Clinical evaluation of different posterior resin composite materials: A 7-year report

Quintessence International

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 418-426

  Şebnem Türkün, Lezize ^a   Oǧuz Aktener, Bekir ^a   Ateş, Mustafa ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Lactobacilli; Long term clinical performance; Mutans streptococci; Posterior resin composites; Ryge's criteria

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; RESIN; CLEARFIL RAY POSTERIOR; PRISMA TPH RESIN COMPOSITE; SILICON DIOXIDE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LACTOBACILLUS; MOLAR TOOTH; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SALIVA ANALYSIS; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; ADULT; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; SALIVA; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISCOLORATION;

ADULT; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LACTOBACILLUS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; SALIVA; SILICON DIOXIDE; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH DISCOLORATION; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0141505926     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:228-232.
2. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-coloured restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
3. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:53-58.
4. Jensen ME, Chan DCN. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Szulc, 1985:243-262.
5. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:298-310.
6. Ress JS, Jacobsen PH. The polymerisation shrinkage of composite resins. Dent Mater 1989;5:41-44.
7. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
8. Pesun IJ, Olson AK, Hodges JS, Anderson GC. In vivo evaluation of the surface of posterior resin composite restorations: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:353-359.
9. Köhler B, Rasmusson C-G, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000;28:111-116.
10. Roulet JF, Seewaldt A, Noack MJ. Margin quality of class III and IV composites in vitro. Dent Mater 1991;7:179-185.
11. Burgoyne AR, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:206-214.
12. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993;21:158-162.
13. Carlsson GE, Johansson A, Lundqvist S. Occlusal wear. Acta Odontol Scand 1985;43:83-90.
14. Birkhed D, Heintze U. Salivary secretion rate, buffer capacity and pH. In: Tenovuo JO (ed). Human Saliva: Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology. Vol 1. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1989:25-73.
15. Leinfelder KF, Wilder AD Jr, Teixeira LC. Wear rates of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:829-833.
16. Rasmusson CG, Köhler B, Ödman P. A 3-year clinical evaluation of two composite resins in class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:70-75.
17. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of class I and class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
18. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:289-296.
19. Bayne SC, Taylao DF, Roberson TM, et al. Long-term clinical failures in posterior composites [abstract 32]. J Dent Res 1989;68:185.
20. Rowe AHR. A five year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material. J Dent 1989;17:S6-S9.
21. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Ten year clinical analysis of 4 UV cured posterior composites [abstract 33]. J Dent Res 1989;68:186.
22. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-151.
23. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
24. Mair L. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int 1998;29:483-490.
25. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge K-LV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 1998;26:311-317.
26. Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, Simonsen RJ. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years. Dent Mater 1992;8:60-64.
27. Wilson NHE The evaluation of materials: Relationship between laboratory investigations and clinical studies. Oper Dent 1990;15:149-155.
28. Wilson NHF. Long-term performance of resin-bonded tooth-coloured restorations. Transactions of Annual Meetings of the Academy of Dental Materials 1996;9: 216-228.
29. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994;22:33-43.
30. Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Long-term clinical performance of direct posterior composites. Transactions of Annual Meetings of the Academy of Dental Materials 1996;9:151-169.
31. Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials. US Dental Health Center, publication 7902244. Government Printing Office, 1971.
32. Westergren G, Krasse B. Evaluation of a micromethod for determination of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli infection. J Clin Microbiol 1978;7:82-84.
33. Wilson NHF, Norman RD. Five-year findings of a multiclinical trial for a posterior composite. J Dent 1991;19:153-159.
34. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17:S10-S17.
35. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: The 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(2):185-194.
36. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1988;19:191-198.
37. Wendt SL Jr, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of Clearfil photoposterior: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5(3):121-125.
38. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001;29:317-324.
39. Bentley CD, Broderius CA, Drake CW, Crawford JJ. Relationship between salivary levels of mutans streptococci and restoration longevity. Caries Res 1990;24:298-300.
40. Köhler B, Hager B. Influence of salivary levels of mutans streptococci on colonization of crown margins: A longitudinal study. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:524-528.
41. Leidal TI. Accomplishments and expectation with posterior composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St Paul, MN: 3M Dental, 1985:541-547.
42. Mjör IA. Long-term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:60-65.
43. Mjör IA. Clinical Longevity of Amalgams and Composites. Direct Restorative Material's Longevity in First, Second, and Third World Countries. [Proceedings of the 73rd General Session of the International Association for Dental Research 28 June-1 July 1995, Singapore].