Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 11-17

  Kiremitci, A ^a   Alpaslan, T ^a   Gurgan, S ^a,b  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Hacettepe University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FILTEK P60 COMPOSITE RESIN; RESIN; SINGLE BOND;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; RECURRENCE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 58649105286     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/08-48     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP & Busato AL (2006) 3-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 33(2) 144-151.
2. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA & Denehy GE (2000) The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison Journal of the American Dental Association 131(11) 1610-1615.
3. Oberländer H, Hiller KA, Thonemann B & Schmalz G (2001) Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations Clinical Oral Investigations 5(2) 102-107.
4. Pallesen UR & Qvist V (2003) Composite resin fillings and inlays: An 11-year evaluation Clinical Oral Investigations 7(2) 71-79.
5. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC & Swift EJ Jr (1999) Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(5) 234-249.
6. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2001) Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dental Materials 17(6) 533-541.
7. Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly DF, Jorge MF & Navarro MF (2006) Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up Clinical Oral Investigations 10(3) 197-203.
8. Perry RD & Kugel G (2000) Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 21(12) 1067-1080.
9. Ryge G & Snyder M (1973) Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 87(2) 369-377.
10. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG & Odman P (2000) A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations Journal of Dentistry 28(2) 111-116.
11. Türkün LS, Türkün M & Ozata F (2003) Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite Journal of the American Dental Association 134(9) 1205-1212.
12. Yip KH, Poon BK, Chu FC, Poon EC, Kong FY & Smales RJ (2003) Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: Results at 12 months Journal of the American Dental Association 134(12) 1581-1589.
13. Aw TC & Nicholls JI (2001) Polymerization shrinkage of densely-filled resin composites Operative Dentistry 26(5) 498-504.
14. Sarrett DC, Brooks CN & Rose JT (2006) Clinical performance evaluation of a packable posterior composite in bulkcured restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 137(1) 71-80.
15. Brackett WW & Covey DA (2000) Resistance to condensation of "condensable" resin composites as evaluated by a mechanical test Operative Dentistry 25(5) 424-426.
16. Burgess JO, Walker R & Davidson JM (2002) Posterior resinbased composite: Review of the literature Pediatric Dentistry 24(5) 465-479.
17. 17.Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY & Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins Dental Materials 16(1) 33-40.
18. Roeder LB, Tate WH & Powers JM (2000) Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites Operative Dentistry 25(6) 534-543.
19. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ & Charlton D (2000) Properties of packable dental composites Journal of Esthetic-Dentistry 12(4) 216-226.
20. Nash RW & Radz GM (1998) Condensable composites Journal of the American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry 46-50.
21. Freedman G (1998) Condensable composites: The new paradigm in amalgam alternatives Dentistry Today 17(10) 72-74.
22. Condensable restorative resins (1998) CRA Newsletter 22(7) 1.
23. 23.Asmussen E & Peutzfeldt A (1998) Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites Dental Materials 14(1) 51-56.
24. Peutzfeldt A (1997) Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems European Journal of Oral Science 105(2) 97-116.
25. Obici AC, Sinhoreti MA, de Goes MF, Consani S & Sobrinho LC (2002) Effect of the photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites Operative Dentistry 27(2) 192-198.
26. Ersoy M, Civelek A, L'Hotelier E, Say EC & Soyman M (2004) Physical properties of different composites Dental Materials Journal 23(3) 278-283.
27. de Souza FB, Guimarães RP & Silva CH (2005) A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: One-year report Quintessence International 36(1) 41-48.
28. Poon EC, Smales RJ & Yip KH (2005) Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: Results at 3.5 years Journal of the American Dental Association 136(11) 1533-1540.
29. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD & Demarco FF (2006) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings Journal of Dentistry 34(7) 427-435.
30. Türkün LS, Aktener BO & Ates M (2003) Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: A 7-year report Quintessence International 34(6) 418-426.
31. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW & Mjör IA (2001) Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement Journal of Dentistry 29(5) 317-324.
32. 32.Mjör IA (1992) Long-term cost of restorative therapy using different materials Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 100(1) 60-65.