Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 16-25

  Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a   Pallesen, Ulla ^b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Clinical; Composite resin; Dental restorations; Nano; Posterior; Self etch adhesive

Indexed keywords

CERAMX; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; IVOCLAR UNIVERSAL CEMENT; NANOCOMPOSITE; ORMOCER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; XENO III;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERAMICS; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78650520095     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. K. Sunnegrdh-Grönberg, J.W.V. van Dijken, U. Funegrdh, A. Lindberg, and M. Nilsson Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden Journal of Dentistry 37 2009 673 678
2. S.B. Mitra, D. Wu, and B.N. Holmes An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials Journal of the American Dental Association 134 2003 1382 1390
3. S.A. Saunders Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: focus on nanocmposite restoratives and biomimetics Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 1 2009 47 61
4. M.H. Chen Update on dental nanocomposites Journal of Dental Research 89 2010 549 560
5. M. Jung, K. Sehr, and J. Klimek Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing Operative Dentistry 32 2007 45 52
6. Y. Korkmaz, E. Ozel, N. Attar, and G. Aksoy The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites Operative Dentistry 33 2008 44 50
7. Z. Ergücü, L.S. Türkün, and A. Aladag Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems Operative Dentistry 33 2008 413 420
8. H. Wolter, W. Storch, and H. Ott Ne inorganic/organic copolymers (ormocers) for dental applications Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings 346 1994 143 149
9. J.F. Schirrmeister, K. Huber, E. Hellwig, and P. Hahn Two-year evaluation of a new nano-ceramic restorative material Clinical Oral Investigations 10 2006 181 186
10. P.M. Monteiro, M.C. Manso, S. Gavinha, and P. Melo Two-year clinical evaluation of packable and nanostructured resin-based composites placed with two techniques Journal of the American Dental Association 141 2010 319 329
11. J.F. Schirrmeister, K. Huber, E. Hellwig, and P. Hahn Four-year evaluation of a resin composite including nanofillers in posterior cavities Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 11 2009 399 404
12. K.L. Van Landuyt, A. Mine, J. De Munck, S. Jaecques, M. Peumans, and P. Lambrechts Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessement of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 11 2009 175 190
13. M. Peumans, P. Kanumilli, J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, and B. Van Meerbeek Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials Dental Materials 21 2005 864 881
14. J.W.V. van Dijken, K. Sunnegrdh-Grönberg, and E. Sörensson Clinical bonding of a single-step self-etching adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 2007 241 243
15. M. Peumans, J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, P. Lambrechts, and B. Van Meerbeek Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 2007 7 10
16. J. Perdigão, M. Dutra-Correa, N. Castilhos, A.R.P. Carmo, C. Anuate-Netto, and H.J.D. Cordeiro One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations American Journal of Dentistry 20 2007 125 133
17. W.W. Brackett, F.R. Tay, S.W. Looney, S. Ito, L.D. Haisch, and D.H. Paschley Microtensile dentin and enamel bond strengths of recent self-etching resins Operative Dentistry 33 2008 89 95
18. F.R. Tay, N.M. King, K.M. Chan, and D.H. Pashley How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4 2002 255 269
19. M. Unemori, Y. Matsuya, H. Hyakutake, S. Matsuya, Y. Goto, and A. Akamine Long-term follow-up of composite resin restorations with self-etching adhesives Journal of Dentistry 35 2007 535 540
20. E.C.M. Poon, R.J. Smales, and K.H.K. Yip Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites. Results at 3.5 years Journal of the American Dental Association 136 2005 1533 1540
21. S. Siegel Nonparametric statistics 1956 McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York p. 166-72
22. B. Van Meerbeek, M. Peumans, E. Poitivin, A. Mine, A. Van Ende, and J. De Munck Relationship between bond strength tests and clinical outcomes Dental Materials 26 2010 100 121
23. L.G. Lopes, D.F.G. Cefaly, E.B. Franco, R.F.L. Mondelli, J.R.P. Lauris, and M.F.L. Navarro Clinical evaluation od two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results Clinical Oral Investigations 7 2003 123 128
24. C.P. Ernst, M. Brandenbusch, G. Meyer, K. Canbek, B. Gottschalk, and B. Willerhausen Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs. a fine-particle hybrid resin composite Clinical Oral Investigations 10 2006 119 125
25. J.W.V. van Dijken, and K. Sunnegrdh-Grönberg A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in Class II cavities Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 7 2005 343 349
26. J.W.V. van Dijken, and K. Sunnegrdh-Grönberg Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities Journal of Dentistry 34 2006 763 769
27. J.W.V. van Dijken, and A. Lindberg Clinical effectiveness of a low shrinkage resin composite. A five-year study Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 11 2009 143 148
28. J. Manhart, H.-Y. Chen, and R. Hickel Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 12 2009 1 7
29. J. Manhart, H.-Y. Chen, G. Hamm, and R. Hickel Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition Operative Dentistry 29 2004 481 508
30. A.R. Cetin, and N. Unlu One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth Dental Materials Journal 28 2009 620 626
31. W. Dresch, S. Volpato, J.C. Gomes, N.R. Ribeiro, A. Reis, and A.D. Loguercio Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month evaluation Operative Dentistry 31 2006 409 417 (Pubitemid 44276628)
32. S. Palaniappan, D. Bharadwaj, D.L. Mattar, M. Peumans, B. Van Meerbeek, and P. Lambrechts Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite Dental Materials 25 2009 1302 1314
33. Z. Ergücü, and L.S. Türkün Clinical performance of novel resin composites in posterior teeth: 18 month results Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 9 2007 209 216
34. Stefanski S, van Dijken JWV. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without a flowable composite intermediate layer. A 2-year evaluation. Clinical Oral Investigations; in press.
35. S.H. Mahmoud, A.E. El-Embaby, A.M. AbdAllah, and H.H. Hamama Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorations in posterior teeth Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 10 2008 315 322
36. R. Hickel, J.-F. Roulet, S. Bayne, S.D. Heintze, I.A. Mjör, and M. Peters Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials Clinical Oral Investigations 11 2007 5 33
37. L. Shi, X. Wang, Q. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Y. Ren, and Z. Chen Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial Operative Dentistry 35 2010 11 19
38. N.J. Opdam, F.J. Roeters, A.J. Feilzer, and E.H. Verdonschot Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo Journal of Dentistry 26 1998 555 562
39. J. Perdigão, S. Geraldeli, and J.S. Hodges Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive. effect on postoperative sensitivity Journal of the American Dental Association 134 2003 1621 1629
40. K. Bekes, L. Boeckler, Gernhardt, and H.-G. Schaller Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system-2-year results Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 34 2007 855 861
41. E.J. Swift Jr., A.V. Ritter, H.O. Heymann, J.R. Sturdevant, and A.D. Wilder Jr. 36-months clinicl evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations American Journal of Dentistry 21 2008 148 152
42. L.S. Türkün The clinical performance of one-and two-step self-etching adhesive systems at one year Journal of the American Dental Association 136 2005 656 664
43. R.B. Ermis, O. Kam, E.U. Celik, and U.B. Temel Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch and rinse and a two-step self-etch adhesive system in class II restorations: two-year results Operative Dentistry 34 2009 656 663
44. J.W.V. van Dijken Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities. A 12-year follow-up Journal of Dentistry 2010 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007
45. J.W.V. van Dijken, and U. Pallesen Clinical performance of a hybrid resin composite with and without an intermediate layer of flowable resin composite A 7-year evaluation Dental Materials 2010 10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.010
46. van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. A six-year prospective study of a fine particle hybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite in Class II restorations. Dental Materials, submitted for publication.
47. V.V. Gordan, E. Mondragan, R.E. Watson, C. Garvan, and I. Mjör A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and giomer restorative material. Results at eight years Journal of the American Dental Association 138 2007 621 627
48. H. Oberländer, K.-A. Hiller, B. Thonemann, and G. Schmalz Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class II restorations Clinical Oral Investigations 5 2001 102 107
49. M. Rosin, H. Steffen, C. Konschake, U. Greese, D. Teichmann, and A. Hartmann One-year evaluation of an ormocer restorative-a multipractice clinical trial Clinical Oral Investigations 7 2003 20 26
50. N. Krämer, C. Reinelt, G. Richter, A. Petschelt, and R. Frankenberger Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in Class II cavities: clinical results and margin analysis after four years Dental Materials 25 2009 750 759
51. M. Sadeghi, C.D. Lynch, and Shamat Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofiled resin composites in Class I restorations Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 37 2010 532 537
52. C. Celik, N. Arhun, and K. Yamahel Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restoration: 12-month results European Journal of Dentistry 4 2010 57 65
53. N. Arhun, C. Celik, and K. Yamahel Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restoration: two-year results Operative Dentistry 35 2010 397 404
54. P. Bottenberg, W. Jaquet, M. Alaerts, and F. Keulemans A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: five-year results Journal of Dentistry 37 2009 198 203