PA, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ, Mjör IA. Two-centre evaluation of a resin composite/ self-etching restorative system: three-year findings. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:47-51.
112. Wilson NH, Wilson MA, Offtell DG, Smith GA. Performance of occlusin in butt-joint and bevel-edged preparations: five-year results. 4. Dent Mater 1991;7:92-98.
113. Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations. Am J Dent 2002;15:274-278.
114. York AK, Arthur JS. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps. Oper Dent 1993;18:203-208.
115. Zöchbauer H. Number of dental restorations worldwide. Market Research Ivoclar Vivadent 2011.