Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 427-438

  Ilie, Nicoleta ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Composites; Mechanical properties; Modulus of elasticity; Strength

Indexed keywords

2,2 BIS (4 (2 METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; 2,2-BIS-(4-(2-METHACRYLOXYETHOXY)PHENYL)PROPANE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOCOMPOSITE; ORMOCER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILORANE SYSTEM ADHESIVE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; HUMAN; MECHANICS; PLIABILITY; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; YOUNG MODULUS;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CERAMICS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELASTIC MODULUS; GLASS; HUMANS; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; METHACRYLATES; NANOCOMPOSITES; PLIABILITY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; SILANES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 71149119392     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0258-4     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. JL Braga RR Ferracane 2004 Alternatives in polymerisation contraction stress management Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 15 176 184 10.1177/154411130401500306
2. JL Ferracane 1995 Current trends in dental composites Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6 302 318 10.1177/10454411950060040301 8664421
3. FA Rueggeberg 2002 From vulcanite to vinyl, a history of resins in restorative dentistry J Prosthet Dent 87 364 379 10.1067/mpr.2002.123400 12011846 (Pubitemid 40433958)
4. W Weinmann R Thalacker C Guggenberger 2005 Siloranes in dental composites Dent Mater 21 68 74 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.007 15681004 (Pubitemid 40135733)
5. SC Bayne HO Heymann EL Swift 1994 Update on dental composite restorations I Am Dent Assoc 125 687 701
6. R Hickel W Dasch R Janda M Tyas K Anusavice 1998 New direct restorative materials. FDI Commission Project Int Dent J 48 3 16 9779078
7. F Lutz RW Phillips 1983 A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems J Prosthet Dent 50 480 488 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90566-8 6579287
8. G Willems P Lambrechts M Braem JP Celis G Vanherle 1992 A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics Dent Mater 8 310 319 10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M 1303373
9. VA Epanechnikov 1969 Nonparametric estimation of a multivariate probability density Theory Probab App 14 153 458 10.1137/1114019
10. DC Sarrett 2005 Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations Dent Mater 21 9 20 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.001 15680997 (Pubitemid 40135726)
11. A Brunthaler F Konig T Lucas W Sperr A Schedle 2003 Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth Clin Oral Investig 7 63 70 10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7 12768463
12. JW van Dijken 2000 Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up J Dent 28 299 306 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00010-5 10785294
13. JP Van Nieuwenhuysen W D'Hoore J Carvalho V Qvist 2003 Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth J Dent 31 395 405 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00084-8 12878022 (Pubitemid 36870889)
14. P Lambrechts C Ameye G Vanherle 1982 Conventional and micro-filled composite resins. Part II. Chip fractures J Prosthet Dent 48 527 538 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90357-2 6958862
15. KF Leinfelder CD McCartha JF Wisniewski 1985 Posterior composite resins. A critical review J Ala Dent Assoc 69 19 25 3882806
16. C Zantner AM Kielbassa P Martus KH Kunzelmann 2004 Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers Dent Mater 20 277 285 10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00104-0 15209233
17. JL Ferracane 2006 Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices Dent Mater 22 689 692 10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.005 16563492
18. AR Curtis AC Shortall PM Marquis WM Palin 2008 Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite J Dent 36 186 193 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.11.015 18237839
19. J Manhart KH Kunzelmann HY Chen R Hickel 2000 Mechanical properties and wear behaviour of light-cured packable composite resins Dent Mater 16 33 40 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00082-2 11203521
20. KK Choi JL Ferracane TJ Hilton D Charlton 2000 Properties of packable dental composites J Esthet Dent 12 216 226 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00224.x 11323865
21. LA Knobloch RE Kerby R Seghi JS Berlin N Clelland 2002 Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials J Prosthet Dent 88 307 313 10.1067/mpr.2002.128069 12426502 (Pubitemid 40433862)
22. F Klein AK Keller HJ Staehle CE Dorfer 2002 Proximal contact formation with different restorative materials and techniques Am J Dent 15 232 235 12572640
23. M Peumans B Van Meerbeek K Asscherickx S Simon Y Abe P Lambrechts G Vanherle 2001 Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts Dent Mater 17 533 541 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00015-X 11567692 (Pubitemid 33660532)
24. CP Ernst C Buhtz C Rissing B Willershausen 2002 Clinical performance of resin composite restorations after 2 years Compend Contin Educ Dent 23 7117 7720
25. CP Ernst K Canbek K Aksogan B Willershausen 2003 Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner Clin Oral Investig 7 129 134 10.1007/s00784-003-0220-9 12898294
26. LG Lopes DF Cefaly EB Franco RF Mondelli JR Lauris MF Navarro 2003 Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results Clin Oral Investig 7 123 128 10.1007/s00784-003-0218-3 12915962
27. EC Poon RJ Smales KH Yip 2005 Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years J Am Dent Assoc 136 1533 1540 16329416
28. H Wolter W Storch H Ott 1994 New inorganic/organic copolymers (ORMOCER®S) for dental applications Mat ResSoc Symp Proc 346 143 149
29. DA Tagtekin FC Yanikoglu FO Bozkurt B Kologlu H Sur 2004 Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite Dent Mater 20 487 497 10.1016/j.dental.2003.06.004 15081556
30. AU Yap CH Tan SM Chung 2004 Wear behaviour of new composite restoratives Oper Dent 29 269 274 15195726
31. M Cattani-Lorente S Bouillaguet CH Godin JM Meyer 2001 Polymerization shrinkage of Ormocer based dental restorative composites Eur Cell Mater 1 25 26
32. N Moszner A Gianasmidis S Klapdohr UK Fischer V Rheinberger 2008 Sol-gel materials 2. Light-curing dental composites based on ormocers of cross-linking alkoxysilane methacrylates and further nano-components Dent Mater 24 851 856 10.1016/j.dental.2007.10.004 18045680 (Pubitemid 351635817)
33. IH el Kalla F Garcia-Godoy 2000 Compomers adaptation to class I and V cavities in permanent teeth ASDC J Dent Child 67 8 29 36 10736655
34. AU Yap SM Chung WS Chow KT Tsai CT Lim 2004 Fracture resistance of compomer and composite restoratives Oper Dent 29 29 34 14753329
35. JL Ferracane RC Antonio H Matsumoto 1987 Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites J Dent Res 66 1140 1145 3476585
36. M Wucher SR Grobler PJ Senekal 2002 A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations Am J Dent 15 274 278 12572648
37. JJ Roeters F Frankenmolen RC Burgersdijk TC Peters 1998 Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results Am J Dent 11 143 148 9823078
38. C Benz R Hickel 2005 4-year evaluation of a compomer in class II restorations Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 60 200 202
39. KC Huth J Manhart A Selbertinger E Paschos C Kaaden KH Kunzelmann R Hickel 2004 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth Am J Dent 17 51 55 15241910
40. HY Chen J Manhart KH Kunzelmann R Hickel 2003 Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured compomer restorative materials Dent Mater 19 597 602 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00110-0 12901983
41. A Htang M Ohsawa H Matsumoto 1995 Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content Dent Mater 11 7 13 10.1016/0109-5641(95) 80002-6 7498610